Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Temirkulova S.B.
DIPLOMA THESIS
Almaty 2022
1
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN
DIPLOMA THESIS
―Approved to defence‖
Head of the department
of Bioresources and Biodiversity _______________ Kurmanbayeva M.S.
Almaty 2022
2
ABSTRACT
3
РЕФЕРАТ
4
РЕФЕРАТ
p
INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………….......... 7
1 LITERATURE REVIEW……………………………………………....... 8
1.1 General understanding of ecosystem services............................................ 8
1.2 Ecosystem Services of Freshwater Organisms…………………………... 12
1.3 Problems of Conservation of Diversity of Freshwater Fishes.................... 16
1.4 Problems of conservation of ecosystems of mountain rivers……………. 17
1.5 General characteristics of natural conditions…………………………..... 18
2 МATERIALS AND METHODS……………………………………....... 21
2.1 Physical and geographical characteristics of the study area…………….. 21
2.2 Water analysis methods.............................................................................. 21
2.3 Methods for collecting and processing ichthyological data …………….. 24
2.4 Statistical processing techniques................................................................ 25
2.5 Methods for assessing the socio-economic condition of the study area… 25
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS……………………………………..… 27
3.1 Results of the assessment of the ecological state of the river……….… 27
3.2 Results of studying the diversity of fish in the natural environment……. 30
3.3 Results of morphological analysis and condition of fish in the natural 35
environment………………………………………………………………
3.4 General assessment of the state of the ecosystem of the Yssyk River and 39
proposals for its rational use.......................................................................
CONCLUSION………………………………………………………….......... 46
REFERENCES…………………………………………………………........... 48
6
INTRODUCTION
Relevance
Physical and geographical conditions of the south-east of the Republic of
Kazakhstan is a favorable region for agriculture and human habitation. Therefore, at
the end of the last century, the transformation of the city of Almaty into a multi-
million metropolis began, which began to have an adverse impact on the
environment. As a result, many natural ecosystems have been transformed. The gorge
of the Yssyk River has been one of the most visited places for outdoor recreation for
many decades. At present, the anthropogenic load here has increased significantly
due to the mass recreation of people in the warm season, as well as the intensification
of economic activity.
In addition, significant changes are happened in the river itself, for the most part
due to the influence of anthropogenic factors. This in turn contributes to the
stagnation of ecosystem services. Gradually, the situation may get out of control, as
water consumption will naturally increase as water needs get higher consumption. It
can be surmised that the leading sources of water pollution in the region are
endeavors and establishments that send out sewer water to meadows where filtration
is formed.
Aims and tasks of investigation. The target of our study was to estimate the
ecosystem services of the Yssyk River. The objectives of the study were: to study the
physical and chemical indicators of water, the diversity of fish, the variability of
morphobiological indicators of mass fish species, to propose measures to optimize
the use of ecosystem services.
The object was the Kazakhstan section of the Yssyk River, water, farms located
on the river, and common fish species. For morphobiological analysis, samples of the
most common fish species were taken - Naked osman (Gymnodiptychus dybowskii),
Tibetan stone loach (Triplophysa stoliczkai), and trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).
Material and Methods
For analysis, water samples were taken from the upper, middle and lower
reaches of the Yssyk River. Conducted physico-chemical and biological analysis of
water.
Practical and theoretical importance of the study: The practical significance
of the work is determined by the need to improve the recreation and irrigation areas.
Freshwater ecosystems are used by humans for various purposes: for drinking water
supply, irrigation, technical and household needs, fish farming and recreation.
Currently, all freshwater ecosystems are experiencing a strong negative
anthropogenic impact due to the increased population and the needs of each person.
The scientific novelty of the study lies in the study and assessment of
ecosystem services of the Yssyk River. According to the results of these learnings,
we have announced one thesis at the Farabi Alemi conference. Based on the results of
the study, the presence of nitrates in the middle and lower reaches was not detected.
7
1 LITERATURE REVIEW
It has now become clear that the natural diversity of animals and plants is
necessary to maintain a human-friendly environment. Those functions that various
types of organisms perform in their ecosystems, which are necessary for this, are
called ecosystem services [1,2].
Ecosystem values are not sufficiently taken into account when making decisions
regarding natural resources. In this context, the concept of ecosystem services offers
an essential opportunity to increase a framework for the rational use of biodiversity,
in addition other natural resources. Although the advantages of using ecosystem
services to build biodiversity assessments have been documented, classification
systems used mixed processes (means) to obtain services and the services themselves
(goals) within the same classification category. This restriction of their contribution
to biodiversity-related choices. The ambivalence of definitions of key titles, such as
ecosystem processes, functions and services, aggravates this situation. After
analyzing the definitions and discussing the main components of an effective
typology, this document develops a classification of ecosystem services that provides
a basis for decision-making in the field of natural resource management. However,
further work is required to address certain issues, such as the classifying of socio-
cultural services. Even though science can facilitate effective decision-making by
clearly dividing services and expressing their relationship to processes, final
decisions regarding biodiversity and other natural resources are naturally socio-
political and included a certain cultural context [1].
Ecosystems give a range of services that are of abecedarian significance to
mortal well- being, health, livelihoods, and survival [2]. Interest in ecosystem
services in both the exploration and policy communities has grown fleetly. In 1997,
the value of global ecosystem services was evaluated to be around US$ 33 trillion per
time (in 1995$ US), a figure significantly larger than global gross domestic product
(GDP) at the time. This actually crude underrate of the weal benefits of natural
capital, and a many other early studies stimulated a huge swell in interest in this
content. In 2005, the conception of ecosystem services gained broader attention when
the United Nations published its Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). The
MEA was a four- time, 1300-scientist study for legislator. Between 2007 and 2010,
an alternate transnational action was accepted by the UN Environment Programme,
called the Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. The TEEB report was picked
up considerably by the mass media, bringing ecosystem services to a broader
followership. Ecosystem services have now also entered the knowledge of
mainstream media and business. The World Business Council for Sustainable
Development has laboriously supported and developed the conception. Hundreds of
systems and groups are presently working toward better understanding, modeling,
valuation, and operation of ecosystem services and natural capital. It would be
8
insolvable to list all of them then, but arising indigenous, public, and global networks,
like the Ecosystem Services Partnership (ESP), are doing just that and are
coordinating their attempts [3].
Francis R.C. was one of the first who tried to estimate modern fisheries science,
its settled traditions, most common uses, and unborn directions. Reasons are
hypothesized as to why fisheries science has constantly led operation to fall detail of
its pretensions, and suggestions are given as to, how fisheries wisdom might evolve
in the future. It was suggested that, of loftiest significance to this elaboration, is a
mindfulness that the scientific approach used to attack a fishery assessment and
operation problem depends on the nature of the individual fishery. In some fisheries,
important consequences can be made by concentrating attention on the utilized stocks
themselves; in others, the structure of the utilized community and its relation to grope
productivity and dynamics should be considered in order to realize effective
operation [4].
