Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ
ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻱ ﺣﻜﻮﻣـﺖ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻘﻴـﺪ ﻛـﺮﺩﻥ ﭘﺎﺩﺷـﺎﻩ ﻣﻄﻠﻘـﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﻣﺤـﺪﻭﺩﻩ
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺁﻥ ﻓﺪﺍﻛﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎ ،ﺟﺎﻧﻔﺸﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎ ،ﭘﺎﻳﻤﺮﺩﻱﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺜﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻠـﺖ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟـﺎﻱ ﺟـﺎﻱ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺳـﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ،ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻱ ،ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳـﻮﻳﻲ ،ﻭ ﭘـﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺣـﺎﻛﻢ ﻣﻄﻠـﻖ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺳـﺮﻳﺮ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺗﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺟﻨـﺒﺶ ﻣﺸـﺮﻭﻃﻪ – ﻛـﻪ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ ﺗـﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻭ
ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ – ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻫﻲ ﻗﺎﺟﺎﺭﻳﻪ ،ﻋﻤﻮﺩ ﺧﻴﻤﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑـﻮﺩ ﻛـﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ »ﻗﺒﻠـﻪ ﻋـﺎﻟﻢ«،
»ﺳﺎﻳﻪ ﺧﺪﺍ« ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺒﺴﻮﻁﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ؛ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻭ »ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻥ« ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻄﺎﻉ .ﺍﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻋﻴﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑـﻮﺩ،
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻲ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻭ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣـﻲﺷـﺪ .ﺍﺯ
ﺭﻫﮕﺬﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻱ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺑﺨﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ،ﭼﻪ ﺟﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ،ﭼﻪ ﻛﺎﺷﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺸﺪ ،ﭼﻪ ﻓﺮﺻﺖﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻛـﻒ
ﻧﺮﻓﺖ ،ﭼﻪ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﺝ ﻧﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺿﺮﺑﻪﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﻜﺮ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﮕﺮﺩﻳﺪ .ﺷـﺮﺡ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺧـﻮﻥ
ﺟﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﻫﺎ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ،ﺳﻔﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ،ﻳﺎﺩﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺭﻭﺯﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ(1).
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ 13ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ 1285ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﻈﻔﺮﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﻩ ﻗﺎﺟﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒـﺎﻝ
ﺁﻥ ،ﻣﺘﻦ »ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻴﺖ« ،ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ ﮔﺸﻮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺣـﺎﻛﻢ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ
– ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ – ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﻘﻴﺪ ﺷـﻮﺩ .ﺑـﻲﺗﺮﺩﻳـﺪ ،ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ ،ﻣﻴـﻮﻩ ﺩﺭﺧـﺖ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﻥ ﭘﺎﻛﺒﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺷﻦﺑﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻳﺨﻮﺍﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺁﺑﻴـﺎﺭﻱ ﮔﺮﺩﻳـﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣـﺎﻥ ،ﻓﺼـﻞ ﺗـﺎﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻭﺭﻕ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺸﺘﻮﺍﻧﻪ ﺁﻥ ،ﺗﻼﺵ ﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ
ﺻﺪﻫﺎ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﻪ ،ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ،ﺗﺮﺟﻤﻪ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻫﻞ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﺎﺭ ،ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺗﺤﺪﻳﺪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﻭ ﻣـﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﻣـﻲﺧـﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ
ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﻪ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ،ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﻭ ﻣﻘﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻘـﻮﻕ
ﻣﻠﺖ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻱ ﺳﻪ ﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻮﺷﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻪ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ:
.1ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
.2ﺁﻳﺎ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ» ،ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ« ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ »ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ«؟
.3ﺁﻳﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ ،ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﭘﺎﺩﺷـﺎﻩ ﺷـﺪ؟ ﺍﮔـﺮ ﭘﺎﺳـﺦ ﻣﺜﺒـﺖ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺣﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ؟
ﺭﻭﺵ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﺎﺭ ،ﺑﺮﭘﺎﻳﻪ »ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻲ« ﻭ »ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘـﺎﺩﻱ«) (2ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨـﻴﻦ ﺍﺳـﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﻭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻮﺷﺘﺎﺭ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ،ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻴـﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﭘﺎﺩﺷـﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﻭﻡ ،ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﻭ ﻣـﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ ﻭ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ،ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴـﺐ ،ﭘﺮﺳـﺶﻫـﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨـﺶ
ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺑﺨﺶ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ .ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻗﺎﺟﺎﺭﻳﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺯﻳﺮ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻓﺸـﺎﺭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤـﺎﻋﻲ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺴـﺘﺮﻩ ﻣﻠـﻲ ﭘﺪﻳـﺪ
ﺁﻣﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻠﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺒﻠﻮﺭ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻓﺮﻣـﺎﻥ ،ﺗﻐﻴﻴـﺮﺍﺕ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺠﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻧﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻭ ﺭﻭ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ .ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻴﺖ ،ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻪ ﺟﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍژﻩ »ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ« ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ» (1 :ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﻣﻘﺘﻀﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺍﻳﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ
ﮔﺬﺍﺭﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ» (2 «.ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﻌﺎﺩﺕ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺷﺒﺨﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ« ،ﻭ » (3ﻣﺠﻠـﺲ ﺷـﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠـﻲ ][….
ﻛﻪ ﻧﮕﻬﺒﺎﻥ ﻋﺪﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻓﺘﺘﺎﺡ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﻣـﻮﺭ ﻣﻤﻠﻜـﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺟـﺮﺍﻱ ﻗـﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺷـﺮﻉ ﻣﻘـﺪﺱ ،ﺷـﺮﻭﻉ ﻧﻤﺎﻳـﺪ(4).
ﭘﻴﺪﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ »ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ« ﻣﺴﺘﻔﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻫﺪﻑ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ ،ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻴﺮﺍﺯﻩ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﮔﺴﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺘﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ 51ﺍﺻﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﺩﻱ ﻣﺎﻩ 1285ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ ) 30ﺩﺳﺎﻣﺒﺮ 1906ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻱ( ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺷـﻴﺦ
ﻣﻈﻔﺮﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻀﺎﻱ ﻭﻟﻴﻌﻬﺪ ﻭ ﺻﺪﺭﺍﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍ ﻧﺼﺮﺍﷲ ﺧﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﻴﺮﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﻪ ﻧـﺎﺋﻴﻨﻲ ﺭﺳـﻴﺪ .ﭘـﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ،ﻣـﺘﻤﻢ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﺎ »ﻋﺠﻠﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺻﺘﻲ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ« ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑـﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺷـﺎﻣﻞ »ﺗﻤـﺎﻡ ﻣـﻮﺍﺩ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ ﻭ
ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ« ﻧﻤﻲﺷﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻠﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺳﺘﺨﻂ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻋﻠﻲ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﺩﺭ 107ﺍﺻﻞ ﺩﺭ ﭘـﺎﻧﺰﺩﻫﻢ
ﻣﻬﺮ ﻣﺎﻩ 1286ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺥ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺘﻲ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺷﻴﺦ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻋﻠﻲ ﺷﺎﻩ ﻗﺎﺟﺎﺭ ﺭﺳـﻴﺪ (4).ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ ،ﭘـﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﺍﻱ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ،ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﻭ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ »ﺩﺭ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ« ﻭ »ﺩﺭ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺣﻘـﻮﻕ ﺁﻥ« ﺍﺳـﺖ ،ﺍﻣـﺎ
ﺩﺭ 51ﺍﺻﻞ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺑﺮ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ،ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ،ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻣـﺘﻤﻢ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ،ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ،ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻣﻠﺖ ،ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺴﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻢﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﻱ ﺳﻪ ﮔﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻧﻬـﺎﺩ ﻗﻀـﺎﻳﻲ ،ﻣﺎﻟﻴـﻪ،
ﻗﺸﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺎﻟﺘﻲ ،ﻭﻻﻳﺘﻲ ﺩﺭﺝ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ »ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ« ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻣـﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ ﻛـﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻣﻮﺿـﻮﻉ ﻣﺮﺑـﻮﻁ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ،ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻣـﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ،
ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻤﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺣﻘﻮﻕﺩﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧـﻲ ﻧﻮﺷـﺘﻪ ﺷـﺪ ﻛـﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ »ﺗﺮﺟﻤﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ« ﮔﺮﺩﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ 15ﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ ،ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻓﺰﻭﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ
ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﻋﻘﻼ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻤﻨﺪﺍﻥ« ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ (5).ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ،
ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻛﻬﻨﻪ ﺗﺮﺟﻤﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ – ﻛـﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﻗﻠـﻢ ﻭ ﺯﺑـﺎﻥ ﺍﻓـﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻫﻤﭽـﻮﻥ ﺟـﻼﻝ
ﺁﻝﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﺎﺕ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ – ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻫﻞ ﺧﻄﺎﺑﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﺎء ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﻏﻴﺮﺩﻗﻴـﻖ
ﺑﻪ ﻋﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ، -ﺑﻪ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻋﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘـﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺩﺭ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸـﻲ ﺭﺍﺟـﻊ ﺑـﻪ
ﺟﻼﻝ ﺁﻝﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪﺍﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﻄﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺧﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺎﻳﺪﻩ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ» :ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻧﻴﺴـﺖ ﺁﻝﺍﺣﻤـﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﺻﻔﺖ »ﻛﻬﻨﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ« ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ،ﭼﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﻪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺷﺎﻩ،
ﺟﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ – ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧـﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣـﺖ – ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠـﺲ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨـﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ،ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ،ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻲ ،ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﻗﻮﺍ ،ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻋـﺪﻡ ﻣﻐـﺎﻳﺮﺕ ﺑـﺎ ﻣـﻮﺍﺯﻳﻦ
ﺷﺮﻉ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳﻤﻴﺖ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺁﻳﺎ ﻛﺪﺍﻣﻴﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻛﻬﻨﻪ ﻭ ﻛﻬﻨﻪﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟«)(6
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰ ﺍﺻﻞ ﭼﻬﻞ ﻭ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ – ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺤـﺚ ﻗـﺮﺍﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫـﺪ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،-ﭼﻴﺰ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ،ﺯﻳﺮ ﻋﻨـﻮﺍﻥ »ﺣﻘـﻮﻕ ﺳـﻠﻄﻨﺖ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ« ،ﺍﺻﻮﻝ 35ﺗﺎ – 57ﻳﻌﻨﻲ 23ﺍﺻﻞ – ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻـﻞ ،35ﺑـﺎ ﺫﻛـﺮ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻋﺒـﺎﺭﺕ ﻛـﻪ:
»ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﻭﺩﻳﻌﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﻫﺒﺖ ﺍﻟﻬﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺷـﺨﺺ ﭘﺎﺩﺷـﺎﻩ ﻣﻔـﻮﺽ ﺷـﺪﻩ« ،ﺗﺼـﺮﻳﺢ ﻣـﻲﺷـﻮﺩ ﻛـﻪ
ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺩﻡﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ »ﺳـﻠﻄﻨﺖ« ﻣـﻲﺭﺳـﺎﻧﻨﺪ .ﺑﻼﻓﺎﺻـﻠﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺻﻞ 36ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ »ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ« ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺿﺎﺷﺎﻩ ﺗﻔﻮﻳﺾ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻـﻞ 36ﺑـﻪ
ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ» :ﻗﻮﺍﻱ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻃﺮﻳﻘﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ ﺁﻥ ﻗﻮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ «.ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺸﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ .ﻗـﺪﺭﺕ ﭘﺎﺩﺷـﺎﻩ – ﻛـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭼـﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷﺪﻩ -ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪﺧـﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﻣـﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ،
ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻣﻄﻠﻘﻪ ،ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺯﻣﺎﻣﺪﺍﺭﻱ ،ﻋﻤﻮﺩ ﺧﻴﻤﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ،ﺑﻪ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻘﻴﺪ ﺑـﻪ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﺷﺪ .ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ،ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺫﻳﻞ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠـﺎ ﺑـﻪ ﺍﺻـﻮﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣـﺘﻤﻢ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺫﻳﻞ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ:
.1ﺩﺭ ﺑﻨﺪ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﺍﺻﻞ ،37ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻮﻩ ﻣﻘﻨﻨﻪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ» ﺳﻪ ﻣﻨﺸـﺎء ﺣـﻖ ﺍﻧﺸـﺎء ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥ« ،ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﺩﺷـﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨـﺎﺭ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺳﻨﺎ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻮﻑ ﺑﻪ »ﻋﺪﻡ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ
ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﻋﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻣﺠﻠﺴﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺷﻴﺢ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺤﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻳﻮﻧﻲ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺟﻌﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﺩﺧـﻞ ﻭ ﺧـﺮﺝ
ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ،ﺍﺯ ﻣﺨﺘﺼﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﺮﺡ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ،ﺍﺯ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﻣﺨﺘﺼﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
.2ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﺻﻞ » ،34ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺳﻨﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﺎﻝ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﻲﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳـﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ 60ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺳﻨﺎ 30 ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳـﺎﺱ ،ﺍﻋﺘﺒـﺎﺭ ﻣـﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺠﻠـﺲ
ﺳﻨﺎ ﻣﻮﻛﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻣﺠﻠﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ،ﺗﻤـﺎﻡ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨـﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳـﻮﻱ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
.3ﺑﺮﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﺻﻞ ،39ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺟﮕﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠـﻲ ﺑـﺎ ﺣﻀـﻮﺭ
ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺳﻨﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺳﻮﮔﻨﺪ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺳﻮﮔﻨﺪﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺁﻣـﺪﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛـﻪ ﭘﺎﺩﺷـﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﻔﻆ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﻭ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺑﻜﻮﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻧﮕﻬﺒﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺳـﻠﻄﻨﺖ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ.
