Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GLOBALGOVERNANCE CHAPTER 5
POLITICAL FLOWS
• The global flow of people, especially refugees and illegal immigrants, poses a
direct threat to the nation - state and its ability to control its borders.
• The looming crises associated with dwindling oil and water supplies threaten to
lead to riots and perhaps insurrections that could lead to the downfall of extant
governments.
• The inability of the nation - state to control economic flows dominated by MNCs, as
well as the current economic and financial crisis that is sweeping the world, is also
posing a profound threat to the nation - state (e.g. in Eastern Europe).
• Environmental problems of all sorts, especially those related to global warming, are
very likely to be destabilizing politically.
• Borderless diseases, especially malaria, TB, and AIDs in Africa, pose a danger to
political structures.
• War is the most obvious global flow threatening the nation – states involved,
especially those on the losing side.
GLOBAL PROBLEMS
• Many of which (e.g. trade protection and liberalization; efforts to increase political
transparency and accountability) are political in nature.
• Finally, political structures (e.g. nation -states, the UN) initiate a wide range of
global flows (e.g. the violence sponsored by Robert Mugabe ’ s
government in Zimbabwe that led to the mass migration of millions of people from
the country).
• Nationalism: is a doctrine and (or) political movement that seek to make the nation
the basis of a political structure, especially a state.
• Nation - state: Integrates sub - groups that define themselves as a nation with the
organizational structure of the state.
The nation - state is especially threatened by the global economy and global
economic flows.
Example
• In terms of the global economy, nation - states have become little more than bit
actors”(Ohmae, 1996: 12). It refers to the borderless global economy that nation -
states are unable to control.
• B.The decline of the nation - state is linked to technological and financial changes,
as well as to “ the accelerated integration of national economies into one single
global market economy ” (Strange 1996 : 13 – 14). While nation - states once
controlled markets, it is now the markets that often control the nation - states.
• B. illegal immigrants,
• D. terrorists,
• E. criminals,
• F. drugs,
• Many of these flows have been made possible by the development and continual
refinement of technologies of all sorts. The nation -state has become increasingly
porous. While this seems to be supported by a great deal of evidence, the fact is that
no nation - state has ever been able to control its borders completely (Bauman 1992:
57). Thus, it is not the porosity of the nation -state that is new, but rather what is new
is a dramatic increase in that porosity and the kinds of flows that are capable of
passing through national borders.
• International Human Rights
• Another threat to the autonomy of the nation -state is the growing interest in
international human rights (Elliott 2007: 343 – 63; Chatterjee 2008; Fredman 2008 ).
Human Rights
• defined as the “entitlement of individuals to life, security, and well - being” (Turner
1993: 489 – 512; 2007 : 591), has emerged as a major global political issue. It is
argued that because these rights are universal, the nation - state cannot abrogate
them. As a result, global human rights groups have claimed the right to be able to
have a say about what is done to people within (for example, torture of terror
suspects) and between, illegal trafficking in humans [Farr 2005] sovereign states.
• Thus, in such a view, human rights are a global matter and not exclusively a
concern of the state (Levy and Sznaider 2006 :657 – 76). Furthermore, the
implication is that the international community can and should intervene when a
state violates human rights or when a violation occurs within a state border and the
state does not take adequate action to deal with the violation.
• (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the
borders of each State.
• (2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to
his country.
• It is clear in this Declaration and its Articles is that human rights take precedence
over the nation -state and that the UN is seeking to exert control over the state, at
least on these issues.
UNITED NATIONS
• The United Nations (UN), in spite of its myriad problems, is the premier global
organization in the realm of politics.
However, the UN is not merely a setting in which nation - states meet; it is also an
independent actor.
• The two best - known state - based organs in the UN:
2.the General Assembly responsible for the maintenance of international peace and
security
• A turning point in the military role of the UN was the 1991 authorization by the
Security Council of the use of force todeal with Iraq ’ s invasion of Kuwait.