While fish stocks in Lake Balkhash have been manipulated in order to gain fish
product by trans- receptacle fish prolusions since the beginning of this century, the
fishery in mountain water bodies of Central Asia and Kazakhstan has concentrated
largely on the taking advantage of indigenous fish stocks. Still, a further increase in
yields has been observed possible for some water bodies of the Kazakhstan Altai,
Dzhungarskiy Alatau and northern Tien Shan. These areas have several lakes and
gutters yet largely innocent by mortal conditioning, and budgets where fish stocks
have formerly been managed in some way. Piecemeal from the intensification of
prisoner fisheries, their coldwaters could be used forsemi-intensive culture of request-
size fish and for the product of grazing material for regular sock of coldwater bodies.
It's known that some of the indigenous fish species have the eventuality to ameliorate
fish yields in the being water bodies, or to be introduced in fish culture. Farther
possibility for adding yields still exists throughinter-basin transfers of fish species in
named mountain lakes and budgets. The northern Tien Shan mountain system
comprises several ranges. The ranges of Zailiyskiy Alatau and Kungey Alatau are
resemblant with Lake Yssyk-kul skirting it in the north. While numerous aqueducts
of the Kungey Alatau run into Issyk-kul, those of Zailiyskiy Alatau substantially
enter the River Ili, which itself ends in Lake Balkhash. South of Lake Issyk-kul and
in resemblant with it, extends the range of Terskey Alatau, and west of Lake Issyk-
kul starts Kyrgyzskiy Khrebet. Utmost aqueducts draining the last mountain range
feed into the River Chu, which ultimately ends in comeuppance of Kazakhstan, close
to the River Syr Darya. Fish stocks and fisheries in Issyk-kul, in water bodies of the
southern Tien Shan, and in the river Chu are dealt with in another paper in this
publication. Rivers of the two most northern ranges of Tien Shan give vital water
force for Lake Balkhash. The swash network is thick, each swash having
multitudinous feeders. There's plenitude of underground water which has a constant
temperature throughout the time. The water has a high dissolved oxygen content and
is low in minerals. Several mountain lakes in this region redounded from landslides
which blocked denes. Some of the heads formed by landslides are unstable and can
be broken through by slush and gemstone slides, which are relatively frequent. This is
9
a constraint hindering the establishment of stable fish stocks and it also prevents the
establishment of a salmonid- grounded fishery. Utmost slush and gemstone slides
take place in summer and are caused by rain, performing in a short-lasting but
unforeseen increase in discharges. Similar cataracts fleetly increase the water
turbidity and the high attention of suspended solids may clog fish gills performing in
fishkills. Lake Balkhash and the Alakol lakes, the ultimate positioned north of
Dzhungarskiy Alatau and east of Lake Balkhash, represent insulated drainages. Both
lakes are slightly salty. The largest swash in the Balkhash system is the Ili. The Ili
receives numerous feeders from the high mountains of the Zailiyskiy Alatau and
Kungey Alatau positioned south of it. Some gutters of Dzhungarskiy Alatau
positioned north of the River Ili drain south into the Ili, while others supply water
directly to the Alakol lakes and Lake Balkhash. Karatal, which originates on the
western pitches of Dzhungarskiy Alatau, is the second largest swash reaching Lake
Balkhash. Some of the gutters flowing towards Lake Balkhash reach it only in spring,
due to the seasonal change in discharges and the irrigation demand. The draining area
of Lake Balkhash is geographically separated from that of the Aral Sea, but both
water bodies partake numerous common fish species, utmost of which belong to the
Schizothoracinae and Noemachelidae [5].
The Balkhash perch Perca schrenkii is one of the indigenous and aboriginal fish
species of the Balkhash Lake milepost, including the Alakol Lakes system [5]. There
are two point of view about its origin: It either is a relic of the ancient fish fauna, or is
a postglacial meddler. A chapter in this volume provides strong substantiation from
DNA sequencing data that it's a true species and is the family species of P. flavescent
from North America. The Balkhash perch formerly added up to one of the most
essential traditional original fisheries, still, in the alternate part of the 20th century
other fish species were introduced into its native range, which came preferred as
food. Altogether, the Balkhash perch was introduced to the Nura River and the Chu
River basins. The native range of the Balkhash perch has come significantly
decreased and it's now rare in utmost of the Balkhash Lake receptacle. Introduced
populations of this species to other areas weren't successful. Although the external
morphology and life strategy of the Balkhash perch appear rather adaptable, this
species future is undetermined [6].
River geographies are connected, complex, dynamic, interacting social –
ecological systems [7], [8]. From headstream to deltas, healthy gutters give all the
introductory musts for the survival and experimental requirements of humanity [9].
In recent decades, the survival of numerous gutters is at stake due to huge water
diversions for mortal requirements. Significant hydrological differences are results of
large investments in water technologies and architectures for irrigation and
hydropower across the globe as well as land- use change [10]. Variations to a swash
geography are the result of divergent preferences and the choices of different
stakeholders. Anthropogenic use of land and water, while serving mortal
development, has defaced the delivery of ecosystem services. These variations either
directly impact ecosystem functions or accelerate natural processes that affect swash-
inflow administrations and therefore ES product [11].
10
With global warming, the dissension between the force and demand of water
coffers is decreasingly prominent in thirsty areas. Enhancing water resource operation
is an essential way to palliate the deficit of ecological water force and ameliorate
ecosystem services in thirsty swash basins. Still, former studies have infrequently
conducted full-scale function zoning of ecosystem services using two aspects order
and strength change, grounded on the changes in ecosystem services. In this regard,
two scientific problems need to be solved: quantifying the temporal and spatial
changes of ecosystem services and conducting function zoning of ecosystem services
in terms of volume and quality. According to the eco-environmental characteristics of
thirsty basins, this study measured four crucial indicators: carbon storehouse (CAS),
evapotranspiration (ET), temperature foliage blankness indicator (TVDI) and
groundwater depth (GWD). We used the affiliated model to observational dissect the
spatial and temporal disposal of these four pointers and the spatial accumulation
characteristics of increases and diminishments [12].
Ecosystem services (ES) are established and maintained by ecosystems and
ecological processes, representing natural ecological conditions and their effect on
mortal well- being [13]. Quantifying ES can give environmental directors and policy
makers with useful information to find out precedence protection areas [14].
The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment suggested that ES contain four types of
services: supply, regulation, artistic and support. ESs are nearly related to human
well-being. According to the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, about 60 of the 24
ES assessed encyclopedically are demeaning. The sharp decline in ecosystem
services has a negative effect on mortal well- being and is a serious trouble to mortal
health and survival [15]. Thus, with this background, full-scale assessment of ES has
entered adding attention, and numerous experts and scholars have strengthened
exploration on ecosystems in order to maintain the force capacity of ES and keep
ecosystems steady.
Nature is appreciated by people in numerous different ways, while at the same
time natural ecosystems are being demeaned and demolished at an unknown scale.
