You are on page 1of 7

Teaching Plan

FAKULTI TEKNOLOGI MAKLUMAT DAN KOMUNIKASI


UNIVERSITI TEKNIKAL MALAYSIA MELAKA

WORKSHOP 1

BITU 2913 SEMESTER I SESSION 2023/2024

BITU 2913 WORKSHOP 1 (3, 0, 9)


TYPE OF COURSE: P
EDITION: 2
UPDATED: 20-09-2022

1.0 COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES


Upon completion this course, students should be able to:
i. Apply the knowledge that had been learned especially in programming
technique to build, run and develop the project individually (PLO1, C3).
ii. Fix problems in systematic way (PLO2, P3).
iii. Defend while presenting results of the project (PLO6, A4).

2.0 SYNOPSIS
Workshop 1 aims to provide exposure and skills to the students in submitting and
presenting a project of application/system development individually. Students
must use the knowledge that had been learned to solve problems and think
creatively to get result that achieved the objective and scope of the proposed
project. Students must use the techniques learned in programming technique and
database courses to assure that the project built will have a logical process flow
and in precise with the system’s criteria of robustness, consistent, have an
interesting interface and able to handle error in data input/output process. At the
end of this Workshop, students must present and debate to defend the project
that had been built. The process of supervision/evaluation is handled in terms of
supervision and progress evaluation by a supervisor within 12 weeks besides the
presentation evaluation by an evaluator. Workshop 1 is also functioned as the
platform to prepare the students for their industrial training program.

3.0 PRE-REQUISITE
BITP 1113 – Programming Technique

4.0 PRACTICAL
The software and programming language that will be used by the students are to
be determined by the Workshop 1 Committee. Students will be given an

Fakulti Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi 1/8


Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
introduction of the software through briefing and short course conducted by
Workshop 1 Committee. The evaluation process is based on progress of the
project that will be conducted by following Workshop 1 flowchart and milestone.

5.0 REFERENCES
[1] JK Bengkel 1, “Buku Panduan Bengkel 1 BITU 2913”, FTMK, 2019.
[2] Horton, I., “Ivor Horton’s Beginning Visual C++ 2012”, John Wiley & Son,
2012.
[3] Zak, D., “Introduction to Programming with C++ 7th Edition”, Cengage
Learning, 2013.
[4] McLaughlin, M., “Oracle Database 11g & MySQL 5.6 Developer Handbook”,
McGraw Hill, 2011.
[5] Sommerville, I., “Software Engineering (9th Edition)”, Pearson, 2011.

6.0 COURSE IMPLEMENTATION


i. Briefing:
• 1 hour of briefing

ii. Supervision and evaluation:


• 2 hour per week for 6 weeks (Total = 12 hours)

iii. Presentation
• 1 hour at the end of the semester

7.0 COURSE EVALUATION


CLO1 CLO2 CLO3 Scheme, Rubric/
Assessment Method
(C3) (P3, CTPS3) (A4, CS3) guideline
Proposal Writing (5%) TR-1 (5%) PW Rubric
Analysis & Design (10%) TR-2 (10%) A&D Rubric
Progress 1 (15%) CW-1 (15%) Progress 1 Rubric
Progress 2 (20%) CW-2 (20%) Progress 2 Rubric
Progress 3 (15%) CW-3 (15%) Progress 3 Rubric
PR-1 (10%) Presentation
Presentation (30%) Rubric
PR-2 (20%)
Final Report (5%) TR-3 (5%) Evaluation Rubric

Total 30% 35% 35%

Fakulti Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi 2/8


Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
8.0 STUDENT LEARNING TIME (SLT)

Guided Learning Time Independant Learning Assessment Time


Week CLO L T P O L T P O F T A O F T A O SLT
W1 1 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 12
W2 1 2 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 2 0.5 15.5
W3 1 2 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 2 0.5 15.5
W4 2 2 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 2 0.5 15.5
W5 2 2 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 2 0.5 15.5
W6 2 2 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 2 0.5 15.5
W7 3 2 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 13
W8 3 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 3 0.7 15.7

Overall 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 88 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 3.2 118.2


SLT Credit Equivalent 2.955

9.0 DETAILED SYLLABUS AND TEACHING PLAN


Delivery
Week Session Contents References
Method
Workshop 1 Briefing
Students will be given some
1 Briefing explanations about project that will [1,2,3,4,5] Briefing
be built for the whole semester,
project scope and software that
will be used

Project Proposal Discussion/


Approval
Discussion
Discussion 1. Students start to think about
1-2 with title and create a draft of [1,2,3,4,5] Proposal
Supervisor project proposal to be Writing
discussed with the supervisor. Assessment
2. Supervisor will approve the
student’s project proposal.

