Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Article
Analysis of Sugarcane Juice Quality Indexes
Copyright © 2017 Zeqing Xiao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The analysis of the quality indexes of sugarcane juice plays a vital role in the process of refining sugarcane, breeding, cultivation,
and production management. The paper analyzes the dynamic laws of five quality indexes (i.e., brix, purity, polarization, sucrose
content, and reducing sugar) combined with graphs over time along the course of crushing season (December–March) in Guangxi
province of China. During this time, the sugarcane is in the mature stage and hypermature stage. At the beginning of December
to early January, during which sugarcane is in the later stage of maturity, the nutrients are accumulating, causing brix, purity,
polarization, and sucrose content increase. At the beginning of January to mid-February, due to low temperature and insufficient
light, it is not conducive to accumulation of nutrients. However, there is the so-called “sugar back” phenomenon and reducing
sugar rises gradually in March, leading to deterioration of the quality of sugarcane juice. The results show that timely harvest of
sugarcane is beneficial for sugar making. The regression analysis results show that some of quality indexes have strong correlation
between them and the regression models are extremely significant, indicating that the prediction results are ideal.
quality and colour. Wang et al. [9] analyzed the changing law 17
of the sugarcane juice purity by using seven main sugarcane 16.8
varieties in the Zhanjiang area. The results show that when the
16.6
ratio of the apparent purity and gravity purity is very close to
1, the sugar content almost reaches its apogee. Golabi et al. [10] 16.4
evaluated the effect of irrigation water electrical conductivity 16.2
on three varieties of sugarcane juice quality. Nawi et al. [11]
Bx (%)
identified the optimum sample form for predicting sugarcane 16
quality using a low-cost and portable spectrometer. Mat et 15.8
al. [12] explore the potential of spectroscopic method to 15.6
predict sugarcane quality parameters by directly scanning the
internode samples. Nawi et al. ([7, 13]) used visible and short- 15.4
wave near infrared (Vis/SWNIR) spectroscopy to predict 15.2
soluble solids content and sucrose content from sugarcane
15
juice samples. The overall results indicated that Vis/SWNIR 19/11 4/12 19/12 2/1 17/1 2/2 17/2 4/3 19/3 3/4
spectroscopy combined with PLS models could be applied to Sampling time (date/month)
predict sugar content in both clear and raw sugarcane juices.
In the previous research, the author of this paper has suc- Figure 1: The change of brix over time for mixed juice samples.
cessfully applied regression method to the field of mechanical
processing (Xiao et al. [14]), in which the regression model is
89
used to establish the relationship between the cutting param-
eters (spindle speed, feed rate and depth of cut) and the sur- 88.5
face roughness. Because the regression model is universal in 88
the field of quality control and prediction, this paper extends
the application of regression method to the field of sugarcane 87.5
juice quality indexes. After analyzing the dynamic laws of five 87
Purity (%)
Figure 2: The change of purity over time for mixed juice samples.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. The Change Rules of Every Index of Mixed Juice. Samples
of sugarcane juice were tested about every two weeks along is conducive to the accumulation of nutrients. However, there
the course of crushing season (December–March), that is, is a positive correlation between brix and nutrients, which
sampling from eight days. leads to the curve changing laws showed in the figure.
It can be clearly seen from Figure 1 that brix decreases Figure 2 shows the change of purity with time. It clearly
in the early stage of maturity and then increases in the late shows that the changing trends of gravity purity and apparent
stage of maturity. Because the daytime temperature is low and purity are similar: there is an increase in purity from early
sunlight is not enough from mid-January to mid-February December to the following early January and after that the
in Guangxi area, nutrients produced by photosynthesis are purity tends to decrease in spite of small fluctuations. The
relatively few. The temperature of daytime rises and sunlight purity, especially the gravity purity, can represent the numeri-
is enough in March, which leads to the relative increase of cal values of dry solid materials of sugarcane [9]; therefore,
nutrients produced by the enhanced photosynthesis. How- it can be seen that the sugar content is the highest in
ever, day-and-night temperature difference is large and the early January during crushing season. The results show that
intensity of respiration decreases due to low night tempera- the sugarcane has begun to “sugar back” in February, so
ture; thus consumption of nutrients is relatively small, which the purity of sugarcane juice has the trend of decreasing.
Journal of Food Quality 3
16
0.8
15.5
0.75
15
0.7
Pol (Suc) (%)
14.5
Rs (%)
0.65
14
0.6
13.5 0.55
13 0.5
0.45
12.5 19/11 4/12 19/12 2/1 17/1 2/2 17/2 4/3 19/3 3/4
19/11 4/12 19/12 2/1 17/1 2/2 17/2 4/3 19/3 3/4
Sampling time (date/month)
Sampling time (date/month)
Data point of polarization Figure 4: The change of reducing sugar (Rs) over time for mixed
Trend line of polarization juice samples.
Data point of sucrose content
Trend line of sucrose content
Figure 3: The change of polarization (Pol) and sucrose content (Suc) 3.2. Simple Linear Regression Analysis. Simple linear regres-
over time for mixed juice samples. sion analysis [16] is carried out by 665 samples of sucrose
content (Suc) and brix (Bx). The regression equation is as
follows:
Therefore, the purity of sugarcane juice of timely harvest of
Suc = 1.3159 + 0.7851 ⋅ Bx. (1)
sugarcane is relatively high, benefitting for sugar making.
