Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis

Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

INSA de Rennes

12.12.2014
Action Items
1. Find out the maximum authorised Effective Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP).
61dBm/5 MHz to 65 dBm/5MHz in FDD downlink (in-block)
2. Find out the reason of (1) the mismatch between numeric solution and solution
obtained from EE vs SE curve for SEopt , (2) glitches on the curve plotted from
EE vs SE and (3) stepped variation of Ptopt .
-Less number of points
-Missing ln2
3. Modify the equation of SE (divide C by w. Not by w/K) and then plot the
curves again. Take rH = 0.5 km. Also take r = rH for parameter K and alpha.
Section 1
4. For showing the effect of r, consider the worst case of interference (Or take the
interferring BS power as different from the desired BS power).
Section 2
5. Plot also SIRopt , SNRopt for different parameters.
Section 1 and 2
6. Simulate f(v) for different alpha and K.
Section 3
7. Curve fitting.
Section 4
E. Commission, “On the harmonisation of the frequency bands 1 920-1 980
mhz and 2 110-2 170 mhz for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic
communications services in the union,” tech. rep., European Commission, 2012
2 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam
Outline

EE-SE Tradeoff for Interference Limited Hexagonal Cellular Network

(Same transmit power for the connected and interferring BS)

EE-SE Tradeoff for Interference Limited Hexagonal Cellular Network

(Different transmit power for the connected and interferring BS)

Simulation and Comparision with Theoretical Results

Curve Fitting

3 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

 Section 1

EE-SE Tradeoff for Interference Limited

Hexagonal Cellular Network (Same transmit
power for the connected and interferring BS)

4 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

System Parameters and Assumptions
Ï System bandwidth = w [Hz]
Ï Transmit power = Pt [W]
£ ¤
Ï Noise spectral density = No W/Hz
Ï Close-in reference distance = ro [m]
Ï Distance between transmitter and receiver = r [m]
Ï Path loss exponent = α
Ï Frequency Reuse Factor = K
Ï Cell Radius = rH [m]
Ï v = rrH
Ï Inter-cell Interference = I, No intra-cell interference
Ï Interference to desired signal ratio = f (v , α, K )
Ï Downlink direction
Ï Only one user
J.-M. Kelif, M. Coupechoux, and P. Godlewski, “A fluid model for performance
analysis in cellular networks,” EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications
and Networking, 2010
5 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam
SE and Pt Corresponding to Maximum EE I

User rate

w ³ Pt ( rHrov )−α ´ £ ¤
C = log2 1 + w b/s
K K No + I

Spectral Efficiency of the user

C 1 ³ Pt ( rHrov )−α ´ £ ¤
SE = = log2 1 + w b/s/Hz (1)
w K K No + I

From equation 1,

6 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

SE and Pt Corresponding to Maximum EE II

Pt ( rHrov )−α
w = 2KSE − 1
K No + I
1
⇔ w = 2KSE − 1
K No I
r v −α + rH v −α
Pt ( Hro ) Pt ( ro )

1
⇔ w = 2KSE − 1
K No
r v −α + f (v , α, K )
Pt ( Hro )
w
K No 1
⇔ + f (v , α, K ) =
Pt ( rHrov )−α 2KSE −1
w
K No 1
⇔ = − f (v , α, K )
Pt ( rHrov )−α 2KSE − 1

7 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

SE and Pt Corresponding to Maximum EE III

Pt ( rHrov )−α 1
⇔ w = 1
K No 2KSE −1
− f (v , α, K )
w KSE − 1)
rH v −α K No (2
⇔ Pt ( ) =
ro 1 − f (v , α, K )(2KSE − 1)
( rHrov )α K
w
No (2KSE − 1)
⇔ Pt =
1 − f (v , α, K )(2KSE − 1)

Total power assumed, Ptotal = aPt + b [W]

Here, a is the coefficienct for transmit power and b is the fixed
circuit power.

