Assignment – 02

ECBC Standard Case Report

Base Case – LMCP Building
MONSOON Semester 2023 Course code: BE4003
Submitted By: Arsh Arora(PBE22059)
Location – Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh (23.26°, 77.41)
CLIMATE
` ZONE: COMPOSITE
BUILDING TYPE: EDUCATIONAL
MODE: MIXED MODE
BASE CASE – GEOMETRY INPUTS and INPUT PARAMETERS
AIC LMCP Foundation, L. M. College of 20 0.7 EXTERNAL WALL SECTION
0.65

OCCUPANT DENSITY
15.1 0.6
Pharmacy.

(persons/m2)
15 13.8 0.5

LPD(W/m2)
Building height: 12.4m. 10 10 0.4
10 8 0.3
Location Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh (23.26°, 77.41) 0.25 0.25 7.1 0.3
5 0.2
CLIMATE ZONE: COMPOSITE 0.1 0.1

VERTICAL SHADING DEVICE

0.1
BUILDING TYPE: EDUCATIONAL 0 0
Classroom Labs Common Office area Coridoor Library
MODE: MIXED MODE room
LPD Occupant density
• Type: Institutional
Existing Model: • Wwr – 40%
• Structure – RCC
• Total height - 13.5 m
• Floor height – 4m
• Floor area – 1014 sqm
• Simulation city – Bhopal

Material inputs:
U – value (w/m2k)
Fig: Windows & Projection Details Fig: Jaali Details
• Ext walls – 0.44 HORIZONTAL
ECBC Design Builder Model: • Roof – 0.33 SHADING DEVICE
• North glass – 3
(shgc-0.5)
• Non-north – 3
(shgc-0.27)
Reflectance :
• Int. Partitions – 50%
• Roof – 0.7
• Glass_vlt(min.)- 0.27
Fig: Building Model Fig: Windows & Projection Details Fig: Jaali Details Fig: Internal Layout
9/25/2023 WBD assignment-02 2
INPUT SCHEDULES AS PER ECBC
BACK OFFICE
1.0 1.0
GROUND FLOOR: Admin Office

DENSITY SCHEDULE
DENSITY SCHEDULE

0.8 0.8 Faculty Area

FIRST FLOOR: Seminar room
0.6 0.6
Faculty Area
0.4 0.4 SECOND FLOOR: Incubates’ Cabin
Conference Room
0.2 0.2
Administration area
0.0 0.0 STUDENT AREA
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617181920212223 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617181920212223 GROUND FLOOR: Classroom
HOUR OF DAY HOUR OF DAY Cell Culture Lab
OCCUPANT HVAC FAN OCCUPANT HVAC FAN Boys’ common room
LIGHT SCHEDULE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE LIGHT SCHEDULE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE Central instrument Lab
Chemistry Lab
Fig. Schedule for Back office Fig. Schedule for Student area Pharma Analysis Lab
FIRST FLOOR: Classroom
1.0 1.0 Clinical Pharma Lab
Girls’ common room
DENSITY SCHEDULE

DENSITY SCHEDULE
0.8 0.8 Pharmaceutical Lab
Pharmacology Lab
0.6 0.6
SECOND FLOOR: Cafeteria
0.4 0.4
LIBRARY/COMPUTER ROOM
0.2 0.2
FIRST FLOOR: Library
0.0 0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617181920212223 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011121314151617181920212223 CORRIDOR
HOUR OF DAY HOUR OF DAY GROUND FLOOR: Corridor & Toilet
OCCUPANT HVAC FAN
OCCUPANT HVAC FAN LIGHT SCHEDULE FIRST FLOOR: Corridor & Toilet
LIGHT SCHEDULE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE
SECOND FLOOR: Corridor & Toilet
Fig. Schedule for Library Fig. Schedule for Corridor/Lobby
9/25/2023 WBD assignment-02 3
MODEL VERIFICATION – BUILDING ENVELOPE
VERIFICATION EVIDENCE-01
6
METHODOLOGY – MAPPING OF DELTA T (SURFACE) AND HEAT FLUX (envelope) WITH OUTDOOR TEMP.