One approach to evaluate and convey the value of nature to humanity relies on
formulating the important dependence of humans on nature in terms of ―ecosystem
services‖, or as nature‘s donation to people. In order to increase policy uptake and the
chances of success of protection and restoration efforts, high- position wisdom-
policy platforms have been settled up that served policy makers with desegregated
and concurred information beneficial biodiversity and ecosystem loss and also
presented protrusions to the future. Methodical reviews list between twenty and thirty
two ecosystem services, the most constantly mentioned bones being recreation and
tourism, water force, water quality control, niche provision, corrosion forestallment
like food force and climate regulation. Brackish Ecosystem services studies name
multitudinous provisioning services, like drag-plying rich soils for husbandry and
places for vineyards in the floodplains, wimp for construction, drinking water, and
food. Brackish ecosystems also give several managing services, like groundwater
recharge, deluge regulation, microclimate regulation, carbon insulation, water quality
control as well as artistic services, similar as the actuality of spiritual places, their
11
emblematic and aesthetic value, alleviation, giving a sense of place to people and
several recreational aspects — swimming, inclination, voyaging [16].
13
Presumably the most important donation of the wide recognition of ecosystem
services is that it reframes the relationship between humans and the rest of nature. A
better comprehension of the part of ecosystem services highlight our natural means as
critical factors of inclusive wealth, well- being, and sustainability. Sustaining and
enhancing mortal welfare requires a balance of all our means — individual people,
society, the erected frugality, and ecosystems. This replan of the way we look at
‗‗nature‘‘ is important to working the problem of how to make a continual and
advantageous future for humanity [24].
One of the most introductory laws of physics is that it's insolvable to produce
commodity from nothing. All profitable products affect from the metamorphosis of
raw accoutrements handed by nature. Likewise, it's insolvable to produce nothing
from commodity. All mortal- made products ultimately break down, wear out and fall
piecemeal, returning to the ecosystem as waste. The birth of raw accoutrements from
nature and the return of disordered waste are known as outturn. In addition, we know
from physics that the metamorphosis of raw material inputs into profitable products
and waste requires low entropy energy, inevitable changed through use into high
entropy waste. Moreover, limited stocks of fossil energies regard for nearly 90
percent of all energy used for profitable product, creating stable overflows of carbon
dioxide and other adulterants into the atmosphere. Society in charge of the rate at
which reactionary energies are uprooted, and hence the inflow of waste into the
ecosystem from their burning. Numerous of the raw accoutrements physically
converted into profitable products alternately serve as the structural structure blocks
of ecosystems. Like mineral energies, society can largely find out how presto to
deplete available stocks. For illustration, we can clear cut a million tree timber in one
time, or crop trees a time for 10 times. By this means that we can cache
ecosystemstructure. However, we've further trees available at the end of the decade,
If we refrain from cutting down trees for a decade [25].
A healthy ecosystem comes out from a particular arrangment of ecosystem
structure. Briefly, ecosystems serve as a fund able of creating a flux of ecosystem
services over time. Ecosystems aren't converted into the services they induce, society
has little control over the rate at which a fund generates services, and services cannot
be squirreled. For illustration, a timber isn't physically converted when it purifies
water and regulates swamping. A given timber can refine or balance only a limited
quantum of water per period. However, further services aren't available at the end of
the month, If there's no downfall for a month or if humans refrain from using water
sanctification and deluge regulation for a month [26].
It is suggested that, note that important of the literature treats numerous fitting
out services as a stock of raw accoutrements. By the description offered then, still,
provisioning services are the reproductive capacity of ecosystems. Actually animals
and plants are only able of replicating at a given rate over a time, aren't physically
converted into their seed (regardless the material in the seed, egg, or invigorated), and
reproductive volume can‘t be squirreled [27]. Economics is constantly explained as
‗‗the study of the allotment of limited, or scant, coffers among indispensable,
contending ends‘‘ [28]. This explanation doesn't presume request mechanisms.
14
Consider one of the central challenges in economics is to find out how important
ecosystem structure should be transformed into profitable products, and how
important left complete to induce ecosystem services. Society is used to be able to
decide how to respond this question, still, it must hierarchize the advantageous ends,
and must also have an establishment comprehension of the nature of the scarce
coffers. These three cases — the advantageous ends of profitable exertion, the nature
of ecosystem services and particular arrangement of ecosystem structure that gives
rise to them, and the ways to allocate — have given rise to several essential debates
on the economics of ecosystem services. The thing of this composition is to light up
these discussions. The composition is made around three advantageous ends that are
taken as self-evident sustainability, fairness and effectiveness [29].
Exchange of land- use is a notable motorist of ecosystem service changes.
According to this article land - use exchange impact water- related ecosystem
services (for example: water yield, water sanctification) in the Guishui River Basin,
Beijing. In addition to this water- related ecosystem services in the Basin are vitally
important for Beijing, which presently faces a severe water extremity.
Comprehension the effects of land - use change on water- related ecosystem services
is essential for effectively managing this extremity. Besides, the study first
anatomized land - use change and corresponding variations in water- related
ecosystem services in the Basin from 1980 to 2011. The examination represent that
increases in forestland and construction land enhanced water yield and soil
conservation services while reforestation and urbanization degraded water
sanctification services. Last but not least the paper also developed four spatially
unequivocal land use scripts, correlate with water conservation, agrarian growth, a
meld. Each of script assessed the effect of unborn land - use changes that happened
with water- related ecosystem services. This exploration found out that water
sanctification and soil conservation services increased under both the water
conservation and soil conservation scripts, while these services dropped under the
agrarian expansion script. Apart from this water yield also increased under the soil
conservation script. Above all, the paper shows that ecosystem services are
temporally specific and greatly affected by different scripts. This discovery
emphasise the worth of studies to ameliorate land operation practices. First and
foremost, this exploration would be useful for those policymakers and stakeholders
that aspired to read the impacts of indispensable land- use programs on water- related
ecosystem services. The restriction and failings of this study, including delicacy in
estimating ecosystem services, are bandied [30].
According to Sagoff M. provides differences between profitable and ecological
criteria for relating, measuring, and assessing ecosystem services. It sugested those
profitable stakeholders (stoner groups) generally do well in relating these services
and assigning prices to them. These prices arise spontaneously in — and serve to
coordinate — request exertion related to the terrain. The applicable ecological
information which requests gather and apply tends to be dispersed, contingent,
particular, original, temporary, and bedded in institutions and practices. As well as
ecologists and other scientists, in discrepancy, frequently seek to understand how
15
ecosystems work and which populations and processes give ecosystem services. The
knowledge wisdom seeks, unlike the information requests gather, tends to be
consolidated, cooperative, collaborative, and agreement- grounded, wisdom pursues
generalities and principles that are dateless and general rather than deciduous and
point-specific. On other hand the dispersed and decentralized information organized
by requests with the collaborative and centralized knowledge specific of wisdom.
Also this article argues that the abstract distance between request - grounded and
scince - grounded styles of assembling information and applying knowledge defeats
sweats to determine the ―worth‖ of ecosystem services in any intertwined sense [31].
