You are on page 1of 5

Received: 2 September 2019 Revised: 17 December 2019 Accepted: 20 March 2020

DOI: 10.1111/scd.12461

CA S E H I ST O RY R E P O RT

Orofacial pain secondary to acoustic neuroma—A case report

Juliana Araújo Oliveira1 Karina Matthes de Freitas Pontes2 Romulo Rocha Regis2
Tereza Nicolle Burgos Nunes1 Sérgio Araújo Holanda Pinto3 Lívia Maria Sales Pinto
Fiamengui2

1 FederalUniversity of Ceará, Fortaleza,


Abstract
Ceará, Brazil
2 Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal
Aim: The present study aimed to report a case of orofacial pain secondary to acoustic
University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil neuroma (AN).
3 Department of Clinical Odontology, Federal
Methods and Results: A 66-year-old female presented with unilateral facial pain and
University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
odontalgia. The pain was described as throbbing, dull, and constant. Tinnitus, hearing
Correspondence loss, dizziness, and others symptoms were also present. Due to the characteristics of
Lívia Maria Sales Pinto Fiamengui, Depart-
ment of Restorative Dentistry, Federal Univer-
the pain and clinical or radiographic findings, other possible diagnoses, such as tem-
sity of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. poromadibular disorder, tooth-related pain, sinusitis, and primary headaches, were
Email: livia_holanda_@hotmail.com excluded. Somatosensory tests for allodynia and hyperalgesia showed extraoral and
intraoral hypersensitivity. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a lesion located on
the right cerebellopontine angle extending into and obliterating the internal auditory
canal and compressing the middle cerebral peduncle, the pons, and the cisternal seg-
ment of cranial nerve V. The patient was diagnosed with a brainstem tumor compatible
with AN and trigeminal neuralgia secondary to cranial nerve V compression.

Conclusion: Although uncommon, intracranial tumors should be considered during


orofacial pain evaluation to avoid iatrogenic treatment and delayed diagnosis.

KEYWORDS
acoustic neuroma, orofacial pain, trigeminal neuralgia

1 I N T RO D U C T I O N people per year.12 It is a benign brainstem tumor involv-


ing abnormal growth and proliferation of Schwann cells that
Orofacial pain is a recurrent cause of searching for dental most commonly involves the vestibular division of the eighth
care;1 although most cases originate in the stomatognathic cranial nerve supplying the inner ear.3–5 Although benign,
system, there can be other causes involved such as headaches, AN can lead to serious morbidity through compression of
neuropathies, and intracranial tumors.1 vital structures such as cranial nerves V to XII and the
Although uncommon, a large variety of facial symptoms brainstem.4,5,13
may be associated with intracranial tumors, and dentists The most typical symptoms associated with AN are hear-
should be aware of these pathologies as possible underlying ing loss and tinnitus, but disequilibrium, vertigo, dizzi-
causes for orofacial pain to avoid unnecessary treatment.2 ness, numbness or tingling in the face, headache and symp-
Acoustic neuroma (AN), or vestibular schwannoma, is an toms, such as temporomandibular disorders (TMD) may also
example of an intracranial tumor that may cause orofacial occur.2,3,12,14,15 Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and trigeminal
pain.3–11 In the United States, its incidence is 1.2 per 100 000 neuropathy secondary to AN are also possible symptoms that

© 2020 Special Care Dentistry Association and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Spec Care Dentist. 2020;1–5. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/scd 1