Analysis Discussion/Approval
1. Students will create and submit
Discussion the analysis of the problem
3 with involves in the project that will [1,2,3,4,5] Discussion
Supervisor be built.
2. Supervisor will evaluate the
analysis part.

Design Discussion/Approval
1. Students will start to design the
project. Students should have Discussion
Discussion flow chart, pseudocode, ERD,
4 with Data Dictionary and Interface [1,2,3,4,5] Analysis and
Supervisor design for the project that will Design
be built. Assessment
2. Supervisor will evaluate the
design part.

Implementation and Discussion


Discussion
Development (Part 1)
5-7 with [1,2,3,4,5]
Progress 1
Supervisor 1. Students start developing the
Assessment
application.

Fakulti Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi 3/8


Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
Delivery
Week Session Contents References
Method
2. Students need to show 30% of
development progress to
supervisor at week 6.
8 MID SEMESTER BREAK
Implementation and
Development (Part 2)
Discussion
Discussion 1. Students continue developing
9-11 with the application. [1,2,3,4,5]
Progress 2
Supervisor 2. Students need to show 60% of Assessment
development progress to
supervisor at week 10.

Implementation and
Development (Part 3)
1. Students continue developing
the application.
2. Students need to show at least Discussion
Discussion
12-14 with 90% development progress to [1,2,3,4,5]
supervisor at week 13. Progress 3
Supervisor
3. Students will be interviewed Assessment
about the project that had been
built and their understanding
regarding programming
techniques that had been used.

Project Presentation Presentation


Students need to present the final and Final
15 Presentation [1,2,3,4,5]
result of the project for evaluation Report
and submit final report. Assessment

Fakulti Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi 4/8


Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
10.0 MATRIX OF LEARNING OUTCOMES
COURSE vs PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME (PLO) COURSE LEARNING OUTCOME (CLO)
PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME (PLO) Apply the knowledge that had been learned
Course
PLO1 PLO2 PLO3 PLO4 PLO5 PLO6 PLO7 PLO8 PLO9 CLO1 especially in programming technique to build, run and
BITU develop the project individually (PLO1, C3)
X X X
2913 CLO2 Fix problems in systematic way (PLO2, P3, CTPS3)
Defend while presenting results of the project (PLO6,
CLO3
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOME (CLO) vs PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME A4, CS3)
(PLO)
PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME (PLO)
Course
PLO1 PLO2 PLO3 PLO4 PLO5 PLO6 PLO7 PLO8 PLO9
CLO1 X
CLO2 X
CLO3 X

COURSE vs SOFT SKILLS


Soft Skills
Critical Thinking & Lifelong Entrepreneur- Ethics & Moral Leadership
Communication Skill Teamwork
Problem Solving Learning ship Skills Professionalism Skills
Course
CT CT CT CT CT
CS CS CS CS CS TS TS TS LL LL LL ES ES ES EM EM EM LS LS LS
PS PS PS PS PS
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
1 2 3 4 5
BITU
X X
2913

COURSE LEARNING OUTCOME (CLO) vs SOFT SKILLS


Soft Skills
Critical Thinking & Lifelong Entrepreneur- Ethics & Moral Leadership
Communication Skill Teamwork
Problem Solving Learning ship Skills Professionalism Skills
CLO
CT CT CT CT CT
CS CS CS CS CS TS TS TS LL LL LL ES ES ES EM EM EM LS LS LS
PS PS PS PS PS
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
1 2 3 4 5
CLO1
CLO2 X
CLO3 X

Fakulti Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi 5/8


Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
COURSE vs TAXONOMY
Taxonomy
Course Affective Cognitive Psychomotor
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7
BITU
X X X X X X X X X X
2913

COURSE LEARNING OUTCOME (CLO) vs TAXONOMY


Taxonomy
CLO Affective Cognitive Psychomotor
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7
CLO1 X X X
CLO2 X X X
CLO3 X X X X

Fakulti Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi 6/8


Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
TEACHING PLAN APPROVAL

Prepared by: Approved by:

…………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………
Name: TS. DR. LIZAWATI SALAHUDDIN Dean/Deputy Dean (Academic)/HOD

Stamp: Stamp:

Date: 6 October 2023 Date: __________________

TEACHING PLAN IMPLEMENTATION


(MID SEMESTER BREAK)

Comment:

Checked by:

……………………………………………………………
Dean/Deputy Dean (Academic)/HOD

Stamp: Date: __________________

TEACHING PLAN IMPLEMENTATION


(WEEK 16)

Comment:

Checked by:

……………………………………………………………
Dean/Deputy Dean (Academic)/HOD

Stamp: Date: __________________

Fakulti Teknologi Maklumat dan Komunikasi 7/8


Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka

You might also like