8 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

SE and Pt Corresponding to Maximum EE IV

Energy Efficiency

C
EE =
Ptotal
wSE
=
aPt + b
wSE
= r v αw [b/J]
( H
ro ) K No (2KSE −1)
a 1−f (v ,α,K )(2KSE −1) + b

9 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

SE and Pt Corresponding to Maximum EE V

r v α No
Putting x = ( H
ro ) K ,

∂EE ∂ wSE
=
∂SE ∂SE (2KSE −1)
axw +b
1−f (v ,α,K )(2KSE −1)

(2KSE −1) K ln2 2KSE 1−f (v ,α,K )(2KSE −1) +(2KSE −1)K ln2 f (v ,α,K )2KSE ´
³ ´ ³ ¡ ¢
axw + b − SE axw ¢2
1−f (v ,α,K )(2 KSE −1) 1−f (v ,α,K )(2KSE −1)
¡
=w
2
³
(2KSE −1) ´
axw +b
1−f (v ,α,K )(2KSE −1)
³
(2KSE −1) ´ ³
K ln2 2KSE
´
axw + b − SE axw ¡ ¢2
1−f (v ,α,K )(2KSE −1) 1−f (v ,α,K )(2 KSE −1)
=w
´2
³
(2KSE −1)
axw +b
1−f (v ,α,K )(2KSE −1)

10 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

SE and Pt Corresponding to Maximum EE VI
∂EE
As w 6= 0, putting ∂SE = 0,

(2KSE −1)
³ ´ ³ ´
K ln 2 2KSE
axw 1−f (v ,α,K )(2KSE −1) + b − SE axw ¡ ¢2
1−f (v ,α,K )(2KSE −1)
´2 =0
(2KSE −1)
³
axw 1−f (v ,α,K )(2KSE −1) +b
³ (2KSE − 1) ´ ³ K ln2 2KSE ´
⇔ axw + b − SE axw ¡
1 − f (v , α, K )(2KSE − 1)
¢2
1 − f (v , α, K )(2KSE − 1)
(2KSE − 1) K ln2 2KSE b
⇔ − SE ¢2 = −
1 − f (v , α, K )(2 KSE − 1) 1 − f (v , α, K )(2KSE − 1) axw
¡

multiplying both sides by 1 − f (v , α, K )(2KSE − 1) if

1
1 − f (v , α, K )(2KSE − 1) 6= 0 ⇔ 1 6= f (v , α, K )(2KSE − 1) ⇔ f (v ,α, K)
6=

11 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

SE and Pt Corresponding to Maximum EE VII
1
2KSE − 1 ⇔ f (v ,α, + 1 6= 2KSE ⇔ SE 6= K1 log2 1 + f (v ,α,
1
¡ ¢
K) K)
⇔
Noise 6= 0,
1
2KSE − 1 − KSE ln2 2KSE ¡
1 − f (v , α, K )(2KSE − 1)
¢

b ¡
1 − f (v , α, K )(2KSE − 1)
¢
=−
axw
Letting 2KSE − 1 = y ⇔ SE = K1 log2 (y + 1),

1 b ¡
1 − f (v , α, K )
¢
y − log2 (y + 1)(y + 1)ln2 =−
1 − f (v , α, K )y axw

No closed form expression for y. Solved it numerically and obtained

the SE corresponding to maximum EE, SEopt . Maximum Pt
rH v α w
( ro ) K No (2KSEopt −1)
corresponding to maximum EE,Ptopt =
1−f (v ,α,K )(2KSEopt −1)

12 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

Parameters for Plots

a =14.5
b =712 W
w =10 MHz
No =-168.83 dBm/Hz
ro =1.70 × 10−4 km
Carrier frequency, fc =1.8 GHz
α =3.5
rH =0.5 km
r = rH
K =1

G. Auer, V. Giannini, M. Olsson, M. J. Gonzalez, and C. Desset, “Framework for

energy efficiency analysis of wireless networks,” in 2nd International Conference
on Wireless VITAE, pp. 1–5, 2011
13 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam
EE-SE Trade-off for r I
³ ´
EE = r v
wSE
( H )α w No (2KSE −1)
;SE = K1 log2 1 +wN
1
K o
a ro K +b r v −α +fKL (v ,α,K )
Pt ( H
1−fKL (v ,α,K )(2KSE −1) ro )
p ( pv )α
1 4π 3 1
fKL (v , α, K ) = .676717−0.00561K +v (0.2297−0.00791K ) 3 α−2 (1− p v )α−2
3K

3K
4
x 10
18 20
r = 0.045 km From EE vs SE
16 18 numerical solution
r = 0.26 km
r= 0.5 km 16
14
14
12

SEopt (b/s/Hz)
12
EE (b/J)