Firstly, it has been 20 times since two seminal publications about ecosystem
services got out corrected book by Gretchen Daily [32] and an composition in Nature
by a group of ecologists and economists on the value of the world‘s ecosystem
services. At this time both have been veritably largely cited and demurred off an
explosion of exploration, policy, and operations of the idea, including the start of this
journal. This composition tracks down the history leading up to these publications
and the posterior debates, exploration, institutions, programs, on-the- ground conduct,
and difficulties they started. Also surveys which has learned during this period about
the crucial issues from delineations to bracket to valuation, from integrated modelling
to public participation and communication, and the elaboration of institutions and
governance invention. Eventually, it supplies recommendations for the future. In
particular, it points to the weakness of the mainstream profitable approaches to
valuation, growth, and development. It deduces that the substantial benefactions of
ecosystem services to the sustainable good of humans and the rest of nature should be
at the core of the abecedarian change demanded in profitable proposition and practice
if we're to achieve a societal metamorphosis to a sustainable and desirable future
[33].
At this time in the once many decades, the meadow of ecological economics has
witnessed a spectacular rise of concern with the assessment of ecosystem functions,
goods and services. Beforehand references to the conception of ecosystem functions,
services and their profitable value date back to themid-1960s and 1970s. More lately,
there has been an nearly rapidly progress in publications on the benefits of natural
ecosystems to mortal society. Even though the increase in publications on ecosystem
wares and services, a methodical typology and comprehensive frame for integrated
assessment and valuation of ecosystem functions remains fugitive. Subsequently
these purposes, in turn, give the wares and services that are evaluated by humans. In
the ecological literature, the terms of ecosystem function have been subject to
colorful, and occasionally antithetical, explanations. Occasionally the conception is
used to describe the internal functioning of the ecosystem and occasionally it
concludes the benefits deduced by humans from the parcels and processes of
ecosystems. In this paper, author mentioned explicitly detail ecosystem functions as
16
―the capacity of natural processes and factors to give goods and services that fulfil
mortal requirements, directly or laterally‖ [34]. By using this description, ecosystem
functions are stylish conceived as a subset of ecological processes, moreover
ecosystem structures. It is suggested that each function is the outcome of the natural
processes of the total ecological sub-system of which it's a part. An additional, natural
processes, in turn, are the outcome of compound relations between biotic and abiotic
factors of ecosystems through the universal driving forces of matter and energy.
Although a broad range of ecosystem functions and their associated goods and
services have been appertained to in literature, according to experience suggests in
this paper that it's accessible to group ecosystem functions into four primary orders
[35]:
1) Settlement functions – the point of this group of functions associated with capacity
of natural and semi-natural ecosystems to balance vital ecological processes and life
support systems through bio-geochemical cycles and other biospheric processes.
Additionally, supporting ecosystem health, these regulation functions give numerous
services, which have direct and circular benefits to humans (similar as clean air,
water and soil, and natural control services).
2) Cave functions - natural ecosystems give retreat and reduplication- niche to wild
plant and animal and thereby contribute to the conservation of natural and inheritable
diversity and developmental processes.
3) Produce functions – Chemosynthesis and nourishing apprehension by autotrophs
converts energy, carbon dioxide, water and nutrients into a wide variety of
carbohydrate structures which are also used by secondary directors to produce an
indeed bigger variety of living biomass. In addition, this broad diversity in
carbohydrate structures represents numerous ecosystem goods for mortal
consumption, ranging from food and raw accoutrements to energy coffers and
inheritable materials.
4) Data functions - because of utmost of mortal elaboration took place within the
environment of unbroken niche, natural ecosystems give an essential ―adduce
function‖ and beget to the conservation of mortal health by furnishing openings for
reflection, spiritual enrichment, cognitive development, recreation and aesthetic
experience [36] [37].
In general, ecosystem services are the opt of ecosystem functions that are useful
to humans. Numerous of these are critical to our survival (for example, climate
regulation, air sanctification) whereas others ameliorate it(aesthetics). Mortal
domination of the biosphere has led to rapid-fire differences in the configuration,
structure and function of ecosystems [38]. Following that in numerous cases their
capacity to give necessary services has been either overwhelmed or eroded [39].
There's still little completed comprehension of utmost ecosystem services, still,
hampering progress in their conservation and operation. According to the story when
17
New York City decided to cover the Catskill Watershed rather than make a precious
water filtration plants, for illustration, it absolved the profitable eventuality of
ecosystem services. It's fascinating, still, how little ecological information went into
this decision. Itineraries reasoned that indeed if they undervalued the area needed by
half, it would still be far cheaper than erecting the water filtration plansts.
Multitudinous civic centres around the world depend on natural water sanctification
mechanisms to give safe drinking water for hundreds of millions of people, yet we've
little capability to prognosticate how important land must be defended and how near
land use must be confined to give water of sufficient volume and quality. Former
work explains and categorizes ecosystem services, identifies styles for profitable
valuation, maps the force and demand for services, appraises pitfalls to them, and
estimates profitable worths. [40] [41], however, it doesn't measure the beginning part
of biodiversity in furnishing services. In discrepancy, studies of biodiversity –
function frequently examine communities whose structures differ markedly from
those furnishing services in real geographies [42] and have been cramped to a small
combine of ecosystem processes [43]. Whereas each of these methods have handed
numerous precious perceptivities, a ground is demanded between these two methods
one that will give abecedarian, ecological understanding of ecosystem services to
help in contriving the stylish operation and policy tools for their conservation and
defendable use. Provided forecasts of global declines in introductory services, it's also
critical to develop and apply this exploration docket on the ecology of ecosystem
services, and to integrate it within being or uncornier-disciplinary studies of
ecosystem services.
20
2 MATERIAL AND METHODS
21
The study was conducted in the period from June 2021 to February 2022. For a
general assessment of the state of the river, the ecological passport of the Yssyk River
was filled out based on a review of literary sources and the results of their own visual
observations. Water sampling for hydrochemical analysis was carried out in
accordance with standard requirements. The color and smell of water were
determined organoleptically. To determine the temperature, pH and mineralization
was used a complex device ―Combo pH&EC‖ of the company ―Hanna Instrument‖.
22
The content of ammonium and nitrate ions was determined by using devices of the
same company - respectively ―HI 96700 Ammonium LR‖ and ―HI 96728 Nitrate‖.
Biological analysis of fish was carried out according to the standard method.
23
Figure 7 - The moment of the study of nitrates and ammonium in water
For catching fish, small-mesh bait, fishing nets of various designs with a mesh
of 3-5 mm, and hook tackle were used. Large fish were analyzed in situ, small fish
were fixed in formalin and further processed in the laboratory. The trout for analysis
was taken at the MG group farm.
Biological and morphological analysis of fish was carried out according to the
schemes generally accepted in ichthyology. To designate morphometric characters,
symbols common in ichthyological works are used: the length of the whole fish (L),
the length to the end of the scale cover (without the caudal fin) (l), the distance to the
dorsal fin (aD), the distance to the anal fin (aA), the distance to pectoral fin (aP),
maximum body height (H), minimum body height (h), head length (c), snout length
(ao), horizontal eye diameter (o), head height through the eye (h c/o), height head at
the occiput (hc), length of the upper lobe of the tail (lCs), length of the middle rays of
the tail (lCm), length of the lower lobe of the tail (lCi), fish are brought into line with
the information contained in the Fish Base information retrieval system.
To assess the diversity of communities, the following indicators were used: S is the
total number of species in the community (species richness), D is the Simpson
diversity index, E is the uniformity of distribution according to Simpson, H is the
Shannon index, J is the uniformity of distribution according to Shannon. The
Shannon scores were calculated using the base 2 logarithm.