.4ﻃﺒﻖ ﺍﺻﻞ » ،43ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻭ ﺭﺿﺎﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷـﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠـﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠـﺲ ﺳـﻨﺎ ،ﻣﺘﺼـﺪﻱ ﺍﻣـﻮﺭ
ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺷﻮﺩ«.
.5ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ »ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﻮﻭﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﺒﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﺯﺭﺍء ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻣـﻮﺭ ،ﻣﺴـﻮﻭﻝ ﻣﺠﻠﺴـﻴﻦ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ«.
.6ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﺻﻞ » ،45ﻛﻠﻴﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﺨﻂﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺘﻲ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣـﻲﺷـﻮﺩ ﻛـﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﺍﻣﻀـﺎﻱ ﻭﺯﻳـﺮ
ﻣﺴﻮﻭﻝ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺴﻮﻭﻝ ﺻﺤﺖ ﻣﺪﻟﻮﻝ ﺁﻥ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺨﻂ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻘـﺶ
ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﻔﺎﺗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻣﺴﻮﻭﻝ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
.7ﺍﺻﻞ » ،49ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ« ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻫﺮﮔـﺰ ﻧﻤـﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧـﺪ
»ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﻮﻳﻖ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ« ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔـﺮ ﭘﺎﺩﺷـﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣـﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻣـﻮﺭ ﻣـﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺗﺠﺪﻳـﺪﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺪﺍﻧـﺪ،
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻠـﺲ ﺑـﺎ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳـﺖ ﺳـﻪ ﭼﻬـﺎﺭﻡ ﺍﺯ
ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺗﺎﺋﻴﺪ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ،ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ» .ﺍﻋﻠﻴﺤﻀـﺮﺕ ﺷﺎﻫﻨﺸـﺎﻩ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺷﻴﻊ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩ«.
.8ﺍﺻﻞ 56ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ» :ﻣﺨﺎﺭﺝ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺎﺭﻑ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺘﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﺎ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ «.ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷـﺨﺺ
ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻳﺪ ﻣﺒﺴﻮﻃﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺖﺍﻟﻤﺎﻝ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺷﺨﺺ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻬـﺎﺩ ﻫـﺮ ﭼـﻪ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﺒﺨﺸﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺣﻘﻮﻕﺑﮕﻴﺮ ﻣﻠﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﺭﺝ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺎﺭﻓﺶ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻭ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
.9ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﺻﻞ » ،59ﺷﺎﻫﺰﺍﺩﮔﺎﻥ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﭘﺴﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻮﻱ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻋﺼـﺮ ﻧﻤـﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨـﺪ ﺑـﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻣﻨﺘﺨـﺐ
ﺷﻮﻧﺪ«.؛ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻛﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ،ﻓﺎﻣﻴﻞ ﺳﺎﻻﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺴﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ،ﻣﻨﻊ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
.10ﺑﺮﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﺻﻞ ،64ﻫﺮﮔﺎﻩ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ »ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺷﻔﺎﻫﻲ ﻳﺎ ﻛﺘﺒﻲ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ« ﺭﺍ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺴﻚ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨـﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﺷـﺎﻥ
ﺳﻠﺐ ﻣﺴﻮﻭﻟﻴﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻪ ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭﺍﺕ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ.
.11ﻧﻘﺶ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﻔﺎﺗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺍﺻﻞ ،80ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺭﻭﺳﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻢ ﻋﺪﻟﻴﻪ ﺭﺍ ،ﺁﻧﮕـﺎﻩ
ﻛﻪ ﻭﻓﻖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻋﺪﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﻲ »ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺏ« ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ،ﺍﮔـﺮ ﭼـﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺑـﺮ ﺍﺻـﻞ 83ﺗﻌﻴـﻴﻦ
ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﻋﻤﻮﻡ )ﺩﺍﺩﺳﺘﺎﻥ( ﺑﻪ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ »ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺷﺮﻉ« ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ 51 ،50 ،48 ،47 ،46ﻭ 55ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﻣـﻮﺭ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﻔﺎﺗﻲ ،ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻧﺴﺎﻻﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻋﺰﻝ ﻭ ﻧﺼﺐ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ،ﺍﻋﻄـﺎء ﺩﺭﺟـﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻧﺸـﺎﻥﻫـﺎ ،ﺍﻧﺘﺨـﺎﺏ ﻣـﺎﻣﻮﺭﺍﻥ
ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ )ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻣﺴﻮﻭﻝ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ( ،ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﻛﻞ ﻗﻮﺍﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ،ﺍﻋﻼﻥ ﺟﻨـﮓ ﻭ ﻋﻘـﺪ
ﺻﻠﺢ ،ﻭ ﺿﺮﺏ ﺳﻜﻪ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ،ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ 52ﻭ ،53ﻋﻬﺪﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺍﺻﻞ 24ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ ﺍﺳـﺘﺘﺎﺭ ﺁﻧﻬـﺎ ﻻﺯﻡ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻓﺼﻮﻝ ﻣﺨﻔﻴﻪ ﺁﻥ ،ﻣﺒﻄﻞ ﻓﺼﻮﻝ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻋﻬﺪﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﺻﻞ 54ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑـﻪ
ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﻓﻮﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺳﻨﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ،ﺍﺻﻞ 57ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ ﺑـﻪ ﻋﻨـﻮﺍﻥ
ﻭﺍﭘﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺑﺨﺶ »ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ« ،ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﻇﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺷﻔﺎﻑ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ ،ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﻴﭽﺪﻥ
ﺩﺳﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻠﻴﻢ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ،ﻣـﻲﮔﻮﻳـﺪ» :ﺍﺧﺘﻴـﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘـﺪﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺳـﻠﻄﻨﺘﻲ ،ﻓﻘـﻂ ﻫﻤـﺎﻥ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗـﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻴﺖ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﺷﺪﻩ«.
ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﺎﺩﺷﺪﻩ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ،ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﻳـﺪ ﭘﻴـﺮﻭ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ .ﭼﻨـﻴﻦ
ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﻭﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺎﻣﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﺩﻭﺭﻱ ﮔﺰﻳﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﻛﻨـﺪ ﻭ ﻧـﻪ
ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ،ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻧﻤﺎﺩ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻈﻬﺮ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭﺣـﺎﻟﻲ ﻛـﻪ ﻛـﺎﺭ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥﮔـﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺑـﺎ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﺩﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻣـﻲﺷـﻮﺩ ،ﻭ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻳﺮﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧـﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭﻭﺍﻗﻊ ،ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺗﻨﻔﺲ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻁﻛـﺮﺩﻥ ﻗـﺪﺭﺕ ﭘﺎﺩﺷـﺎﻩ ﺑـﻪ ﻗﻴـﺪ ﻭ
ﺷﺮﻁ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ،ﺍﺯ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛـﻪ ﭘﺎﺩﺷـﺎﻩ ﻣﺤـﻮﺭ ﻫﻤـﻪ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺮﻭﺍﻱ ﻛﻞ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ؛ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺯﻳﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖ ﺧـﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺑـﻪ ﭼﺸـﻢ
ﻥ ﻣﺤـﻮﺭ ﮔـﺮﺩﺵ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﮔﻮﺷﺖ ﻭ ﭘﻮﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﻮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳـﺘﻨﺪ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮ ْ
ﻥ ﻓﺼﻞﺍﻟﺨﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻧﻪ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻳـﺎ ﻣـﺎﻓﻮﻕ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻧﺒﺎﺷـﺪ، ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻧﻪ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ،ﻗﺎﻧﻮ ْ
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﺯﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺫﻳﻞ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩ ﻓﺮﺧﻨﺪﻩ ﺟﺎﻣﻪﻋﻤﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺧـﻮﺩ ﭘﻮﺷـﻴﺪ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﻪ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺎﻣﮕﻲ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ،ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ.
ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺁﻣﺪ ،ﺯﻳﺮﭘﺎﻧﻬﺎﺩﻥ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ ﻣﺸـﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻋﻠﻲ ﺷﺎﻩ ﻗﺎﺟﺎﺭ ،ﺭﺿﺎﺷﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎﺷﺎﻩ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺍﺳـﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﻗﺎﺟﺎﺭﻳـﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴـﺪ ﺷـﺪ ﻭ ﺁﺭﺍﻡ ﺁﺭﺍﻡ
ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻮﺩ ﺧﻴﻤﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ،ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺑـﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻄﻠـﺐ،
ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺟﺪ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻧﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ،ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ،ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ،ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺗـﺪﺭﻳﺠﻲ
ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﻨﺪﻱ ﺩﺭﺍﺯﻣﺪﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺩﻣﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﻪ ،ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺎﻣﮕﻲ ﻭ »ﭼﻪ ﻓﺮﻣـﺎﻥ ﻳـﺰﺩﺍﻥ،
ﭼﻪ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺷﺎﻩ« ،ﺑﺎ ﻓﺪﺍﻛﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺍﺯﺧﻮﺩﮔﺬﺷﺘﮕﻲ ،ﺍﻳﺜﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺕﻃﻠﺒﻲ ،ﺑﺎ ﺻﺪﺍﻱ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ »ﻧﻪ« ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻣـﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳـﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺛﺒﺖ ﻭ ﺿﺒﻂ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﻓﻘﻴﺮ ،ﻋﻘﺐ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ،ﺍﺳـﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﺯﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﺩﺭﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺎﻭﻳﻪ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻭ ﺟﺰﻣﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺧﺮﺍﻓﻪ ،ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻏﺎﻳﺖ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺯﻣـﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺻـﺖ
ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭﻭﺍﻗﻊ ،ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ،ﺭﺍﻫﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺣﻜﻮﻣـﺖ ﻭ ﻣـﺮﺩﻡ ﺑـﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣـﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻳـﺎﺩ ﻧﺒـﺮﻳﻢ ﻛـﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳـﻮﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﺰﻣﻦ ﺗﺎ ﻣﻐﺰ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻨﺎﻑ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺏ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﻣﻜﻨﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳـﺖ
ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺳﻮﺍﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻦ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻨﮕﺪﺳﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻋﻘﺐﺍﻓﺘـﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﻭ ﻓﻘـﺪﺍﻥ ﺁﮔـﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺧﻮﺏ ،ﻳﻚ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﺳـﺖ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻣـﻞ ﺁﻥ
ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺧﻠﻂ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﻄﻠﻘـﻪ ﻓـﺮﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺳـﺪ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ – ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻮﺍﻱ ﺳﻪﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﺒﻠﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﻓـﺖ – ﮔﺴـﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﺑـﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣـﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻴـﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﭘﺎﺩﺷـﺎﻩ ﻣﺤـﺪﻭﺩ .ﺷـﺎﻩ
ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻠﺖ ،ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺖ ،ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ،
ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻩﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﺎ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳـﺎ ﺁﻥ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ،ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ،ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺎﻣﮕﻲ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻳـﺎ ﻫـﺮ ﻣﻘـﺎﻡ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ،ﺣﺎﻛﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ ﻭ ﻣـﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ ﻭ ﺳـﺎﻳﺮ ﻗـﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻪ ﻋﺪﻭﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ،ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ،ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﻣـﺮﺩﻡ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻛﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺷﺨﺺ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺣﺠﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺣﺠﺖ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﺎﻛﻤـﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺿـﻊ
ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ،ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻭ ﻋﺬﺭ ﻭ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻞ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺯﻭﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺳـﺨﻦ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻨـﺪ .ﻫﻤـﻪ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻫـﺎ ،ﺑـﻪ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻳﺮﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ،ﺁﺳﻴﺐ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ .ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻣﺤﻮ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻤﻨﺪﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻁﻛـﺮﺩﻥ ﻗـﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﻄﻠﻘـﻪ ﭘﺎﺩﺷـﺎﻩ .ﺩﺭ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ،ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﻪ ،ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺲ ﭘﺎﺳـﺨﮕﻮ ﻧﺒـﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﺮﭼـﻪ ﻣـﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳـﺖ ﻣـﻲﻛـﺮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ
ﮔﺴﺘﺮﻩ ﻗﻮﺍﻱ ﺳﻪﮔﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﻩ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻮﺩ ﺧﻴﻤﻪ ﺍﺳـﺒﺘﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻄﻠﻘـﻪ ﻓـﺮﺩﻱ
ﻓﺮﻭ ﺭﻳﺨﺖ.
ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﻭ ﻣـﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ ،ﻧﺸـﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻡ ﻛـﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻴـﺎﺭﺍﺕ
ﺷﺎﻩ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﻔﺎﺗﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺫﻳﻞ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻛﻨـﻮﻥ ﺑـﻪ ﺑﺨـﺶ
ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻡ ﺗﺎ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺧﺘﻴـﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﻘـﺎﻡ
ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﻭﻡ .ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ ﭘﻨﺞﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣـﻮﺍﺭﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻓﺸﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﻣﻲ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﻴـﺰﺍﻥ ﺗـﺎﺛﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺑـﺮ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺼـﻞ ﺍﺧﺘﻴـﺎﺭﺍﺕ
ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻣﻴﺴﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ:
.1ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1387ﺍﺻﻮﻝ 4ﻭ 5ﻭ 6ﻭ 49ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ ﺩﺳـﺘﺨﻮﺵ ﺗﻐﻴﻴـﺮ ﮔﺮﺩﻳـﺪ .ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻫـﺎ ﺩﺭﻣـﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻌـﺪﺍﺩ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏﺷﻮﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺪﺕ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ،ﺣﻖ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﻳﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﮔﺸـﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﺠﻠـﺲ ﺑـﺎ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﻳﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ.