10
10
8
8
6
6
4
4

2 2

0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
SE (b/s/Hz) r (km)

14 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

EE-SE Trade-off for r II
rH v α w
( ro ) K No (2KSEopt −1)
Ptopt =
1−fKL (v ,α,K )(2KSEopt −1)
5
x 10
20 4 20 2
(b/s/Hz)

SEopt (b/s/Hz)
EEmax (b/J)

(W)
10 2 10 1

opt
opt

Pt
SE

0 0 0 0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
r (km) r (km)

15 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

EE-SE Trade-off for r III
rH v −α
Ptopt ( ro )
SIRopt = fKL (v1,α,K ) , SNRopt = w
No
K

60 600

40 400

SNRopt
SIRopt

20 200

0 0
0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5
r (km)

16 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

EE-SE Trade-off for K I
³ ´
EE = r v
wSE
( H )α w No (2KSE −1)
;SE = K1 log2 1 + wN
1
K o
a ro K +b r v −α +fKL (v ,α,K )
Pt ( H
1−fKL (v ,α,K )(2KSE −1) ro )
p ( pv )α
1 4π 3 1
fKL (v , α, K ) = .676717−0.00561K +v (0.2297−0.00791K ) 3 α−2 (1− p v )α−2
3K

3K

12000 1
From EE vs SE
K=1
numerical solution
K=3 0.9
10000
K=4
0.8
8000

SEopt (b/s/Hz)
0.7
EE (b/J)

6000 0.6

0.5
4000
0.4
2000
0.3

0 0.2
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
SE (b/s/Hz) K

17 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

EE-SE Trade-off for K II
rH v α w
( ro ) K No (2KSEopt −1)
Ptopt =
1−fKL (v ,α,K )(2KSEopt −1)
4
x 10
1 2 1 3.5

0.8 3
SEopt (b/s/Hz)

(b/s/Hz)
EEmax (b/J)

(W)
0.5 1 0.6 2.5

opt
opt

t
P
SE
0.4 2

0 0 0.2 1.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
K K

18 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

EE-SE Trade-off for K III
rH v −α
Ptopt ( ro )
SIRopt = fKL (v1,α,K ) , SNRopt = w
No
K

160 400

140 350

120 300

100 250

SNRopt
SIRopt

80 200

60 150

40 100

20 50

0 0
0 5 10 15 20 25
K

19 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

EE-SE Trade-off for α I
³ ´
EE = r v
wSE
( H )α w No (2KSE −1)
;SE = K1 log2 1 + wN
1
K o
a ro K +b r v −α +fKL (v ,α,K )
Pt ( H
1−fKL (v ,α,K )(2KSE −1) ro )
p ( pv )α
1 4π 3 1
fKL (v , α, K ) = .676717−0.00561K +v (0.2297−0.00791K ) 3 α−2 (1− p v )α−2
3K

3K

6000 0.45
α=2.27 From EE vs SE
α=3.3 0.4 numerical solution
5000
α=3.64
0.35
4000

SEopt (b/s/Hz)
0.3
EE (b/J)

3000 0.25

0.2
2000
0.15
1000
0.1

0 0.05
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
SE (b/s/Hz) α

20 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

EE-SE Trade-off for α II
rH v α w
( ro ) K No (2KSEopt −1)
Ptopt =
1−fKL (v ,α,K )(2KSEopt −1)

0.6 6000 0.5 25

0.4 20

0.4 4000
SEopt (b/s/Hz)

SEopt (b/s/Hz)
EEmax (b/J)
0.3 15

(W)
opt
Pt
0.2 10
0.2 2000

0.1 5

0 0 0 0
2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
α α

21 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

EE-SE Trade-off for α III
rH v −α
Pt ( )
SIRopt = fKL (v1,α,K ) , SNRopt = optw Nroo
K
Pr (dB) = 10log10 Pt − 10α log10 r + 10α log10 ro ;
L(dB) = A + B log10 (r );Pr (dB) = 10log10 Pt − B log10 (r ) − A
0.5 500

SNRopt
SIRopt

0 0
2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
α

22 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

 Section 2

EE-SE Tradeoff for Interference Limited

Hexagonal Cellular Network (Different transmit
power for the connected and interferring BS)

23 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

System Parameters and Assumptions

Ï Desired BS Transmit power = Pt [W]