Figure 3 indicates that the change trend of polarization
It is proved by the strong correlation (𝑅2 = 0.924535)
is consistent with the change trend of sucrose content in
between sucrose content (Suc) and brix (Bx). The simple
juice, which shows a strong correlation between them. The
regression model reaches a very significant level (𝑝 < 0.01).
comparison of Figures 1 and 3 shows that the laws of the
In addition, the regression coefficient and regression inter-
curves are similar. The reasons for the change are similar to
cept have reached a significant level (𝑝 < 0.01). The results
those discussed in Figure 1. At later stage of maturity, the
show that there is a strong correlation between brix and
photosynthetic products are mainly accumulated in the form
sucrose content. In addition, the way of measurement of brix
of sucrose but are rarely used as a form of monosaccharide
is simple, quick, and convenient. Therefore, sucrose content
for growth, so growth is stagnant and sugar accumulation is
could be calculated by measuring the brix of sugarcane juice.
much.
681 samples are taken to set up a regression model
It can be concluded from Figure 4 that reducing sugar is
between sucrose content (Suc) and polarization (Pol). The
low when the sugarcane is ripe and reducing sugar is high
model is as follows:
when the sugarcane is immature or overripe; especially when
the quality of sugarcane juice tends to be worse, reducing Suc = 0.0634 + 1.0039 ⋅ Pol. (2)
sugar increases significantly. The results show that, during
the period of the growth and maturity of sugarcane, after The model was significant (𝑝 < 0.05) with 𝐹 value
sucrose produced by sugarcane leaves is transported to the of 1.054781𝑒 + 05. The data present the strong correlation
cane and then decomposed again, the ratio for growth in the (𝑅2 = 0.993604) between polarization (Pol) and sucrose con-
form of reducing sugar decreases gradually. Reducing sugar is tent (Suc), which implies that the model accounts for
again constantly used for growth and synthesized to sucrose 99.3604% variability in the data. Lack of fit is insignificant,
in the cane. Coupled with the consumption of respiration, so so the model is considered adequate as it had a high 𝑅2 value
reducing sugar is decreasing with the increasing of plant age. and significant 𝐹 value. According to (2), sucrose content can
However, sucrose begins to be transformed, showing the so- be expressed approximately by polarization.
called “sugar back” phenomenon because of increased tem- Because factors that affect sucrose content (Suc) include
peratures and increased rain after March in the subtropical the apparent purity (Ap) and brix (Bx), multiple linear
climate of Guangxi, so the content of reducing sugar begins regression analysis is performed as follows:
to rise again. Therefore, the constantly dropping content of
reducing sugar of sugarcane during maturation stage is an Suc = 12.9679 + 0.1525 ⋅ Ap + 0.8578 ⋅ Bx. (3)
important characteristic of maturity. The lower the content
of reducing sugar is, the better the quality of cane juice is. The coefficient of determination of (3) is 0.993684, which
According to the above analysis, the sugar will be consumed indicates high degree of fitting, namely, high reliability of the
quickly after harvest. trend. The simple regression model reaches a very significant
4 Journal of Food Quality
Suc (%)
15 15.5
16 17.5 14.5 15
15 17 14 14.5 15
14 14.5
Suc (%)
14
16.5
13 13.5
14
Bx (%)
16 13.5
12 13 14
11 15.5 13 13.5
18
17 90 15 12.5 13
Bx 16 88
(% 15 86 12.5 13
) 84 14.5 12
14 82 )
80 Ap (% 12.5
12
Figure 5: 3D response surface of the detected data (apparent purity, 82 83 84 85 86 87 88
brix, and sucrose content). Ap (%)
14
12
4. Conclusions
This work has dynamically analyzed five quality indexes
10
18 of sugarcane juice along the course of crushing season
17 16 (December–March) in the Guangxi province of China. Sim-
16 15 ple linear regression analysis showed that the following
Bx 14
(%
) 15 13 quality indexes have strong correlation between them and the
14 12 )
11 Pol (% regression models are extremely significant (𝑝 < 0.01): (a)
Figure 7: 3D response surface of the detected data (polarization, sucrose content (Suc) and brix (Bx); (b) sucrose content (Suc)
brix, and sucrose content) at apparent purity = 81.16%. and polarization (Pol); (c) apparent purity (Ap), brix (Bx),
and sucrose content (Suc); (d) polarization (Pol), brix (Bx),
and sucrose content (Suc); (e) apparent purity (Ap), polar-
Suc (%) [Hold Ap = 81.16%]
ization (Pol), and sucrose content (Suc); (f) apparent purity
(Ap), polarization (Pol), brix (Bx), and sucrose content (Suc);
11
17.5
12
(g) sucrose content (Suc), brix (Bx), and gravity purity (Gp);
13
14
15
16
12
16
13
14
15
Conflicts of Interest
16
17
15.5
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
15
14.5
Acknowledgments
13
14
15
16
17
Peptides
Advances in
BioMed
Research International
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Stem Cells
International
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Virolog y
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
International Journal of
Genomics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Journal of
Nucleic Acids
=RRORJ\
International Journal of