Throughout the 1990s the UN engaged in a wide variety of actions that were not
anticipated by its founders and which had been regarded previously as the province
of states. These included:
• C. disarmament,
• D. and even the assumption of state functions (in Cambodia and East Timor,for
example) ” (Weiss and Zach 2007 : 1219). However, the expansionism of the UN in
these areas was tempered by failures in the 1990s in Somalia and Yugoslavia. In the
military realm it is also important to mention the fact that the UN has been actively
involved in arms control and disarmament.
• 3.Environmental issues- (e.g. pollution, hazardous wastes) which are dealt with
primarily through the United Nations Environment Programme.
transnational organizations.
three stages :
• and finally, to a tri - polar future with the US, EU, and China as the three centers of
power.
Also examined is the emergence of the United Nations, as well more specific
• The second is governance through various public policy networks. At the global
level, this involves government by various international institutions as well as INGOS
(International Non -Governmental Organizations; see below) and private sector
organizations of various sorts.
• The increasing “premigration” of the global order. This reflects increasing global
diversity as well as the array of contradictory forces that have been unleashed as a
result. Among those contradictory forces are globalization and localization,
centralization and decentralization, and integration and fragmentation (premigration).
• The declining power of nation -states. If states themselves are less able to handle
various responsibilities, this leaves open the possibility of the emergence of some
form of global governance to fill the void.
• The vast flows of all sorts of things that run into and often right through the borders
of nation - states. This could involve the flow of digital information of all sorts through
the Internet. It is difficult, if not impossible, for a nation - state to stop such flows and
in any case it is likely that such action would be politically unpopular and bring much
negative reaction to the nation – state involved in such an effort. For example,
China’ s periodic efforts to interfere with the Internet have brought great
condemnation both internally and externally.
• The mass migration of people and their entry, often illegally, into various nation -
states. If states are unable to control this flow, then there is a need for some sort of
global governance to help deal with the problem. The flow of criminal elements, as
well as their products (drugs, laundered money, those bought and sold in sex
trafficking, etc.), is a strong factor in the call for global governance.
• Horrendous events within nation - states that the states themselves either foment
and carry out or are unable to control. For example, in Darfur, Sudan, perhaps
hundreds of thousands have been killed and millions of people displaced and the
lives of many more disrupted in a conflict that dates to early 2003.
• Then there are global problems that single nation - states cannot hope to tackle on
their own. One, of course, is the global financial crises and panics (including the
current one) that sweep the world periodically and which nations are often unable to
deal with on their own. Indeed, some nations (e.g. the nations of Southeast Asia)
have often been, and are being, victimized by such crises. Unable to help
themselves, such nations are in need of assistance from some type of global
governance.
• International not - for – profit organizations performing public functions but not
established or run by nation - states.
• The first modern INGOs are traceable to the nineteenth century (the International
Red Cross was founded in Switzerland in 1865), but they have boomed in recent
years.
• Turning point in the history of INGOs occurred in 1992 when a treaty to control the
emission of greenhouse gases was signed as a result of the actions of a variety of
groups that not only exerted external pressure, but were actually involved in the
decision - making process.
• They are elitist (many involve better - off and well - educated people from the North)
– that is, undemocratic – organizations that seek to impose inappropriate universal
plans on local organizations and settings.
• Thus, they have the potential to be “loose cannons” on the global stage.
• They are seen as annoying busybodies that are forever putting their noses in the
business of others (Thomas 2007: 84 – 102).
• They often pander to public opinion and posture for the media both to attract
attention to their issues and to maintain or expand their power and membership.
• As a result, they may distort the magnitude of certain problems (e.g. overestimating
the effects, and misjudging the causes, of an oil spill) in order to advance their cause
and interests.
• Their focus on one issue may adversely affect the interest in, and ability to deal
with, many other important issues.
• The nature of the focus, and indeed the very creation, of an INGO may be a
function of its ability to attract attention and to raise funds. As a result, other worthy,
if not more worthy, issues (e.g. soil erosion, especially in Africa) may fail to attract
much, if any, attention, and interest.
• In some cases, well - meaning INGOs conflict with one another, such as those
wishing to end certain practices (e.g. logging) versus those that see those practices
as solutions (e.g. logging producing wood as a sustainable resource that is
preferable to fossil fuels).
• The North’ s control over INGOs has actually increased, leading to questions about
their relevance to the concerns of the South.