.2ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1304ﺍﺻﻮﻝ 36ﻭ 37ﻭ 38ﻭ 40ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣـﻮﺭﺩ ﺑـﺎﺯﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﻗـﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓـﺖ .ﺑـﺮ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺍﺳـﺎﺱ،
ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺿﺎﺷﺎﻩ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻱ ﺗﻔـﻮﻳﺾ ﮔﺮﺩﻳـﺪ ،ﻣﻘـﺮﺭ ﺷـﺪ ﻛـﻪ ﻭﻻﻳﺘﻌﻬـﺪ ﺑـﺎ ﭘﺴـﺮ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘـﺮ ﭘﺎﺩﺷـﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣـﺎﺩﺭﻱ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲﺍﻻﺻﻞ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﻗﺎﺟﺎﺭ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺳﻦ 20ﺳﺎﻟﮕﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺼﺪﻱ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻭﻟﻴﻌﻬـﺪ ﺗﻌﻴـﻴﻦ ﮔﺮﺩﻳـﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﺻﻞ 40ﺑﻪ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ.
.3ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1328ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻞ 48ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪ .ﺍﺻـﻞ
48ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺤﻮ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ »ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻫﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠـﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠـﺲ ﺳـﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺪﺍﮔﺎﻧـﻪ ﻳـﺎ ﻫـﺮ ﺩﻭ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﺤﻞ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ«.
ﺍﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﺎﻩ »ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺳﻨﺎ ،ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﻳـﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻳﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺩﻭ ﺛﻠـﺚ ﻛﻠﻴـﻪ
ﺍﻋﻀﺎء ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ« ﻭ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺠﻠﺴﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﺎﻥ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
.4ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1336ﺍﺻﻮﻝ 4ﻭ 5ﻭ 6ﻭ 7ﻭ 8ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻞ 49ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑـﺎﺯﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﻗـﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓـﺖ .ﺍﻳـﻦ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﻳﺘﺨﺖ ﻭ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎ ،ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻲ ،ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠـﻲ ﭘـﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀـﻮﺭ
ﺩﻭﺳﻮﻡ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺬ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺼﻒ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺻﻞ 8ﺑـﻪ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ 49ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ،ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ »ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺣﻜـﺎﻡ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺟـﺮﺍﻱ
ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﻮﻳﻖ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ« ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤـﻮﺭ
ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﺎﻩ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﺁﺭﺍء ﻧﻈـﺮ ﺳـﺎﺑﻖ ﺧـﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺷﺎﻩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺷﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻭ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
.5ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1346ﺍﺻﻮﻝ 38ﻭ 41ﻭ 42ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻـﻮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻣـﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻌﻴـﻴﻦ ﻧﺎﻳـﺐﺍﻟﺴـﻠﻄﻨﻪ ﺗـﺎ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﻭﻟﻴﻌﻬﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻦ 20ﺳﺎﻟﮕﻲ ،ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻧﺎﻳﺐﺍﻟﺴﻠﻄﻨﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﻮﻳﻖﻧﻴﻔﺘﺎﺩﻥ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﻣﺸـﺘﺮﻙ
ﺩﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 10ﺭﻭﺯ ،ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﻳﺪﻥ ﻧﺎﻳﺐﺍﻟﺴﻠﻄﻨﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰ ﺍﺻﻞ 48ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ ،ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻧﻮﺑﺖ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ 1287ﺗﺎ 1346ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﺕ 59ﺳـﺎﻝ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺗﻐﻴﻴـﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻌﻨـﻲﺩﺍﺭ ﻭ
ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﺑﻴﺎﻓﺰﺍﻳﺪ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻـﻞ 48ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻢ.
ﺍﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺍﺻﻞ 48ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺷﺎﻩ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺳﺎﻋﺪ ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻭﻗﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﭼﻬـﺎﺭﻡ ﺍﺳـﻔﻨﺪ 1327
ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ »ﻣﺸﻌﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﻭ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ ﻭ
ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ« ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺷﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﻝ ،ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣـﻲﻛﻨـﺪ .ﺍﻳـﻦ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﺭﺩﻳﺒﻬﺸﺖ 1327ﺑﺎ ﺧﻄﺎﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﮔﺸﺎﻳﺶ ﻣـﻲﻳﺎﺑـﺪ (7).ﺷـﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺧﻄﺎﺑـﻪ ،ﺍﺯ »ﺁﺷـﻔﺘﮕﻲ ﺍﻭﺿـﺎﻉ ﻭ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺭﻧﮓ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﻭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﺗﻔﺮﻳﻂ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ« ﺷﻜﻮﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻠﺖﺍﻟﻌﻠﻞ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﻳـﺐ ﺭﺍ
»ﻋﺪﻡ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻗﻮﺍﻱ ﺛﻼﺛﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ« ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ .ﺷﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳـﺪ» :ﺩﺭﻧﺘﻴﺠـﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻮﺍﺯﻥ ،ﻫﻴﭻﻭﻗﺖ ﻗﻮﻩ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﻪ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻜﺎء ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻩ ﻣﻘﻨﻨﻪ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺍﻣﻲ ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻭﻗـﺎﺕ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﺒﻬـﺎﻱ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺮﻑ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻋﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ،ﭼﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﻗﻮﻩ ﻣﻘﻨﻨﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻘﺮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺧﻞ ﻭ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻣﻤﻠﻜـﺖ ﺍﻋﻤـﺎﻝ
ﻭ ﻟﻮﺍﻳﺢ ﻣﻔﻴﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ،ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ(8)«.
ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺣﻜﻴﻤﻲ )ﺣﻜﻴﻢﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ( ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺳﻨﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﺎﻥ ،ﺩﺭ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﺟﻠﺴـﻪ ﺑـﻪ »ﺑﻠﻴـﻪﺍﻱ ﺑـﺰﺭگ«
ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻴﺮﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻱ ﻧﺎﺻﺮ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻓﺨﺮﺁﺭﺍﻳﻲ ﺑـﻪ ﺷـﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﭘـﺎﻧﺰﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﻬﻤـﻦ 1327ﻫﻨﮕـﺎﻡ ﺩﻳـﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﻜﻴﻤﻲ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺪ» :ﺑﺮ ﺁﻗﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ ﻭ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺼﺮ ﭘﻮﺷﻴﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻔـﺖ ﺳـﺎﻝ ﻭ
ﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺛﻲ ﻫﻮﻟﻨﺎﻙ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺻﻴﻞ ﻣﻠـﺖ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﭼـﻪ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻫـﺎﻱ ﺳـﻬﻤﻨﺎﻛﻲ ﺑـﺮ ﻣﻤﻠﻜـﺖ ﻣـﺎ
ﮔﺬﺷﺖ(9)«.