A variety of types of anthropogenic load, their different intensity and duration,
different physical and geographical conditions of water bodies encourage scientists to
24
search for expert methods for assessing the state of communities based on
morphological, pathological, anatomical and ecological indicators of fish. To assess
the state of fish populations, important indicators are the size, weight and fatness of
fish, as well as the sex ratio.
The assessment of the state of fish communities was determined on the basis of
morphological and pathological-anatomical parameters of fish. For the
morphopathological analysis of fish, we used the scoring method proposed by Yu.S.
Reshetnikov et al. The absence of pathology is scored as zero points. Depending on
the obtained ANN value, 3 states of aquatic ecosystems are distinguished:
I - zone of relative ecological well-being (INS for peaceful fish species no more than
4);
II - zone of ecological disaster (INS for peaceful fish species from 5 to 8);
III - zone of ecological crisis (INS for peaceful fish species is more than 8).
The study of the modern ichthyological composition of water bodies within the
city of Almaty shows that introduction work is currently ongoing, resulting in the
emergence of new fish species in the Almaty region. The tenants of most ponds
specialize in the provision of paid services for recreational anglers, and in an
increasingly competitive environment, they seek to offer the latter new recreational
fishing facilities.
Statistical data processing was carried out according to the guidelines of G.F.
Lakin and Press W.H. et al. [81] using the computer program Excel. To compare the
samples, we used Tst, ―difference coefficient‖ CD, and ―divergence‖ - d21.2.
2.5 Methods for assessing the socio-economic condition of the study area
25
the complexity and difficulty of this task. We can divide the ecological component of
this task into sub-topics, including: identifying the species or other entities that are
key ecosystem service providers (ESPs) and characterizing their functional
relationships; determining the various aspects of community structure that influence
function in real landscapes, especially compensatory community responses that
stabilize function, or non-random extinction sequences that rapidly erode it; assessing
the key environmental factors influencing provision of services, and measuring the
spatiotemporal scale over which providers and services operate. While each of these
sub-topics is a subject of active research in ecology, this approach will be most useful
in influencing environmental policy and land-use planning when applied in its
entirety. For maximum effect, it should also be integrated into interdisciplinary
studies of ecosystem services including socio-economic aspects, but for the purposes
of this paper, I will consider only the ecological component. Carrying out such an
agenda will present an enormous logistical, financial and scientific challenge, but it is
not outside our human potential. We have only to look at the enormous strides made
in medicine or space exploration, to name a few, to realize that is possible, given
careful planning and sufficient resources.
26
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
According to the results of the conducted studies, the mineralization in the upper
part of the river varied from 69 ppm to 78 ppm, pH – from 6.32 to 6.75, the content
of ammonium and nitrates 0.0 – 0.04 mg/l. For the middle section of the river,
mineralization varied from 58 ppm to 66 ppm, pH – from 6.92 to 7.27, the content of
ammonium and nitrates 0.0 – 0.01 mg/l. For the lower part of the river,
mineralization varied from 74 ppm to 78 ppm, pH - from 6.10 to 6.49, ammonium
content reached 20.3 mg/l, and nitrates were not detected.
As a result of provided investigation the ecological passport of the Yssyk River was
completed:
I. General information about the river
1. River system (to which catchment does the water
Object 2): Ili River - Kapchagay reservoir
3. The main river or tributary (of what order is the lake): They feed the glaciers of the
Zailiysky Alatau
4. Where does the river begin (source): formed from the Cassina glacier
5. Where it flows into (mouth): Kapchagai reservoir
6. The length of the river: Length - 96 km, of which 22 km - in the mountain gorge,
which is named after the river - Yssyk Gorge.
7. Flows through the territories (districts, nearby settlements): Yssyk city
8. What tributaries does it take: right, left, no
9. Are there dams, dams, where 1963 is located, in the Yssyk gorge of the Zailiysky
Alatau, east of Almaty, the length was 1,850 m, the width was 500 m, the depth was
up to 80 m.
10. For artificial watercourses (channels, ditches):
11. The nature of the watercourse (dug, concrete banks, etc.): concrete banks
12. When was it created? 1990 Why was it created? For fish farming
II. Characteristics of the river and its valley at the study site
1. Description of the location of the studied section of the river (in the upper
current / closer to the source, middle, lower / closer to the mouth) in the middle
course
2. Location of observation sampling station
3. Features of the river valley: width and shape, the Yssyk was 1850 m long, 500 m
wide, and 50–79 m deep.
4. The presence of terraces, their number, what rocks are built - no
5. Vegetation along the banks of the river and on the slopes of the river valley
River floodplain: width_ 500 m_vegetation The lake is surrounded by rocks, forests,
alpine meadows. Almost all types of flora grow here.
Springs in the river valley (number, location)
Not
27
6. Riverbed: width-depth: maximum – average.
7. The presence of islands, fords, channels, rifts and their location - no.
8. Features of the bottom soil sand and stone
9. Flow rate (on the farm) 300l/min. No water consumption if there is no evaporation
10. Assessment of water quality (you can use the tables from Chapter 4 for
convenience):
11. Transparency: Measured by the Secchi disk, Varies by site and season: from 2-5
cm during spring and summer floods to 2-3 m during dry periods
12. In optimal condition it is not cloudy, but during rain it can be gray and it will be
impossible to see the fish.
13. Color: greenish blue to brown
14. Smell: above settlements without smell? In the area of residential buildings, a
slight hydrogen sulfide smell was sometimes noted.
15. Temperature + 2-4 ° C in winter to 32 ° C in the lower section in summer.
III. Life in the river and by the river
1. Coastal vegetation (specify prevailing and rare
2. Types of algae, wild rose, birch forest, broad-leaved ash tree.
3. Aquatic and bottom vegetation (predominant and rare Views)
5. Degree of overgrowth of the channel (% of the area) The lake is surrounded by
rocks, forests, alpine meadows. Almost all types of flora grow here.
6. Rare species: There are several plants listed in the Red Book - Kungei feather
grass, golden adonis, Cossack juniper, Schrenk spruce, edelweiss and others.
7. Fish: A common species of rainbow trout is a fish that lives only in running or
spring water.
8. Rare species - no.
9. Crayfish (availability and quantity)
10. Bottom organisms
11. Animals, birds, their traces There are more than 150 species of birds and almost
30 species of mammals, including deer, mountain goats, wolves, lynxes, bears and
leopards.7. Invertebrates on the banks of the river: crayfish, small-bristle worms,
polychaete worms.
IV. The use of the river and its valley and its ecological consequences
1. What settlements are located in the river valley and along the banks, on which
distance from the river? Yssyk city, Almaly settlement, Koktobe.
2. Industrial and agricultural enterprises, their location according to
3. in relation to the river: ESIK SAULET, LLP. Activities in the field of architecture,
with the exception of nuclear industry and nuclear power facilities.
Nur Eco LLP
Unifruit Production LLP
4. What kind of agricultural land (sown fields, pasture meadows)? - no
5. What area do they occupy? - no
6. How the river and valley are used for recreation (rest houses, children's camps,
beaches
28
etc.) - Primarily used for fish farming, for visitors, rest homes. There are also
children's camps.
