Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bessel
Bessel
G-function identities
Victor Adamchik
Wolfram Research Inc., 100 Trade Center Dr., Champaign, IL 61820, USA
Abstract
1 Introduction
The article Adamchik and Kolbig [1] considers a singular case of the G-
function arising from the integral of a product of two polylogarithms. It
was shown that there are no serious obstacles to evaluating a G-function in
the special case algorithmically. Although Mathematica is doing this already,
2 Reduction Formulas
n
Y
(a)n = (a + i − 1),
i=1
p
Y
Γ(~an,p + s) = Γ(ai + s).
i=n
q ≥ 1, 0 ≤ n ≤ p ≤ q, 0 ≤ m ≤ q.
and
I
m,n a 1 Γ(b~ 1,m + s) Γ(1 − a~ 1,n − s)
Gp, q z p = z−s ds
bq 2πi ~
Γ(~an+1,p + s) Γ(1 − bm+1,q − s)
L
where the contour of the integration L is a left loop, beginning and ending at
−∞ and encircling all poles of Γ(bk +s), k = 1, 2, . . . , m in the positive direction,
but none of the right series of the poles of Γ(1 − ak − s), k = 1, 2, . . . , n.
CASE 1. a − b is positive
m+1,n+1 a, ap a−b m+1,n ap
Gp+1, q+2 z = (−1) Gp, q+1 z −
a, bq, b b, bq
" # (1)
a−b
a−b
X Γ(b + s) Γ(b~ 1,m + s) Γ(1 − a
~ 1,n − s) −s
(−1) Res z
k=1
s=−a+k ~
Γ(~an+1,p + s) Γ(1 − bm+1,q − s)
2
CASE 2. a − b is negative or zero
m+1,n+1 a, ap b−a m+1,n ap
Gp+1, q+2 z = (−1) Gp, q+1 z (2)
a, bq, b b, bq
Proof.
Consider the integrand of the G-function on the left side of equations (1)
and (2). For the purpose of clear exposition, we will concentrate on those
gamma functions in the integrand that involve parameters a and b:
Γ(a + s) Γ(1 − a − s)
Γ(1 − b − s)
Applying a reflection formula for the gamma function
π
Γ(1 − a − s) = ,
Γ(a + s) sin π(a + s)
sin π(b + s)
Γ(b + s)
sin π(a + s)
Now we have to figure out how this algebraic transformation has changed
the poles of the integrand. The below picture shows that in the case where
a − b is a positive integer, the transformation has added a finite number of
new poles at −a + 1, −a + 2, . . . , −a + (a − b) :
3
... ? ? ? ? ... ?
... −a − 1 −a −a + 1 −a + 2 ... −b = −a + (a − b)
| {z }
It follows that, to make the relation (3) completely correct we need to sub-
stract the sum of residues at the new poles from the G-function on the right
side of (3). To complete this case, we need to check if the contour of in-
tegration separates these new poles from the right series of poles. This is
provided by the restriction
−b − l 6= 1 − ak + j, k = 1, . . . , n,
m, n+1 a, ap , b a−b m, n ap , a
Gp+2,q+1 z = (−1) Gp+1,q z (4)
bq , b bq
Proof. In very much the same way as it is done for the previous propo-
sitions, we can prove this one. The only difference is that in this case the
transformation by using a reflection formula is invariant with respect to
those poles of the integrand which belong to the domain encircled by the
contour L.
4
Proposition 3 Suppose a − b and c − a + 1 are positive integers and ak − b, k =
1, . . . , n are not positive integers. Then
a, ap a−b ap
(a − z d )
m+1,n+1 m+1,n
Gp+1, q+2 z = (−1) Gp, q+1 z −
c, bq, b dz c−a b, bq
" # (5)
a−b
c−b
X ~ 1,m + s) Γ(b + s) Γ(1 − a
Γ(b ~ 1,n − s)
(−1) Res (a + s) z−s
k=1
s=1−b−k ~
Γ(~an+1,p + s) Γ(1 − bm+1,q − s) c−a
Γ(c + s) Γ(1 − a − s)
(6)
Γ(1 − b − s)
a−b = r and c − a + 1 = k
Then
r
Γ(1 − b − s) = Γ(1 − a − s + r) = (1 − a − s) Γ(1 − a − s) = (−1) (a − r + s) Γ(1 − a − s)
r r
and
m+1,n+1 a, ap
Gp+1, q+2 z ⇒
c, bq, b
a−b I
(−1) Γ(b + s) Γ(b~ 1,m + s) Γ(1 − a~ 1,n − s)
(a + s) z−sds
2πi Γ(~an+1,p + s) Γ(1 − b~ m+1,q − s) c−a
L
5
Represent the inner polynomial (a + s)c−a with respect to s through deriva-
tives with respect to z. In operator form this is
d k −s
sk z−s = (−z ) z
dz
or
d
(a + s) z−s = (a − z ) z−s
c−a dz c−a
Hence,
a, ap a−b ap
(a − z d )
m+1,n+1 m+1,n
Gp+1, q+2 z ⇒ (−1) Gp, q+1 z (7)
c, bq, b dz c−a b, bq
Again we should figure out how this transformation has changed the poles
of the integrand. It is clear that formally the parameter c from the G-function
on the left side has been replaced by b. This means that the transformation
has added new poles to the integrand at points −c + 1, . . . , −b. Consequently,
we have to subtract the sum of residues at these points from the G-function
on the right side (7) and we immediately accomplish the proposition.
