Semester Fall 2021-2022

Course: FWS211 Instructor Abdullah Bani Rshaid

Section 1 Online Test - 1 Portfolio

LO 1 LO 2
S.# Last Name First Name ID 20 25
1 Aalrabeea Noora 1075766 14 21
2 Abd Almahmoud Fadi 1076707 17 23.5
3 Alblooshi Mohammed 1077608 11 22
4 Aldahmani Ali 1078376 9 19.5
5 Aldahmani Mohamed 1079122 13 19.5
6 Aldarmaki Saeed 1074298 11 22.5
7 Alhammadi Khalifa 1077711 14 22
8 Alhammadi Yousef 1079020 19 22
9 Alhamoudi Mohammed 1078331 13 19.5
10 Alharthi Ahmed 1074483 7 23.5
11 Alhebsi Abdulla 1075372 12 21.5
12 Alhebsi Ali 1076228 16 22
13 Alkaabi Hazza 1079161 17 22.5
14 Alketbi Majid 1069698 14 24.5
15 Alketbi Mohamed 1078337 8 19.5
16 Alkharman Ahmed 1078561 10 22
17 Alkhyeli Jaber 1078253 10 22
18 Almansoori Obaid 1075107 8 22.5
19 Almansoori Obaid 1074884 10 23.5
20 Almarzooqi Abdulraheem 1073710 19 22
21 Almarzooqi Sultan 1074409 7 22.5
22 Almazrouei Ali 1079096 15 19.5
23 Almazrouei Ammar 1079113 12 19.5
24 Almazrouei Hamad 1077861 13 22.5
25 Almazrouei Ibrahim 1076483 14 22.5
26 Almazrouei Marwan 1079166 9 19.5
27 Almazrouei Saif 1079117 13 19.5
28 Almazrouei Saif 1081242 11 22.5
29 Almazrouei Sultan 1077791 10 22.5
30 Almoamari Talal 1076747 9 23.5
31 Alnaqbi Taleb 1076835 15 19.5
32 Alnuaimi Hamad 1073991 10 21.5
33 Alshamsi Mohammed 1075012 18 22
34 Alshehhi Ali 1078339 12 19.5
35 Alshehhi Rashed 1072869 16.5 22.5
36 Alshemeili Khalifa 1076516 18 23.5
37 Alshemeili Saeed 1076508 18 22
38 Alyami Rakkan 1074565 13 23.5
39 Alyammahi Musabbeh 1078375 10 19.5
40 Alyileili Hazzaa 1078631 15 19.5
41 Alzaabi Abdelaziz 1078153 18 21.5
42 Alzaabi Abdulla 1081024 8 22.5
43 Alzaabi Khalid 1081933 12 25
44 Alzeyoudi Marwan 1079216 10 22
45 Mutahar Abdulrahman 1075667 13 23.5
Average 12.7 21.7
% Satisfactory 64% 87%