7. Is the river used for navigation? Not
8. Is the river used for fishing? What are the ways to catch fish? net, fishing rod, nets
9. Is the river used for water supply and other household needs? For water supply to
farmers, for irrigation, water is also diverted through the canal
V. Sources of river pollution and other water protection measures
1. Natural sources and causes of changes in water quality
1-during the rain, mudflows often occur and destroy not only vegetation but also the
structure of the river.
2-when glaciers melt.
2. Anthropogenic sources of river pollution: Feed given on the farm. Rubbish
removed from factories. Household waste
3. Where are the dumping sites for untreated water? At the lower mouth of the river
4. Where are the disposal sites for treated wastewater located? What measures are
taken to clean them up? No
5. What is the width of the protected area of the river
6. Your suggestions for the protection and rational use of the river and its valley: to
introduce filtration channels for untreated and wastewater, which in turn pollute not
only vegetation but also residential areas.
7. What is her condition medium-stable
8. What have you done to clean up the river and its banks: garbage disposal.
Completion date: beginning - July 5, 2021, final -12 July 2021
The recent constitution of the ichthyofauna of the reservoirs of the Yssyk river
was formed as a result of the natural perforation of fish from other rivers after the end
of the ice age and notably expanded due to the acclimatization of a large number of
species carried out by humans in the second half of the last century.
Table 1 presents a general list of fish species known for the Balkhash basin.
Overall 63 species of fish from 10 orders are known for the Kazakh part of the Yssyk
River.
30
Table 1 Continued - List of fishes of the Balkhash basin in 4 languages
Schizothorax
5 argentatus argentatus Balkhash marinka Балхаш маринкасы Балхашская маринка
Kessler, 1874
Schizothorax
argentatus
6 Ili marinka Іле маринкасы Илийская маринка
pseudaksaiensis
Herzenstein, 1889
Diptychus maculatus
7 Scaly osman Қабыршақты осман Чешуйчатый осман
Steindachner, 1866
Gymnodiptychus
8 dybowskii (Kessler, Naked Osman Жалаңаш осман Голый осман
1874)
Triplophysa stoliczkai Tibetan stone Тибет талма
9 Тибетский голец
(Steindachner, 1866) loach балығы
Nemacheilus
Северцов талма
10 sewerzowi Severtsov's loach Голец Северцова
балығы
G.Nikolsky, 1938
Triplophysa dorsalis
11 Gray loach Сұр талма балығы Cерый голец
(Kessler, 1872)
Triplophysa strauchii Spotted thicklip Тенбіл талма
12 Пятнистый губач
(Kessler, 1874) loach балығы
Triplophysa labiata Plain thicklip
13 Not determined Одноцветный губач
(Kessler, 1874) loach
Perca schrenkii
14 Balkhash perch Балхаш алабұғасы Балхашский окунь
Kessler, 1874
Alien species:
Rutilus rutilus
15 Roach Арал тортасы Аральская плотва
aralensis (Berg, 1916)
Aspius aspius
16 Asp Ақмарқа Жерех
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Abramis brama Шығыс тыран
17 Freshwater bream Восточный лещ
orientalis Berg, 1949 балығы
Carassius gibelio
18 Prussian carp Мөңке Cеребряный карась
(Bloch, 1782)
Silurus glanis Wels catfish
19 Жайын Обыкновенный сом
Linnaeus, 1758
Sander lucioperca Обыкновенный
20 Pike-perch Көксерке
(Linnaeus, 1758) судак
Acipenser nudiventris Fringebarbel
21 Not determined Шип
Lovetsky, 1828 sturgeon
Salmo mikiss mykiss
22 Rainbow trout Құбылмалы бахтах Микижа
(Walbaum, 1792)
Salmo mikiss irideus
23 Not determined Not determined Радужная форель
(Gibbons, 1855)
Үлкенауызды Большеротый
24 Ictiobus cyprinellus Bigmouth buffalo
буффало буффало
31
Table 1 Continued - List of fishes of the Balkhash basin in 4 languages
Rutilus rutilus
Солтүстік Каспий Северокаспийская
25 caspicus (Jakowlew, Caspian roach
торта балығы вобла
1870)
Ctenopharyngodon
26 idella (Valenciennes, Grass carp Ақ амур Белый амур
1844)
Tinca tinca (Linnaeus,
27 Tench Not determined Линь
1758)
Abbottina rivularis Chinese false
28 Not determined Речная абботтина
(Basilewsky, 1855) gudgeon
Pseudorasbora parva
29 (Temminck et Stone moroko Not determined Амурский чебачек
Schlegel, 1846)
Barbus
30 brachycephalus s Aral barbel Арал қаязы Аральский усач
Kessler, 1872
Rhodeus ocellatus Қызғырт кекіре
31 Rosy bitterling Глазчатый горчак
(Kner, 1865) балығы
Rhodeus sericeus Қарапайым кекіре Обыкновенный
32 Bitterling
(Pallas, 1776) балығы горчак
Carassius gibelio
33 Prussian carp Мөңке балық Cеребряный карась
(Bloch, 1782)
Cyprinus carpio
34 Common carp Тұқы Cазан
Linnaeus, 1758
Hemiculter
Обыкновенная
35 leucisculus Sharpbelly Not determined
востробрюшка
(Basilewsky, 1835)
Hypophthalmichthys
36 molitrix Silver carp Ақ дөңмаңдай Белый толстолобик
(Valenciennes, 1844)
Hypophthalmichthys
Пестрый
37 nobilis (Richardson, Bighead carp Not determined
толстолобик
1846)
Oryzias sinensis Chen,
38 Not determined Not determined Медака
Uwa, Chu , 1989
Gambusia affinis
Eastern Шығыс гамбузия
39 holbrookii (Girard, Восточная гамбузия
mosquitofish балығы
1859)
Sander lucioperca Обыкновенный
40 Pike-perch Көксерке
(Linnaeus, 1758) судак
Sander volgensis
41 Volga pikeperch Берш Берш
(Gmelin, 1788)
Ctenopharyngodon
42 idella (Valenciennes, Grass carp Ақ амур Белый амур
1844)
Hypophthalmichthys
43 molitrix Silver carp Ақ дөңмаңдай Белый толстолобик
(Valenciennes, 1844)
32
Table 1 Continued - List of fishes of the Balkhash basin in 4 languages
The composition of the ichthyofauna of the tributaries of the Ile River, which
includes the Yssyk River studied by us, is also undergoing changes. Based on a
review of literature data and materials of my own research, we have compiled a
comparative analysis of the ichthyofauna in the secular aspect.