EDELTA T (EXT. SURFACE TEMP - INT.

SIMULATION DONE FOR SUMMER AND WINTER (classified as occupied and unoccupied hours) 4
At zone level. AREA- FACULTY AREA CABINS (FF) ORIENTATION - SOUTH
30 2

SURFACE TEMP)
0
25
-2

20 -4

-6
FACADE HEAT FLUX (W/m²)

15
-8
10 5 15 25 35 45
WINTER SUMMER OUTDOOR DBT (°C)
• With the indoor set temperature at 24c the operative
5
temperature will also follow the same trend as a result
the inside surface temperature will always be closer to
0 24°c
• There are constant heat gains on the external facade
-5 with an increase in outside DBT. Hence delta T increases
with the rise in outdoor temperatures.
-10 • when inside surface temperatures ( mostly in winters )
are greater than outside DBT it means that heat
transfer is from inside to outside
-15
• During unoccupied hours heat flux is from inside to
-14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8
outside as air conditioning is off where as heat flux
EDELTA T (EXT. SURFACE TEMP - INT. SURFACE TEMP)
• Hence we can say that model is behaving correctly.
OCCUPIED HOURS UN OCCUPIED HOURS
9/25/2023 WBD assignment-02 4
MODEL VERIFICATION – SHADING DEVICE VERIFICATION
VERIFICATION EVIDENCE-02

SENSIBLE COOLING LOAD (kW)

1.25
METHODOLOGY – MAPPING OF SOLAR GAINS ON EXTERIOR WINDOWS WITH GLOBAL HORIZONTAL 1.2
RADIATION SIMULATION DONE ANNUAL. WITH AND WITHOUT SHADING COMPONENT BLOCKS 1.15
At zone level. AREA- FACULTY AREA CABINS (FF) ORIENTATION - SOUTH 1.1
1.6 1.05
1
0.95
1.4 0.9
0.85
SOLAR GAINS EXTERIOR WINDOWS (W/m²)

0.8
1.2 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
HOURS

1 With shading device without shading device

• The solar gains on the exterior windows clearly increased

0.8 by 26% which states that the component block input in
the base case model is working as per expectation.
26% • Sensible cooling loads mapped during operational hours
0.6
are higher in buildings without a shading device however
showing the effect on the thermal mass of the envelope
0.4 as while not having the shading device cooling loads
decrease as the outside DBT gets lower than the inside air
0.2 temperature as cooling loads remain constantly high even
after 17 00 hrs with the shading device. Hence the model
is working correctly.
0 • we cannot see a great difference in the reduction of solar
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
heat gains hence there is a need for an optimized shading
GLOBAL HORIZONTAL RADIATION (W/m²) device that provides better protection from the solar
SHADING NO SHADING Linear (SHADING) Linear (NO SHADING ) gains while keeping the blinds open.
9/25/2023 WBD assignment-02 5
MODEL VERIFICATION – OCCUPANCY AND HVAC SCHEDULE
VERIFICATION EVIDENCE-03 1 0.3
0.9
METHODOLOGY – MAPPING OF SOLAR GAINS WITH DIRECT AND DIFFUSED RADIATION SIMULATED

SOLAR INCIDENT GAINS (W/m²)

0.25
0.8
ANNUALLY At zone level. AREA- FACULTY AREA CABINS (FF) ORIENTATION - SOUTH

RADIATION (W/m²)
0.7
1.4 0.2
0.6
0.5 0.15
0.4
0.1
1.2 0.3
0.2
0.05
0.1
0 0
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
SOLAR GAINS EXTERIOR WINDOWS (W/m²)

DIRECT NORMAL DIFFUSED SOLAR INCIDENT GAINS

0.8
• We can clearly see the effect of diffused

0.6 radiation and direct radiation on the solar

gains. Due to the south orientation, the solar

0.4
gains must depend on direct radiation falling
on the building.
• As direct normal radiation increases the heat
0.2
gains in the zone also follow a similar trend,
hence we can say that the model is working
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 correctly.
SOLAR RADIATION (W/m²)
DIFFUSE HORIZONTAL DIRECT NORMAL
9/25/2023 WBD assignment-02 6
MODEL VERIFICATION – SEASONAL COOLING LOADS
VERIFICATION EVIDENCE-04 32 30