• However, perhaps the strongest criticism of INGOs is that they “seem to have
helped accelerate further state withdrawal from social provision” (Harvey 2006 :52).
In that sense they can be seen as neo - liberalism’ s “Trojan horses, ” furthering its
agenda while seeming to operate against some of its worst abuses.
• There are also the more material gains since such an organization might provide
badly needed funding to various INGOs;
• work may even be sub - contracted to INGOs and they can earn income for
performing the required tasks.
Dangers to INGOs
• Other possible changes in INGOs include a loss of flexibility (as they must satisfy
the demands of the IGO which, after all, may well be the source of badly needed
funds), a decline in capacity to act quickly, and, perhaps most troubling, a loss of
autonomy and perhaps even identity.
• For their part, IGOs are affected by the involvement of INGOs. They, too, can gain
symbolically and increase their legitimacy through the involvement of high - minded
INGOs. Further, they can gain in a material sense because of the fact that less
bureaucratized INGOs can perform tasks that would be much more costly, and done
much more slowly and inefficiently, were they performed by IGOs.
Global Divides: The North and the South (focus: Latin America)
Global South refers to the regions of Latin America, Asia, Africa, and
Oceania mostly low- income and often politically or culturally marginalized. It
may also be called the "developing World" such as Africa, Latin America,
and the developing countries in Asia, "developing countries," "less
developed countries," and "less developed regions”
including poorer "southern" regions of wealthy "northern" countries .
(122) (123)
The development of the global south must begin by drawing most of the
country’s financial
resources for development from within rather than becoming dependent on
foreign investments and foreign financial markets . (129)
The global south is not relevant for those who live in countries
traditionally associated with it but also signifies that the south continues to
be globalized. It also represents emergent forms of progressive
cosmopolitanism. It is an always emergent and provisional internationalism.
Asian Regionalism
The Asia and South Pacific has emerged over the past decade as a
new political force in the world. The economies of Japan, Korea, Indonesia,
Vietnam and Pakistan have strategic relevance in today’s global system.
They are the focused of global powers outside of the region. A foreign policy
shift called “Pacific Pivot” was implemented by the United States to commit
more resources and attention to the region. This shift which is also called
“Atlantic Century” was termed “Pacific Century” by US Secretary of States
Hilary Clinton. He stated that the Asia Pacific has become a key driver of
global politics. It is the home to several key allies and important emerging
powers like China, India, and Indonesia.
Globalization in the Asia Pacific and South Asia is an external
phenomenon being pushed into the region by world powers like US and
Europe. Globalization in this context is a process that transforms the Asia
Pacific and South Asia. It can be viewed as a force for good, bringing
economic development, political progress, and social and cultural diversity.
Asia Pacific and South Asia’s Impact on Globalization
Asia was the central global force in the early modern world economy. It was
the site of the most important trade routes and in some places more
advanced in technology than West such as science and medicine. Colonies
in the Asia pacific and South Asia influenced the West and vice versa. They
were often “laboratories of modernity” (133). Colonialism was not simply a
practice of Western Domination but a product of what one thinks of as
Western and modern.
furthering globalization.
3. India opened -up and emphasized an export-oriented strategy. Textiles and
other low wage sectors have been a key part of the economy with highly successful
software development exports. It also plays a key role in global service provisions as
trends in outsourcing and off- shoring increase .
(136)
4. India and China have also become a major source of international migrant
labor, which is also one of the fundamental characteristics of the era of globalization.
This includes the migration of highly skilled labor into the high- tech industry based in
Silicon Valley. India, China and the Philippines were three of the top four recipient
states of migrant remittances.
5. The trend of the rising regional free arrangements in the Asia Pacific and
South Asia. This kind of regionalism would mean as bulwark to globalization or as
compatible and even pushing forward the process of global economic integration.
Regionalism can promote learning, assuage domestic audiences to the benefits of free
trade, and form the institutional framework to scale up from regional cooperation o
global cooperation . Regionalism can act as springboard for globalization.