Table 2 - Changes in the composition of the ichthyofauna of the tributaries of the Ili River over the
past 30 years
Origin Years
English name Latin name 1991– 2001– 2011–
2000* 2010** 2021***
1 2 3 4 5 6
Order Carps – Cypriniformes, family– Cyprinidae
Gymnodiptychus
Not
Naked Osman dybowskii (Kessler, Not determined
determined
1874)
Rutilus rutilus aralensis
Roach А Not determined
(Berg, 1916)
Aspius aspius (Linnaeus,
Asp А 0 + +
1758)
Abramis brama
Freshwater bream А + + +
orientalis Berg, 1949
33
Table 2 continued - Changes in the composition of the ichthyofauna of the tributaries of the Ili
River over the past 30 years
Carassius gibelio
Prussian carp + + +
(Bloch, 1782) А
Cyprinus carpio
Aral carp aralensis Spitczakov, + + +
1935 А
Ctenopharyngodon
Grass carp idella (Valenciennes, Ч 0 + +
1844)
Hypophthalmichthys
Silver carp molitrix (Valenciennes, Ч + 0 +
1844)
Rhodeus sericeus
Bitterling Ч ? ? 0
sericeus (Pallas, 1776)
Rhodeus ocellatus
Rosy bitterling Ч + + +
(Kner, 1865)
Pseudorasbora parva
Stone moroko (Temminck et Schlegel, Ч + + +
1846)
Abbottina rivularis
Chinese false gudgeon Ч 0 + +
(Basilewsky, 1855)
Triplophysa stoliczkai
Tibetan stone loach
(Steindachner, 1866)
Order – Cyprinodontiformes, family Пецилиевые – Poeciliids
Gambusia holbrooki
Eastern mosquitofish Ч + 0 +
(Girard, 1859)
Order Needle fishes – Beloniformes, family – Oriziatidae
Japanese rice fish Oryzias latipes
(Temminck et Schlegel, Ч + + 0
1846)
Order Catfishes – Siluriformes, Order Sheatfishes – Siluridae
Bitterling Silurus glanis Linnaeus,
А + + +
1758
Order Perch-likes - Perciformes, Order Perches – Percidae
Sander lucioperca
Pike-perch А + + +
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Order Odontobutidae – Freshwater sleepers
Micropercops
(Hypseleotris) cintus
Eleotris A 0 + 0
(Dabry de Thiersant,
1872)
Family Snakeheads – Channidae
Channa argus (Cantor,
Snakehead A + + +
1842)
Family Goby – Gobiidae
Chinese goby Rhinogobius sp. A + + +
Note - I - source data [137-143]: "I" - native species, "A" - alien species; "+" - taxon found, "0" -
taxon absent, "?" - species definition needs to be clarified
34
Tibetan stone loach and naked osman are more adapted to mountain rivers, so
they have been preserved. The replenishment of the trout in the river occurs due to
the fish constantly escaping from the farm.
35
Portion spawning in the lacustrine form of the Yssyk-Kul naked osman has been preserved as
an ancient trait inherited from the original progenitor river form. This provides him with good
survival in the conditions of a low-feeding lake, such as Yssyk-Kul. Individual absolute
fecundity in lake naked osman 25-50 cm in size and weighing from 200 to 20000 g varies
between 4070-32690 eggs, on average 1200-13000 eggs. Fertility increases especially sharply
in Osman females at the age of 12-14 years.
Озеро
Н.Кульсай
Naked osman Our data, n=2 Река Чилик [50] [50]
Features min max M ±m ±s CV min max M M m
L 75 76 75.5 0.50 0.71 0.94 Not investigated
l 61 62 61.5 0.50 0.71 1.15 9.4 13.2 10.95 23.43 0.2
Q 4.25 4.28 4.27 0.015 0.021 0.50 Not investigated
Fulton 1.78 1.89 1.83 0.051 0.072 3.95 Not investigated
в % от длины тела (l):
aD 50.0 50.8 50.4 0.41 0.58 1.15 Not investigated
aP 19.7 24.2 21.9 2.26 3.20 14.58 Not investigated
aV 56.5 59.0 57.7 1.28 1.81 3.14 Not investigated
aA 66.1 75.4 70.8 4.64 6.56 9.27 Not investigated
c 24.2 24.6 24.4 0.20 0.28 1.15 24.0 27.1 25.55 27.0 0.3
hco 8.1 8.2 8.1 0.07 0.09 1.15 10.6 13.9 12.38 14.6 0.2
hc 17.7 19.7 18.7 0.97 1.36 7.30 Not investigated
H 21.3 22.6 21.9 0.63 0.90 4.09 18.1 22.4 20.11
h 9.7 13.1 11.4 1.72 2.43 21.33 Not investigated
Cs 22.6 23.0 22.8 0.19 0.26 1.15 Not investigated
Ci 24.2 24.6 24.4 0.20 0.28 1.15 Not investigated
Cm 8.2 9.7 8.9 0.74 1.05 11.72 4.7 7.3 6.57 5.8 0.1
hco/hc 41.7 45.5 43.6 1.89 2.68 6.15 Not investigated
hc/H 78.6 92.3 85.4 6.87 9.71 11.37 Not investigated
h/H 42.9 61.5 52.2 9.34 13.21 25.31 Not investigated
36
Index of unfavorable state was 0, that indicated rather good state of living conditions
for the Tibetan stone loach in the Yssyk River.
37
Table 4 continued- Morphological and biological features of the Tibetan stone loach
Радужная Микижа
форель жилая [52]
My data of trout from the fish farm (Yssyk River, Кульсай
10 February 2022) 2+[52]
Features min max M ±m ±s CV min max min max
Not 28
L, mm 240 315 276,1 18,68 24,28 8,79 investigated 45
l, mm 225 295 254,7 16,76 22,30 8,76 Not investigated
Q, g 145 355 252,2 57,16 73,69 29,22 Not investigated
38
Table 5 continued - Morphological and biological features of trout
Index of unfavorable state significantly varied among individuals of trout in the farm.
It varied from 0 to 2 degrees with average mean 0.6±0.72.
3.4 General assessment of the state of the catchment area and the economic
use of the river
Figure 13 - Approximate satellite images of the Yssyk River from Google Earth
Several agrotechnical measures (snow retention, plowing) carried out in the vast
territories of our country cannot but affect the change in the conditions for the
formation of surface runoff, in most cases reducing the average annual runoff.
Quantitative assessment of the magnitude of changes caused by human economic
activity is extremely difficult and at present is of an approximate nature.
Figure 14 - There is an artificial waterfall on the Yssyk River in the vicinity of the
dam.
40
The Yssyk valley was formed by a grandiose mudflow in 1963, or rather, an almost
new valley was created within the range from Lake Yssyk to the foothills.
Figure 15 - After the dam, the Yssyk River flows in a deep, mudflow-eroded canyon.
41
Figure 17 - The middle course of the river where the bazaar of the Yssyk river is
located
Circling along the mountain serpentine road to the lake, you can also see rock
paintings and bas-reliefs, for example, the rock drawing of V. I. Lenin, made for the
centenary of his birth. On the rocks you can see the pattern of leopards.
43
Lake Yssyk is a great place to relax, its features are clean and cool air, cold water,
clear water is an ideal place for team building and walking.
44
The surroundings of the lake are a wonderful place for year-round outdoor activities
and tourism. Especially popular among tourists who prefer outdoor activities is the
"Kremlin Wall", located near the lake, on the territory of the Ile-Alatau National
Natural Park and the Almaty Reserve.
