Professional Documents
Culture Documents
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00764-023-00221-8
Received: 7 October 2022 / Accepted: 30 December 2022 / Published online: 28 January 2023
© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2023
Abstract
People all over the world are affected by the chronic, disabling autoimmune illness known as rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Herbal products are more commonly used in treating RA as of their safety and efficacy. The selected formulation for the
present study is ANTARTH capsules, which is a polyherbal formulation containing different herbs effective in the treat-
ment of RA. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a precise, accurate, novel high-performance thin-layer
chromatography (HPTLC) method for the simultaneous estimation of quercetin, berberine, rutin, and curcumin and to deter-
mine the levels in a polyherbal formulation. A good chromatographic separation was accomplished using a mobile phase
consisting of toluene‒ethyl acetate‒methanol‒formic acid (5:3:2:0.5, V/V ) with wavelengths of 366 nm and 426 nm using
an ultraviolet‒visible (UV‒VIS) detector. The retention factors for quercetin, berberine, rutin, and curcumin were found
to be 0.57, 0.316, 0.093, and 0.663, respectively. A good linear regression relationship between peak areas and concentra-
tions was obtained with correlation coefficients of 0.9988, 0.9987, 0.9977, and 0.9984 for quercetin, rutin, berberine, and
curcumin, respectively. The method developed was found to be accurate, precise, and robust. The method was then applied in
a marketed formulation (ANTARTH capsule), and the percent content was found to be 5.26 ± 1.09, 4.76 ± 0.83, 3.80 ± 0.94
and 7.62 ± 1.58 for quercetin, rutin, berberine, and curcumin, respectively.
Keywords Rheumatoid arthritis · Quercetin · Rutin · Berberine · Curcumin · High-performance thin-layer chromatography
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
64 JPC – Journal of Planar Chromatography – Modern TLC (2023) 36:63–70
Quercetin is a flavone, which is a subclass of flavo- for Human Use (ICH) Q2 (R1) guideline, the method was
noids, chemically it is 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3,5,7- validated and the applicability of the method was tested
trihydroxychromen-4-one [7]. It can be found in a variety by analyzing the marketed formulation.
of fruits and vegetables, including black currant, black
tea, onion (Allium cepa Linn.), and apple (Malus pumila
Miller) (Ribes nigrum Linn.). It plays a part in a variety 2 Experimental
of processes including those that are antioxidative, anti-
carcinogenic, anti-inflammatory, anti-aggregatory, and 2.1 Materials and method
vasodilation [8, 9]. Buckwheat, asparagus, leaves and
petioles of rheum species contain rutin, a citrus flavonoid 2.1.1 Phytochemical standards
glycoside [10]. Chemically it is 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-
5,7-dihydroxy-3-[(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy- Curcumin was obtained as a gift sample from Omni Active
[[(2R,3R,4R,5R,6S)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-methyloxan-2-yl] Health Technologies (Pune, India). Quercetin and rutin were
oxymethyl]oxan-2-yl]oxychromen-4-one [11]. It thins the purchased from Yucca Enterprises (Mumbai, India) and
blood, inhibits platelet aggregation, reduces capillary per- berberine was purchased from Yarrow Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.
meability, thereby enhances circulation [12]. Berberine, (Mumbai, India).
phytoconstituent present in daruhaldi [13], chemically is
16,17-dimethoxy-5,7-dioxa-13-azoniapentacycl-henic- 2.1.2 Marketed formulation
osa-1,2,4,9,14,16,18,20-octaene. It is a well-known anti-
inflammatory agent useful in a wide variety of disorders ANTARTH capsules (Millennium Life Sciences; Delhi,
including hypercholesterolemia, hypertension [14]. Cur- India) used for the study was procured from a local pharmacy.
cuma longa Linn., a common Indian spice plant, yields the Each 600-mg capsule contains the following herbs: Gug-
yellow pigment curcumin [15]. Chemically it is (1E,6E)- gul (Boswellia serrate), 15 mg; Methi (Trigonella foenum),
1,7-bis(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)hepta-1,6-diene- 6.6 mg; Shuddha guggul (Commiphora mukul), 21.4 mg;
3,5-dione. The antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, Nirgundi (Vitex negundo), 5.5 mg; Ashwagandha (Withania
antibacterial, antifungal, and anticancer features are some somnifera), 12.5 mg; Punarnava (Boerhaavia diffusa), 5.8 mg;
of the potent properties of curcumin. Researchers believe Chopchini (Smilax china), 10 mg; Trikatu (Piper longum,
that curcumin offers a great potential for treating a vari- Piper nigrum, Zingiber officinale), 7.1 mg; Gokshura (Tribu-
ety of illnesses, including allergies, diabetes, Alzheimer’s lus terrestris); 5 mg; Triphala (Terminalia chebula, Terminalia
disease, and arthritis [16]. belerica, Emblica officinalis), 25 mg; Guduchi (Tinospora cor-
The combination of the above four biomarkers is pre- difolia), 8.3 mg; Shuddha shilajit (Asphaltum), 8.3 mg; Haridra
sent in the marketed formulation product ANTARTH (Curcuma longa), 8.3 mg.