2 OLIVEIRA ET AL.

occur due to direct tumor pressure on the trigeminal nerve or


due to a tumor pushing an artery in contact with the trigeminal
nerve.2,4,6-8,13,15
Idiopathic TN (ITN) is the most common form of cranial
neuralgia.16 It is a disorder unrelated to other pathologies
characterized by recurrent, unilateral, short-term shock-like
episodes of pain with abrupt onset and end confined to the
somatosensory distribution of one or more branches of the
trigeminal nerve.16–18 It is triggered by nonpainful stimuli
such as chewing, brushing teeth, washing the face, shaving,
speech, or touching the affected dermatome zone.18–20 Addi- F I G U R E 1 Panoramic radiography
tionally, it may mimic an odontogenic pain.2,4,5 It is often mis-
diagnosed, and 33% to 65% of patients undergo unwarranted
dental interventions.21 alterations were needed. At same time, the patient presented
Previous studies found that 14.3% to 27.2% of patients with to otolaryngologists complaining of hearing loss, but they also
TN had associated intracranial structural lesions on magnetic declared no clinical treatments were needed. Over the years,
resonance imaging (MRI).22–24 Idiopathic and secondary TN the pain and hearing loss gradually worsened.
present with similar symptoms, and some authors have sug- During clinical examination, she did not present with tem-
gested MRI for all patients diagnosed with TN to exclude poromandibular joint (TMJ) or muscle pain complaints dur-
intracranial lesions.23,24 ing manual palpation. Additionally, the right maxillary sec-
Few cases of TN secondary to AN mimicking, TMD or ond molar already had endodontic treatment and did not show
odontogenic pain have been reported.3–5,8–11 Due to the possi- physical or radiographic alterations (Figure 1). Tests of allo-
ble symptoms, knowledge of this disorder is extremely impor- dynia and hyperalgesia were performed using a cotton swab
tant to avoid delays in AN diagnosis and iatrogenic treatments. and the tip of a dental explorer, respectively. Both stimuli were
Therefore, the aim of the present study is to report a case of used intraorally and extraorally. Hypersensitivity was detected
orofacial pain secondary to AN. extraorally from below the right eye to the mandibular body
and intraorally in both superior and inferior dentoalveolar
regions.
2 CA SE REPORT Due to the medical history and clinical and radiographic
findings, other possible diagnoses, such as TMD, tooth-
A 66-year-old female was referred to our Orofacial Pain Ser- related pain, sinusitis, and primary headaches, were excluded.
vice with the chief complaint of daily facial pain on the right MRI was requested, in which an expansive T2-hypersignal
side, more specifically the supraorbital and zygomatic area lesion measuring 3.3 × 3.3 × 2.5 cm was found located in the
extending to ala nasi. Intraorally, pain occurred in both the right cerebellopontine angle, extending into and obliterating
superior and inferior dentoalveolar region and was accompa- the internal auditory canal and compressing the middle cere-
nied by odontalgia on the right maxillary second molar. bral peduncle, the pons, and the cisternal segment of cranial
The facial pain was described as throbbing, dull, and con- nerve V (Figure 2). The patient was diagnosed with a brain-
stant, with episodes of stabbing pain graded as 8 accord- stem tumor compatible with AN and TN secondary to cra-
ing to a 0-10 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). In the morning, nial nerve V compression. Palliative treatment with 100 mg
and while washing her face, talking, chewing and brushing carbamazepine twice a day was prescribed, and after 1 week,
her teeth, it was described as intolerable, leading to avoid- the patient showed total pain remission. Next, the patient was
ing brushing her teeth. Other symptoms, such as ipsilat- referred to a neurosurgeon.
eral tearing and rhinorrhea, especially upon waking, tinni-
tus, pain in the temple area, gradual hearing loss, mild imbal-
ance during domestic activities, jaw locking or stiffness, were 3 DIS CUS S IO N
also described. The patient also reported controlled diabetes,
hypertension, and anxiety. In the present case report, the patient presented with orofa-
The patient declared that the pain started when she was 59 cial pain secondary to AN with several symptoms that could
years old. At that time, the pain was localized on the right lead to misdiagnosis. The patient had complaints of otological
side of the tongue, mandible, and maxilla and was described symptoms of hearing loss, tinnitus, and imbalance. According
as mild, dull, and constant and more pronounced on the right to Toledo et al,25 otological symptoms are frequently asso-
maxillary second molar. The patient reported several dental ciated with TMD, with ear fullness being the most preva-
evaluations, but all professionals declared no oral or dental lent (74.8%), followed by otalgia (55.1%), tinnitus (52.1%),
OLIVEIRA ET AL. 3

Common characteristics of neuropathic pain conditions


are changes in somatosensory sensitivity with loss of affer-
ent sensory function and the paradoxical presence of certain
hyperphenomena such as allodynia, hyperalgesia, wind-up-
like pain and after-sensations.31 Frequently, patients with TN
are able to identify pain triggers, such as laughing, chewing,
shaving, or brushing their teeth,32 a phenomenon known as
allodynia, when pain is evoked by innocuous stimuli.33
In the present clinical report, symptoms similar to TN
were present such as severe electric shock-like pain triggered
by innocuous stimuli. The patient also reported dental pain,
which could lead to an odontogenic pain misdiagnosis, but
no clinical or radiographic alterations were identified. Pain
of nonodontogenic origin mimicking dental pain has been
reported in cases of TN, AN, herpes zoster, diabetic odon-
talgia, and myocardial infarction.34 When facial pain worsens
with chewing or manipulation of teeth and/or gums, patients
often consult their dentist first.32
F I G U R E 2 Contrast axial MRI showing an expansive lesion
To provide information about mechanisms underlying
located in the right cerebellopontine angle extending into the internal
pain conditions, a standardized battery of Quantitative Sen-
auditory canal
sory Testing (QST) was developed to study somatosensory
vertigo (40.8%), and hearing loss (38.9%). Although frequent, function.35 Therefore, a simpler, faster, and more qualitative
these symptoms should be analyzed with caution by a special- clinical method to assess somatosensory testing has been pro-
ist. In addition to TMD, other possible diagnoses were consid- posed, the Qualitative Somatosensory Testing (QualST). It
ered, such as primary headache, more specifically paroxysmal provides information, such as hyposensitivity or hypersensi-
hemicrania, and sinusitis. Tooth-related pain, such is pulpitis tivity to touch, cold, and pinprick stimuli, covering the func-
and periodontitis, was also ruled out. tion of A𝛽-, A𝛿, and C-fibers.36 In the present study, QualST
Previous case reports related to orofacial pain secondary using touch and pinprick stimuli were used. These tests were
to AN described pain as moderate to severe localized performed on both painful and contralateral sides to observe
in the maxilla and mandibular regions, with episodes of sensorial differences.
shock-like pain compatible with TN.3,10,4,7,9 Other symptoms AN may be managed through three distinct treatment
reported were pain at preauricular and auricular3 regions, options, observation, radiation, and surgical removal,37 and
tenderness or pain on the TMJ,3,9 masticatory muscles,3,10,9 the last one is the most common treatment modality.12 Con-
toothache,3,10,4,5 facial numbness,7,5 burning symptoms,7,5,13 servative treatment, such as antiepileptics, may be indicated
tinnitus,3,4,5 hearing impairment,3,10,5 and intermittent loss of for patients with few symptoms, small lesions, or who are not
balance.3,10 able to undergo surgery.38
AN has been diagnosed in patients of all ages, but the inci- In this case report, after AN diagnosis using medical his-
dence increases with age, peaking in the sixth decade of life tory, clinical examination and imaging exams, the patient
and is more common in women.12 An increased incidence of received palliative treatment with carbamazepine to alleviate
AN in recent decades has been reported, but it has not been clinical symptoms and was referred to a neurosurgeon. Car-
determined whether these data reflect a real increase in tumor bamazepine (200-1200 mg/day) is the treatment of choice for
incidence or just easier access to imaging diagnosis,26 such TN,39 and its response is better in cases of ITN. Patients pre-
as gadolinium enhanced T1-weighted MRI, the gold standard senting with secondary TN neuralgia are less responsive to
for diagnosis and surveillance in patients with suspected or treatment.40 Due to carbamazepine’s poor tolerability, oxcar-
known AN.27 bazepine may be preferred.39
It is hypothesized that neuronal involvement related to AN
occurs by mass compression of the nerve,7 typically com-
pressing the root near its entry into the pons, which induces 4 CONC LU SI ON S
focal demyelination and is thought to trigger paroxysmal
ectopic discharge.28 Another possible mechanism suggests a AN is frequently associated with a wide range of symptoms,
distortion of the contents of the posterior fossa with displace- which may lead to several diagnostic hypotheses. Facial
ment of the nerve root against a blood vessel or the skull pain that worsens during function, headache, and otologic
base.29,30 symptoms are frequently present and found in individuals
4 OLIVEIRA ET AL.

with TMD. Dental pain commonly occurs secondary to caries, 14. Selesnick SH, Jackler RK, Pitts LW. The changing clinical pre-
periodontal disease, sinusitis and myofascial pain, but it may sentation of acoustic tumors in the MRI era. Laryngoscope.
also be a symptom of a variety of neuropathies. Thus, intracra- 1993;103:431-436.
15. Swartz JD. Lesions of the cerebellopontine angle and internal audi-
nial tumors, such as AN, must be considered during orofacial
tory canal: diagnosis and differential diagnosis. Semin Ultrasound
pain evaluation to avoid misdiagnosis and treatment delays.
CT MR. 2004;25(4):332-352.
The patient gave permission to use clinical information and 16. Kanpolat Y, Savas A, Bekar A, Berk C. Percutaneous controlled
photographic material. radiofrequency trigeminal rhizotomy for the treatment of idiopathic
trigeminal neuralgia: 25-year experience with 1,600 patients. Neu-
CONFLICT OF I NT E R E ST rosurgery. 2001;48(3):524-532.
17. Zhang H, Lian Y, Ma Y, et al. Two doses of botulinum toxin type A
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose. for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: observation of therapeutic
effect from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J
Headache Pain. 2014;15:65.
ORC ID 18. Headache Classification Committee of the International
Lívia Maria Sales Pinto Fiamengui Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of
Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38 (1):1-211.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2746-2219
http://doi.org/10.1177/0333102417738202.
19. Spina A, Mortini P, Alemanno F, Houdayer E, Iannaccone S.
REFERENCES Trigeminal neuralgia: toward a multimodal approach. World Neu-
rosurg. 2017;103:220-230.
1. Kumar A, Brennan MT. Differential diagnosis of orofacial pain and 20. Jones MR, Urits I, Ehrhardt KP, et al. A compreehensive review of
temporomandibular disorder. Dent Clin North Am. 2013;57(3):419- trigeminal neuralgia. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019;23(10):74.
428. 21. Benoliel R, Eliav E. Neuropathic orofacial pain. Oral Maxillofac
2. Moazzam AA, Habibian M. Patients appearing to dental profes- Surg Clin North Am. 2008;20(2):237-254.
sionals with orofacial pain arising from intracranial tumors: a lit- 22. Majoie CB, Hulsmans FJ, Verbeeten B, et al. Trigeminal neuralgia:
erature review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. comparison of two MRimaging techniques in the demonstration of
2012;114(6):749-755. neurovascularcontact. Radiology. 1997;204:455-460.
3. Ramdurg P, Srinivas N, Mendigeri V, Puranik SR. Acoustic neu- 23. Goh BT, Poon CY, Peck RHL. The importance of routine magnetic
roma mimicking orofacial pain: a unique case report. Case Rep Oto- resonance imaging intrigeminal neuralgia diagnosis. Oral Surg Oral
laryngol. 2016;2016:1947616. Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;92:424-429.
4. Mehrkhodavandi N, Green D, Amato R. Toothache caused by 24. Toller MO, Uzun E, Incesu L. Clinical and magnetic resonance
trigeminal neuralgia of vestibular schwannoma: a case report. J imaging evaluation of facial pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
Endod. 2014;40(10):1691-1694. Oral Radiol Endod. 2004;97:652-658.
5. Lam R. Acoustic neuroma manifesting as toothache and numbness. 25. Toledo IP, Stefani FM, Porporatti AL, et al. Prevalence of otologic
Aust Dent J. 2016;61(1):109-112. signs and symptoms in adult patients with temporomandibular dis-
6. Matsuka Y, Fort ET, Merrill RL. Trigeminal neuralgia due to an orders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig.
acoustic neuroma in the cerebellopontine angle. J Orofac Pain. 2017;21(2):597-605.
2000;14(2):147-151. 26. Stangerup SE, Tos M, Thomsen J, Caye-Thomasen P. True inci-
7. Neff BA, Carlson ML, O’Byrne MM, Van Gompel JJ, Driscoll dence of vestibular schwannoma. Neurosurgery. 2010;67(5):1335-
CLW, Link MJ. Trigeminal neuralgia and neuropathy in large spo- 1340.
radic vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg. 2017;127(5):992-999. 27. Coelho DH, Tang Y, Suddarth B, Mamdani M. MRI surveil-
8. Seo Y, Kim DG. Contralateral trigeminal neuralgia in a rapidly lance of vestibular schwannomas without contrast enhancement:
growing vestibular schwannoma: a case report. J Clin Neurosci. clinical and economic evaluation. Laryngoscope. 2018;128(1):
2018;47:132-134. 202-209.
9. Bisi MA, Selaimen CM, Chaves KD, Bisi MC, Grossi ML. Vestibu- 28. Cruccu G, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS, et al. Trigeminal neuralgia: new
lar schwannoma (acoustic neuroma) mimicking temporomandibular classification and diagnostic grading for practice and research. Neu-
disorders: a case report. J Appl Oral Sci. 2006;14(6):476-481. rology. 2016;87(2):220-228.
10. Alvarez-Arenal A, Gonzalez-Gonzalez I, Moradas Estrada M, 29. Love S, Coakham HB. Trigeminal neuralgia: pathology and patho-
deLlanos-Lanchares H, Costilla-Garcia S. Temporomandibulardis- genesis. Brain. 2001;124:2347-2360.
orderornot? A case report. Cranio. 2016;34(4):264-269. 30. Horowitz M, Ochs M, Carrau R, Kassam A. Trigeminal neural-
11. German DS. A case report: acoustic neuroma confused with TMD. gia and glossopharyngeal neuralgia: two orofacial pain syndromes
J Am Dent Assoc. 1991;122(12):59-60. encountered by dentists. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135(10):1427-
12. Babu R, Sharma R, Bagley JH, Hatef J, Friedman AH, Adam- 1433.
son C. Vestibular schwannomas in the modern era: epidemiol- 31. Jensen TS, Gottrup H, Sindrup SH, Bach FW. The clinical picture
ogy, treatment trends, and disparities in management. J Neurosurg. of neuropathic pain. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001;429(1-3):1-11.
2013;119(1):121-130. 32. Eckardstein KL, Keil M, Rohde V. Unnecessary dental proce-
13. Ferguson JW, Burton JF. Clinical presentation of acoustic nerve dures as a consequence of trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurg Rev.
neuroma in the oral and maxillofacial region. Oral Surg Oral Med 2015;38(2):355-360.
Oral Pathol. 1990;69(6):672-675.
OLIVEIRA ET AL. 5