Ï Interferring BS Transmit power = PI [W]
Ï Inter-cell Interference = I, No intra-cell interference
Ï Interference to desired signal ratio,
PI rH v −α
Pt f (v , α, K ) ⇔ I = PI f (v , α, K )( ro )
I
rH v −α =
Pt ( ro )

24 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

SE and Pt Corresponding to Maximum EE I

User rate

w ³ Pt ( rHrov )−α ´ £ ¤
C = log2 1 + w b/s
K K No + I

Spectral Efficiency of the user

C 1 ³ Pt ( rHr v )−α ´
= log2 1 + w o
£ ¤
SE = b/s/Hz (2)
w K K No + I

25 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

SE and Pt Corresponding to Maximum EE II

From equation 2,

Pt ( rHrov )−α
w = 2KSE − 1
K No + I
Pt ( rHrov )−α
⇔ w rH v −α = 2KSE − 1
K No + PI f (v , α, K )( ro )
rH v −α ³ w rH v −α ´ KSE
⇔ Pt ( ) = No + PI f (v , α, K )( ) (2 − 1)
ro K ro
³w rH v α ´
⇔ Pt = No ( ) + PI f (v , α, K ) (2KSE − 1)
K ro

26 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

SE and Pt Corresponding to Maximum EE III
Energy Efficiency

wSE
EE =
aPt + b
wSE
= ³ ´
w rH v α
a K No ( ro ) + PI f (v , α, K ) (2KSE − 1) + b

∂EE ∂ wSE
=
∂SE ∂SE a w N ( rH v )α + P f (v , α, K ) (2KSE − 1) + b
³ ´
Ko r o I
³ ³ r v α KSE − 1) + b − SEK ln2 2KSE a w N ( rH v )α + P f (v , α, K )
a w No ( H
´ ´ ³ ´
K ro ) + PI f (v , α, K ) (2 K o ro I
=w
r v α KSE − 1) + b 2
³ ³
a w No ( H
´ ´
ro ) + PI f (v , α, K ) (2
K

∂EE
As w 6= 0, putting ∂SE = 0,
³ ¡ ´
a K No ( rHrov )α + PI f (v , α, K ) (2KSE − 1) + b −
w
¢

No ( rHrov )α + PI f (v , α, K ) = 0
¡w
SEK ln2 2KSE a K
¢

27 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

SE and Pt Corresponding to Maximum EE IV

Letting 2KSE − 1 = y ⇔ SE = K1 log2 (y + 1),

³ ¡ ´
w rH v α
K No ( ro ) + PI f (v , α, K ) y + b − log2 (y + 1)(y +
¢
a
w
No ( rHrov )α + PI f (v , α, K ) = 0
¡ ¢
1)ln2 a K
No closed form expression for y. Solved it numerically and obtained
the SE corresponding to maximum EE, SEopt . Maximum Pt
corresponding
³ to maximum EE, ´
w rH v α
Ptopt = K No ( ro ) + PI f (v , α, K ) (2KSEopt − 1)

28 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

Parameters for Plots

a =14.5
b =712 W
PI = 400 W
w =10 MHz
No =-168.83 dBm/Hz
ro =1.70 × 10−4 km
Carrier frequency, fc =1.8 GHz
α =3.5
rH =0.5 km
r = rH
K =1

G. Auer, V. Giannini, M. Olsson, M. J. Gonzalez, and C. Desset, “Framework for

energy efficiency analysis of wireless networks,” in 2nd International Conference
on Wireless VITAE, pp. 1–5, 2011
29 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam
EE-SE Trade-off for r I
wSE
EE = ¡ w rH v α
¢
a K No ( ro ) +PI fKL (v ,α,K ) (2KSE −1)+b
³ ´
SE = K1 log2 1 + wN
1
K o PI
r v −α + Pt fKL (v ,α,K )
Pt ( H
ro )
p ( pv )α
fKL (v , α, K ) = .676717−0.00561K +1v (0.2297−0.00791K ) 4π3 3 1 3K
α−2 (1− p v )α−2
3K
4
x 10
8 14
r = 0.045 km From EE vs SE
r = 0.26 km numerical solution
7 12
r= 0.5 km

6
10

SEopt (b/s/Hz)
5
8
EE (b/J)

4
6
3

4
2

1 2

0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
SE (b/s/Hz) r (km)