capsule used in the management of RA. So, in order to
ensure that quality is not compromised, numerous analyti- 2.1.3 Chemicals
cal techniques like high-performance liquid chromatog-
raphy (HPLC), liquid chromatography‒mass spectrom- Toluene, ethyl acetate, methanol and formic acid of analytical
etry (LC‒MS), gas chromatography‒mass spectrometry reagent grade were acquired from Merck Chemicals (Mumbai,
(GC‒MS) and high-performance thin-layer chromatogra- India).
phy (HPTLC) are used either alone or in combination for
product assessment. 2.2 Instrumentation
A literature review found different analytical tech-
niques for estimating these chosen markers either alone The employed HPTLC system included a CAMAG Lino-
or in combination with other markers. So far, simultaneous mat 5 semi-automatic spotting device (CAMAG, Muttenz,
HPTLC estimation of these selected markers has not been Switzerland), operated by visionCATS software (V 3.15,
reported. Therefore, in the present study, an attempt was CAMAG). On pre-coated silica gel 60 F254 aluminum plates
made to develop a new HPTLC method for the simultane- (20 cm × 20 cm, 250 μm thickness), the HPTLC system sample
ous estimation of quercetin, rutin, berberine and curcumin. application was carried out using a 100-μL Hamilton syringe
In accordance with the International Council for Harmo- (Bonaduz, Switzerland). A CAMAG twin-trough glass cham-
nisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals ber (20 cm × 10 cm) with a stainless steel top was used for
plate development. In CAMAG TLC Visualizer 2, visual
13
JPC – Journal of Planar Chromatography – Modern TLC (2023) 36:63–70 65
image was captured at 254 and 366 nm and CAMAG TLC 2.5 Validation of the method
Scanner 3 was used for densitometric analysis. As radiation
source, tungsten and deuterium lamps were employed. The ICH recommendations were used to verify the devel-
oped HPTLC method for the simultaneous determination
2.3 Preparation of stock solutions of quercetin, rutin, berberine, and curcumin for linearity,
precision, robustness, limit of detection (LOD), limit of
Accurately weighed 10 mg of quercetin, rutin, berberine, quantification (LOQ), and recovery as per ICH Q2 (R1) [17].
and curcumin were dissolved in 10 mL of methanol sepa-
rately to get a concentration of 1000 μg/mL; then aliquots 2.5.1 Linearity
of the above solution were accurately withdrawn and diluted
with methanol to get concentrations of 500 μg/mL, 100 μg/ Different volumes in the range of 1–6 μL for quercetin and
mL, and 50 μg/mL for quercetin, berberine, and curcumin, rutin and 2–7 μL for berberine and curcumin were applied
respectively, whereas the same stock solution of 1000 µg/ on TLC plate to obtain the concentrations of 500–3000 ng/
mL was used for rutin. spot, 1000–6000 ng/spot, 200–700 ng/spot and 100–350 ng/
spot, respectively. The calibration curves were constructed
2.4 HPTLC method development and optimization by plotting respective peak areas vs. concentrations of the
of chromatographic conditions four standards.
The plate used for HPTLC method development was cut of 2.5.2 Precision
6 cm × 10 cm and applied 6 mm sample band each, i.e., 2
μL of quercetin (500 μg/mL),5 μL of rutin (1000 μg/mL), 5 Both intra-day and inter-day method’s repeatability and
μL of berberine (100 μg/mL) and 3 µL of curcumin (50 μg/ reproducibility were performed. The intra-day repeatability
mL) and at 10 mm distance between bands. The plates were was assessed by injecting six replicates of 1000 ng/spot for
pre-saturated for 20 min with the mobile phase consisting quercetin, 2000 ng/spot for rutin, 400 ng/spot for berberine,
of toluene‒ethyl acetate‒methanol‒formic acid (5:3:2:0.5, 150 ng/spot for curcumin, on the same day. Repeating the
V/V) and then developed in ascending position. The length same process served to demonstrate inter-day repeatability
of each run was 8 cm. The plate run took 15 min. The plate with the same concentrations for quercetin, rutin, berberine
was dried, visualized at 254 and 366 nm and then scanned and curcumin for three days. The percent relative standard
in an absorbance mode at 366 nm and 425 nm. The slit size deviation (%RSD) was used to validate the repeatability and
was set at 5 mm × 0.45 mm, and the scanning speed was reproducibility of the method.
