Professional Documents
Culture Documents
On
21-PS-556
Department of Psychology
Method- This will be a qualitative study involving undergraduate (University students), dean of
students and counsellor of two different Universities. Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and Key
informant interviews will be used to collect data. Thematic analysis will also be done by
identifying, coding, and categorizing patterns or themes found in data. Conclusion: The
commonly abused substances were alcohol, marijuana and cigarettes. Alcohol and drug abuse
has left a negative impact among undergraduates (University students). The main
consequences being: discontinuation of studies, mental disturbances and risky sexual activities.
INTRODUCTION
Substance abuse among college students is a public health concern. The use of
drugs at this early age predisposes one to drug dependence later in adulthood.
Studies have shown that consumption of licit and illicit substances among young
people had increased all over the world.
Studies done among University students in Kenya showed that, substance abuse
was a hazard with alcohol being the most frequently used stuff.
Alcohol and substance abuse was an increasing menace to the country and in
particular the coastal region which was a major transmit hub that had easy access
to illicit drugs. Substance use tends to peak between the ages of 18 and 25 years
with University students being at higher risk.
Substance use among University students was likely to interfere with their studies
and as a result their career development ends in jeopardy.
Historically, conceptualisations of alcoholism and drug addiction posited the
existence of an addictive personality based in psychodynamic formulations of
pathological dependency. This perspective is clearly stated within the first and
second editions of the DSM which classified alcoholism and drug addiction as
types of “sociopathic personality disturbances” and then later under a broader
category of “personality disorders”.
It is now widely admitted that the addictive personality does not exist, or has, at
least, been largely rejected (Kerr, 1996; Nathan, 1998). In particular several
studies have shown that drug dependent individuals differ from controls on
several personality characteristics including, impulsivity, sensation seeking, and
proneness toward social deviance.
According to Ball (2005), Personality traits have not only been well validated as
predictors of substance use both in adolescents and adults, but are also reliable
predictors of earlier age of onset, polydrug use, chronic/heavy use, conduct and
antisocial personality disorders, violence, arrests, substance dependence severity,
HIV risk behaviours, psychiatric symptoms, mood disorders, suicide attempts,
family history and early dropout.
Shalini Singh and Yatan Pal Singh Patra (2016) conducted a study on “A review of
Indian Research on co-occurring Psychiatric Disorders and Alcohol use Disorders”
published by The Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, to find out the co-
occurrence of Psychiatric disorder and Alcohol use disorder. This study concluded
that a large portion of the treatment seeking population with alcohol use
disorders presented with Psychiatric co morbidities. The commonly associated
diagnosis included almost all the disorders including mood disorders, psychotic
spectrum disorders, anxiety spectrum disorders as well as sexual dysfunction.
Personality disorders were also commonly prevalent, and childhood ADHD poses
a risk of developing substance use disorder in the future.
Sorab Gupta, Sandeep Singh Sarpal, Dinesh Kumar, Turandeep Kaur and Sumant
Arora (2013) conducted a study on “Prevalence, pattern and familial effects of
substance use among the male college students- a North Indian study”, published
by the Journal of clinical and diagnostic research, to find out the familial effects of
drugs among the male college students in North India. The result of this study
shows that the prevalence of substance use was seen in 52.7% students belonging
to age group of 19 to 21 years. More prevalence of substance abuse was found
among law students (76.2%) followed by the students from Art stream (62.5%).
Among the users Alcohol was most commonly used (53.5%), followed by smokers
(27.3%), tobacco chewers (8.2%), cannabis (6.8%). 49% of the users were using
substances on daily basis, followed by 23% who were using weekly and 29.3% of
users had father using any substance.
Four Key Informant Interviews (KII’s) with the deans of students and counsellors
from the two universities were conducted. There were two interviews in each
University about the perceptions on the problem of drug abuse and the
magnitude of the problem among students. The number of KIIs was guided by
data saturation. By the time the third interview was conducted, the interviewer
noticed there was repetition of issues that had already been raised and a decision
was made not to conduct further interviews.
A total of 40 students (20 males and 20 females) between 18-25 years actively
took part in Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). Four FGDs with students from both
Universities were carried out. The number of FGD was guided by data saturation.
During FGDs, there was always moderator research assistant that kept time and
took short notes of the discussions. An FGD guide with a list of questions was
used in the meetings. Each FGD lasted between 40-50 minutes; the taped
discussions were then transcribed in readiness for analysis.
This study found that the burden of alcohol and drug abuse among the University
students was quite substantial and it impacts negatively on those involved in the
vice. The study showed alcohol was the commonly abused substance. Other
abused substance included marijuana, miraa and cigarettes.
The problem of drug abuse has had negative effects on both students and staff in
institutions of higher learning. This has an impact on the students learning
activities. Drug abuse leads to poor attendance and poor performance that
sometimes lead to discontinuation from the university.
Substance abuse particularly use of marijuana (bhang) had been linked to mental
health problems. Participants confirmed witnessing students with mental
disorders which after follow up was established to be associated with the intake
of bhang. Studies have shown that, there was a relationship between the use of
marijuana and conditions like depression, anxiety disorders, mania as well as
psychosis. Marijuana use may also decrease age at onset in both schizophrenia
and bipolar disorder.
Globally, non communicable diseases related burden of deaths, net years of life
lost and net disability adjusted life years, respectively can be attributed to alcohol
consumption, with the burden being particularly high for cancer and liver
cirrhosis. Alcohol consumption contributes to disease, injury, disability and
premature death more than any other risk factor in developing countries with low
mortality.
The problem of substance abuse among the undergraduates in the coastal region
was of concern to both students and the staffs. The most commonly abused
substance was alcohol particularly the local brew (mnazi). Easy accessibility to
various substances was a main factor predisposing students to engage in drug
abuse. Among other factors, alcohol and drug abuse lead students engage in risky
sexual behaviour exposing themselves to the risk of contracting sexually
transmitted diseases including HIV/ AIDS. There is need to sensitize this group of
student on the harm associated with drug abuse and dissuading them from
engaging in substances abuse. This will require Universities to set up programs
aimed at creating awareness on the harmful effects of the substances.
Reference
Topic- Drug abuse: A study and result of Indian distress and unfullfillment of
human beings.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime www.jcdr.com THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF
DRUG ABUSE