Grade # % Comp %
A 7 15.6% 15.6%
B+ 9 20.0%
FWS 211
B 17 37.8%
57.8% FALL 202
18
C+ 9 20.0%
26.7% 16
C 3 6.7%
14
D+ 0 0.0% 12
0.0%
D 0 0.0% 10
F 0 0.0% 0.0% 8
6
Total 45 100.0% 100.0%
4
W/WA/I/IP 0
2
Total 45 0
A B+ B
 2021-2022
dullah Bani Rshaid
Research Review Research Review
Online Test - 2
Report Presentation Total Grades
LO 3 LO 3 LO 4
15 15 25 100 Letter
13 12 25 85 B+
13.5 13 25 92 A
9.5 9 25 76.5 C+
11 12 25 76.5 C+
13.5 13 23 82 B
10.5 13 24 81 B
13 10.5 23 82.5 B
10.5 10 25 86.5 B+
13.5 10 25 81 B
11 9 22 72.5 C
13 12 24 82.5 B
10 14.5 24 86.5 B+
10.5 10.5 22 82.5 B
14.5 15 22 90 A
13 13 22 75.5 C+
10 10.5 24 76.5 C+
13 12.5 19 76.5 C+
12 12 18 72.5 C
10 14.5 23 81 B
10 10.5 25 86.5 B+
10 14.5 22 76 C+
12 13 23 82.5 B
13 14.5 21 80 B
13 12 25 85.5 B+
13 13 24 86.5 B+
13 13 21 75.5 C+
13 13 24 82.5 B
11 11 21 76.5 C+
14 11 25 82.5 B
13 12.5 22 80 B
13.5 13 24 85 B+
13 12 25 81.5 B
12 15 23 90 A
 12 10 23 76.5 C+
13.5 14 25 91.5 A
13.5 13 22 90 A
13 12 25 90 A
14 12 24 86.5 B+
10.5 11 19 70 C
12 13.5 20 80 B
13 13 25 90.5 A
13 12.5 24 80 B
12 12 24 85 B+
11.5 12 25 80.5 B
10 10.5 24 81 B
12.1 12.2 23.2
81% 81% 93%

FWS 211 Sec 1

FALL 2021 -22
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
A B+ B C+ C D+ D F
 Final Grade Distribution Form
Note:
This form shall be completed by all faculty members at CAS and attached to the grade breakdown sheet.
The office of the Dean shall not accept the final grade breakdown unless accompanied by this form.

Semester and Academic Year: Fall 2021-2022

College: College of Arts & Sciences
Program: Humanities & Social Sciences
Course Title and Number: FWS211
Section: 1
Name of the Instructor: Abdullah Bani Rshaid

Number of Composite Grade Distribution

Grade Percentage
Students Percentage FWS 211 Sec 1
A 7 15.6% 15.6%
FALL 2021-22
B+ 9 20.0% 40.0%
57.8%
B 17 37.8% 35.0%
30.0%
C+ 9 20.0%
26.7% 25.0%
C 3 6.7% 20.0%

D+ 0 0.0% 15.0%
0.0%
10.0%
D 0 0.0%
5.0%
F 0 0.0% 0.0%
0.0%
Total 45 100% 100% A B+ B C+ C D+ D F

Others
0
W/WA/I/IP

Abdullah Bani Rshaid ______________________________

Instructor Signature Course Leader Signature

________________________________
Department Chair Signature
 Course: FWS211 Learning Outcomes
Section 1 Online Test - 1 Portfolio