ﺳﻴﺪ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﻃﺒﺎﻃﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﻳﻴﺲ ﻣﻨﺘﺨﺐ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻣـﺎ ﻧﺴـﺒﺖ ﺑـﻪ ﺯﻣـﺎﻥ
ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻗﻮﺍﻱ ﺛﻼﺛﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳﻲ ،ﺑـﺮ ﺣﺴـﺐ
ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﻤﺎﻳﻮﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨـﺎﺏ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨـﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠـﺲ ﻣﻮﺳﺴـﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻛﻨـﻮﻥ ﺍﻳـﻦ
ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺤﻮﻝ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻧﺎﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﭘﻨﺪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭﻇـﺎﻳﻒ ﻭﺟـﺪﺍﻧﻲ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ(10)«...
ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﺎﻥ ،ﺳﺎﻋﺪ ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﻋﻤﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻠـﺲ ﻣﺤﺘـﺮﻡ ﻭ ﺗﺠﺪﻳـﺪﻧﻈﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻋﻠﻴﺤﻀﺮﺕ ﻫﻤﺎﻳﻮﻥ ﺷﺎﻫﻨﺸﺎﻫﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻀﻤﻦ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺑـﺰﺭگ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺟﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ] [...ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ 48ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ،
ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ،ﻃﺒﻖ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻝ ﺍﺳـﺖ (11)«...ﺭﻳـﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻠـﺲ
ﻣﻮﺳﺴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ،ﻋﻠﻞ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺟﺒﺎﺕ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ:
» .1ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺮﻣﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ ﺁﻥ.
.2ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺭﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ.
.3ﺿﻌﻒ ﻗﻮﺍﻱ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﻪ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻗﻮﺍ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺗﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ.
.4ﺿﻌﻒ ﻗﻮﻩ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻭ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻳﺖ ﻗﻄﻌﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻫﺮﺝ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺝ ﻭ ﺍﺧـﺘﻼﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻠﻴـﻪ ﺍﻣـﻮﺭ
ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ«)(12
ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻞ 48ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺤﻼﻝ ﻫﻢﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺟﺪﺍﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠـﺲ ﺳـﻨﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺷﺎﻩ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺤﻼﻝ ،ﻋﻠﺖ ﺍﻧﺤﻼﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺫﻛـﺮ ﻛﻨـﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻣـﺮ ﺑـﻪ
ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺠﻠﺴﻴﻦ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﺖ ﻣﻨﺤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﺩﺍﻣـﻪ ﺍﺻـﻞ 48
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺳﺎﺯ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺣﻞ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺳﻨﺎ ﺍﺳـﺖ ،ﻫﻨﮕـﺎﻣﻲ ﻛـﻪ ﺑـﺎ ﻋـﺪﻡ ﺗﻮﺍﻓـﻖ ﻣﻴـﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻳﺎ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ،ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻂ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭﺻـﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﺳـﺖﻧﻴـﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﺑـﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻓـﻖ ،ﻣـﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺎﻩ ﻣﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺷﺎﻩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺩﺭﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ؛ ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﻳـﻦﺻـﻮﺭﺕ،
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﺎ ﺷﺶ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻣﺴﻜﻮﺕ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻳﺎ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻠﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺧﻪ 48ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﺟﻤﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻴـﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺤـﻼﻝ ﻫﺮﻳـﻚ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻠـﺲ ﺷـﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠـﻲ ﻭ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺳﻨﺎ ،ﺟﺪﺍﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻳﺎ ﺑـﻪﻃـﻮﺭ ﻫﻤﺰﻣـﺎﻥ ،ﺑـﻪ ﭘﺎﺩﺷـﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺍﺩﺍﻣـﻪ ﺍﺻـﻞ ﻣﻨﺴـﻮﺧﻪ 48ﺑـﺎ ﺍﺻـﻞ ﺟﺪﻳـﺪ
ﺷﺒﺎﻫﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺣﻞ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ(13).
ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻳﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1328ﺫﻛﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨـﺪ ،ﻣـﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺳـﻮﻡ ﻭ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﺩﺭﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺍﺻﻞ 48ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻓﺤﻮﺍﻱ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺭﻳﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﺎﻥ – ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻠﻢ
ﻣﻲﻓﻬﻤﺪ -ﺗﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ »ﺿﻌﻒ ﻗﻮﺍﻱ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﻪ« ﻭ »ﻧﺎﺗﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻭﻇـﺎﻳﻒ
ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ« ﻭ »ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻳﺖ ﻗﻄﻌﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻴﻪ« ﻭ »ﻇﻬـﻮﺭ ﻫـﺮﺝ ﻭ ﻣـﺮﺝ ﻭ ﺍﺧـﺘﻼﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻠﻴـﻪ ﺍﻣـﻮﺭ
ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ« ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﺭﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺑﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺤﻼﻝ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺳﻨﺎ ،ﺟﺪﺍﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻄﻮﺭ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺎﻩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻗﻮﻩ ﻣﻘﻨﻨـﻪ ﺑـﻪ
ﺷﺎﻩ ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺳﺘﺨﻂ ،ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺑﺰﻧـﺪ .ﺑـﺪﻳﻦ ﺳـﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺳـﺘﻘﻼﻝ
ﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﻴﮕﺎﻩ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺷـﺎﻩ ،ﭘـﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﮔﻠـﻴﻢ ﺳـﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﺩﺭﺍﺯ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺠﻠـﺲ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻴﺖ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢ ،ﺑﺎ ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺗﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﭼﻴﺪﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺴﻴﻦ ،ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻴﺖ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؛ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﻣﻈﻬﺮ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﭘﺪﻳـﺪﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﻭ ﻫـﻢ ﭼﻨـﻴﻦ ﻣﺸـﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ ﺑﺨﺸـﻴﺪﻥ ﺑـﻪ ﺳـﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻈـﺎﻡ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺳﺮﭼﺸﻤﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻥ ،ﺑﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺍﺻﻞ ،48ﺍﺻﻞ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ ﺁﺷـﻜﺎﺭﺍ
ﻼ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ «.ﺭﻭﺷـﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛـﻪ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺩﺳـﺖﺍﻧـﺪﺍﺯﻱ ﻧﻘﺾ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﺁﻥ »ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻴﺖ ﺟﺰﺍً ﻭ ﻛ ً
ﺟﻔﺎﻛﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﻭ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ،ﻛـﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳـﺖ ،ﺧﺴـﺎﺭﺕ ﺑـﺎﺭ ﻭ
