Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Test Bank
Multiple Choice
1. Friedlander and Brown’s (1974) review of early organization change research framed
their review in terms of two types of interventions that led to outcomes. The two
categories of interventions were ______.
Ans: B
2. Faucheux, Amado and Laurent (1982) broadened Friedlander and Brown’s (1974)
context of organization change by adding a linkage between a given organization and
______.
B. its values
1
Instructor Resource
Burke, Organization Change, 5th edition
SAGE Publishing, 2018
Ans: C
3. Beer and Walton (1987) described which of the following four types of problems with
organization change research?
B. Most organization change research takes snapshot rather than a longitudinal view.
D. The way the results were reported were not user (management)-friendly.
E. All of these.
Ans: E
A. the research objective should, but did not always, dictate the research methodology
D. there was not enough agreement between researchers on how to measure the
variables
2
Instructor Resource
Burke, Organization Change, 5th edition
SAGE Publishing, 2018
Ans: A
D. a major change in the perspective or frame of reference within which phenomena are
perceived and classified
Ans: C
D. a major change in the perspective or frame of reference within which phenomena are
perceived and classified
3
Instructor Resource
Burke, Organization Change, 5th edition
SAGE Publishing, 2018
Ans: B
D. A major change in the perspective or frame of reference within which phenomena are
perceived and classified
Ans: D
D. none of these
Ans: B
4
Instructor Resource
Burke, Organization Change, 5th edition
SAGE Publishing, 2018
A. chaos theory
C. fractal theory
D. all of these
Ans: D
10. The complex systems approach to organization change research takes into account
______.
B. the fact that patterns of interconnections and the strength associated with each
interconnection may vary
C. that organization change occurs over time and that change measurements will vary
over time
D. all of these
Ans: D
5
Instructor Resource
Burke, Organization Change, 5th edition
SAGE Publishing, 2018
Ans: C
C. an irrelevant pattern of behavior that detracts from the variable being investigated
D. none of these
Ans: A
6
Instructor Resource
Burke, Organization Change, 5th edition
SAGE Publishing, 2018
D. all of these
Ans: D
14. The planned organization change model developed by Porras (1987) is grounded in
______.
A. chaos theory
B. no theory
D. revolutionary theory
Ans: C
7
Instructor Resource
Burke, Organization Change, 5th edition
SAGE Publishing, 2018
15. The shift from “normal” science for organization change research and theory moved
to which of the following approaches?
D. a non-system approach
Ans: B
16. Which one of the following proposed that a “complete” organization change theory
contains the four elements what, how, why and who/where/when?
A. Porras
D. Whetten
Ans: D
17. Which of the following psychologists suggested that emotional behavior precedes
emotional experience?
8
Instructor Resource
Burke, Organization Change, 5th edition
SAGE Publishing, 2018
A. Porras
D. Whetten
Ans: D
18. Porras and Silvers’ (1991) Planned Process Model of Organizational Change
distinguishes between which of the following types of change interventions?
D. none of these
Ans: B
19. According to Porras and Robertson, 1992, alpha, beta and gamma changes have to
do with ______.
9
Instructor Resource
Burke, Organization Change, 5th edition
SAGE Publishing, 2018
B. the environment
D. all of these
Ans: A
A. predictable
B. ongoing
C. rational
D. none of these
Ans: D
21. Burke still contends that action science will promote more creativity in the future
than ______.
A. normal science
B. natural science
C. earth science
10
Instructor Resource
Burke, Organization Change, 5th edition
SAGE Publishing, 2018
D. none of these
Ans: A
D. none of these
Ans: B
23. Oreg and colleagues (2011) provided a critique of 79 studies that they had reviewed
and concluded that ______.
B. executives are often incapable of predicting how change recipients will react
11
Instructor Resource
Burke, Organization Change, 5th edition
SAGE Publishing, 2018
Ans: B
24. The consistent findings from Oreg and his colleagues (2011) review of change
recipient’s reaction in 79 studies led them to conclude that three aspects of organization
change are critical ______.
D. all of these
Ans: A
25. The meta-analysis conducted by Oreg and colleagues focused mainly on the
recipients of change, another meta-analysis conducted by Ford and Ford (2012)
targeted ______.
C. resistance
D. surveys of change
12
Instructor Resource
Burke, Organization Change, 5th edition
SAGE Publishing, 2018
Ans: A
26. The body of literature covered by Ford and Ford (2011) was limited to review of the
leadership of change per se and involved ______.
A. 14 articles
C. clear-cut literature
D. easy to identify
Ans: A
27. Ford and Ford (2011) help further the understanding that leading change and
studying leadership involved ______.
A. charismatic leaders
D. followership
13
Instructor Resource
Burke, Organization Change, 5th edition
SAGE Publishing, 2018
Ans: B
28. The primary analysis that Ford and Ford (2012) conducted with the 14 studies they
reviewed concerned ______.
