Professional Documents
Culture Documents
13743 JEADV
SHORT REPORT
Abstract
Introduction Acne vulgaris commonly affects adolescents. But recent reports suggest a rising prevalence of post-ado-
lescence acne. While there are few reports on post-adolescence acne, there are even fewer reports comparing adoles-
cence acne and post-adolescence.
Methods Epidemiological data of adolescence (<25 years) and post-adolescence (≥25 years) acne patients diagnosed
between 2004 and 2013 in a tertiary dermatology referral centre was analysed. From the pool of patients seen in 2010,
80 adolescence and 84 post-adolescence acne patients’ epidemiological characteristics and treatment responses were
analysed.
Results During the 10-year study period, there was an increase in the number and proportion of acne cases. In 2004,
4447 (5.77%) of all new diagnoses made were of acne vulgaris. The proportion rose to 5723 (8.13%) in 2013. There were
consistently more female than male acne patients. The proportion of post-adolescent cases remained constant at about
30% of all acne patients seen. Mean age of acne vulgaris patients decreased from 23.1 years in 2004 to 22.6 years in
2013. In the subgroup analysis, there were more males than females with adolescence acne (61.3% vs. 38.8%,
P < 0.01) and more females with post-adolescence acne (69.0% vs. 31.0%, P < 0.01). Thirty-four (40.5%) post-adoles-
cence acne patients had acne from adolescence persisting into adulthood. Comedonal acne was more prevalent in the
adolescence acne patients (58.8% vs. 40.5%, P = 0.019), whereas cystic acne was more prevalent in post-adolescence
patients (18.1% vs. 7.5%, P = 0.044). Systemic retinoids were more often used for treatment in the adolescence acne
patients than post-adolescence acne patients (23.8% vs. 10.7%, P = 0.027).
Conclusion Acne predominantly affects adolescents but post-adolescence acne is not uncommon. For post-ado-
lescence acne, females predominate over males. Inflammatory and cystic acne tends to be more predominant in
post-adolescence acne patients, whereas comedonal acne is more often seen in adolescence acne patients.
Received: 19 August 2015; Accepted: 31 March 2016
Conflicts of interest
Dr H.H. Oon has served as a speaker for Galderma and received honoraria. The rest of the authors report no
conflict of interest.
Funding sources
None received for this study.
The adolescence acne group consisted of patients aged below Female post-adolescent acne
Male post-adolescent acne
25, and the post-adolescence acne group includes those who Female adolescent acne
were 25 years and older. 3000 Male adolescent acne
Number of patients
such as duration, severity and distribution of acne and treatment
2000
history was performed on a subset of patients randomly selected
1500
from patients diagnosed with acne vulgaris in 2010 using a ran-
dom number generator on Microsoft Excel (2007 version). Year 1000
2010 was chosen to give sufficient period after the initial diagno- 500
sis of acne vulgaris to follow-up on treatment. 0
Severity of acne was classified as mild, moderate or severe
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
12
13
11
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
based on the Combined Acne Severity Classification, developed Years
by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.6 This classi-
fication takes into account the numbers of comedones, inflam- Figure 1 Year-on-year comparison of adolescence and post-
matory lesions, cysts and total lesion count. It is a subjective, adolescence acne patients by gender.
qualitative scale developed as a modification of the Investigator
Global Assessment for clinical trials in acne and was validated by
a strong correlation with Leeds grading, a pictorial acne grading
system.6,7 male cases. Although female patients consistently made up the
All patients had their type and number of acne lesions majority of acne vulgaris cases, there was a decline over the years
recorded by their attending doctors, who were either dermatolo- from 54.3% in 2004 to 51.8% in 2013 (Fig. 1).
gists or resident trainees in dermatology. The severity of acne Throughout the study period, there were more males with
vulgaris for each patient was derived from this scoring system. adolescence acne vulgaris (range: 53.2–57.9%) compared to
females (range 42.1–46.8%). There were more females with
Results post-adolescence acne vulgaris, (range 64.1–69.6%) compared to
Between 2004 and 2013, Singapore’s population increased from males (range 30.4–35.9%).
4.2 to 5.4 million, but the total number of new patients seen in The number of acne vulgaris cases in all races increased dur-
our centre decreased from 77 062 in 2004 to 70 416 in 2013. All ing the 10-year study period (Table 1). Among the races, the
patients were referred patients as our centre is a national tertiary Chinese had the highest increase in number and proportion of
dermatology referral centre. Despite the decline of new patient acne vulgaris cases (3569–4312 cases). The proportion of Chi-
attendances in our centre during the study period, the number nese with acne vulgaris was 4.6% of all new attendances in 2004
of acne vulgaris cases seen had increased from 4447 (5.77% of all and 6.1% in 2013. The ethnic distribution of new patients seen
new attendances) to 5723 (8.13% of all new attendances). The in our centre in 2010 was similar to the ethnic distribution of
proportion of post-adolescence acne cases remained constant at patients diagnosed with acne vulgaris between 2004 and 2013.
approximately 30% (range 29.9–34.4%) of all the acne vulgaris Countrywide population census in 2010 showed an ethnicity
cases seen. mix of 74.1% Chinese, 13.4% Malays, 9.2% Indians and 3.3%
During the 10-year study period, there were consistently more other races.8 In patients with acne vulgaris, the Chinese, who
females than males with acne vulgaris (range: 50.5–54.3% vs. formed the majority ethnic group were slightly over-represented
45.7–49.5%). In 2013, there were 2963 female acne cases vs. 2759 with an under-representation of the Malays.
Table 1 Racial distribution of patients in our centre diagnosed with acne vulgaris compared with all new patients seen in the centre (all
diagnoses) and countrywide population
Table 2 shows more detailed comparison of the characteristics treating patients with adolescence acne than those with post-
of adolescence and post-adolescence acne patients in the random adolescence acne (23.8% vs. 10.7%, P = 0.027). However, it was
cohort of 164 patients (80 adolescents, 84 post-adolescents) observed that there was no significant difference in treatment
selected from a total of 5803 patients diagnosed with acne vul- outcome between the two treatment groups (P = 1.000, data not
garis in 2010. This subgroup accurately represented the age, eth- shown). Thirty-four (40.5%) of 84 post-adolescent acne patients
nicity and gender distribution of the patients seen in our centre had acne that persisted from their adolescent years. Clinical
within the 10-year study period (Table 3). characteristics of acne vulgaris were compared between this
Comedonal acne was more prevalent in patients with adoles- adult persistent acne group and the adult-onset acne group.
cence compared to those with post-adolescence acne (58.8% vs. Truncal acne occurred more often in those with adult persistent
40.5%, P = 0.019). Cystic acne was more prevalent in patients acne than adult-onset acne (29.4% vs. 12.0%, P = 0.046).
with post-adolescence than those with adolescence acne (18.1% Patients with adult persistent acne tend to have more pustular
vs. 7.5%, P = 0.044). Systemic retinoids were more often used in lesions (50% vs. 24%, P = 0.014).
Table 3 Comparison of age, ethnicity and gender distribution between the subgroup analysis patients in 2010 and all patients diagnosed
with acne vulgaris in 2010