ﻭﻳﺮﺍﻧﮕﺮ ﻣﻠﻚ ﻭ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻓﺰﻭﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺷﺨﺺ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻱ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﭘﻴﺸﮕﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺨﺎﺻﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻧـﺎﻡ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨـﺪﻩ ،ﺍﻳـﻦ
ﺑﺪﻋﺖ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺴﻮﻭﻝ ،ﮔﻨﺎﻫﻜﺎﺭ ،ﺟﻔﺎﭘﻴﺸﻪ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺍﻓﻜﻨﺪﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭﻳﻐﺎ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻫﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ،ﺳﻮﺋﺪ ،ﻧﺮﻭژ ،ﺩﺍﻧﻤﺎﺭﻙ ﻭ ﻫﻠﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﻣـﺎ،
ﺷﺎﻫﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻈﻬﺮ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻙ ﻭ ﻣﺤـﺪﻭﺩ ﺧـﻮﻳﺶ
ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﭙﺮﻱ ﺷﺪﻥ 23ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗـﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺷـﺎﻩ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺴﭙﺎﺭﺩ ،ﺑﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻲ ﻭﺍﭘﺴـﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﺪﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﻗﺎﺟﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦﺳﺎﻥ ،ﺗﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﭘﺎﺩﺷـﺎﻩ ﻭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ،ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺍﺣﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﺎﺳﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﺰﺩﻭﺭ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﻓﺮﻭﺧﺘﻪ ،ﻋﺮﺻـﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ،ﺣﻘـﻮﻕ
ﻣﻠﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳﻲ ﺗﻨﮓ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺧﺪﺍﺩ ﻧﺎﻣﻴﻤﻮﻥ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻋﺠﻴﺒﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭼـﺮﺧﺶ ﺑـﻪ ﺳـﻤﺖ ﻭ
ﺳﻮﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﻪ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫـﺮ ﮔـﺎﻩ ﺩﻭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﺸـﻮﺩﻩ ﺷـﻮﺩ ﻛـﻪ ﻳﻜـﻲ ﺑـﻪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑـﺮﻱ ﻭ
ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻴﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺎﻣﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺧﻔﻘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺾ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸﺮ ،ﺟﻤﺎﻋـﺖﻫـﺎﻳﻲ
ﺳﺮ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎ ﻧﺸﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻲﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺷﻴﻔﺘﻪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺣﺮﺹ ﻭ ﻭﻟﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻒ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺷﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺧـﻮﻳﺶ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻋﻘﺐﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺠﺎﻋﻲ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻨﺎﻑ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ
ﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﻟﺒﺪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ،ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻭ ﺟﺎ ﺧﻮﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ،ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺑﺮﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻧﻮﺑﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰ ﺍﺻﻞ 48ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ،ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭘـﻲ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﻧﺎﻇﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻭﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴ ْﺮ ﺿﺮﺑﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳـﺎﺱ ﻣﺸـﺮﻭﻃﻴﺖ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ
ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺳﺖﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻱ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﻳﻢ ﺁﺭﺍء ﻣﻠﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﮕـﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺷـﻮﺭﺍ ﻭ ﺳـﻨﺎ،
ﺩﺭﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻳﻮﺭﺵ ﺧﺮﺩﺳﺘﻴﺰﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻫﺰﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﺴﻨﮓ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ﺳﻨﺖ ﻗﺠﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻣﻨﺪﺍﻧـﻪ ﺷﻜﺴـﺘﻨﺪ ﻛـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ،
ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻫﻢ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻢ ﻣﺠﺮﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ،ﻫﻢ ﻗﺎﺿﻲﺍﻟﻘﻀـﺎﺕ ،ﻫـﻢ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧـﺪﻩ ﻗﺸـﻮﻥ ﻭ ﻫـﻢ ﻓﺼـﻞﺍﻟﺨﻄـﺎﺏ ﺩﺭﺳـﺖ ﻭ
ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺳﻨﺖ ،ﻭ ﺩﺍﻭﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴـﺰ ﻭ ﻫﻤـﻪ ﻛـﺲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤـﻪ ﺟـﺎ .ﭘـﺪﺭﺍﻥ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪﻃﻠﺐ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺪﺑﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩﻧﮕﺮﻱ ،ﺩﺳﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻮﺳﺖ ﮔﺮﺩﻭﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻓﺮﻭ ﺑـﺮﺩﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺧﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺒﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻧﻪ ﻣﻈﻬـﺮ ﻗﻬـﺮ ﻭ ﺳـﻔﺎﻫﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺮﻗـﻪ .ﺩﺭ ﻫـﺮ ﺣـﺎﻝ ﺟﻨـﺒﺶ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺴﻮﻭﻟﻴﺖ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺮﺑﻠﻨﺪﻱ ﺑـﻪ ﺍﻧﺠـﺎﻡ ﺭﺳـﺎﻧﻴﺪ ﺗـﺎ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥْ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ،
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻤﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﺑﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺑﻴﺪﺍﺭﻱ ،ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ،ﺑﺴﻂ ﻭ ﮔﺴـﺘﺮﺵ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳـﻲ ،ﻣﺮﺍﻋـﺎﺕ ﺣﻘـﻮﻕ ﺑﺸـﺮ ،
ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎء ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﻣـﺎ ﻫﻤـﻮﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻧـﺪ؛ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﺭﺷـﺘﻲ ﻛـﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﻛﻮﺭﻩﺭﺍﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺮ ﭘﻴﭻ ﻭ ﺧﻢ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﮔﺬﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﺟﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ
ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﻙ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ،ﮔﺸﻮﺩﻥ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﺸـﺘﺮ ﺑـﻪ ﺳـﻮﻱ ﺗﻜﺜﺮﮔﺮﺍﻳـﻲ ،ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ،ﺑﺮﺍﺑـﺮﻱ ،ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳـﻲ ،ﻣـﺪﺍﺭﺍ ﻭ
ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺪﺍﺭ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻣـﻲﺷـﻮﺩ ،ﺣﻜﻮﻣـﺖ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﺟﺎﻱ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﻪ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ،ﺩﻳﻦﺩﺍﺭ ﻭ ﻣـﻴﻬﻦﺩﻭﺳـﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨـﺎﺭ ﻫـﻢ ﺑـﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﺑـﻂ ﺑﺮﺍﺑـﺮ
ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﮔﻴﺮﻱ
ﮔﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺒﻠـﻮﺭ ﻳﺎﻓـﺖ ﺗـﺎ ﻗـﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﻲ ﺯﻳـﺮ
ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺩﺭﺁﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ
ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﻳـﺪﻩ ﺧـﻮﻳﺶ ﺳـﭙﺮﺩﻩ ﺷـﻮﺩ .ﺩﻭ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻨﺎ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﻴﮕﺎﻩ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻈﻬﺮ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭﻓﻖ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺤـﺖ
ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ،ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﺩﺷـﺎﻩ
ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺎﻣﻪ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖﮔﺮﺍ ،ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﻪ ،ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺎﻓﻮﻕ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻳﺪ ﻣﺒﺴﻮﻃﻪ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺴـﺖ ﻭ
