FIRST GENERAL ASSEMBLY
September 30, 2023
Name: ____________________________________________
Designation: _______________________________________
RATING FOR SESSION
Rate the session with the following scale 5- Strongly
Agree 4- Agree 3- Neither Disagree nor Agree 2-
Disagree 1- Strongly Disagree
5 4 3 2
1. Session started on time.
2. Session ended on time.
3. Objectives of the session were
achieved.
4. Topic was well-suited to the
online format.
5. Participants were engaged in the
activities
6. Activities were congruent to the
objectives
7. Activities were appropriate to
adult learning
8. The online session was relevant to
our current work
9. Time allotment for the topic was
adequate
RATING FOR THE FACILITATOR
Name of Facilitator: _________________________________
Rate the session with the following scale 5- Strongly
Agree 4- Agree 3- Neither Disagree nor Agree 2-
Disagree 1- Strongly Disagree
5 4 3 2
1. Facilitator exhibited mastery of
the topic.
2. Facilitator expressed ideas clearly.
3. Facilitator asked stimulating
questions.
4. Facilitator processed questions
and responses to deepen learning.
5. Facilitator maintained positive
learning environment.
6. Facilitator communicated clearly
and was easy to understand.
7. Facilitator was organized, well
prepared, and used time
efficiently.
8. Facilitator presented course
material in a clear manner that
facilitated understanding.
9. Facilitator was effective in
facilitating online discussion.
How can the session be improved at all?
(Suggestions/Recommendations)
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
FIRST GENERAL ASSEMBLY
September 30, 2023
Name: ____________________________________________
Designation: _______________________________________
RATING FOR SESSION
Rate the session with the following scale 5- Strongly
Agree 4- Agree 3- Neither Disagree nor Agree 2-
Disagree 1- Strongly Disagree
1 5 4 3 2 1
1. Session started on time.
2. Session ended on time.
3. Objectives of the session were
achieved.
4. Topic was well-suited to the
online format.
5. Participants were engaged in
the activities
6. Activities were congruent to
the objectives
7. Activities were appropriate to
adult learning
8. The online session was relevant
to our current work
9. Time allotment for the topic
was adequate
RATING FOR THE FACILITATOR
Name of Facilitator: _________________________________
Rate the session with the following scale 5- Strongly
Agree 4- Agree 3- Neither Disagree nor Agree 2-
Disagree 1- Strongly Disagree
1 5 4 3 2 1
1. Facilitator exhibited mastery of
the topic.
2. Facilitator expressed ideas
clearly.
3. Facilitator asked stimulating
questions.
4. Facilitator processed questions
and responses to deepen learning.
5. Facilitator maintained positive
learning environment.
6. Facilitator communicated clearly
and was easy to understand.
7. Facilitator was organized, well
prepared, and used time efficiently.
8. Facilitator presented course
material in a clear manner that
facilitated understanding.
9. Facilitator was effective in
facilitating online discussion.
How can the session be improved at all?
(Suggestions/Recommendations)
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________