20 mm/s. Table 1 summarizes the optimized chromato-
graphic conditions.
13
66 JPC – Journal of Planar Chromatography – Modern TLC (2023) 36:63–70
2.5.3 Robustness 2.5.5 Recovery
Small purposeful adjustments to the mobile phase composi- The accuracy of the method was determined from recovery
tion, saturation time, and development distance were made studies. Recovery studies were carried out by spiking 80%,
for robustness experiments. The mobile phase composition of 100%, and 120% of the standard markers onto the sample solu-
toluene‒ethyl acetate was changed by ± 0.2 (V/V); saturation tions. The experiment was carried out in triplicate.
time was changed by ± 5 min, and development distance was
changed by ± 5 cm. The %RSD of the peak area was subse- 2.5.6 Standardization of herbal formulation
quently calculated.
To determine the content of quercetin, rutin, berberine and
2.5.4 Sensitivity curcumin in the extract of the marketed formulation of
ANTARTH capsule, accurately weighed five capsules were
The LOD is the smallest amount of analyte that, under specific added in a 25-mL volumetric flask containing 15 mL metha-
experimental circumstances, can be found in a sample but is nol. Further, the mixture was sonicated for 30 min, cooled
not always measured. The lowest amount of an analyte that and the volume was made up to the mark using methanol.
can be detected and quantified with respectable accuracy, pre- This solution was centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000 rpm and
cision, is called LOQ. The standard error approach was used the supernatant was filtered and used for the study. Then 5 µL
to determine LOD and LOQ. They were calculated using the and 10 µL of extract sample were applied on the TLC plate
following equations utilizing the slope of the calibration (S) followed by development and scanning. Three repetitions were
curve and the standard error of the y-intercept (σ): performed, and the percent contents were determined using the
𝜎 formula as follows:
LOD = 3.3 ×
S Percent content in formulation (%)
Area of sample Weight of standard
𝜎 = ×
LOQ = 10 × Area of standard Weight of sample
S
× Dilution factor × 100
Fig. 1 HPTLC plate for the four markers, i.e., quercetin, rutin, berberine and curcumin along with sample on visualization at 366 nm (a). Densi-
togram of the mixed standard solution at optimized chromatographic condition (b)
13
JPC – Journal of Planar Chromatography – Modern TLC (2023) 36:63–70 67
Fig. 2 Linearity densitogram overlay of a rutin and quercetin; b berberine and curcumin
Table 3 Intra–day and inter-day precision results reported as mean 3.2 Development of the optimized mobile phase
area ± SD and %RSD
Intra-day precision Inter-day precision The HPTLC conditions were established by taking different
Mean area ± SD %RSD Mean area ± SD %RSD trials with varying ratios of mobile phase. The mobile phase
of toluene‒ethyl acetate‒methanol‒formic acid (5:3:2:0.5,
Quercetin 0.0136 ± 0.0002 1.4 0.0118 ± 0.0002 1.4 V/V) with a saturation time of 20 min and a development dis-
Rutin 0.0186 ± 0.0002 0.9 0.0177 ± 0.0003 1.7 tance of 8 cm gave good symmetric and resolved peaks. This
Berberine 0.0079 ± 0.0001 1.7 0.0074 ± 0.0001 1.5 mobile phase resulted in RF values of 0.57 ± 0.02 for quercetin,
Curcumin 0.0115 ± 0.0002 1.8 0.0125 ± 0.0002 1.9 0.09 ± 0.02 for rutin, 0.30 ± 0.02 for berberine, and 0.66 ± 0.02
SD standard deviation, %RSD percent relative standard deviation
for curcumin, respectively, and are shown in Fig. 1.
3.3 Linearity
3 Results and discussion
The linearity range, correlation coefficient and regression
3.1 Wavelength selection
equation for the four marker standards are represented in
Table 2. Figure 2 shows the densitogram overlay of each
To acquire the absorption spectrum, all the four marker
standard over their respective concentration ranges.
standards in HPTLC were scanned between 200 and
700 nm. Quercetin, rutin, and berberine displayed maxi-
mum absorbance (max) at 366 nm, while curcumin did 3.4 Precision
so at 425 nm.