30 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

EE-SE Trade-off for r II
³ ´
w rH v α
Ptopt = K No ( ro ) + PI fKL (v , α, K ) (2KSEopt − 1)
5
x 10
20 2 20 400
(b/s/Hz)

SEopt (b/s/Hz)
EEmax (b/J)

(W)
10 1 10 200

opt
opt

Pt
SE

0 0 0 0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5
r (km) r (km)

31 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

EE-SE Trade-off for r III rH v −α
Pt Ptopt ( ro )
SIRopt = PI fKL (vopt,α,K ) , SNRopt = w
No
K
4
x 10
12 3

10 2.5

8 2

opt
SIRopt

SNR
6 1.5

4 1

2 0.5

0 0
0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5
r (km)
32 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam
EE-SE Trade-off for K I
wSE
EE = ¡ w rH v α
¢
a K No ( ro ) +PI fKL (v ,α,K ) (2KSE −1)+b
³ ´
SE = K1 log2 1 + wN
1
K o PI
r v −α + Pt fKL (v ,α,K )
Pt ( H
ro )
p ( pv )α
fKL (v , α, K ) = .676717−0.00561K +1v (0.2297−0.00791K ) 4π3 3 1 3K
α−2 (1− p v )α−2
3K

2000 0.4
K=1 From EE vs SE
1800 K=3 0.38 numerical solution
K=4
1600 0.36

1400 0.34

SEopt (b/s/Hz)
1200 0.32
EE (b/J)

1000 0.3

800 0.28

600 0.26

400 0.24

200 0.22

0 0.2
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
SE (b/s/Hz) K

33 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

EE-SE Trade-off for K II
³ ´
w rH v α
Ptopt = K No ( ro ) + PI fKL (v , α, K ) (2KSEopt − 1)

0.4 2000 0.4 400

0.35 300
SEopt (b/s/Hz)

SEopt (b/s/Hz)
EEmax (b/J)

(W)
0.3 1000 0.3 200

opt
Pt
0.25 100

0.2 0 0.2 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
K K

34 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

EE-SE Trade-off for K III
rH v −α
Ptopt Ptopt ( ro )
SIRopt = PI fKL (v ,α,K )
, SNRopt = w
K No

10 3000

opt
SIRopt

SNR
5 2000

0 1000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
K

35 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

EE-SE Trade-off for α I
wSE
EE = ¡ w rH v α
¢
a K No ( ro ) +PI fKL (v ,α,K ) (2KSE −1)+b
³ ´
SE = K1 log2 1 + wN
1
K o PI
r v −α + Pt fKL (v ,α,K )
Pt ( H
ro )
p ( pv )α
fKL (v , α, K ) = .676717−0.00561K +1v (0.2297−0.00791K ) 4π3 3 1 3K
α−2 (1− p v )α−2
3K

700 0.5
α=2.61
From EE vs SE
α=3.3 0.45
600 numerical solution
α=4.5
0.4
500

SEopt (b/s/Hz)
0.35
400
EE (b/J)

0.3
300
0.25

200
0.2

100 0.15

0 0.1
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
SE (b/s/Hz) α

36 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

EE-SE Trade-off for α II
³ ´
w rH v α
Ptopt = K No ( ro ) + PI fKL (v , α, K ) (2KSEopt − 1)

0.45 800 0.5 1100

0.4 700 0.45 1000

0.35 600 0.4 900

SEopt (b/s/Hz)

SEopt (b/s/Hz)
0.3 500 0.35 800

EEmax (b/J)

(W)
0.25 400 0.3 700

opt
Pt
0.2 300 0.25 600

0.15 200 0.2 500

0.1 100 0.15 400

0.05 0 0.1 300

2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
α α

37 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

EE-SE Trade-off for α III
rH v −α
Pt Ptopt ( ro )
SIRopt = PI fKL (vopt,α,K ) , SNRopt = w
No
K
6
x 10
0.6 4

SNRopt
SIRopt

0.4 2

0.2 0
3 3.5 4 4.5
α

38 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

 Section 3

Simulation and Comparision with Theoretical

Results

39 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

Assumptions and Parameters

Ï Hexagonal Cellular Network

Ï Downlink
Ï Same BS transmit power
Ï sectorisation=0
Ï Number of rings=21
Ï ro =1.70 × 10−4 km
Ï rH =0.5 km
Ï v = rrH , r is the distance of a user from the BS
r
( roj )−α
P
rj
Ï fsim (v ) = rH v −α , rj is the distance of a receiver from the
( ro )
interferring BSs