LO 1 LO 2
S.# Last Name First Name ID 20 25
1 Aalrabeea Noora 1075766 14.00 21.00
2 Abd Almahmoud Fadi 1076707 17.00 23.50
3 Alblooshi Mohammed 1077608 11.00 22.00
4 Aldahmani Ali 1078376 9.00 19.50
5 Aldahmani Mohamed 1079122 13.00 19.50
6 Aldarmaki Saeed 1074298 11.00 22.50
7 Alhammadi Khalifa 1077711 14.00 22.00
8 Alhammadi Yousef 1079020 19.00 22.00
9 Alhamoudi Mohammed 1078331 13.00 19.50
10 Alharthi Ahmed 1074483 7.00 23.50
11 Alhebsi Abdulla 1075372 12.00 21.50
12 Alhebsi Ali 1076228 16.00 22.00
13 Alkaabi Hazza 1079161 17.00 22.50
14 Alketbi Majid 1069698 14.00 24.50
15 Alketbi Mohamed 1078337 8.00 19.50
16 Alkharman Ahmed 1078561 10.00 22.00
17 Alkhyeli Jaber 1078253 10.00 22.00
18 Almansoori Obaid 1075107 8.00 22.50
19 Almansoori Obaid 1074884 10.00 23.50
20 Almarzooqi Abdulraheem 1073710 19.00 22.00
21 Almarzooqi Sultan 1074409 7.00 22.50
22 Almazrouei Ali 1079096 15.00 19.50
23 Almazrouei Ammar 1079113 12.00 19.50
24 Almazrouei Hamad 1077861 13.00 22.50
25 Almazrouei Ibrahim 1076483 14.00 22.50
26 Almazrouei Marwan 1079166 9.00 19.50
27 Almazrouei Saif 1079117 13.00 19.50
28 Almazrouei Saif 1081242 11.00 22.50
29 Almazrouei Sultan 1077791 10.00 22.50
30 Almoamari Talal 1076747 9.00 23.50
31 Alnaqbi Taleb 1076835 15.00 19.50
32 Alnuaimi Hamad 1073991 10.00 21.50
33 Alshamsi Mohammed 1075012 18.00 22.00
34 Alshehhi Ali 1078339 12.00 19.50
35 Alshehhi Rashed 1072869 16.50 22.50
36 Alshemeili Khalifa 1076516 18.00 23.50
37 Alshemeili Saeed 1076508 18.00 22.00
38 Alyami Rakkan 1074565 13.00 23.50
39 Alyammahi Musabbeh 1078375 10.00 19.50
40 Alyileili Hazzaa 1078631 15.00 19.50
41 Alzaabi Abdelaziz 1078153 18.00 21.50
42 Alzaabi Abdulla 1081024 8.00 22.50
43 Alzaabi Khalid 1081933 12.00 25.00
44 Alzeyoudi Marwan 1079216 10.00 22.00
45 Mutahar Abdulrahman 1075667 13.00 23.50
Average 12.70 21.74
% Satisfactory 64% 87%

FWS 211 Sec 1

FALL 2021-22
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
LO 1 LO 2 LO 3 LO 4
earning Outcomes
Research Review
Report & Online Test - 2
Presentation
LO 3 LO 4
30 25
25.00 25.00
26.50 25.00
18.50 25.00
23.00 25.00
26.50 23.00
23.50 24.00
23.50 23.00
20.50 25.00
23.50 25.00
20.00 22.00
25.00 24.00
24.50 24.00
21.00 22.00
29.50 22.00
26.00 22.00
20.50 24.00
25.50 19.00
24.00 18.00
24.50 23.00
20.50 25.00
24.50 22.00
25.00 23.00
27.50 21.00
25.00 25.00
26.00 24.00
26.00 21.00
26.00 24.00
22.00 21.00
25.00 25.00
25.50 22.00
26.50 24.00
25.00 25.00
27.00 23.00
22.00 23.00
 27.50 25.00
26.50 22.00
25.00 25.00
26.00 24.00
21.50 19.00
25.50 20.00
26.00 25.00
25.50 24.00
24.00 24.00
23.50 25.00
20.50 24.00
24.36 23.22
81% 93%

LO 3 LO 4
 Comprehensive Review of the Course
Department Humanities & Social Sciences
Course Code: FWS211
Section: 1
Number of Students: 45
Semester: Fall 2021-2022
Reported by: Abdullah Bani Rshaid

Rate how appropriate are the assessment instrument/s used to the learning outcomes of this course and provide justification/evidence to support the correlation
# Course Learning Outcomes Linkage to Program Learning Outcomes Assessment Methods Assessment Results

Evaluate the major factors influencing human emotions in different

1
situations
PLO 2. Gather, critically evaluate and analyze information. Online Test - 1 64%
Understand and apply the concepts and components of Emotional PLO 3.Generate and apply innovative ideas and approaches in problem solving and
2
Intelligence decision-making.
Portfolio 87%

Differentiate between the various scientific approaches and techniques to PLO 5. Demonstrate ethical reasoning and social conscience in personal, social and Research Review Presentation
3
enhance emotional intelligence. professional contexts. Research Review Presentation
81%

Identify the key practical aspects of emotional intelligence related to human

4
success.
PLO 2. Gather, critically evaluate and analyze information. Online Test - 2 93%

Analysis and Action:

Analysis of Current Data:

