Professional Documents
Culture Documents
for
Health and Performance
Why?
Self-Belief-Certainties of High Performance-Goals
Self-Appraisal
1
High Performance “is a level playing field until PRESSURE emerges
and those who ‘walk towards it’ and have a ‘skillset’ that enables them
to navigate the inevitable obstacles that populate this terrain, will
ultimately prevail and be rightfully crowned CHAMPIONS.”-Gilbert
Enoka (All Blacks)
2
Intention of this Activity Based Introduction
At this point, you would have received your ThinkWell for Health & Performance
(Mindfulness Based Cognitive Training) Handbook which outlines the intentions,
purpose, and safety issues of the programme.
Before you meet your programme trainer for the Orientation Session, please read
through this activity based introduction and write down any reflections.
The activity captures the key targets and processes which we will be working on
during the programme.
We will now explore Self-Belief, Four Certainties of Performance, Goals, and Self-
Appraisal.
Self-Appraisal basically means how we think about our experiences and how we Self-
Appraise, effects our level of Self-Belief. Self-Belief is generally referred to as
confidence.
1.Self-Belief
Give This a Go!
3
2. If someone opposes me, I can find skilful means and ways to approach my target.
7. I can remain calm when facing difficulties because I can rely on my performance
based skills and coping abilities.
The total score is calculated by adding up what you scored for each question. The
total score ranges between 10 and 40, with a higher score indicating higher levels of
Self-Belief.
However, it does not matter whether you scored high or low, because now we know
what needs working on. Either establishing, strengthening, or maintaining your level
of Self-Belief. Or what is often found for high performers all three, because our levels
of Self-Belief do not remain the same, they are not static. Sometimes our Self-Belief
is higher and at other times it’s lower. This programme aims to support performers to
build skills to establish greater consistency and balance with levels of Self-Belief.
Self-Belief is having the belief you can master your environment and effectively
solve problems as they arise.
4
People with high levels of Self-Belief stay committed to solving their problems,
don’t give up when their original solution didn’t work and seek new solutions and
persist until they find a workable solution to the challenge or obstacle.
When we train the mind, it’s like strengthening a mental muscle. It is a similar
process to your strength and conditioning, technical and tactical training, they all
need time and a deliberate progressive approach.
5
2. A Healthy Understanding & the Four Certainties of High
Performance
A Healthy Understanding
6
Four Certainties of High Performance
3. You can choose how to perceive pressure (or how to think, feel and
relate to it)
Question:
7
3. Contemplation of the Two Goal Orientations & Research
Simply reflect on the 2 goal orientations offered below and ask yourself
the following questions:
A) When you are pursuing a goal, how do you think about it?
B) Which one of the following two goal orientations is the dominate source of
your motivation when pursing a goal?
Note: The difference between the thinking styles of the two goal orientations
may appear quite subtle (or ultra-fine).
Be Good Goal
When thinking about doing well with a goal from the perspective of a Be
Good Goal it means:
Proving to myself and others I’m good…proving that I’m smart… proving I’m
effective…proving I’m talented and an expert…proving I have what it takes to
others and myself.
When thinking about doing well with a goal from the perspective of a
Get Better Goal it means:
8
Research Based Contemplation:
It’s not just a change in language but a change in thinking. This results in the
person becoming more intrinsically motivated (when we are moved to act
for the fun or challenge entailed rather than because of external pressures, or
rewards) facilitating:
9
Ask yourself:
Experiment Now!
These Trigger Words may be introduced when you think, plan, or speak
about training and competition. Simply include these words in conversations,
discussions and when planning:
• Improve
• Develop
• Progress
• Grow
• Become
10
4.Bit of Theory: How Self-Belief is Constructed through the
Process of Self-Appraisal
Confidence is the most important single factor in this game, and no matter how great
your natural talent, there is only one way to obtain and sustain it: work-Jack
Nicklaus
11
Self-awareness is the first step towards learning and growth in all fields of
high performance. So, let’s reflect on the question on page 12, after reading
through this section on Self-Belief and Self-Appraisal.
Self-Belief is not a trait people are born with, but an ability which we can all build,
maintain and strengthen (through training our attention, awareness, attitude, and
action on the FACT programme).
The training or working with our Self-Belief requires effort, careful planning,
persistence, choosing the right strategies and learning how to deal with
obstacles.
1. Past performance
12
Typical Process of Negative Self-Appraisal (Less Constrained by Reality)
If our Self-Appraisal of a specific event or performance (at pre, during and post)
is negative, influenced by emotions, over-personalised or over-identified with
(‘I’m defined by my sport. I am my results’), the Appraisal will be less constrained
by reality. This then generates a training and performance cycle that limits our
capacity to:
Negative Self-Appraisal restricts our perspective and engagement at pre, during and
post-performance, because our capacity for decision making and reflection is
affected by the tendency to monitor how we think things are and compare them with
how we think things should be’ (Feldman & Kuyken, 2019). This appraisal style of
comparing how our actual experience is, with how we think it should be, how we’d
like to be, how it was in the past, and so on, is referred to as discrepancy thinking.
On one level, there is nothing inherently wrong with this mode of mind that seeks to
make comparisons and find solutions to an intended goal in the external world, like
making a meal or planning a training timetable. ‘The basic strategy to achieve such
goals involves the discrepancy monitor. We monitor progress to see whether the
gap is increasing or decreasing and adjust our actions accordingly. We know we
have reached our goal when our idea of how things are coincides with our idea of
how we want them to be’ (Segal, Williams & Teasdale, 2012). So, this approach
often referred to as the doing mode is very effective when working towards, solving,
and achieving impersonal and external goals. However, if we apply this approach
when we are working with our personal and internal worlds of thoughts and
feelings, which influence the cognitive appraisal process of Self-Belief, ‘it can
all go terribly wrong’ (Segal, Williams & Teasdale, 2012).