40 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

Comparision with Kelif’s Equation I

α=2.5 α=3
6 4
fK(v) for K=1 fK(v) for K=1
fsim(v) for K=1 3.5 fsim(v) for K=1
5
fsim(v) for K=3 fsim(v) for K=3
3
fsim(v) for K=4 fsim(v) for K=4
4
fsim(v) for K=7 2.5 fsim(v) for K=7
f(v)

f(v)
3 2

1.5
2
1
1
0.5

0 0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
v v

41 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

Comparision with Kelif’s Equation II

α=3.5 α=4
3.5 3
fK(v) for K=1 fK(v) for K=1

3 fsim(v) for K=1 fsim(v) for K=1

2.5
fsim(v) for K=3 fsim(v) for K=3
2.5 fsim(v) for K=4 fsim(v) for K=4
2
fsim(v) for K=7 fsim(v) for K=7
2
f(v)

f(v)
1.5
1.5

1
1

0.5
0.5

0 0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
v v

42 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

Comparision with Kelif-Lagrange’s Equation I

α=2.5 α=3
7 4
fKL(v) for K=1 fKL(v) for K=1
6 fKL(v) for K=3 3.5
fKL(v) for K=3
fKL(v) for K=4 fKL(v) for K=4
3
5
fKL(v) for K=7 fKL(v) for K=7
fsim(v) for K=1 2.5
fsim(v) for K=1
4
fsim(v) for K=3 fsim(v) for K=3
f(v)

f(v)
2
3 fsim(v) for K=4 fsim(v) for K=4
fsim(v) for K=7 1.5
fsim(v) for K=7
2
1

1 0.5

0 0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
v v

43 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

Comparision with Kelif-Lagrange’s Equation II

α=3.5 α=4
3 2.5
fKL(v) for K=1 fKL(v) for K=1

fKL(v) for K=3 fKL(v) for K=3

2.5
2
fKL(v) for K=4 fKL(v) for K=4

fKL(v) for K=7 fKL(v) for K=7

2
fsim(v) for K=1 1.5 fsim(v) for K=1

fsim(v) for K=3 fsim(v) for K=3

f(v)

f(v)
1.5
fsim(v) for K=4 fsim(v) for K=4
1
fsim(v) for K=7 fsim(v) for K=7
1

0.5
0.5

0 0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
v v

44 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

 Section 4

Curve Fitting

45 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

Quadratic Equations
Ï K=1, ffit (v , α) =
2.793 + 1.8872v − 1.843α − 1.4695v α + 5.380v 2 + 0.3244α2
Ï K=3,
ffit (v , α) = .747 + 1.061v −.5417α −.4054v α +.5807v 2 + 0.096α2
K=1 K=3
5 0.8
fsim(v) for α=2.5 fsim(v) for α=2.5
0.7 fsim(v) for α=3
fsim(v) for α=3
4
fsim(v) for α=3.5 0.6 fsim(v) for α=3.5

fsim(v) for α=4 fsim(v) for α=4

3 0.5
ffit(v) for α=2.5 ffit(v) for α=2.5
0.4 ffit(v) for α=3
ffit(v) for α=3
f(v)

f(v)
2
ffit(v) for α=3.5 0.3 ffit(v) for α=3.5

ffit(v) for α=4 ffit(v) for α=4

1 0.2

0.1
0
0

−1 −0.1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
v v

46 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

 Ï K=4,
ffit (v , α) = .5255 +.7311v −.3808α−.2701v α+.3409v 2 +.0672α2
Ï K=7,
ffit (v , α) = .2752 +.3486v −.1964α −.1229v α +.1294v 2 +.034α2
K=4 K=7
0.6 0.3
fsim(v) for α=2.5 fsim(v) for α=2.5

0.5 fsim(v) for α=3 0.25 fsim(v) for α=3

fsim(v) for α=3.5 fsim(v) for α=3.5

0.4 fsim(v) for α=4 0.2 fsim(v) for α=4

ffit(v) for α=2.5 ffit(v) for α=2.5

0.3 0.15
ffit(v) for α=3 ffit(v) for α=3
f(v)

f(v)
ffit(v) for α=3.5 ffit(v) for α=3.5
0.2 0.1
ffit(v) for α=4 ffit(v) for α=4

0.1 0.05

0 0

−0.1 −0.05
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
v v

47 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

 α=2.5,K=1 α=3,K=1
4.5 3.5
fsim(v) fsim(v)
4 3
ffit(v) ffit(v)
3.5
2.5
3
2
2.5
f(v)

f(v)
1.5
2
1
1.5
0.5
1

0.5 0

0 −0.5
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
v v

48 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

 α=3.5,K=1 α=4,K=1
3 2.5
fsim(v)
fsim(v)
2.5 ffit(v)
ffit(v) 2

2
1.5

1.5
f(v)

f(v)
1
1

0.5
0.5

0
0

−0.5 −0.5
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
v v

49 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

 α=2.5,K=3 α=3,K=3
0.8 0.6
fsim(v) fsim(v)
0.7
ffit(v) 0.5 ffit(v)
0.6
0.4
0.5

0.4 0.3
f(v)

f(v)
0.3 0.2

0.2
0.1
0.1
0
0

−0.1 −0.1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
v v

50 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

 α=3.5,K=3 α=4,K=3
0.3 0.14
fsim(v) fsim(v)

0.25 0.12 ffit(v)

ffit(v)

0.1
0.2

0.08
0.15
f(v)

f(v)
0.06
0.1
0.04

0.05
0.02

0 0

−0.05 −0.02
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
v v

51 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

Third Order Equation

K=1, ffit (v , α) = v 3 +α3 + v 2 α+ v α2 + 2(v 2 +α2 ) + 2v α+ 3(v +α) + 4;

α=2.5,K=1 α=3,K=1
5 3.5
fsim(v) fsim(v)
ffit(v) 3
4 ffit(v)

2.5
3
2
f(v)

f(v)
2 1.5

1
1
0.5
0
0

−1 −0.5
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
v v

52 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

 α=3.5,K=1 α=4,K=1
3 2.5
fsim(v) fsim(v)

2.5 ffit(v) ffit(v)

2

2
1.5

1.5
f(v)

f(v)
1
1

0.5
0.5

0
0

−0.5 −0.5
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
v v

53 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

 α=2.5,K=3 α=3,K=3
0.8 0.6
fsim(v) fsim(v)
0.7
ffit(v) 0.5 ffit(v)

0.6
0.4
0.5

0.4 0.3
f(v)

f(v)
0.3 0.2

0.2
0.1
0.1
0
0

−0.1 −0.1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
v v

54 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

 α=3.5,K=3 α=4,K=3
0.25 0.14
fsim(v) fsim(v)
0.12
ffit(v) ffit(v)
0.2
0.1

0.08
0.15
0.06
f(v)

f(v)
0.04
0.1
0.02

0
0.05

−0.02

0 −0.04
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
v v

55 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

 α=2.5,K=4 α=3,K=4
0.6 0.3
fsim(v) fsim(v)

0.5 ffit(v) 0.25 ffit(v)

0.4 0.2

0.3 0.15
f(v)

f(v)
0.2 0.1

0.1 0.05

0 0

−0.1 −0.05
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
v v

56 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

 α=3.5,K=4 α=4,K=4
0.14 0.08
fsim(v) fsim(v)

0.12 ffit(v) ffit(v)

0.06

0.1
0.04

0.08
f(v)

f(v)
0.02
0.06

0
0.04

−0.02
0.02

0 −0.04
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
v v

57 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

 α=2.5,K=7 α=3,K=7
0.3 0.12
fsim(v) fsim(v)
ffit(v) ffit(v)
0.25 0.1

0.2 0.08

0.15 0.06
f(v)

f(v)
0.1 0.04

0.05 0.02

0 0

−0.05 −0.02
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
v v

58 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam

 α=3.5,K=7 α=4,K=7
0.045 0.02
fsim(v)
fsim(v)
0.04
ffit(v) 0.015
ffit(v)
0.035
0.01
0.03

0.025 0.005
f(v)

f(v)
0.02 0

0.015
−0.005
0.01
−0.01
0.005

0 −0.015
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
v v

59 Progress Meeting of the PhD Thesis Ahmad Mahbubul Alam