Thousands
METHODOLOGY – MAPPING OF COOLING LOAD WITH OUTDOOR AIR ENTHALPY SIMULATED
30 25
ANNUALLY At zone level. AREA- FACULTY AREA CABINS (FF) ORIENTATION - SOUTH

Cooling loads (Kw)

20
90 28

Temp. (°C)
15
26
10
80
24
5
22 0
70
20 -5
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23
60
Time (h)
COOLING LOAD(W/m²)

DBT Air temperature

Zone sensible cooling loads Predicted zone sensible loads
50
• While mapping total cooling loads with outdoor air
enthalpy we can clearly see that cooling loads during
40 winters are lower as the enthalpy is less during that time.
• Monsoon experiences the highest cooling loads as along
with higher temperatures there is a considerable increase
30 in RH%.
• An increase in Rh and DBT results in higher enthalpy
which directly corresponds to the cooling loads required.
20
• The set point here is constant at 24°C during occupied
hours which we can clearly see that the system is able to
10 maintain the set point temperature during those hours.
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Hence, The schedule and model are working correctly.
ENTHALPY(J/G)
WINTER SUMMER MONSOON
9/25/2023 WBD assignment-02 7
MODEL VERIFICATION – LATENT LOADS

VERIFICATION EVIDENCE-03 LATENT LOAD VS RH

METHODOLOGY – MAPPING OF Total latent loads vs relative humidity 17

SIMULATED ANNUALLY At the building level 15

9

LATENT LOAD (W/m²)

13
11
8 9
7
5
7
3
1
6 25 35 45 55 65
LATENT LOAD (W/m²)

RELATIVE HUMIDITY (%)

OTHER OCCCUPIED HOURS 8:00 TO 9:00 HOURS

5
• While mapping latent loads with rh we can clearly
see a direct relation as rh increases latent loads in
4 the building also increase hence we can say that
the HVAC system is correctly catering to the latent
loads.
3 • There is a sudden increase in latent loads (black
dots ) when the occupancy enters as there is a
sudden increase in latent loads simultaneously
2 when the HVAC system starts.
• This further proves that the HVAC schedule and
occupancy schedule inputs are working in unison,
1
hence, we can say that the model is working
25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
RELATIVE HUMIDITY (%) correctly .
9/25/2023 WBD assignment-02 8
MODEL VERIFICATION – EXHAUST FAN

ZONE INFILTRATION SENSIBLE HEAT

VERIFICATION EVIDENCE-06 80
60
METHODOLOGY – MAPPING OF AIR TEMPERATURE AND OUTDOOR DBT FOR PEAK SUMMER SENSIBLE
40
MONTH At zone level. AREA- LAB AREA(GF) ORIENTATION - NORTH 20
HEAT GAIN

ENERGY (W)
37
0
-20
-40
-60 SENSIBLE
35
-80 HEAT LOSS
-100
0 10 20 30 40 50
33 Outside DBT (°C)

Zone Infiltration Sensible Heat Loss Energy (W)

Air Temp. (°C)

Zone Infiltration Sensible Heat Gain Energy (W)

31
• When the DBT is less than the room air temperature, the
zone is losing sensible heat through infiltration

• When the DBT is higher than the room air temperature, the
29
zone is gaining sensible energy via infiltration