D. all of these
Ans: C
29. Unique to the review by Ford and Ford was the consideration of a third area of
research ______.
D. all of these
Ans: C
14
Instructor Resource
Burke, Organization Change, 5th edition
SAGE Publishing, 2018
30. The phrase “episodic change” is used to group together organizational changes that
tend to be ______.
Ans: B
31. Weick and Quinn (1999) provided a new way of applying ______.
D. none of these
Ans: A
15
Instructor Resource
Burke, Organization Change, 5th edition
SAGE Publishing, 2018
32. Burke has focused on reviewing the reviews of organization change research and
theory over the past quarter century because ______.
B. normal science could not lead to usable conclusions and it was only in 1991 that
Porras and Silvers proposed a framework and process as an adequate theory about
how organization change actually works
C. the research added support for considering organization change in terms of complex
nonlinear systems and of behavioral focus preceding cognition
D. all of these
Ans: D
33. A highly useful way to understand organization change more effectively is ______.
D. A and B
Ans: D
16
Instructor Resource
Burke, Organization Change, 5th edition
SAGE Publishing, 2018
34. To perceive a causal link between our thoughts and actions, according to Wagner
and Wheatley (1999), requires meeting three criteria of the following criteria, ______.
A. priority
B. consistency
D. all of these
Ans: D
35. Porras and Silvers (1999) followed a new model or theory of planned change that
offered ______.
D. none of these
Ans: A
17
Instructor Resource
Burke, Organization Change, 5th edition
SAGE Publishing, 2018
True/False
1. Organization change theory is widely researched and can be dated back to the early
1920s.
Ans: F
Ans: T
Ans: T
18
Instructor Resource
Burke, Organization Change, 5th edition
SAGE Publishing, 2018
4. A few main aspects from research has found that trust, involvement, and selection to
lead a successful change effort automatically lead to change recipients trusting their
leaders.
Ans: F
Ans: F
6. Ford stated that the way leaders approach change has an effect on recipients as
measured by their commitment and readiness for change.
Ans: T
19
Instructor Resource
Burke, Organization Change, 5th edition
SAGE Publishing, 2018
Ans: F
Ans: T
9. It looks as though more creativity is likely to emerge in the action science world.
Ans: T
Ans: F
20
Instructor Resource
Burke, Organization Change, 5th edition
SAGE Publishing, 2018
Short Answer
Ans: Friedlander and Brown’s model’s targets of interventions are people and
technology. The people approach combines people with organizational processes and
the outcome is human fulfillment. Technology is combined with organizational structures
and the outcome is task accomplishment. They call the people target the “human-
processual approach,” which refers to organizational processes such as
communication, decision-making, and problem solving. They call the technology target
the “techno-structural approach,” which refers to task methods, job design, and
organizational design.
Ans: The change interventions in the Porras and Silvers model are organization
transformation and organization development. Organization transformation’s outcome is
improved organizational performance. Organization development’s outcome is
enhanced by individual development. The organization transformation target variable is
21
Instructor Resource
Burke, Organization Change, 5th edition
SAGE Publishing, 2018
visions: guiding bullets and principles; purpose; and mission. The organization
development target variable is work setting: organization arrangements (goals,
strategies, structure, and systems); social factors (culture, social patterns and networks,
and individual attributes); technology (tools, equipment, machinery, job design, and
technical systems); and physical setting (space, ambiance, interior design, and so on).
Porras and Silvers’ model assumes that employee cognition change precedes their
behavior change, that is, leadership communicates a vision that is the impetus for
changing employees’ cognitions, but the cognitions don’t change until accompanied by
behavioral changes.
3. Compare and contrast the linear, open-system model of organization change with the
nonlinear complexity model of organization change.
Ans: Linear open-system models assume that change follows a sequence of input from
the environment to the processing of that input, and then to the output, which loops
back to the input. This model assumes a steady progression through predictable stages.
But organization change is likely to have “false starts.” So while you may start out with a
linear plan, something doesn’t go as planned and the shape is better described as a
spiral pattern of contemplation, action and relapse, which is repeated until the change is
integrated.
4. In concluding that the emerging field of action science may need to be followed,
Burke referred to a 2016 discussion dealing with the issues of normal science versus
applied/action research. In the panel presentation at the annual meeting of the
Academy of Management, what was the conclusion?
22
Instructor Resource
Burke, Organization Change, 5th edition
SAGE Publishing, 2018
Ans: The issues have not changed. Yet, there was a realization that action science and
normal science reside in different worlds with different incentive systems. These two
worlds will remain largely separated. Creativity is more likely to emerge in the action
science world.
5. Weick and Quinn (1999) consider there to be two primary categories of organization
change: episodic and continuous. Describe their definition of episodic change and their
description of continuous change.
23