(137)
One distinguishing feature of regional institutions in Asia Pacific and South Asia
is the adoption of “Open Regionalism” which aims to develop and maintain cooperation
with outside actors. This is meant to resolve the tension between the rise of regional
trade agreements and the push for global trade as embodied by World Trade
Organization (WTO) ), the only global international organization dealing with the rules
(138
The product of regional economic development in the post war era are
the middle classes in east Asia. Regional economic development took place
within the context of the American informal empire in “Free Asia”, with the
US-led regional security system and the triangular trade system as its two
major pillars. Furthermore, the national states in the region promoted it
actively under democratic or authoritarian developmentalist regimes, both of
which espoused the politics of productivity, a politics of that transformed
political issues into problems of output and sought to neutralize class conflict
in favor of a consensus on economic growth . (142)
New urban middle classes emerged in the post 1986 Philippines. They were
created through growth in retail trade, manufacture, banking, real estate
development, and an expanding range of specialist services such as
accounting, advertising, computing, and market research. Fostered by
government policies of liberalization and deregulation, the development of
these new enterprises has been oriented both toward the export and
domestic markets and has entailed increasingly diverse sources of foreign
investment and variable subcontracting, franchise, and service
relationships, with a noticeable expansion of ties connecting the Philippines
to other countries in East and Southeast Asia.
Complex historical forces shaped new urban middle classes. They are
product of regional economic development, which has taken place in waves
under the U.S. informal empire over a half century, first in Japan, then in
South Korea, Taiwan, Hongkong, and Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia,
Indonesia and Philippines, and now in China. They are product as well for
development states. Their lifestyles have been shaped in very complex ways
by their appropriation of things American, Japanese, Chinese, South
Korean, Islamic and other ways of life, often mediated by the market.
The political consequences of the rise of East Asia middle classes
vary. The cultural and political hegemony of the South Korean middle
classes is embodied by single generation, while that of the Taiwanese
middle classes manifest itself in the political assertiveness of an ethnic
majority. Southeast Asian middle classes also exemplify the diversity and
complexity of class formation. Thai middle classes are coherent socially,
hegemonic culturally, and ascend politically; their counterparts in Malaysia
and Indonesia are socially divided, dependent on the state, politically
assertive and vulnerable; and the Philippine middle classes are socially
coherent, less dependent on the state, culturally ascendant, but politically
vacillating.
CONTEMPORARY
GLOBALGOVERNANCE CHAPTER 5
POLITICAL FLOWS
• The global flow of people, especially refugees and illegal immigrants, poses a
direct threat to the nation - state and its ability to control its borders.
• The looming crises associated with dwindling oil and water supplies threaten to
lead to riots and perhaps insurrections that could lead to the downfall of extant
governments.
• The inability of the nation - state to control economic flows dominated by MNCs, as
well as the current economic and financial crisis that is sweeping the world, is also
posing a profound threat to the nation - state (e.g. in Eastern Europe).
• Environmental problems of all sorts, especially those related to global warming, are
very likely to be destabilizing politically.
• Borderless diseases, especially malaria, TB, and AIDs in Africa, pose a danger to
political structures.
• War is the most obvious global flow threatening the nation – states involved,
especially those on the losing side.
GLOBAL PROBLEMS
• Many of which (e.g. trade protection and liberalization; efforts to increase political
transparency and accountability) are political in nature.
• Finally, political structures (e.g. nation -states, the UN) initiate a wide range of
global flows (e.g. the violence sponsored by Robert Mugabe ’ s
government in Zimbabwe that led to the mass migration of millions of people from
the country).
The nation - state is especially threatened by the global economy and global
economic flows.
Example
• In terms of the global economy, nation - states have become little more than bit
actors”(Ohmae, 1996: 12). It refers to the borderless global economy that nation -
states are unable to control.
• B.The decline of the nation - state is linked to technological and financial changes,
as well as to “ the accelerated integration of national economies into one single
global market economy ” (Strange 1996 : 13 – 14). While nation - states once
controlled markets, it is now the markets that often control the nation - states.
