Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CONTROLLING
STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL (SPC)
2.7, 2.9, 3.1, 3.4, 3.7, 4.1, 4.3, 4.7, 4.7, 40.8
Mean = 2.7, 2.9, 3.1, 3.4, 3.7, 4.1, 4.3, 4.7, 4.7, 40.8
10
= 7.1
Out of
Abnormal variation control
due to assignable sources
UCL
LCL
Abnormal variation
due to assignable sources
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Sample number
Mean
4. Evaluate:
in-control
LCL
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Sample number
LCL
1 2 3 4
Sample number
6/23/2020 NY –TQM 2019 14
In-Control vs. Out-of-Control
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8
In-Control Shifted
In-Control by 2 Shifted
Shifted by 2 by 4
In-Control
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8
In-Control Shifted by 2
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
Standard deviation of sample means : X
n
Control Chart
for sample of Variation due
Out of to assignable
9 boxes control causes
17 = UCL
Variation due to
16 = Mean natural causes
15 = LCL
Variation due
| | | | | | | | | | | |
to assignable
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Out of causes
Sample number control
UCLx = x + A2R
= 12 + (.577)(.25)
= 12 + .144
= 12.144 ounces
From
Table S6.1
where
R = average range of the samples
D3 and D4 = control chart factors from Table S6.1
UCL
(x-chart detects
x-chart shift in central
tendency)
LCL
UCL
(R-chart does not
R-chart detect change in
mean)
LCL
Figure S6.5
6/23/2020 NY –TQM 2019 33
Mean and Range Charts
(b)
These
sampling (Sampling mean
distributions is constant but
result in the dispersion is
charts below increasing)
UCL
(x-chart does not
x-chart detect the increase
in dispersion)
LCL
UCL
(R-chart detects
R-chart increase in
dispersion)
LCL
Figure S6.5
6/23/2020 NY –TQM 2019 34
For Variables: Mean & Range Control
Charts
When the process mean (µ) and standard deviation (σ) are unknown:
Procedures:
1. Collect multiple samples;
2. Calculate sample averages ( X ’s) and ranges (R’s);
3. Calculate grand average ( X ) and average of the
ranges ( R );
4. Use Table S6-1 to find A2, D3, and D4;
5. Calculate UCL’s and LCL’s for the mean and range
charts.
98
97 UCL = 96.81
96
Nominal Value = grand avg = 95.07
Sample Mean
95
94
LCL = 93.33
93
92
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Sample No.
7 UCL = 6.33
6
5
Range
4
Nominal Value = avg range = 3.00
3
1
LCL = 0
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Sample No.
total # of defectives
Percent defective : p
# of samples sample size
p (1 p )
Standard deviation of p : ^p
n
UCL p z p
LCL p z p
0.12
UCLp = 0.10
0.10
Fraction Defective
0.08
0.06
p= 0.04
0.04
0.02
LCLp = 0
0.00
0 5 10 15 20 25
Sample Number
total # of defects
No. of defects per sample : c
# of samples
Standard deviation of c : c c
UCL c z c
LCL c z c
c is standard deviation
6/23/2020 NY –TQM 2019 53
Example c-chart
Day No. of
The management of Complaints
hotel has received 1 3
several complaints for 2 0
over 9-day period based 3 8
on the table. Set control 4 9
limit at 99.73%. 5 6
6 7
7 4
8 9
9 8
54
6/23/2020 NY –TQM 2019 54
Calculation
Total Number of complaints 54
c = = = 6
9
Day
UCLC = c + z c = 6 + 3 ( 6 ) = 13.35
Control Chart
14 UCLp = 13.35
12
No. of Complaints
10
6 c= 6
4
0
LCLp = 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Day
x-Chart
R-chart
0.45
0.4
LCL
LCL
UCL
UCL
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0 0.45
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
0.4
In-Control StdDev=1
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0 0.45
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
0.4
0.35 In-Control StdDev=1
0.3
0.25
0.2
NY –TQM 2019
0.15
mean
0.1
0.05
0 0.45
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
0.4
0.35 In-Control StdDev=1
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
In-Control StdDev=1
(Process mean is
Mean and Range Charts: shift of the
Figure 10-10A
shifting upward, but
Does not
59
detect shift
shape remains the same.)
Detects shift
Mean and Range Charts: increase in
variability
6
6
6
6
4
4
4
4
(Process variability is
2
2
2
Sampling
In-Control StdDev=1
increasing from 1 to 1.75,
StdDev=4
StdDev=2
StdDev=3
Distribution
0
0
0
but the mean remains
-2
unchanged.)
-2
-2
-2
-4
-4
-4
-4
UCL
0.4 -6
-6
0.25 -6
-6
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Does not
0.45
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0.30
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
x-Chart
reveal increase
LCL
UCL
LCL
Figure 10-10B
6/23/2020 NY –TQM 2019 60
Managerial Issues and
Control Charts
Three major management decisions:
Target
Target
Target
Target
Target
Target
A. Process variability
matches specifications
Lower Upper
Specification Specification
B. Process variability
Lower Upper
well within specifications Specification Specification
C. Process variability
exceeds specifications
6/23/2020 NY –TQM 2019 76
3 Sigma and 6 Sigma Quality
Lower Upper
specification specification
Process
mean
+/- 3 Sigma
+/- 6 Sigma
Upper Lower
Cpk = minimum of Specification - x , x - Specification
Limit Limit
3 3
Cpk = zero
Cpk = 1
Cpk > 1
Figure S6.8
6/23/2020 NY –TQM 2019 83
Acceptance Sampling
Form of quality testing used for
incoming materials or finished goods
Take samples at random from a lot
Rejected lots can be:
(shipment) of items
Returned
Inspect each of the to the
items in the sample
supplier
Decide whether to reject the whole lot
Culledresults
based on the inspection for
defectives
Only screens lots; does
(100%not drive
inspection)
quality improvement efforts
6/23/2020 NY –TQM 2019 84
Operating Characteristic Curve
Keep whole
shipment
P(Accept Whole Shipment)
100 –
75 –
Return whole
shipment
50 –
Cut-Off
25 –
0 |– | | | | | | | | | |
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
% Defective in Lot
6/23/2020 NY –TQM 2019 86
AQL and LTPD
75 –
Probability
of 50 –
Acceptance
25 –
10 –
= 0.10 Percent
0 |– | | | | | | | |
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 defective
AQL LTPD
Consumer’s
risk for LTPD Good Indifference
Bad lots
lots zone
6/23/2020 NY –TQM 2019 88
Producer’s and Consumer’s Risks
Producer's risk ()
Probability of rejecting a good lot
Probability of rejecting a lot when the
fraction defective is at or above the
AQL
Consumer's risk ()
Probability of accepting a bad lot
Probability of accepting a lot when
fraction defective is below the LTPD
6/23/2020 NY –TQM 2019 89
OC Curves for Different Sampling
Plans
n = 50, c = 1
n = 100, c = 2
(Pd)(Pa)(N - n)
AOQ =
N
where
Pd = true percent defective of the lot
Pa = probability of accepting the lot
N = number of items in the lot
n = number of items in the sample
Modern
technologies
allow virtually
100% inspection
at minimal costs
Not suitable for
all situations