Students show great commitment and active participation throughout the course. The study activity, the survey project was carried out very well. The outcome of this course indicates student participation in the
learning environment. Classroom residents played a vital role in the success of this course. Most of the students had good grades and the assessment showed that the learning outcomes of the course were
effectively achieved. Regarding the top
Scores on LO 4 (93%) were high, which included the second test, the teacher planned to prepare a higher level of questions for the final exam and submitted them through the Lockdown browser, however the
students achieved high marks in it. It is followed by LO 2 (87%), which included participation in class activities and e-portfolio, and the portfolio included simple activities in the form of questionnaires that
students had to answer from their daily lives, and it took 25% of the total course marks, and it was very good. It was LO3, with a good average of 81%, in Research Review Presentation, and the lowest score was
in LO 1 by (64%), which included the first test, and this can be justified as the students' first test and the nature of course variation on them, and that it includes new concepts.

Plans for Future Classes:

suggest that there should be a reformulation of the activities within the electronic portfolio, to include tasks that measure learning levels according to the Bloom pyramid, and that the course includes the textbook,
this course will be more suitable for face-to-face learning rather than distance learning.

Rate the extent to which the syllabus was covered. If not completely covered, please discuss reasons why
# Coverage Percentage
1 100%
Rate the appropriateness of textbooks and other learning resources used in this course, and subsequently provide any suggestions or recommended changes to the
educational resources used, in order to improve this course.
# Title of textbook/learning materials Level of Appropriateness General remarks and or suggestions
used in this course
 Reference Textbook

 Steven J. Stein, Howard E. Book, Korrel Kanoy (2013), The Student

EQ Edge: Emotional Intelligence and Your Academic & personal
Success
1  Denis Waitley, (2016) Psychology of Success: Finding Meaning in
Work and Life, Sixth Edition ,©2016 | Waitley | McGraw-Hill Higher
Education — USA
 Brockbank, Anne and McGill, Ian. Coaching with Empathy.
Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2013.
 King, L. A. (2016). Experience Psychology
Appropriate

References

 Steven J. Stein, Howard E. Book, Korrel Kanoy (2013), The Student

EQ Edge: Emotional Intelligence and Your Academic & personal
Success
 Daniel Goleman. Emotional Intelligence(1995, 10 Anniversary
Edition 2005
 Goleman, D. (1995b). What’s your emotional intelligence quotient?
You’ll soon find out. Utne Reader, November/December.
 Goleman, D. (1998a). Working with emotional intelligence. New
York: Bantam Books. Goleman, D. (1998b).
 Caruso, D. R. and Salovey P. (2004). The Emotionally Intelligent
2 Manager. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco CA.
 Weisinger, H. (1998). Emotional Intelligence at Work. John Wiley
& Sons, San Francisco, CA.
 Gordon, A.E. 2007, Emotional intelligence as an antecedent of
leader-member exchange relationships and leader effectiveness, State
University of New York at Albany
 Seligman, Martin E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new
positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment.
New York
 Feldman, R.S. (2008). Understanding psychology. (8th ed.). New
York: McGraw-Hill Companies.

Appropriate

Journals

 Rosete, D. & Ciarrochi, J. 2005, "Emotional intelligence and its

relationship to workplace performance outcomes of leadership
effectiveness", Leadership & Organization Development Journal, vol.
26, no. 5, pp. 388-399.
 Weisinger, H. 1998, Emotional intelligence at work, Toronto, Ont.
Appropriate
 Internet Resources

 Search Google.com or Yahoo.com – Psychology Topics and Current

topics in psychology, etc.
 Fenichel’s current topics in Psychology
www.Fenichel.com/current.shtm/
3  Psychology Topics, Books and Articles – Research
www.question.com/popularsearches/psychology-topics
 All Psych online – The virtual Psychology Classroom
http://all.psych.com/psychology 101/research.html
 Student Activities – Psychology website;
www.abacon.com/psychsite. Also has practice Psychology test, etc.

Appropriate