• B. illegal immigrants,
• D. terrorists,
• E. criminals,
• F. drugs,
• Many of these flows have been made possible by the development and continual
refinement of technologies of all sorts. The nation -state has become increasingly
porous. While this seems to be supported by a great deal of evidence, the fact is that
no nation - state has ever been able to control its borders completely (Bauman 1992:
57). Thus, it is not the porosity of the nation -state that is new, but rather what is new
is a dramatic increase in that porosity and the kinds of flows that are capable of
passing through national borders.
• Another threat to the autonomy of the nation -state is the growing interest in
international human rights (Elliott 2007: 343 – 63; Chatterjee 2008; Fredman 2008 ).
Human Rights
• defined as the “entitlement of individuals to life, security, and well - being” (Turner
1993: 489 – 512; 2007 : 591), has emerged as a major global political issue. It is
argued that because these rights are universal, the nation - state cannot abrogate
them. As a result, global human rights groups have claimed the right to be able to
have a say about what is done to people within (for example, torture of terror
suspects) and between, illegal trafficking in humans [Farr 2005] sovereign states.
• Thus, in such a view, human rights are a global matter and not exclusively a
concern of the state (Levy and Sznaider 2006 :657 – 76). Furthermore, the
implication is that the international community can and should intervene when a
state violates human rights or when a violation occurs within a state border and the
state does not take adequate action to deal with the violation.
• (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the
borders of each State.
• (2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to
his country.
• It is clear in this Declaration and its Articles is that human rights take precedence
over the nation -state and that the UN is seeking to exert control over the state, at
least on these issues.
UNITED NATIONS
• The United Nations (UN), in spite of its myriad problems, is the premier global
organization in the realm of politics.
However, the UN is not merely a setting in which nation - states meet; it is also an
independent actor.
2.the General Assembly responsible for the maintenance of international peace and
security
The UN 4 broad areas.
• A turning point in the military role of the UN was the 1991 authorization by the
Security Council of the use of force todeal with Iraq ’ s invasion of Kuwait.
Throughout the 1990s the UN engaged in a wide variety of actions that were not
anticipated by its founders and which had been regarded previously as the province
of states. These included:
• C. disarmament,
• D. and even the assumption of state functions (in Cambodia and East Timor,for
example) ” (Weiss and Zach 2007 : 1219). However, the expansionism of the UN in
these areas was tempered by failures in the 1990s in Somalia and Yugoslavia. In the
military realm it is also important to mention the fact that the UN has been actively
involved in arms control and disarmament.
• 3.Environmental issues- (e.g. pollution, hazardous wastes) which are dealt with
primarily through the United Nations Environment Programme.
three stages :
and IAEA.
GLOBAL
• The second is governance through various public policy networks. At the global
level, this involves government by various international institutions as well as INGOS
(International Non -Governmental Organizations; see below) and private sector
organizations of various sorts.
• The increasing “premigration” of the global order. This reflects increasing global
diversity as well as the array of contradictory forces that have been unleashed as a
result. Among those contradictory forces are globalization and localization,
centralization and decentralization, and integration and fragmentation (premigration).
• The declining power of nation -states. If states themselves are less able to handle
various responsibilities, this leaves open the possibility of the emergence of some
form of global governance to fill the void.
• The vast flows of all sorts of things that run into and often right through the borders
of nation - states. This could involve the flow of digital information of all sorts through
the Internet. It is difficult, if not impossible, for a nation - state to stop such flows and
in any case it is likely that such action would be politically unpopular and bring much
negative reaction to the nation – state involved in such an effort. For example,
China’ s periodic efforts to interfere with the Internet have brought great
condemnation both internally and externally.
• The mass migration of people and their entry, often illegally, into various nation -
states. If states are unable to control this flow, then there is a need for some sort of
global governance to help deal with the problem. The flow of criminal elements, as
well as their products (drugs, laundered money, those bought and sold in sex
trafficking, etc.), is a strong factor in the call for global governance.
• Horrendous events within nation - states that the states themselves either foment
and carry out or are unable to control. For example, in Darfur, Sudan, perhaps
hundreds of thousands have been killed and millions of people displaced and the
lives of many more disrupted in a conflict that dates to early 2003.