• Hence, the infiltration input is working correctly

• Latent energy should also be checked in this case, because
27
while infiltration is reducing sensible energy during favorable
DBT conditions it might be increasing the latent energy
• The mechanical exhaust fan is responding as per the
occupancy schedule giving a maximum ACH of 0.5
25
• The maximum ACH of infiltration has been set to 0.05
20 25 30 35 40 45
• Since the windows are closed in these spaces, the 5 ACH
Outside DBT (°C) exhaust fan will also suck in outside hot air
Case 2 Unoccupied hrs. Case 2 Occupied hrs Case 1 unoccupied hrs case 1 Ocupied hrs
9/25/2023 WBD assignment-02 9
THERMAL ZONING – GROUND FLOOR
TOTAL COOLING LOADS
Admin AREA 1085.58
Toilet perimeter Faculty perimeter Cell lab peri. Boys room peri.
CLASSROOM CORE 8.14
Zone-14 Zone-1 Zone-3 Zone-5 Zone-7
CLASSROOM PERIMETER 3.2
CONDITIONED AREA 496.78
Cell lab Boys room
Admin core Faculty core core. CENTRAL INST. ROOM 10.9
core
Zone-2 Zone-4
Zone-6 Zone-8 TOTAL COOLING LOAD
FACULTY AREA OPEN 7.19 (KW) 53.2
Corridor Zone-15 FACULTY AREA CABINS 4.08
CELL CULTURE LAB 1 1.6 TOTAL DESIGN
CELL CULTURE LAB 3.61 CAPACITY (KW) 61.19
NV
Classroom BOYS COMMON ROOM 1 2.22
AC core Zone-13
VRF SYSTEM REQ (KW) 20.9
Central
Chemistry Lab 1 Pharma Lab 2 BOYS COMMON ROOM PTAC SYSTEM REQ
instrument 5.85
Zone-10 Zone-9
Exhaust
lab Zone-11
ADMIN OFFICE OPEN 4.02
(KW) 40.2
Classroom peri.
Zone-12 ADMIN OFFICE CABINS 2.39 UDI 90% 13.60%
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
SDA 40% 16.50%
ORIENTATIO DESIGN
SNO. NAME AREA( SQM)
N CAPACITY MONTHLY HEAT GAINS - GROUND FLOOR
4.5
GROUND FLOOR 61.19
Thousands 4.3
1 ADMIN OFFICE CABINS SOUTH 25.2 2.75
0.6 0.6 0.6
2 ADMIN OFFICE OPEN SOUTH 33.8 4.63 4.1
3 BOYS COMMON ROOM SOUTH 36.7 6.73 0.5 0.4 0.5
4 BOYS COMMON ROOM 1 SOUTH 22.3 2.55
3.9
0.4
5 CELL CULTURE LAB SOUTH 36.7 4.16 3.7 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
0.3 0.3
W/m²

0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3

6 CELL CULTURE LAB 1 SOUTH 22.3 1.84 0.3 0.2
3.5 0.2 0.2 0.2
7 CENTRAL INST. ROOM NORTH 100.4 12.53 0.2 0.2
8 CORIDOOR CENTRAL 377 0 3.3 0.6
0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5
9 FACULTY AREA CABINS SOUTH 51.6 4.69 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4
3.1
10 FACULTY AREA OPEN SOUTH 69.4 8.27
11 CLASSROOM PERIMETER NORTH 27.5 3.68 2.9
12 CLASSROOM CORE NORTH 70.88 9.36 2.7 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
13 LAB 1 CHEMISTRY NORTH 91.4 0
14 LAB 2 PHARM. ANALYSIS NORTH 89.4 0 2.5
15 TOILET EAST 31 0 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER
INTERNAL PARTITIONS WALLS GLAZING
9/25/2023 WBD assignment-02 10
THERMAL ZONING – FIRST FLOOR
COOLING LOADS AREA (sqm) 1085.58
Seminar peri. Faculty Perimeter Libraray Peri. Girls room Peri.
Toilet
Zone-17 Zone-19 Zone-21 Zone-23 CONDITIONED AREA (sqm) 496.78
Zone-31 SEMINAR ROOM P 2.22

Faculty Core Library Core Girls room core SEMINAR ROOM C 4.72
Seminar core
Zone-18 Zone-20 Zone-22 Zone-24
LIBRARY P
TOTAL COOLING LOAD (KW) 51.6
1.35
LIBRARY C 4.12 TOTAL DESIGN CAPACITY
Corridor Zone-16
G COM ROOM P 2.2 (KW) 59.33