ﺍﻭ ﻧﻪ »ﺳﺎﻳﻪ ﺧﺪﺍ« ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻧﻪ »ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﻋﺎﻟﻢ« ﻧﻪ »ﻧﺎﺩﺭﻩ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ« ﻭ ﻧﻪ »ﺟﺎﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ« .ﺍﻭ ﻓﻘـﻂ ﭘﺎﺩﺷـﺎﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﺑـﻪ ﻋﻨـﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤـﺎﺩ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺫﻳﻞ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﭘﺪﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ 105 ،ﺳـﺎﻝ ﭘـﻴﺶ – ﻳﻌﻨـﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1285ﻫﺠﺮﻱ ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ -ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ؛ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑـﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑـﺎ ﺩﻗﺘـﻲ
ﻣﺜﺎﻝﺯﺩﻧﻲ ﺩﻳﻮ ﺗﺮﺳﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻨﺪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴـﺖ ﻣﻠـﻲ ،ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ،ﺑﺮﺍﺑـﺮﻱ،
ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻭ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳﻲ ﮔﺸﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﮕﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻨﺞﮔﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ ﻭ ﻣـﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ – ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﺕ 59ﺳﺎﻝ -ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺍﺻﻞ 48ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ ﻛـﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻴـﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺤـﻼﻝ ﻫﻤﺰﻣـﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻳـﺎ ﺟﺪﺍﮔﺎﻧـﻪ
ﻣﺠﻠﺴﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺎﻩ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺷﺎﻩ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻱ ﺍﻓـﺰﻭﺩ .ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴـﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ ﻛـﺎﺭﻱ
ﻧﺎﺑﺨﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ،ﻧﺴﻨﺠﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﭘﺮﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ،ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﺍﺳـﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻄﻠﻘـﻪ ﻓـﺮﺩﻱ ﻭ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻗﻴﻤﻮﻣﻴﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﺷﻜﻞ ﻭ ﺷـﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨـﺪ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻥﮔﺮﺍﻳـﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳـﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ ﭘـﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨـﺒﺶ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻨﮕﻨﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻱ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺳﺖﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻣﻠﺖ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﺯ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻧﺒﺮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ 105ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ،ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﺁﻥ ،ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺷﺨﺼـﻲ ﻛـﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻗـﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﻄﻠﻘـﻪ
ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ .ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻃﻌﻢ ﺗﻠﺦ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﺟﺎﺭﻳﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭼﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺳﺘﻤﮕﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﻭ ﺑـﻲﻗـﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ
ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﻟﻤﺲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ،ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺴﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﻛـﺎﻣﮕﻲ ﻭ
ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ – ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻮﻉ -ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺶ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺁﻥ ﻛـﻪ ﻣﻴـﺮﺍﺙ ﻣﺒـﺎﺭﻙ ﻭ
ﮔﺮﺍﻧﺴﻨﮓ ﭘﺪﺭﺍﻥ ﻏﻴﻮﺭ ،ﺭﻭﺷﻦﺑﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻥﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭﺱ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻟﻴﺮﺍﻧﻪ ،ﻓﺮﻭﺗﻨﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺪﻻﻧﻪ ﺑـﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺠﺪﻳـﺪ
ﻋﻬﺪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﭘﻲﻧﻮﺷﺖﻫﺎ
.1ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻲﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ،ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ،ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ،ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺎﻣﮕﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺾ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ ﻣـﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﭘـﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ،ﻣﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ:
ﺳﺎﻣﻮﺋﻞ ﮔﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﻠﺮ ﺑﻨﺠﺎﻣﻴﻦ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ،ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺳﻔﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺭﺣـﻴﻢ ﺭﺿـﺎﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻠـﻚ ،ﺗﻬـﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻧﺸـﺮ
ﮔﻠﺒﺎﻧﮓ.1363 ،
ﺟﺮﺝ ﻥ .ﻛﺮﺯﻥ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺗﺮﺟﻤﻪ ﻍ .ﻭﺣﻴﺪ ﻣﺎﺯﻧﺪﺭﺍﻧﻲ ،ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺍﻧﺘﺸـﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻋﻠﻤـﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕـﻲ ،1362 ،ﺟﻠـﺪ
ﺍﻭﻝ.
ﻛﺎﺭﻻ ﺳﺮﻧﺎ ،ﺳﻔﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺎﺩﺍﻡ ﻛﺎﺭﻻ ﺳﺮﻧﺎ ،ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺗﺮﺟﻤﻪ ﻋﻠﻲﺍﺻﻐﺮ ﺳﻌﻴﺪﻱ ،ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺯﻭﺍﺭ.1362 ،
ﺁﺩﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﻫﻲﺗﻴﻪ ،ﻳﺎﺩﺩﺍﺷﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﻨﺖ ﺩﻭﮔﻮﺑﻴﻨﻮ ،ﺗﺮﺟﻤﻪ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺮﺿﺎ ﻫﻮﺷﻨﮓﻣﻬـﺪﻭﻱ ،ﺗﻬـﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺍﻧﺘﺸـﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺟﻮﻳـﺎ،
1370.
-2ﺳـﻴﺪﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﺤﻤـﻮﺩﻱ» ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻫﻴـﺖ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖ« ،ﻋـﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ،ﺗﻬــﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺸـﺮ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸـﻪ ،ﻣﻌﺎﺻــﺮ.1376 ،
»ﭘﻴﺸﮕﻔﺘﺎﺭ ،ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ :ﭘﺎﺳﺨﻲ ﻧﻮ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎ ﺗـﺎﺯﻩ« ،ﻓﻠﺴـﻔﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﻲ ﻛﺎﻧـﺖ ،ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸـﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﮔﺴﺘﺮﻩ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ،ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻧﺸﺮ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ،13 ،ﭼﺎپ ﺩﻭﻡ.
-3ﻋﻄﺎﺍﷲ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﻲ ،ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ،ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺮ ﺗﻜﺎﻣـﻞ ﺁﻥ ،ﺗﻬـﺮﺍﻥ ،ﭼﺎﭘﺨﺎﻧـﻪ ﻣﺠﻠـﺲ ﺷـﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻠـﻲ،
،1356ﺻﺺ 5.-6
-4ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺻﺺ 12ﻭ 15.
-5ﻓﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥ ﺁﺩﻣﻴﺖ ،ﺁﺷﻔﺘﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻜﺮ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ] ،ﺑﻲﺟﺎ[] ،ﺑﻲﻧﺎ[ ،1360 ،ﺹ .5
-6ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩﻱ» ،ﺁﻝﺍﺣﻤﺪ ،ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ،ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳﻲ« ،ﺁﻳﻴﻦ ،ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺷﺸﻢ ،ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪ 1385.
-7ﻋﻄﺎﺍﷲ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﻲ ،ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ،ﺻﺺ 45.-47
-8ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺹ 48.
-9ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺹ 50.
-10ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺻﺺ 51.-52
-11ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺹ 54.
-12ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺻﺺ 55.-56
-13ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺻﺺ .59-60