No.

de Formato:AQAF002-F8
Hanon Systems – Confidential # Fecha Ultima Revisión del Formato: JUN/29/2021
Código de Retención: QUAL-02
Closure Checklist for 8Ds
Question Response
DO Symptom Yes No N/A
Has all necessary information been obtained from the customer?
Is this an appropriate tool to apply to the issue?
Have Emergency Response Actions (ERAs) been identified, implemented, verified, and validated? ERAs are actions implemented immediately to stop shipment of
defective product.
D1 Team
Have the appropriate cross-functional members been assigned to the team?
Has the Champion role been assigned? The Champion must verify high quality-of-event for D0-D7 via the Checklist, approving each step as complete.
D2 Problem Description
Does the problem description include what, where, how big, when, if repeat problem and the customer issue number?
Has the problem description been confirmed as matching what the customer is experiencing?
D3 Interim Containment Action
Were operators, supervisor and support personnel notified of concern, Quality Alert, etc.?
Were containment actions verified and results documented?
Were sort results documented (#sorted, #defects found, % defective, dates) for all stock locations?
Was identification of certified parts agreed to by the customer and production and documented on work instructions?
Were containment work instructions developed and available to operators?
Was potential impact to other products/processes, including Service, investigated and containment actions implemented?
Will the interim containment action be in place until after validation of permanent corrective action?
D4 Root Cause
Was a root cause for occurrence identified and verified for each root cause?
Was a root cause for escape identified and verified for each root cause?
Were appropriate quality tools used to identify root cause (5 Why, Is/Is Not, Cause & Effect Diagram, etc.)
Was true root cause identified (rather than symptom or effect) and verified?
Is there evidence that the failure mode was able to be turned on and off using the root cause that was identified?
D5 Permanent Corrective Actions (Choose and Verify)
Were permanent corrective actions identified and verified for each verified root cause?
Was data collected and statistically anlyzed to confirm the effectiveness of the corrective actions?
D6 Permanent Corrective Actions (Implement and Validate)
Were robust Poke-Yokes added where possible?
Were corrective actions implemented for each root cause for occurrence and escape?
Were corrective actions validated for each root cause for occurence and escape
Was a process walk conducted to verify all corrective actions were implemented?

Does the corrective action require a change to work instructions? If yes, have the QPS been updated, the operators retrained and the skill matrix updated?
Was the iterim containment action removed after validation of corrective actions?
D7 Prevent Recurrence
Were actions implemented to prevent recurrence of the root cause(s) for occurrence and escape for this issue?
Is the failure mode included in the PFMEA and the RPN reviewed for accuracy based on actual severity, occurrence and detection rates in production?
Where appropriate, has the Control Plan been updated?
Were actions implemented to prevent recurrence of the root cause(s) for occurrence and escape on other similar applications (e.g., cross-line applications within
the plant)?
Were systemic preventative actions implemented, such as updates to the Baseline DFMEA and the Baseline PFMEA, to prevent recurrence of the root cause(s) for
occurrence and escape for future products and processes?

Formato creado en Microsoft Office versión 2016

Hanon Systems – Confidential #

Fecha Descripcion del cambio

6/27/2019 Emisión inicial del check list
JUN/26/2020 Actualización de fecha de ultima revisión del formato

Actualización de fecha de ultima revisión del formato

JUN/29/2021 Se actualiza texto al pie de página "Formato creado en Microsoft
Office versión 2016”