G COM ROOM C 5.72 VRF +

FACULTY AREA OPEN 7.14 AC SYSTEM PTAC
NV Classroom Clinic Pharma lab
Core Zone-30 core Zone-28 VRF SYSTEM REQ (KW) 37.29
Pharmacology Pharmaceutics FACULTY AREA CABIN 4.11 14.89
AC lab Zone-26 lab Zone-25
CLASSROOM C PTAC SYSTEM REQ (KW) 22.04

Exhaust Classroom peri. Clinic Pharma lab CLASSROOM P 5.13 UDI 90% 26.30%
Zone-29 Peri. Zone-27
0 5 10 15 SDA 40% 21.11%
SNO. NAME ORIENTATION AREA( SQM) DESIGN CAPACITY
MONTHLY HEAT GAINS - FIRST FLOOR
FIRST FLOOR 59.33 4.5

Thousands
16 CLASSROOM P NORTH 27.5 5.89 4.3
17 CLASSROOM C NORTH 70.88 17.13
18 CPP LAB C NORTH 73.6 0 4.1
0.6 0.6
19 CPP LAB P NORTH 26.8 0 3.9 0.6
20 CORIDOOR CENTRAL 377 0 0.5 0.4 0.5
0.3 0.4
21 FACULTY AREA CABIN SOUTH 51.6 4.72 3.7 0.3 0.3 0.3
W/m²

0.3
22 FACULTY AREA OPEN SOUTH 69.4 8.21 0.3 0.2 0.2
3.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
0.2 0.2 0.2
23 G COM ROOM C SOUTH 36.7 6.58 0.1 0.1
24 G COM ROOM P SOUTH 22.3 2.53 3.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3
25 LIBRARY C SOUTH 36.7 4.74
3.1
26 LIBRARY P SOUTH 22.3 1.55
27 PHARMACEUTICS NORTH 89.4 0 2.9
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
PHARMACOLOGY
28 NORTH 91.4 0 2.7
LAB
29 SEMINAR ROOM C SOUTH 36.7 5.43 2.5
30 SEMINAR ROOM P SOUTH 22.3 2.55 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER
31 TOILET EAST 31 0
INTERNAL PARTITIONS WALLS GLAZING
9/25/2023 WBD assignment-02 11
THERMAL ZONING – SECOND FLOOR
COOLING LOADS
Toilet Cafeteria peri
Incubate cabin Incubate cabin peri Incubate cabin
Zone-39
• AREA (sqm) 1085.1
Zone-49 peri Zone-33 Zone-35 peri Zone-37 LAB WEST PERIMETER 3.06
LAB NORTH PERIMETER 17.05
• CONDITIONED AREA (sqm) 699.1
Incubate Incubate cabin core Incubate Cafeteria core IC-05 7.86
cabin core Zone-36 cabin core Zone-40
Zone-34 Zone-38 IC-04 6.24 • TOTAL COOLING LOAD
LAB EAST PERIMETER 2.62 (KW) 116.85
Corridor Zone-32 LAB CORE 21.8
CONFERENCE ROOM 11.1
Zone-43

• TOTAL DESIGN CAPACITY

Admin

Incubate Conference IC-03 PERIMETER 2.64

Incubat Zone-46 Zone-48 IC-03 CORE 4.5 (KW) 134.42
e Zone-
NV IC-02 PERIMETER 4.33
45
IC-02 CORE • VRF SYSTEM REQ (KW)
Zone-42
Lab East

7.35 87.55

Lab West
Zone-47
AC Lab Core Zone-44 IC-01 PERIMETER 2.94
IC-01 CORE 4.86 • PTAC SYSTEM REQ (KW) 46.87
Exhaust Lab North Zone-41 CAFETERIA PERIMETER 5.63
CAFETERIA CORE 11.69 • UDI 90% 38.30%
ADMIN 3.18
SNO. NAME ORIENTATION AREA( SQM) DESIGN CAPACITY
0 5 10 15 20 25 • SDA 40% 33.40%
SECOND FLOOR 134.42
32 ADMIN SOUTH 15.3 3.65 MONTHLY HEAT GAINS - SECOND FLOOR
4.5
33 CAFETERIA CORE SOUTH 36.7 13.45
34 CAFETERIA PERIMETER SOUTH 22.3 6.47
35 CONFERENCE ROOM NORTH 38.7 12.76 4.2 0.4
36 LAB CORE NORTH 122.3 25.07 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.6
37 CORIDOOR CENTRAL 355 0 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.6
0.3
38 LAB EAST PERIMETER NORTH 18.8 3.02 0.5 0.3
3.9 0.3
KW/m²

