Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assessment Sheet
Our Lady of Fatima University
Research Development and Innovation Center
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Research Title
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Chair: d
Panel Members Member 1: d
Member 2: d
Statistician
MANUSCRIPT CRITERIA
EXCEPTIONAL GOOD AVERAGE POOR
3 POINTS 2 POINTS 1 POINT 0 POINT
Concise and clearly stated;
Stated but difficult to
PROBLEM Rationale and significance are Concise and clearly stated Inferred
understand
discussed
Clearly stated sampling, Design of study clearly stated; Design of study clearly stated;
procedure and measurement Sampling procedure and Sampling selection procedure Design of study, sampling
METHOD tools are clearly identified; measurement tools were and measurement tools are selection, measurement tools
Reliability and validity were clearly defined; Procedures stated; Procedures are and procedures were vague
discussed are clearly stated difficult to understand
Clear and consistent with
aims; Research design
ANALYSIS Data analysis were presented Data analysis is vague Data analysis is not stated
appropriate for type of data
collected
Clearly described; Limitations
Results and findings were Results and findings were Results and findings were not
RESULT and generalizability is
presented vague stated
discussed
Implication to professional
practice is discussed; Implication for professional Implication for professional Implication for professional
CONCLUSION
Limitation and generalizability practice is described practice is vague practice is not stated
is discussed
Impressive and complete Presentation not completed Presentation is poor and
PRESENTATION Complete presentation
presentation within the required period incomplete
Well written, correct spelling Clearly written; Few
Vague, poor grammar; Did
MANUSCRIPT and grammar; Follows misspelled words; Few Research is disorganized
not follow required format
required format formatting problems
Score Matrix RECOMMENDATIONS
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
24=100 11=79
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
23=97 10=78
22=94 9=77 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
21=92 8=75 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
20=90 7=73
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
19=88 6=71
18=86 5=68 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
17=85 4=65 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
16=84 3=62
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
15=83 2=58
14=82 1=54 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13=81 0=50 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
12=80
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Score: Name of Panel Member over Signature: Date: