STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

WITH SOFTWARE
APPLICATION
GROUP ACTIVITY N0.2

BSBA-FM 2 (ABC1)

Group 10
Cabag, Alili Maureen B.
Fernandez, James Anthony V.
Palabrica, Rycel A.
Yamot, Jullian B.

Submitted to:

Mr. Julito A. Puebla Jr.

 LABORATORY ACTIVITIES
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS WITH SOFTWARE APPLICATION
1ST Semester, AY 2021-2022

Direction: Read and understand the question carefully, and then you are free to
use statistical tools like Jeffreys’s Amazing Statistical Program (JASP) or any
preferred software to solve the given problems.

1. A test in Statistics was given to two groups of Business Administration students

major in Financial Management and Marketing Management. The following
table shows thetest scores of the ten students from each major:
Financial Management Marketing Management
87 89
95 90
92 91
90 89
93 87
90 85
90 88
93 87
92 85
90 87

Test if there is a significant difference between the test scores of Financial

Managementand Marketing Management students at 5% level of significance.

1. State the 𝐻0 and 𝐻𝑎 hypotheses.

𝐻0: There is no significant difference between the test scores of Financial Management and
Marketing Management in Statistics.

𝐻𝑎: There is a significant difference between the test scores of Financial Management and
Marketing Management in Statistics.

2. Complete the Presentation of Results

Indicator Majors Mean t-value p-value Decision Remarks

Financial 91.2
Test 3.579 0.001 Reject 𝐻0 Significant
Scores Marketing 87.8

Independent Samples T-Test

t df p
scores 3.579 18 0.001
Note. For all tests, the alternative hypothesis specifies that group Financial Management is greater than group
Marketing Management .
Note. Student's t-test.

Group Descriptives
Group N Mean SD SE Coefficient of variation
scores Financial Management 10 91.200 2.251 0.712 0.025
Marketing Management 10 87.800 1.989 0.629 0.023
 3. Conclusion:
There is sufficient evidence to support that there is a significant difference between the
test scores of Financial Management and Marketing Management students in Statistics.
 2. The Director of the Human Resource Management Services (HRMS) is interested to
determine whether the training course increases the teaching performance of the 20
teachers who attended the training. The data shown below are the performances of the
20 teachers before and after the training courses:
Teacher Before After
1 85 95
2 84 98
3 86 97
4 87 92
5 89 96
6 82 93
7 80 94
8 84 95
9 86 90
10 82 82
11 89 97
12 87 98
13 82 95
14 81 95
15 86 92
16 89 91
17 89 94
18 84 95
19 85 96
20 88 97

Test if there is a significantly increase on the teaching performance before and after
the training course at 5% level of significance.

1. State the 𝐻0 and 𝐻𝑎 hypotheses.

𝐻0: The training course will not help to increase the teaching performance of 20 teachers.

𝐻𝑎: The training course will help to increase the teaching performance of 20 teachers.

2. Complete the Presentation of Results

Indicator Training Mean t-value p-value Decision Remarks

Before 85.25
Teaching -9.696 <.001 Reject 𝐻0 Significant
Performance After 94.10

Paired Samples T-Test

Measure 1 Measure 2 t df p
Before - After -9.696 19 < .001
Note. Student's t-test.

Descriptives
N Mean SD SE Coefficient of variation
Before 20 85.250 2.845 0.636 0.033
After 20 94.100 3.626 0.811 0.039
 3. Conclusion:

There is sufficient evidence to support that the training course will help to increase the
teaching performance of 20 teachers.
 3. Let us consider three groups of seven students, where each group is subjected to one
of the three strategies or methods of teaching. Group A was exposed to Exploratory
Approach, Group B for Cooperative Learning, and Group C for Traditional Method. The
grades of the students are presented below:
Group A Group B Group C
Student
Exploratory Cooperative Traditional
1 85 86 100
2 90 88 89
3 92 89 88
4 88 90 87
5 91 87 83
6 93 88 85
7 89 89 80

Test if there is a significant difference among the three strategies or methods of

teaching at 5% level of significance.

1. State the 𝐻0 and 𝐻𝑎 hypotheses.

𝐻0: There is no significant difference among the three strategies or methods of teaching

𝐻𝑎: There is a significant difference among the three strategies or methods of teaching

2. Complete the Presentation of Results

Indicator Strategies Mean f-value p-value Decision Remarks

Exploratory 88.143
Failed to Not
Grades Cooperative 89.714 0.582 0.569 reject 𝐻0 Significant
Traditional 87.429

ANOVA - GRADES
Cases Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p
GROUP 19.143 2 9.571 0.582 0.569
Residuals 296.000 18 16.444

Note. Type III Sum of Squares

Descriptives - GRADES
GROUP N Mean SD SE Coefficient of variation
COOPERATIVE 7 88.143 1.345 0.508 0.015
EXPLORATORY 7 89.714 2.690 1.017 0.030
TRADITIONAL 7 87.429 6.347 2.399 0.073

3. Conclusion: There is no sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is significant
difference among the three strategies or methods of teaching.
4. Ten students were asked of the summative test scores in Statistics and their number
of hours in studying the subject. The answers of the 10 students were recorded below:

No. Hours of Study (𝑥) Summative Test Scores (𝑦)

8.5 87
7 67
6.8 67
6.2 61
6.5 67
9 90
4.2 50
7.2 78
9.2 92
8 87

a. Find the least square line

y = a + bx = 7.887 + 9.189 x
Coefficients
Model UnstandardizedStandard ErrorStandardized t p
H₀ (Intercept) 74.600 4.500 16.578 < .001
H₁ (Intercept) 7.887 6.229 1.266 0.241
No. Hours of Study (x) 9.189 0.842 0.968 10.914 < .001

Descriptives
N Mean SD SE
Summative Test Scores (y) 10 74.600 14.230 4.500
No. Hours of Study (x) 10 7.260 1.499 0.474

x y xy x^2 y^2
8.5 87 739.5 72.25 7569
7 67 469 49 4489
6.8 67 455.6 46.24 4489
6.2 61 378.2 38.44 3721
6.5 67 435.5 42.25 4489
9 90 810 81 8100
4.2 50 210 17.64 2500
7.2 78 561.6 51.84 6084
9.2 92 846.4 84.64 8464
8 87 696 64 7569
∑x=72.6 ∑y=746 ∑xy=5601.8 ∑x^2=547.3 ∑y^2=57474
 Given:
y=a + bx
a=7.887
b=9.189

y= a + bx
y= 7.887 + 9.189 (7.5)
y= 7.887 + 68.9175
y= 76.804

b. Predict the value of 𝑦 given 𝑥 = 7.5

c. Solve the correlation coefficient and interpret