3 Examples
In order to show how and where these propositions are working, we con-
sider a few improper integrals of a product of Bessel functions.
3.1 Example 1
In the article McPhedrane t al. [4] the authors investigated the following
class of integrals
Z∞
x exp(−x2/z) Jn (x) Yn (x) dx
0
and discovered common analytical formulas for their solutions. In this sec-
tion we show how to evaluate this type of integral algorithmically. Consider
the most interesting case, when the parameter n is an integer. Without loss
of generality we can set the parameter n to, for example, 2. In the first step
we use the Mellin integral transform to represent the integral as Meijer’s
G-function:
6
Z∞
z 2,2 0, 1/2, −1/2
x exp(−x2/z) J2(x) Y2(x) dx = √ G3,4 z
2 π 0, 2, −1/2, −2
0
2,2 1/2, 0, −1/2 2,1 1/2, −1/2
G3,4 z = G2,3 z −
2, 0, −1/2, −2 2, −2, −1/2
Γ(2 + s) Γ(−2 + s) Γ(1/2 − s) −s
Res z −
s=1 Γ(−1/2 + s) Γ(3/2 − s)
Γ(2 + s) Γ(−2 + s) Γ(1/2 − s) −s
Res z
s=2 Γ(−1/2 + s) Γ(3/2 − s)
Again, we can reduce the order of the G-function here, by applying the
proposition 2, where a = 1/2 and b = −1/2. It implies
2,1 1/2, −1/2 2,0 1/2
G2,3 z = G1,2 z
2, −2, −1/2 2, −2
The G-function on the right side is a known integral representation for the
modified Bessel function Kv (x) (see [3, p.307]):
c−1/2
z K(z/2)
2,0 c
G1,2 z = √a−c+1/2
(8)
a, b exp(z/2) π
where 2 c − a − b − 1 = 0.
Finally, we obtain
Z∞
−2 4 z K2 (z/2)
x exp(−x2/z) J2 (x) Y2(x) dx = + − (9)
π zπ 2 π exp(z/2)
0
3.2 Example 2
Z∞
x exp(−x2/z) I3 (x) K3 (x) dx
0
7
With the same technique we can express this as a G-function:
Z∞
z 2,2 1/2, 0
2
x exp(−x /z) I3(x) K3 (x) dx = √ G2,3 z
4 π 0, 3, −3
0
2,2 1/2, 0 2,1 1/2
G2,3 z = − G1,2 z +
0, 3, −3 3, −3
Res Γ(3 + s) Γ(−3 + s) Γ(1/2 − s) z−s +
s=1
Res Γ(3 + s) Γ(−3 + s) Γ(1/2 − s) z−s +
s=2
Res Γ(3 + s) Γ(−3 + s) Γ(1/2 − s) z−s
s=3
Evaluating residues and using this representation of the Bessel function
Kv (x) from Luke (see [3, p.307]):
c−1/2 √
2,1 c z K (z/2) exp(z/2) π
G1,2 z = a−c+1/2
(10)
a, b cos π (a − c + 1/2)
3.3 Example 3
Z∞
x3 exp(−x2/z) J2 (x) Y2(x) dx
0
z2 2,2 1/2, −1, −1/2
√ G3,4 z
2 π 2, 0, −1/2, −2
8
Applying the proposition 2 with a = 1/2 and b = −1/2 we reduce this
G-function to
−z2 2,1 −1, 1/2
√ G2,3 z
2 π 2, 0, −2
Now we can easily observe that the proposition 3 is applicable to this func-
tion. With a = −1, b = −2 and c = 0 it follows that
2,1 −1, 1/2 2,0 1/2 d 2,0 1/2
G2,3 z = G1,2 z +z G1,2 z +
2, 0, −2 2, −2 dz 2, −2
Γ(2 + s) Γ(−2 + s) (s − 1) Γ(2 + s) Γ(−2 + s) (s − 1)
Res + Res
s=1 Γ(1/2 + s) zs s=2 Γ(1/2 + s) zs
Z∞
x3 exp(−x2/z) J2 (x) Y2(x) dx =
0
(12)
−4 z (2 + z) K0 (z/2) z (8 + 4z + z ) K1 (z/2)
2 2
+ +
π 4 π exp(z/2) 4 π exp(z/2)
3.4 Example 4.
Z∞
x5 exp(−x2/z) I3 (x) K3(x) dx
0
z3 2,2 1/2, −2
√ G2,3 z
4 π 3, 0, −3
9
1/2, −2 1/2 1/2
− 3z d
2,2 2,1 2,1
G2,3 z = −2 G1,2 z G1,2 z −
3, 0, −3 3, −3 dz 3, −3
d 2 2,1 1/2
(−z ) G1,2 z +
dz 3, −3
X
3
Res Γ(3 + s) Γ(−3 + s) Γ(1/2 − s) (s − 1) (s − 2) z−s
k=1 s=k
References
[2] Adamchik, V.S, Marichev, O. I. (1990). The algorithm for calculating integrals
of hypergeometric type functions and its realization in REDUCE System. Proc.
Conf. ISSAC’90. Tokyo, 212–224.
[3] Luke, Y. L. (1975). Mathematical functions and their approximations. New York:
Academic Press.
[4] McPhedran, R. C., Dawes, D. H., Scott, T. C. (1993). On a Bessel function integral.
Maple Tech. Newsletter 8, 33–38.
10