The computed intra-day and inter-day precision for each
standard is shown in Table 3. It illustrates that the approach
13
68 JPC – Journal of Planar Chromatography – Modern TLC (2023) 36:63–70
Table 4 Robustness results Parameter Markers Conc. (ng/spot) RF mean ± SD %RSD Area mean ± SD %RSD
of the method reported as
mean ± SD and %RSD Mobile phase ratio (toluene‒ethyl acetate‒methanol‒formic acid)
4.8:3.2:2:0.5, V/V Quercetin 1000 0.564 ± 0.006 1.0 0.0139 ± 0.0001 0.9
Rutin 2000 0.096 ± 0.001 0.7 0.0251 ± 0.0003 1.1
Berberine 400 0.307 ± 0.004 1.2 0.0077 ± 0.0001 1.8
Curcumin 150 0.682 ± 0.005 0.7 0.0052 ± 0.0001 1.4
Quercetin 2000 0.591 ± 0.005 0.9 0.0140 ± 0.0002 1.3
5.2:2.8:2:0.5, V/V Rutin 2000 0.094 ± 0.001 1.1 0.0261 ± 0.0004 1.5
Berberine 400 0.318 ± 0.002 0.7 0.0079 ± 0.0001 1.0
Curcumin 150 0.677 ± 0.006 0.9 0.0052 ± 0.0001 1.6
Development distance
75 cm Quercetin 1000 0.564 ± 0.0 0.0 0.0133 ± 0.0002 1.1
Rutin 2000 0.092 ± 0.001 0.7 0.0255 ± 0.0003 1.1
Berberine 400 0.306 ± 0.005 1.5 0.0074 ± 0.0001 1.6
Curcumin 150 0.656 ± 0.012 1.8 0.0052 ± 0.0001 1.0
85 cm Quercetin 1000 0.562 ± 0.008 1.3 0.0132 ± 0.0001 1.0
Rutin 2000 0.097 ± 0.001 0.6 0.0260 ± 0.0003 1.3
Berberine 400 0.326 ± 0.0 0.0 0.0075 ± 0.0001 1.6
Curcumin 150 0.678 ± 0.0 1.2 0.0052 ± 0.0001 1.2
Saturation time
15 min Quercetin 1000 0.577 ± 0.010 1.7 0.0131 ± 0.0001 0.5
Rutin 2000 0.095 ± 0.001 1.2 0.0259 ± 0.0003 1.3
Berberine 400 0.240 ± 0.001 0.5 0.0076 ± 0.0001 1.3
Curcumin 150 0.666 ± 0.009 1.4 0.0052 ± 0.0001 1.1
25 min Quercetin 1000 0.590 ± 0.006 1.0 0.0138 ± 0.0001 1.0
Rutin 2000 0.094 ± 0.001 1.5 0.0261 ± 0.0001 0.3
Berberine 400 0.212 ± 0.002 1.1 0.0075 ± 0.0001 1.3
Curcumin 150 0.676 ± 0.012 1.7 0.0051 ± 0.0001 1.9
Table 5 Limit of detection and limit of quantification values for Table 7 Estimation of % content of quercetin, rutin, berberine and
quercetin, rutin, berberine and curcumin curcumin in marketed formulation
Standard LOD (ng/spot) LOQ (ng/spot) Formulation Markers % Content
Table 6 Recovery of quercetin, rutin, berberine and curcumin is repeatable and reproducible because the %RSD values for
quercetin, rutin, berberine, and curcumin did not surpass 2%.
Recovery Standard markers
level (%) % Accuracy
Quercetin Rutin Berberine Curcumin 3.5 Robustness
80 95.61 95.64 94.50 94.51 The results of the robustness study are summarized in
100 97.99 97.43 97.32 98.60 Table 4. The low %RSD values indicate they are less scat-
120 100.80 100.41 99.20 100.73 tered and hence the method can be considered robust.