• Then there are global problems that single nation - states cannot hope to tackle on
their own. One, of course, is the global financial crises and panics (including the
current one) that sweep the world periodically and which nations are often unable to
deal with on their own. Indeed, some nations (e.g. the nations of Southeast Asia)
have often been, and are being, victimized by such crises. Unable to help
themselves, such nations are in need of assistance from some type of global
governance.
• International not - for – profit organizations performing public functions but not
established or run by nation - states.
• The first modern INGOs are traceable to the nineteenth century (the International
Red Cross was founded in Switzerland in 1865), but they have boomed in recent
years.
• Turning point in the history of INGOs occurred in 1992 when a treaty to control the
emission of greenhouse gases was signed as a result of the actions of a variety of
groups that not only exerted external pressure, but were actually involved in the
decision - making process.
• They are elitist (many involve better - off and well - educated people from the North)
– that is, undemocratic – organizations that seek to impose inappropriate universal
plans on local organizations and settings.
• Thus, they have the potential to be “loose cannons” on the global stage.
• They are seen as annoying busybodies that are forever putting their noses in the
business of others (Thomas 2007: 84 – 102).
• They often pander to public opinion and posture for the media both to attract
attention to their issues and to maintain or expand their power and membership.
• As a result, they may distort the magnitude of certain problems (e.g. overestimating
the effects, and misjudging the causes, of an oil spill) in order to advance their cause
and interests.
• Their focus on one issue may adversely affect the interest in, and ability to deal
with, many other important issues.
• The nature of the focus, and indeed the very creation, of an INGO may be a
function of its ability to attract attention and to raise funds. As a result, other worthy,
if not more worthy, issues (e.g. soil erosion, especially in Africa) may fail to attract
much, if any, attention, and interest.
• In some cases, well - meaning INGOs conflict with one another, such as those
wishing to end certain practices (e.g. logging) versus those that see those practices
as solutions (e.g. logging producing wood as a sustainable resource that is
preferable to fossil fuels).
• The North’ s control over INGOs has actually increased, leading to questions about
their relevance to the concerns of the South.
• However, perhaps the strongest criticism of INGOs is that they “seem to have
helped accelerate further state withdrawal from social provision” (Harvey 2006 :52).
In that sense they can be seen as neo - liberalism’ s “Trojan horses, ” furthering its
agenda while seeming to operate against some of its worst abuses.
• There are also the more material gains since such an organization might provide
badly needed funding to various INGOs;
• work may even be sub - contracted to INGOs and they can earn income for
performing the required tasks.
Dangers to INGOs
• Other possible changes in INGOs include a loss of flexibility (as they must satisfy
the demands of the IGO which, after all, may well be the source of badly needed
funds), a decline in capacity to act quickly, and, perhaps most troubling, a loss of
autonomy and perhaps even identity.
• For their part, IGOs are affected by the involvement of INGOs. They, too, can gain
symbolically and increase their legitimacy through the involvement of high - minded
INGOs. Further, they can gain in a material sense because of the fact that less
bureaucratized INGOs can perform tasks that would be much more costly, and done
much more slowly and inefficiently, were they performed by IGOs.
1. Oral Communication
Globalization as a social process is characterized by the existence of
global economic, political, cultural, linguistic and environmental
interconnections and flows that make the many of the currently existing
borders and boundaries irrelevant.
Of all forms of media, human speech is the oldest and most enduring.
Humans are allowed to cooperate and communicate through language.
Human ability to move from one place to another and to adapt to a new and
different environment are facilitated by the sharing of information of other
peoples . Languages as a means to develop the ability to communicate
(146)
across culture are the lifeline of globalization. Without language there would
be no globalization; and vice versa, without globalization there would be no
world languages . (147)
2. Script
Writing is humankind’s principal technology for collecting, manipulating,
storing, retrieving, communicating and disseminating information. Writing
may have been invented independently three times in different parts of the
world: in the Near East, China and Mesoamerica. Writing is a system of
graphic marks representing the units of a specific language. Cuneiform
script created in Mesopotamia, present-day Iraq, is the only writing system
which can be traced to its earliest prehistoric origin.
Humans communicate and shared knowledge and ideas through script- the
very first writing. The origin of writing was in the form of carvings such as
wood, stone, bones and others. The medium that drove humans to
globalization was the script of Ancient Egyptian written in papyrus (plant).
