Peer Evaluation Form

IST 5885
Spring 2020

Your name: _______​Griffin Sauter​__________________________________________

Your group number: ______________________​1​______________________________

Please evaluate the contribution of your group members (including yourself) on a scale of 0-10
(10 being highest and 0 being lowest). If your rating is less than 10/10, please provide written
justifications in the form below. :

Group member name: _____________________​Griffin

Sauter​___________________________

Criteria Evaluation (1-10)

Quantity of effort 10
Quality of effort 9
Professionalism 10
Overall contribution 9.5

Justification: ​I am always willing and able to meet with my team, respond promptly to group
messages, and take the lead in group discussions and brainstorms.

1
Group member name: _________________________​Becca Davis​_______________________

Criteria Evaluation (1-10)

Quantity of effort 10
Quality of effort 9
Professionalism 9
Overall contribution 9

Justification: ​Becca is a strong group member with a lot to offer in terms of ideas and work ethic.
However she can appear unprofessional when responding to group messages.

Group member name: ___________________​Miles Huber​_____________________________

Criteria Evaluation (1-10)

Quantity of effort 10
Quality of effort 9
Professionalism 10
Overall contribution 9.5

Justification: ​Miles did a great job on this second mini-project, and contributed way more than he
did in the first project.

2
3
Group member name: _______________________​Yingrui Xi​_________________________

Criteria Evaluation (1-10)

Quantity of effort 9
Quality of effort 10
Professionalism 10
Overall contribution 9.5

Justification: ​Yingrui is great to work with and is very good at time management and keeping us
on track.

Group member name: _____________________​Matthew

Allen​___________________________

Criteria Evaluation (1-10)

Quantity of effort 10
Quality of effort 9
Professionalism 10
Overall contribution 9.5

Justification: ​Matt is an intelligent individual who communicates effectively and always has
deadlines in mind.

Group member name: _____________________​Khaled

Alfaleh​___________________________

Criteria

4
Evaluation (1-10)

Quantity of effort

8.5

Quality of effort

10

Professionalism

10

Overall contribution

Justification: ​Khaled is a hard worker and diligent, but seems to be too complacent with work
that is not at an exceptional level of quality. On the other hand, he is a pleasure to work with.