What are the pros and cons of FPGA vs ASIC

in terms of performance, cost, and flexibility?

Powered by AI and the LinkedIn community

1 FPGA basics

2 ASIC basics

3 Performance comparison

4 Cost comparison

5 Flexibility comparison

6 Here’s what else to consider

If you are working on a system design project that requires high-speed, low-power, or
customized logic, you may have to choose between two types of integrated circuits: FPGA
and ASIC. FPGA stands for field-programmable gate array, and ASIC stands for application-
specific integrated circuit. Both have their advantages and disadvantages in terms of
performance, cost, and flexibility. In this article, we will compare and contrast these two
options and help you decide which one is best for your needs.

Top experts in this article

Experts who add quality contributions will have a chance to be featured. Learn more

Earn a Community Top Voice badge

Add to collaborative articles to get recognized for your expertise on your profile. Learn more

Start a contribution

See what others are saying

Convert web pages and HTML files to PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API Printed with Pdfcrowd.com
1 FPGA basics
FPGA is a type of reconfigurable hardware that consists of an array of logic blocks, memory
elements, and interconnects that can be programmed to implement any logic function.
FPGA can be reprogrammed as many times as needed, allowing you to modify or update
your design without changing the hardware. FPGA is also more flexible and adaptable than
ASIC, as you can use the same device for different applications or test different designs on
the same board.

Add your perspective

2 ASIC basics
ASIC is a type of custom-made hardware that is designed and fabricated for a specific
purpose or application. ASIC is optimized for performance, power, and size, as it only
contains the necessary components and logic for the intended function. ASIC is also more
reliable and secure than FPGA, as it is less prone to errors, tampering, or reverse
engineering. However, ASIC is also more expensive and time-consuming to produce, as it
requires a complex and lengthy design and manufacturing process.

Add your perspective

Convert web pages and HTML files to PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API Printed with Pdfcrowd.com
3 Performance comparison
One of the main factors to consider when choosing between FPGA and ASIC is the
performance of your system. Generally speaking, ASIC has higher performance than FPGA,
as it can run faster, consume less power, and have lower latency and jitter. This is because
ASIC has less overhead, less wiring, and less switching activity than FPGA, which results in
less heat dissipation and less signal degradation. However, FPGA can also achieve high
performance in some cases, especially if you use high-end devices, optimize your design,
and leverage parallelism and pipelining.

Add your perspective

4 Cost comparison
Another important factor to consider when choosing between FPGA and ASIC is the cost of
your project. Generally speaking, FPGA has lower cost than ASIC, especially for low-volume
or prototyping purposes. This is because FPGA has lower upfront and non-recurring costs,
such as design tools, testing, and verification. FPGA also has lower risk and higher
flexibility, as you can easily modify or correct your design without incurring additional costs.
However, FPGA can also have higher recurring costs, such as device, board, and power
costs, which can add up for high-volume or long-term applications.

Add your perspective

Convert web pages and HTML files to PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API Printed with Pdfcrowd.com
5 Flexibility comparison
The last factor to consider when choosing between FPGA and ASIC is the flexibility of your
system. Generally speaking, FPGA has higher flexibility than ASIC, as it can be
reprogrammed and reused for different applications or scenarios. FPGA also allows you to
implement complex or novel logic functions that may not be feasible or efficient with ASIC.
FPGA also enables faster time-to-market and shorter design cycles, as you can test and
validate your design on the fly. However, FPGA can also have lower flexibility in some
aspects, such as device availability, compatibility, and portability, which can limit your
choice of vendors or platforms.

Add your perspective

6 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous
sections. What else would you like to add?

Add your perspective

Convert web pages and HTML files to PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API Printed with Pdfcrowd.com
 + Follow
Electrical Design

Rate this article

We created this article with the help of AI. What do you think of it?

It’s great It’s not so great

Report this article

More articles on Electrical Design

How can you simulate actuator How can you navigate the electrical What essential tools
saturation to test control system design job market? as an IC designer?
response?

See all

Explore Other Skills

Web Development Programming Mobile Applications Agile Methodologies

Machine Learning Software Development

Show more

More relevant reading

Convert web pages and HTML files to PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API Printed with Pdfcrowd.com
Very-Large-Scale Integration (VLSI)
How do you ensure the quality and reliability of VLSI design and testing processes?

Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA)

How do you ensure the correctness and completeness of FPGA specifications?

Very-Large-Scale Integration (VLSI)

How do you balance the cost and time constraints of VLSI design and testing projects?

Electrical Engineering
What are the steps to implement a digital control system with an FPGA?

Convert web pages and HTML files to PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API Printed with Pdfcrowd.com