13
JPC – Journal of Planar Chromatography – Modern TLC (2023) 36:63–70 69
Fig. 3 TLC image of marketed formulation along with four standard markers, i.e., quercetin, rutin, berberine and curcumin on visualization at
254 nm (a). Densitogram overlay of marketed formulation with standard solution at optimized chromatographic condition (b)
3.6 Sensitivity curcumin. The HPTLC method resulted in the % contents
of 5.26 ± 1.09, 4.76 ± 0.83, 3.80 ± 0.94 and 7.62 ± 1.58 for
LOD and LOQ values are summarized in Table 5 for querce- quercetin, rutin, berberine and curcumin, respectively, in
tin, rutin, berberine and curcumin, respectively, which indi- ANTARTH formulation. The novel HPTLC method can
cated that the developed method was sensitive. be useful for the routine quality control analysis for both
extracts and polyherbal formulations containing the above
phytochemical standards as active ingredients.
3.7 Recovery
Author contributions SL, RD, and SS contributed to the study’s con-
Recovery studies are useful in evaluating the analytical ceptualization and design. AK handled the material preparation, data
collecting, and analysis; she also drafted the text, which was then
method’s accuracy. The results of recovery studies are
modified by all authors. All authors have read and approved the final
shown in Table 6. Recovery was found in the acceptable manuscript.
range and the values attained were between 95 and 102%.
Declarations
3.8 Estimation in marketed formulation Conflict of interest The authors have not disclosed any conflicts of
interest that would have an impact on the information in this article.
13
70 JPC – Journal of Planar Chromatography – Modern TLC (2023) 36:63–70
4. Lindler BN, Long KE, Nancy A, Taylor WL (2020) Use of herbal LF, Medina-Medrano JR (2021) Quantitative analysis of rutin
medications for treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthri- by HPTLC and in vitro antioxidant and antibacterial activities
tis. Medicines 7:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines7110067 of phenolic-rich extracts from Verbesina sphaerocephala. Plants
5. Nimesh S (2018) Herbal drug is better than allopathic drug in the 10:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10030475
treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Pharmacogn 5:539–545 12. Kumar KA, Shetty SR, Narsu L (2011) HPTLC method devel-
6. Bhupinder K, Reena G, Gupta M (2017) Natural products in treat- opment and validation for determination of rutin in flavanoidal
ment of rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Green Pharm 11:S356–S363. fraction of Hibiscus micranthus Linn. E-J Chem 8:1444–1450.
https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i11.20170 https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/902106
7. Ji JJ, Lin Y, Huang SS, Zhang HL, Diao YP, Li K (2013) Querce- 13. Ghosh VK, Nagore DH, Patil MJ, Prakash A (2010) Development
tin: a potential natural drug for adjuvant treatment of rheuma- and validation of a method for densitometric analysis of berberine
toid arthritis. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med AJTCAM in herbal extract and polyherbal formulation. Med Princ Pract
10:418–421 19:473–478. https://doi.org/10.1159/000320307
8. Laila O, Murtaza I, Abdin MZ, Ahmad S, Ganai NA, Jehangir 14. Rittiner JE, Moncalvo M, Chiba-Falek O, Kantor B (2020) Gene-
M (2014) Development and validation of HPTLC method for editing technologies paired with viral vectors for translational
simultaneous estimation of diosgenin and quercetin in fenugreek research into neurodegenerative diseases. Front Mol Neurosci
seeds (Trigonella foenum-graceum). ISRN Chromatogr 2014:1–8. 13:1–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2020.00148
https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/583047 15. Sinden RR (2012) DNA structure and function. Academic Press,
9. Bidikar CM, Hurkadale PJ, Nandanwadkar SM, Hegde HV (2022) Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-02451-9
A validated spectro densitometric regulatory compliant USP-HP- 16. Hewlings SJ, Kalman DS (2017) Curcumin: a review of its effects
TLC protocol for quantification of polyphenols and antioxidants on human health. Foods 6:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods
from polyherbal formulations containing Terminalia species. 6100092
J Chromatogr B 1207:123379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb. 17. International Conference on Harmonization (2005) Q2 (R1): Vali-
2022.123379 dation of analytical procedures: text and methodology. Geneva.
10. Alam P, Parvez MK, Arbab AHA-DM (2017) Quantitative analy- https://www.fda.gov/media/152208/download
sis of rutin, quercetin, naringenin, and gallic acid by validated RP-
and NP-HPTLC methods for quality control of anti-HBV active Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds
extract of Guiera senegalensis. Pharm Biol 55:1317–1323. https:// exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the
doi.org/10.1080/13880209.2017.1300175 author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted
11. Rodríguez-Valdovinos KY, Salgado-Garciglia R, Vázquez- manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of
Sánchez M, Álvarez-Bernal D, Oregel-Zamudio E, Ceja-Torres such publishing agreement and applicable law.
13