Written and orderly arrangement of documents pertaining to religious,
cultural, economic and religious practices are done through script for
dissemination to other places. These can also be
handed down from generation to generation. Script is an important tool for
globalization as it considers the integration of economy, politics and culture
to the world. The great civilization from Egypt to Rome and China were
made possible through script . (149)
4. Electronic Media
television . (154)
5. Digital Media
2. Post-Modernist Perspective.
Throughout the 20th century migration of faiths across the globe has
been a major feature. One of these features is the deterritorialization of
religion – that is , the appearance and the efflorescence of religious
traditions in places where these previously had been largely unknown or
were at least in a minority position .(163)
movement attempt to construct pure religion that sheds the cultural tradition
in which past religious life was immersed . (165)
Forms of Glocalization
1. indigenization
2. vernacularization
3. nationalization
4. transnationalization
References:
Chapter 8 GLOBAL POPULATION AND MOBILITY
was used to describe these three urban centers of New York, London,
and Tokyo as economic centers that exert control over the world’s political
economy. World cities are categorized as such based on the global reach
of organization found in them. Not only are there inequalities between
these cities there also exists inequalities within each city. Alternatively,
175
Global Demography
The term demography was derived from the Greek word demos for
“population” and graphia for “description” or “writing,” thus the phrase,
“writings about population.” 181 It was coined by Achille Guillard, a Belgian
statistician, in 1855. However, the origins of modern demography can be
traced back to the John Graunt’s analysis of ‘Bills of Mortality’ which was
published in 1662. 182
century that mortality decline in Africa and Asia, with the exemption of
Japan. In India, life expectancy in India was only 24 years in the early 20 th
that “total fertility rate did not drop below five births per woman”. This
185
resulted in rapid population growth after the Second World War affecting
the age structure of Asia and the developing world. Specifically, the baby
boom in the developing world was caused by the decline of infant and
child mortality rates. The West, on the other hand, experienced baby
boom that resulted from rising birth rates.
the world’s population, from 22.0 percent to 33.0 percent, while Asia and
Oceania’s contribution dropped from 69.0 percent to 56.7. India and
China suffered from economic stagnation and decline during that time. 186
century as Africa, Asia, Latin America, and Oceania had high levels of
population growth rates. Population growth shows a more remarkable
shift: “Between 1820 and 1980, 69.3 percent of the world’s population
growth occurred in Europe and Western offshoots. Between 1950 and
2000, however, only 11.7 percent occurred in the region.” 187
In terms of age structure, the overall trend in Japan and the West
was downward until 1950. Their dependency ratio was close to 0.5. It
only increased, although temporary, when the baby boom after the
Second World War occurred. Japan’s dependency ratio, however,
increased between 1888 and 1920. its dependency ratio was higher than
the West between 1920 and
the early 1950’s. It dropped in 1970 and later since its precipitous decline
in childbearing during the 1950’s and low fertility rates in recent years.
The developing countries like India and the Philippines had higher
dependency ratios than the West in 1900. A great increase in
dependency ratio was caused by the decline in infant and child mortality
and high levels of fertility, with its peak around 1970.
next 50 years, the cases of dependency ratios of these two areas in the
world will be reversed. 188
The aging populations will cause a rise in
dependency ratio, starting in the West.
In stage one, pre-industrial society, death rates and birth rates are
high and roughly in balance. An example of this stage is the United
States in the 1800s. All human populations are believed to have had this
balance until the late 18th century, when this balance ended in Western
Europe. In fact, growth rates were less than 0.05% at least since the
Agricultural Revolution over 10,000 years ago.
Stage 2
In Europe, the death rate decline started in the late 18th century in
northwestern Europe and spread to the south and east over
approximately the next 100 years. Without a corresponding fall in birth
rates this produces an imbalance, and the countries in this stage
experience a large increase in population.
Stage 3
Stage 4
During stage four, there are both low birth rates and low death
rates. Birth rates may drop to well below replacement level as has
happened in countries like Germany, Italy, and Japan, leading to a
shrinking population, a threat to many industries that rely on population
growth. Sweden is considered to currently be in Stage 4.