The best time to visit the lake is mid-summer or early autumn. In summer, the air
temperature in the lake area rarely rises above 25 degrees Celsius, the water
temperature is about 8 degrees. Swimming in the lake is prohibited.
45
CONCLUSION
47
REFERENCES:
49
24 Costanzaa R., de Groot R., PaulSutton., der Ploegb S., J.Anderson.Sh.,
Kubiszewski I., Farber S., R.Turner.K. Changes in the global value of ecosystem
services// Global Environmental Change – 2014. – Vol.26. - Pages 152-158.
doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002.Farley J.
25 Ecosystem services: The economics debate// Ecosystem Services – 2012. –
Vol.1. - Pages 40-49. doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.002.
26 Malghan D. A dimensionally consistent aggregation framework for biophysical
metrics// Ecological Economics - 2011. - Vol.70. - Pages 900-909.
doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.015.
27 Farley J., Costanza R. Payments for ecosystem services: from local to global//
Ecological Economics - 2010. - Vol. 69.- Pages 2060-2068.
doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.010.
28 Daly H., Farley J. Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications: 2nd
edition//Island Press, Washington, DC - 2010. - Pages 450.
doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.08.002.
29 Farley J. Ecosystem services: The economics debate// Ecosystem Services –
2012. – Vol.1. - Pages 40-49. doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.002.
30 Gao J., Lia F., Gao H., Zhoua C., Zhang X. The impact of land-use change on
water-related ecosystem services: a study of the Guishui River Basin, Beijing, China//
Journal of Cleaner Production – 2017. – Vol.163. - Pages S148-S155.
doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.049.
31 Sagoff M. The quantification and valuation of ecosystem services// Ecological
Economics – 2011. – Vol.70. - Pages 497-502.
doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.10.006.
32 Costanza R., de Groot R., Braat L., Kubiszewski I., Fioramonti L., Sutton P.,
Farber S., Grasso M. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come
and how far do we still need to go? // Ecosystem Services – 2017. – Vol.28. – Pages
1-16. doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008.
33 De Groot, R.S. Functions of Nature: Evaluation of Nature in Environmental
Planning, Management and Decision Making// Polar Record - 1992.- Vol.29. - Pages
162. doi.org/10.1017/S0032247400023779.
34 De Groot, R.S., van der Perk J., Chiesura A., Marguliew S. Ecological
Functions and Socio-economic Values of Critical Natural Capital as a measure for
Ecological Integrity and Environmental Health - 2000. - Vol.1.- Pages 191-214.
DOI:10.1007/978-94-011-5876-3_13.
35 S. de Groot R., A. Wilson M., M.J. Boumans R. A typology for the
classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services -
SPECIAL ISSUE: The Dynamics and Value of Ecosystem Services: Integrating
Economic and Ecological Perspectives// Ecological Economics – 2002. – Vol.41. –
Pages 393–408. doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7.
36 Kremen C. Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about
their ecology? // Ecology Letters – 2005. - Vol 8. – Pages 468–479. doi:
10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00751.x.
50
37 Vitousek, P.M., Mooney, H.A., Lubchenco, J. & Melillo, J.M. Human
domination of Earth‘s ecosystems// Science - 1997.- Vol.277.- Pages 494–499. DOI:
10.1126/science.277.5325.494].
38 Daily, G.C. Nature‘s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems//
Island Press, Washington - 2000. - Vol.6. - Pages 274. DOI:10.1071/PC000274.
39 Palmer, M., Bernhardt, E., Chornesky, E., Collins, S., Dobson, A., Duke, C.
Ecology for a crowded planet//Science - 2004. - Vol.304.- Pages 1251–1252.DOI:
10.1126/science.1095780.
40 Daily, G.C. Nature‘s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems//
Island Press, Washington. - 1997.- Vol.1. – Pages. DOI: 10.5070/G31810307.
41 Daily, G.C., Soderqvist, T., Aniyar, S., Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., Ehrlich, P.R.
et al. Ecology: the value of nature and the nature of value// Science - 2000. - Vol.
289. - Pages 395–396. DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5478.395.
42 Diaz, S., Symstad, A.J., Chapin, F.S., Wardle, D.A. & Huenneke, L.F.
Functional diversity revealed by removal experiments// Trends Ecol. Evol - 2003. -
Vol. 18. - Pages 140–146. doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00007-7].
43 Schwartz, M.W., Brigham, C.A., Hoeksema, J.D., Lyons, K.G., Mills, M.H. &
van Mantgem, P.J. Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for
conservation ecology// Oecologia - 2000. - Vol.122. - Pages 297–305.
DOI:10.1007/s004420050035.
44 Ресурсы поверхностных вод СССР. Том 13. Центральный и Южный
Казахстан. Выпуск 2. Бассейн озера Балхаш. - Л.: Гидрометеоиздат, 1970. - 645
c.]
45 Современное экологическое состояние озера Балхаш // Под ред.
Т.К.Кудекова. - Алматы. Каганат, 2002. - 388 с.
46 Гидрогеология СССР. Южный Казахстан. - М.: Недра, Т.36, 1970. - 472 с.]
[Сапожников Д.Г. Современные осадки и геология озера Балхаш // Изв. АН
СССР. Сев. Геол., 1951. - Вып. 132. - 203 с.] [Илийский артезианский бассейн. /
Под ред. У.М. Ахмедсафина. - Алма-Ата: Наука КазССР, 1980. – 148 с.]
[Гидрологические и водохозяйственные аспекты Или-Балхашской проблемы.
/Под. ред. А.А. Соколова. - Л.: Гидрометеоиздат, 1989. - 310 с.]
47 Ресурсы поверхностных вод СССР. Том 13. Центральный и Южный
Казахстан. Выпуск 2. Бассейн озера Балхаш. - Л.: Гидрометеоиздат, 1970. - 645
c.]. [Гидрогеология СССР. Южный Казахстан. - М.: Недра, Т.36, 1970. - 472 с.]
[Физическая география частей света. - М.: Учпедиздат, 1961. – 588 с.]
48 Достай Ж.Д., Турсунов A.A. Концепция равновесного
природопользования в условиях Или-Балхашского региона. Вестник КазГУ,
cep. reorp. 1995. - No 2. - c. 12-26.]
49 Kustareva L. A., Naseka A. M. Fish diversity in Kyrgyzstan: Species
composition, fisheries and management problems// Aquatic Ecosystem Health &
Management – 2015. - Vol.18. – Pages 149-159. DOI:
10.1080/14634988.2015.1028309
51
50 Захаров А. Б. , Бознак Э. И. Современные изменения рыбного населения
крупных рек европейского северо – востока России. Журнал Биологических
инвазии. Россия, – 2011. – Pp.23-33
51 Баимбетов А.А.. Мельников В.А.. Метрофанов В.П. Triplophysa stolickai –
тибетский голец // Рыбы Казахстана – Алма – Ата: Наука. 1988 – т.4 – с. 128-
159
52 Баимбетов А.А.. Мельников В.А.. Метрофанов В.П. Oncorchynchus mykiss
– микижа // Рыбы Казахстана – Алма – Ата: Наука. 1988 – т.5 – с. 172-190
52
53