39 IC-01 CORE SOUTH 33.8 5.59 0.3 0.3

40 IC-01 PERIMETER SOUTH 25.2 3.39 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2
0.2 0.2
41 IC-02 CORE SOUTH 69.4 8.46 3.6 0.3 0.2 0.2
42 IC-02 PERIMETER SOUTH 51.6 4.99
0.4 0.5 0.4
43 IC-03 CORE SOUTH 33.8 5.18 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
0.3 0.3 0.3
44 IC-03 PERIMETER SOUTH 25.2 3.04 3.3
45 IC-04 NORTH 29.1 7.18
46 IC-05 NORTH 55.8 9.04 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
47 LAB NORTH PERIMETER NORTH 103 19.61 3
48 TOILET EAST 31 0 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER
49 LAB WEST PERIMETER NORTH 18.1 3.52
INTERNAL ROOFS WALLS GLAZING
9/25/2023 WBD assignment-02 12
BASE CASE ENERGY PERFORMANCE REPORT
HEAT GAINS IN THE
• BUILDING GEOMETRY: L.M. COLLEGE OF PHARMACY, • TOTAL BUILDING AREA 3256.26 SQM BUILDING
• NET CONDITIONED BUILDING AREA 1692.66 3.5
LOCATION: BHOPAL, MADHYA PRADESH SQM

x 100000
• CO-ORDINATES: 23.26⁰ N I 77.41 ⁰ E • ENERGY PER TOTAL BUILDING AREA 131 kWh/m2 3
• CLIMATE ZONE: COMPOSITE • HVAC SYSTEM VRF + PTAC
2.5
• BUILDING TYPE: EDUCATIONAL • TOTAL COOLING LOAD (KW) 221.65 KW
• MODE: MIXED MODE • TOTAL DESIGN CAPACITY (KW) 254.94 KW 2

KW
• VRF SYSTEM REQ (KW) 125.45 KW 1.5

EPI 211.56 • VRF CHILLER COP

• PTAC SYSTEM REQ (KW)
3.3
129.49 KW
1

• UDI 90% 26.07% 0.5

• STATIC SET POINT - 24°C • SDA 40% 23.67% 0

EPI = 216.35 kWh/m² In the case above the floating set points are floated ENNVELOPE INTERNAL
AVG. Zonal unmet hours = 11.2 monthly on the basis of the IMAC band for the AC mode TOTAL BUILDING ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION
45 18
• VARIABLE SET POINT – 24.5 TO 25.5°C

x 10000
Thousands

EPI = 211.56 kWh/m² 40 17

AVG. Zonal unmet hours = 10.1 35
16
• Having unmet hours almost similar variable set point 30
17.5
schedule the epi has reduced by 5 as the set point has 15.1 11.8 11.8 15
ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION(W)

8.7 11.2 13.1 10.5 11.2 8.9

COST UNITS
changed so cooling load will be less during months 25 9.6
8.5
with setpoint more than 24. 14
20 4.8 4.6 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.8 4.6
• ECBC clearly states that simulation parameters should 4.2 4.4 4.2 4.4 4.4
13
be the same. If we change setpoints it will not be the 15
right way to analyze ECMS as the need of the user in 12
terms of cooling load is reduced resulting in less 10
17.9 15.5 16.3 17.1 17.9 15.5 17.9 17.1 16.3 17.9 16.3 17.1
energy use. 5 11
• There is no optimization of any building system hence
epi with floating setpoints should be used as it is giving 0 10
actual EPI as per user-specific set point needs. This JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER
shall not change in the proposed case
LIGHTING EQUIPMENT HVAC COST
9/25/2023 WBD assignment-02 13
BASE CASE REPORT - REPORTING UN-MET HOURS, COST AND HVAC SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
TOTAL
MET HVAC SYSTEM PERFORMANCE BASE CASE VRF+PTAC
ZONE OPERATIONAL UNMET HOURS
HOURS
HRS TOTAL ANNUAL HVAC
GF CLASSROOM CORE 2871 2871 9
ELECTRICITY