33. Svensson P, Baad-Hansen L, Pigg M, et al. Guidelines and role for conservative management. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol Bord.
recommendations for assessment of somatosensory function in 2000;121(1):21-26.
oro-facial pain conditions—a taskforce report. J Oral Rehabil. 39. Attal N, Cruccu G, Haanpaa M, et al. EFNS guidelines on
2011;38(5):366-394. pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain. Eur J Neurol.
34. Bender IB. Pulpal pain diagnosis—a review. J Endod. 2006;13(11):1153-1169.
2000;26(3):175-179. 40. Cruccu G, Truini A. Trigeminal neuralgia and orofacial pain. In:
35. Rolke R, Baron R, Maier C, et al. Quantitative sensory testing in the Pappagallo M, ed. The Neurological Basis of Pain. New York, NY:
German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standard- McGraw-Hill; 2005:401-414.
ized protocol and reference values. Pain. 2006;123(3):231-243.
36. Baad-Hansen L, Pigg M, Ivanovic SE, et al. Chairside intrao-
ral qualitative somatosensory testing: reliability and comparison
between patients with atypical odontalgia and healthy controls. J
Orofac Pain. 2013;27(2):165-170. How to cite this article: Oliveira JA, de Freitas
37. Gouveris H, Zisiopoulou M, Mann WJ. Management of vestibu- Pontes KM, Regis RR, Nunes TNB, Pinto SAH,
lar schwannoma: dependence on stakeholder’s view for small Fiamengui LMSP. Orofacial pain secondary to acous-
and medium-sized tumors otorhinolaryngology clinics. Int J.
tic neuroma—A case report. Spec Care Dentist. 2020;
2011;3(1):7-13.
1–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/scd.12461
38. Walsh RM, Bath AP, Bance ML, Keller A, Tator CH, Rutka JA.
The natural history of untreated vestibular schwannomas. Is there a

You might also like