Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract - Rigorous calculation of gravity effects of faults for the mterpretation of subsurface structure
from exploration gravity surveys is ttme-consummg and tedious. Resort to electronic computers is
convenient but not always necessary. Simple hand calculations can be instructive and are often adequate and
useful. Thas paper confirms the basic ideas of some geophysicists on the usefulness of approximating most
fault structures by one semi-infinite horizontal slab, and presents two simple nomograms to determine the
slab parameters from gravity very rapidly.
A field example from the MersaMatruh Basin, Western Desert of Egypt, is presented in which the thickness
and depth of a fault are estimated from the nomograms and verified from drilhng data.
P(x,z)
// t
iz _ X
: _t
h
%
[ : eco
/
Fig. I. P a r a m e t e r s of o n e semi-infinite slab. 070_:E
0
Also, from equation (5), it is clear that a depth to the
central axls of the fault required to have a gravity Fig. 2. N o m o g r a m s h o w i n g s l a b t h i c k n e s s e s t i m a t i o n
effect of one regal is about 0.32/S=.
{S) wells {Fig. 4}. The thickness of the fault is about
T H E NOMOGRAMS 610 meters and the depth to the fault is more t h a n
4000 meters (Barakat a n d Darwish, 1984). The age
Based on the above formulation, we have of faulting is Lower Cretaceous time (KSstandi,
constructed two simple n o m o g r a m s to be used for 1959; Said, 1962; Abdin and Deibis, 1972).
rapid determination of the fault p a r a m e t e r s (t and Before gravity anomalies are modeled, it is
z). The first n o m o g r a m is shown in Fig. 2 and is important to remove a regional field caused by
u s e d to determine the thickness of the slab from Ag deep seated s t r u c t u r e s from the Bouguer map
and the density contrast. On the other hand, the (Fig. 4a). When we exclude graphical m e t h o d s of
second n o m o g r a m which is shown in Fig. 3, is used deter-minlng regionals from our consideration, on
to determine the depth to the central axis of slab the ground of their being involved with personal
from Ag and S=. In both cases, a straight line prejudices and j u d g m e n t s , we are left with other
connecting the two k n o w n values is drawn, the methods such as those due to Griffin (I 949), Saxov
intersection of this straight line with the t-axis a n d Nygaard (1953), Swartz (1954), and
(Fig. 2) or with z-axls (Fig. 3) gives the value oft or Abdelrahman et al. (1985). In this study, the
z, respectively. regional field is obtained by applying the least-
We stress that the a c c u r a c y of the results squares m e t h o d (Abdelrahman e t al_, 1985) to the
obtained by these n o m o g r a m s depends upon the Bouguer values digitized from the original Bouguer
a c c u r a c y to which the residual anomaly, c a u s e d by anomaly map on an 19 x 16 square grid pattern
the fault alone, c a n be separated from the Bouguer with grid separation of 2.5 kin. Regional compo-
anomaly. nents ofilrst, second, third, and fourth orders were
fitted to the input data. The correlation factors
FIELD EXAMPLE between successive residual m a p s were computed
in order to determine the optimum order of the
To illustrate the practical application of the regional surface which, when subtraced from the
approach developed here, a field example from the observed gravity values p r o d u c e s o p t i m u m
n o r t h e m part of the Mersa Matruh basin, Northern residual component of the field {Abdelrahman et
Western Desert of Egypt is presented. In Fig. 4a, a/-, 1985). Here the correlation factors between
the Bouguer anomaly of Mersa Matruh area as successive residual m a p s were determined using a
being compiled in 1985 by the Egyptian General formula given by Davis (1973). Results were:
Petroleum Corp., using a Bouguer density of
2.3 g / c m 3, Is shown. A fault zone striking NE-SW r12 = 0.9064, r23 = 0.6667, and r34 = 06073,
is evidenced from Mersa Matruh (MM) and Siqueffa
Nomograms for determining fault parameters from gravity data 457
@
-- G0
°° Computed j
_
0 0125 -- 35
e Sm ~
o /T o05e ed
_ O"'r"° i "4
0 0250 -- 50
0 0575 _
-- 25
c~
~o E
00500 - ~6-_'~ o -- 2O
s
O
o
o
= L
.J 0 0625 -- --15 (D
<3
o
(D
0 0750 --
10
tO x
0 087~ --
- zn
5
FormuLobon Sm: A g / r r Z
0 I000 --
0
(a)
3-- I
~LS
I
2
fault trace point / ! 2
c~ V7-] s s
E
v~J
b 0 5
(D Sh
51Ol5` i -I
4
-2 Dot
I I I I x(km) 5
5 10 15 20
Sh/LS
6
surface MM S
o .............!...,,i,,,,,,,,,,,, I LS/Do(
~ . - _ . -
7
[--1 Sh/SS
27000~ v • ,~~--:---ff - .~-, ...........
CI:lrngat 8
o~ [~-] s s
C)
| OoOooOO O o O f ~ ) [ ± t
- ,UI/I/////////VA ) L 9
J" 12"l~"\FauLt zone ~ DoL/LS