Stage 5 (Debated)
Internal migration
This refers to people moving from one area to another within one
country
International migration
This refers to the movement people who cross the
borders of one country to another.
while the fourth are migrants whose families have “petitioned” them to move
to the destination country. The fifth group are refugees (also known as
assylum-seekers), i.e., those “unable or unwilling to return because of a well-
founded fear of persecution on acccount of race, religion, nationality,
membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. “194
3. Environmental Factor
Despite the fact that human relocation is a fundamental piece of
history and culture of world, ecological change assumes a contributing
part in influencing populace movement, especially on local level.
According to IOM (International Organisation of Migration):
“Environmental migrants are persons or groups of persons who, for
compelling reasons of sudden or progressive changes in the environment
that adversely affect their lives or living conditions, are obliged to leave
their habitual homes, or choose to do so, either temporarily or
permanently, and who move either within their country or abroad”. This 203
4. Economic Factors
Migration is a process affecting individuals and their families economically.
It ensues as a response to economic development along with social and
cultural factors. Recent studies on the economic impact of migration in
European countries as well as other part of the world have reflected fresh
comparative evidence that provides boost for economy. International
migration has two-way effects on economic growth. Though it is still
debatable about its positive impact on GDP growth of a host country, it is
worldwidely recognised that migration expands the skilled workforce.
A recent UNCTAD report notes: ‘Remittances are more stable and
predictable as compared to other financial flows and, more importantly,
they are counter-cyclical providing buffer against economic shocks. In
conflict or post–conflict situations, remittances can be crucial to survival,
sustenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction. In providing primarily for
household livelihoods, remittances are spent on general consumption
items in local communities that contribute to local economies by
supporting small businesses.
Moreover, in contributing to foreign exchange earnings, remittances
can spur economic growth by improving sending countries’ credit
worthiness and expanding their access to international capital markets’. 205
Dependency Ratio
Demand for food will be 60% greater than it is today and the
challenge of food security requires the world to feed 9 billion people by
2050. Global food security means delivering sufficient food to the entire
world population. It is, therefore, a priority of all countries, whether
developed or less developed. The security of food also means the
sustainability of society such as population growth, climate change, water
scarcity, and agriculture. The case of India show how complex the issue
of food security is in relation to other factors:
Agriculture accounts for 18% of the economy’s output and 47% of
its workforce. India is the second biggest producer of fruits and
vegetables in the world. Yet, according to the Food and Agriculture
Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, some 194 million Indians are
undernourished, the largest number of hungry people in any single
country. An estimated 15.2% of the population of India are too
malnourished to lead a normal life. A third of the world’s malnourished
children live in India (n.p.) 216
But perhaps the closest aspect of human life associated with food
security is the environment. A major environmental problem is the
destruction of natural habitats, particularly through deforestation. 217
a rapid pace.
Another significant environmental challenge is that of the decline in the
availability of
fresh water. Because of the degradation of soil or desertification, decline
219
in water supply has transformed what was once considered a public good
into a privatized commodity. The poorest areas of the globe experience
220
GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP
citizen has a duty to address issues affecting our being citizens. As there
could be no formal process to become a global citizen, holding this
citizenship status is something that we all have a right to and obligation as
well.
Given this above definition, citizenship can thus be associated with
rights and obligations. For instance, the right to vote and the obligation to
pay taxes. Both rights and obligations link the individual to the state. It also
has to do with our attitude. We need to be willing to engage and to spend
time and effort to the community of which we feel part of.
Caecilia Johanna van Peski (as cited in Baraldi, 2012) defined global
citizenship “as a moral and ethical disposition that can guide the
understanding of individuals or groups of local and global contexts, and
remind them of their relative responsibilities within various communities.”
Global citizens are the glue which binds local communities together in an
increasingly globalized world. In van Peski’s words, “global citizens might
be a new type of people that can travel within these various boundaries
and somehow still make sense of the world”. 229
Global citizenship may seem to have far broader meanings than the
above given ones. Equally, it is still important to note its salient features for
230
levels, should be more accountable for their actions because they are now
surrounded by an “ocean of opacity”. Increased transparency has been
236