The doing mode is a very effective problem solving strategy, especially when
applied to impersonal and external goals. But once the self becomes involved,
any attempt through the doing mode to find solutions to reduce the discrepancy gap
between how we think things are and how we think things should be, just leads the
mind into going round and round, dwelling, judging, basically, ruminating.
13
When we attempt to fix the perceived personal and internal effects of
performance through a doing mode of mind, any felt negative states tend to
intensify through a feedback loop of:
o thoughts (e.g., Why does this always happen to me? I’m never going
to succeed.)
What we think, affects emotions, the emotions affect the body, the body effects the
thinking, and this effects our behaviour. How we then behave effects our thoughts,
feelings, and body sensations. As you can see, thoughts, feelings, body
sensations and behaviour are all interrelated.
This state of mind body restricts our cognitive capacity to Self-Appraise and to
process the reality of the situation or event in the present moment. This
compromises our decision making, leaving it difficult to know what is required as the
best response in the situation. It limits are potential to learn and adapt from our
experiences.
The type of questions we may ask ourselves when the Self-Appraisal of the
four domains (past performance, verbal persuasion, or feedback from others,
observing and comparing ourselves to others and observing what’s going on in our
own body and mind) is less constrained by reality and more personalised and
negative:
Why me?
Why do I feel and think like this
14
Why does this happen to me?
Why can’t I remember anything that’s gone well
Why can’t I get going or just get it right like in training?
What does this mean?
What are the consequences of this?
What have I done to deserve this?
What will others think of me?
Why does this keep happening to me
Why do I feel and think like this
It is worth mentioning that these thoughs are simply attempts to find solutions to a
problem, difficulty or when we have got stuck and it can occur subconsciously and
automatically.
If our Self-Appraisal of a specific event or performance (at pre, during and post)
is more reality based, less influenced by emotions, non-personalised or non-
identified with (‘I’m not defined by my sport. I am not my results’), the Appraisal
will be constrained by reality. This then generates a training and performance
cycle that expands our capacity to:
Through a reality based Self-Appraisal view we can detect any triggers, early signs
of negative thoughts and emotions and provide a capacity to decide how best to
respond skilfully. For example: decentering from the thoughts (stepping back from
them), not trying to fix or resolve them, not taking them personally or believing them
to be facts but accepting them for what they are, basically, just thoughts, which are
passing events of the mind.
An increase in our scope to act skilfully when under pressure, brings greater
consistency and leads to an increased frequency in positive reality based Self-
Appraisal. This process enables an acknowledgement and perspective of where we
are now and how we may approach learning, strengthening, and adaptation by
deliberate practice-improving, and maintaining an alignment with our goals, purpose,
and values. This may lead to an increased capacity to regulate our emotions pre,
during and at post-performance, with a general increase in our levels of motivation.
15
This reality based approach to Self-Appraisal, requires effort, careful planning,
persistence, choosing the right strategies and learning how to deal with
obstacles.
When we practice these skills, the level of Self-Belief will be higher and we will be
better able to maintain a balance, increasing the potential of us perceiving events
as a challenge, responding to what is required and increasing our performance
potential.
The type of questions we ask ourselves when the Self-Appraisal of the four
domains (past performance, verbal persuasion, or feedback from others, observing
and comparing ourselves to others and observing what’s going on in our own body
and mind) is positively constrained by reality, supporting disengagement from
over personalised negative thinking, helping us to regulate our emotions,
which facilitates a perception of pressure as a challenge to test our skills,
encouraging us to consistently approach these situations to learn and adapt
are as follows:
The programme trains you through attention, awareness, attitude, and action
based practices and exercises in how to spot the triggers and conditions that activate
negative states of mind and how we may decentre or disengage from the patterns of
negative over thinking, which will allow and facilitate a shift in thinking towards the
more reality and responsive based thinking styles.
16
Questions: What specific moments and types of experience have you noticed
effect your levels of Self-Belief? Is it possible to reflect on examples of both high
and low levels of Self-Belief and the effects on performance and recovery? Has
there been a time where you spotted low levels of Self-Belief and you were able to
rebalance and shift the appraisal to more positive reality based Self-Appraisal-a
higher level of Self-Belief.
Recommended Reading
We highly recommend in supporting your mental performance & mindset
training, High Performance by Jake Humphrey and Prof. Damian
Hughes, we.
17
Further Notes:
Self-Belief Questions: Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In J.
Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and
control beliefs
Getting Better Goal- Related to intrinsic motivation. Getting Better Goal orientation is constrained
by reality-based appraisals with increased Higher Executive brain Functioning involvement including
proficiency in adaptable thinking, planning, self-monitoring, self-control, working memory, time
management, and organization. Related to higher levels of Self-Belief.
Be Good Goal orientation is less constrained by reality-based appraisals with increased activity of the
brain’s Default Mode linked to self-referential thinking, including automatic mind-wandering closely
connected with negative states of mind and usually involves thinking about others, thinking about
oneself, remembering the past, and envisioning the future rather than the task being performed.
Related to lower levels of Self-Belief.
Increased dominance of an extrinsic motivation widens the discrepancy thinking gap with Ideal and
Shoulds/Oughts which are thought based self-guides.
18