You are on page 1of 2

ATENEO DE DAVAO UNIVERSITY

School of Business and Governance


MGT 4259 – STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
Peer Evaluation on the Assigned Group Tasks

Section and Group Number: _______________________


Report Title/Case Title: ____________________
Date of Submission: ______________________

5 = Excellent work; was crucial component to group’s success


4 = Very strong work; contributed significantly to group
3 = Sufficient effort; contributed adequately to group
2 = Insufficient effort; met minimal standards of group

1 = Little or weak effort; was detrimental to group


An assessment of “1” or “0”requires a written explanation.

Team Name Rating for Quantity of


Member No Rating for Quality of
Contribution (0-5)
Contribution (0-5)

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

GROUP
LEADER

SELF
Self-Reflection

1. What did you learn from the experience?

- I learned how important it is to be productive, manage time efficiently, handle pressure, and ensure
that everyone in the group contributes fairly to our project, promoting fairness and teamwork.

2. What do you think went well?

- Our audit paper turned out successfully, indicating our group effectively tackled challenges by
working together and adapting to achieve our common goal.

3. What would you have done differently, given the opportunity?

- If I could do it over, I would have communicated more openly with my group members from the
start, ensuring clear roles and balanced work distribution to create a cooperative and supportive
atmosphere.

4. Do you have any other comments or suggestions about the project?

- In addition to the lessons learned, it's vital to balance productivity and stress management while
also replicating successful practices from this project in the future. Continuous efforts to improve
communication and cooperation within the group will lead to consistent success in future
collaborations.

Submitted by:

________________
Date: ______________________

You might also like