Professional Documents
Culture Documents
November
In the journal Hippocampus there’s an article entitled Rest Boosts the Long-Term
Retention of Spatial Associative and Temporal Order Information. In the articles the Author’s
Michael Craig, Michaela Dewar, Sergio Della Sala, and Thomas Wolbers are speaking to an
experts, cognitive aging and cognitive epidemiology specialists, scientists with a specialty life
science/ neurology and behavioral and Brain Science specialists. The article argues “rest boosts
beneficial effect of rest in humans should extend to complex hippocampal tasks, for which replay
has been demonstrated, i.e. associative memory and sequences.” The Article focuses on utilizing
the conventions to relay the methodology and results to support the hypothesis. (Craig, et.al)
Craig’s article is effective in supporting its argument because the peer reviewed article utilizes
logos and ethos to maintain topicality within the genre of neuroscience (find specific specific
genre).
*in revision present args in accessible terms (write for your target audience)*
Topic sentence - quoted edv- explanation (rhet strata and how it ties into supporting the
arg
Craig’s utilization of ethos in the footnote to establish credibility in the article is effective
because it falls within the umbrella of the material discussed in this article and in the journal in
of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom” (Craig et al) Craig’s experience and knowledge in
the fields of neuroscience and psychology make his a credible source in the topic of brain
function and the effects of testing the variable of rest on memory function in participants.
Craig et al usage of logos is highly apparent in the scoring and results sections of the
experimentation fit the criterion of a peer reviewed article in the field of psychology and
neuroscience. “Associative memory test The total number of correct responses, i.e. the number
of correctly stated directions traveled at decision points (e.g. right turn), was extracted. Raw
scores were then transformed into a percentage of correct responses by dividing the number of
correct responses by the total number of landmarks, i.e. (number of correct responses/8) 3 100 ”
(Caraig et al) Logical reasoning and explanation for conclusions drawn and overlap in testing