Title: Energetic drinks should be made illegal

In recent years, the usage of energy drinks has increased significantly. These
beverages have grown in popularity among young people since they are touted as a
source of rapid energy and improved performance. However, growing data indicates
that the potential hazards related to consuming energy drinks outweigh any potential
advantages. This essay will offer three strong arguments against the legalization of
energy drinks.
To begin with, the consumption of energy beverages has been linked to multiple
adverse health effects. These drinks frequently feature high concentrations of sugar and
caffeine, which can be harmful to the body. Caffeine abuse can result in heart
arrhythmias, elevated blood pressure, and accelerated heart rate. According to (Bedi et
al., 2014) the high sugar content of these beverages raises the risk of type 2 diabetes
and obesity. Energy drinks may cause dehydration and have a deleterious effect on
cognitive performance, according to studies. Therefore, the government should consider
outlawing energy drinks in order to preserve public health.
Moreover, energy drink producers often market their offerings towards young
individuals, in particular teenagers and undergraduates. These people are more
vulnerable to the potential risks of using energy drinks, thus this aggressive marketing
technique is alarming. The excessive amounts of sugar and caffeine in these drinks can
alter sleep cycles, resulting in chronic weariness that can affect overall health and
academic performance. Additionally, the trend of combining energy drinks with alcohol
is risky because it might obscure the effects of alcohol and raise the possibility of
accidents linked to alcohol consumption. We can safeguard disadvantaged populations
from the potential hazards linked with the intake of energy drinks by making them
illegal(Breda et al., 2014).
However, there is a significant absence of legislation governing the production and
marketing of energy drinks despite the accumulating data pointing to their potential
hazards. Consumers find it challenging to make educated decisions because
manufacturers are not obligated to reveal the precise amount of caffeine and other
stimulants in their goods. Additionally, the marketing strategies employed by energy
drink manufacturers frequently give the impression of improved physical stamina and
performance. This deceptive marketing may cause people to depend on energy drinks
instead of healthy hydration and sleep, which could have negative health effects.
Energy drink prohibition will help to end these dishonest business practises and
guarantee consumer protection.

Furthermore, excessive use of energy drinks has been related to negative effects on
one's mental health. These drinks contain a lot of caffeine, which can make some
people more anxious, nervous, and even have panic episodes Stated by(Clauson et al.,
2008), people frequently take large amounts of energy drinks, which can lead to a crash
once the effects wear off. This collapse can exacerbate mental health problems by
causing feelings of exhaustion, anger, and difficulties concentrating. In addition to
disrupting the neurotransmitter balance in the brain, a high coffee and sugar intake can
also affect mood disorders like depression. Energy drink prohibition would help prevent
negative effects on people's psychological wellbeing, especially for those with pre-
existing mental health disorders(De Sanctis et al., 2017).
Another crucial reason to make energy beverages illegal is what effect they have on
public safety. These stimulant-rich drinks may impair judgement and decision-making,
which increases the likelihood of accidents and injuries. Energy drink users may engage
in unsafe behavior or participate in activities that call for quick thinking and reflexes,
such operating machinery or a vehicle. In addition, the high levels of caffeine might
conceal signals of exhaustion, causing people to continue working out for a long time
before realizing they need a break(Higgins et al., 2018). By removing the possible risks
connected to diminished cognitive function and risky behavior, we can protect the
broader public in addition to consumers by outlawing energy drinks(Rath, 2012).
To conclude, the negative consequences of energy drink consumption extend beyond
physical health concerns. The impact on mental health and the potential risks to public
safety provide additional compelling reasons to make energetic drinks illegal. From the
adverse health effects, targeting vulnerable populations, and lack of regulation and
misleading advertising to the detrimental impact on mental health and public safety, it is
evident that the ban of energy drinks is necessary to safeguard the well-being of
individuals and society as a whole. Governments should prioritize the health and safety
of their citizens by implementing regulations that restrict the availability and marketing of
these potentially harmful beverages.
References
Bedi, N., Dewan, P., & Gupta, P. (2014). Energy drinks: Potions of illusion. Indian pediatrics, 51, 529-533.
Breda, J. J., Whiting, S. H., Encarnação, R., Norberg, S., Jones, R., Reinap, M., & Jewell, J. (2014). Energy
drink consumption in Europe: a review of the risks, adverse health effects, and policy options to
respond. Frontiers in public health, 134.
Clauson, K. A., Shields, K. M., McQueen, C. E., & Persad, N. (2008). Safety issues associated with
commercially available energy drinks. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 48(3),
e55-e67.
De Sanctis, V., Soliman, N., Soliman, A. T., Elsedfy, H., Di Maio, S., El Kholy, M., & Fiscina, B. (2017).
Caffeinated energy drink consumption among adolescents and potential health consequences
associated with their use: a significant public health hazard. Acta Bio Medica: Atenei Parmensis,
88(2), 222.
Higgins, J. P., Babu, K., Deuster, P. A., & Shearer, J. (2018). Energy drinks: a contemporary issues paper.
Current sports medicine reports, 17(2), 65-72.
Rath, M. (2012). Energy drinks: what is all the hype? The dangers of energy drink consumption. Journal
of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 24(2), 70-76.