TOTAL COOLING LOAD / TOTAL HVAC ELECTRICITY

2871 2823 1 6 10
GF CLASS ROOM PERIMETER

x 10000
ADMINISTRATION OFFICE 9
CABINS
0 0 9
GROUND FLOOR

ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OPEN

0 0
8

ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION (KW)

FACULTY AREA 2610 2459 0 5

CELL CULTURE LAB PERIMETER
CELL CULTURE LAB CORE
BOYS COMMON ROOM
PERIMETER
CONSUMPTION (W/W)
0 0 7
0 0
4 6
0 4

0 3 5
BOYS COMMON ROOM CORE 5
CLASSROOM CORE FF 2871 2871 11
2871 2860 3 3 4
CLASS ROOM PERIMETER FF

SEMNAR ROOM PERIMETER

2610 2610 1 3
9
FIRST FLOOR

SEMINAR ROOM CORE 2610 2610

FACULTY AREA CABINS FF 2610 2604 1 2 2
FACULTY AREA OPEN FF 2610 2610 0
LIBRARY PERIMETER 0 3 1
LIBRARY CORE 0 4
GIRLS COMMON ROOM
2871 2866 4 1 0
PERIMETER
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 VRF SYSTEM PTAC SYSTEM
GIRLS COMMON ROOM CORE
0 4
OUTDOOR DBT (°C)
CONFERENCE ROOM SF 2610 2610 4
INCUBATES CABIN 4 2610 2610 3 • The HVAC system is underperforming as the electricity
ADMINISTRATION 2610 2610 0 CAPITAL COST TOTAL consumption of the ptac system is very high which is
INCUBATES CABIN 5 2610 2610 5
3000 bringing the performance of vrf system down.
CORE LAB 2871 2871 55 2,566
RUPEES x 10000

WEST PERIMETER LAB 2871 2871 21 2500 • Annual consumption of the vrf system is 1.6 times higher
NORTH PERIMETER LAB 2871 2860 15
1,867 than the vrf system while having a similar tonnage.
SECOND FLOOR

EAST PERIMETER LAB 2871 2871 4 2000

INCUBATES CABIN 1 PERIMETER
2610 2610 0 • All air-conditioned areas have unmet hours below 300.
1500
2610 2610 0 • The proposed case will be modeled such that the met
INCUBATES CABIN 2 PERIMETER
1000 hours do not increase the threshold of 300.
2610 2610 0
INCUBATES CABIN 3 PERIMETER
500
368 • Before moving forward it is also important to the annual
INCUBATES CABIN 1 CORE 2610 2610 0
INCUBATES CABIN 2 CORE 2610 2610 0
0
maintenance cost and electricity consumption which will
INCUBATES CABIN 3 CORE 2610 2610 0 help us understand ROI and annual savings done by
CAFETERIA PERIMETER 2871 2871 3 HVAC SYSTEM BUILDING ENVELOPE INTERNA PARTITIONS AND
CAFERERIA CORE 2871 2871 2 FLOORS introducing ECMs in proposed case
9/25/2023 WBD assignment-02 14
MOVING FORWARD

PROPOSAL OF
DAYLIGHTING SIMULATION AND
HVAC ZONING ECMS THAT WILL
ECBC STANDARD OPTIMIZATION REPORT RESULTS
ACCORDING TO HELP IN REDUCING
CASE VERIFICATION (KINETIC SHADING ACCORDING TO
CLIMATE ANALYSIS EPI WITH UN MET
DEVICE) ECMS.
THRESHOLD – 300

THANK YOU
9/25/2023 WBD assignment-02 15