It can be considered that the result is the argument of the article, the materials and methods are

the arguments and arguments, and the discussion is equivalent to a summary.For papers in
science and engineering, although the core content of the article varies depending on the
research object and method, in general, in terms of basic structure, Introduction, Experiment and
discussion, and Conclusion are generally necessary.It can also be considered that the conclusion
is actually an argument, and the core part of the article, experiments and discussions are
arguments and arguments.

As for the liberal arts, the feeling of ”literary uncertainty" is heavier, but it remains unchanged
from its original sect. The three points of argument, argument, and argument are still
indispensable, but they are not as direct in the thesis as in medicine and science and
technology.Taking Lu Xun's thesis "The composition of Lu Xun's concept of “People of the
World” and its Contemporary Ideological Value“ as an example, this article was published in
the ”Literary Review" in 2013. The authority of the journal is beyond doubt, and the quality of
the article is also very high. The abstract of the article directly expresses his research point of
view: "People of the World" is a concept that has not been noticed in Lu Xun's research, and it is
a rare constructive concept in Lu Xun's thought.Lu Xun's thought of “people of the world”
must be placed in his entire ideological system and the current historical context of Chinese
thought and culture for extended reading.Unlike ordinary cultural pioneers, Lu Xun did not
appeal to the system of “Datong Society”, but started from the purpose of “to the whole of
humanity”, focusing on the spiritual appeal of “people of the world”, the core of which is the
individual-based human consciousness.“People of the world“ is the highest level and
important content of Lu Xun's national transformation of ”human nature to the whole", and it is
an ideological scale that cannot be ignored in Lu Xun's criticism of national quintessence and
nationalism.This kind of criticism is often opposed to the general thoughts and emotions of the
people.Therefore, the ideas contained in Lu Xun's concept of “people of the world” have very
unique enlightenment value for understanding the lack of modern consciousness of traditional
Chinese people and thinking about the current state of Chinese thought and culture and its
direction.

Sort it out, there are so many arguments：

Argument 1.“People of the world" is an unnoticed concept in Lu Xun's research, and it is a rare
constructive concept in Lu Xun's thought.

Argument 2.Lu Xun's thought of “people of the world” must be placed in his entire ideological
system and the current historical context of Chinese thought and culture for extended reading.

Argument 3.Unlike ordinary cultural pioneers, Lu Xun did not appeal to the system of “Datong
Society”, but started from the purpose of “to the whole of humanity”, focusing on the
spiritual appeal of “people of the world”, the core of which is the individual-based human
consciousness.

Argument 4.“People of the world“ is the highest level and important content of Lu Xun's
national transformation of ”human nature to the whole", and it is an ideological scale that
cannot be ignored in Lu Xun's criticism of national quintessence and nationalism.This kind of
criticism is often opposed to the general thoughts and emotions of the people.

Argument 5.The ideas contained in Lu Xun's concept of “People of the world” have very unique
enlightenment value for understanding the lack of modern consciousness of traditional Chinese
people and thinking about the current state of Chinese thought and culture and its direction.

In the text, the paper is divided into three major pieces：