System Evaluation

An evaluation conducted using questionnaire among the respondents to

determine their perception with respect to the functionality and usability of the

developed system. The following tables present the result of the evaluation made.

Table 2 presents the result of the system’s evaluation as to its functionality.

The respondents gave a high rating of 4.86 which implies that the respondents

strongly agree on the functionality of the developed system.

Table 2. Respondents Rating on the System’s Functionality

Weighted Description
Functionality
Mean

1. The system is capable of recording tenant’s 4.88 Strongly Agree

Information.
2. The system payment and billing reports are 4.76 Strongly Agree
well Organized.
3. The Market Supervisor (user) and the assistant 4.68 Strongly Agree
can access the system.
4. The SMS notification automatically notifies the 4.69 Strongly Agree
tenants before their due date.
5. The user will immediately look for the available 4.69 Strongly Agree
and non-available space in sitemap.
6. The system is quickly recording the monthly 4.72 Strongly Agree
payment for the tenant.
7. Each user has personal account 4.74 Strongly Agree
8. The system prevents an account from being 4.68 Strongly Agree
deleted while it is still active.
9. The system allows running of reports which 4.74 Strongly Agree
records are being updated
Over-all Weighted Mean 4.86 Strongly
Agree

31
 Table 3 presents the result of the system’s evaluation as to its usability. The

respondents strongly agreed on the usability requirements of the system. The

weighted mean rating of 4.73 implies that the developed application is found to be

usable as perceived by the respondents.

Table 3. Respondents Rating on the System’s Usability

Usability Weighted Description
Mean
1. The system is easy to use and understand. 4.86 Strongly Agree
2. The system gives us response immediately. 4.60 Strongly Agree
3. Searching records can be done easily. 4.60 Strongly Agree
4. The system is quickly adding, editing and 4.66 Strongly Agree
updating of information.
5. The system’s design and layout are consistent. 4.56 Strongly Agree
6. Features of the system are easy to explore. 4.63 Strongly Agree
7. Receiving SMS messages immediately. 4.84 Strongly Agree
8. The system is easy to manipulate and navigate. 4.63 Strongly Agree
9. The different functionalities can be easily 4.68 Strongly Agree
learned by the user.
Over-all Weighted Mean 4.73 Strongly
Agree

Summary of Ratings

Table 4 shows the summary of ratings of the respondents on the functionality

and usability of the system. Across all features, the respondents strongly agreed on the

functionality and usability of the system which has a general weighted mean of 4.70.

Table 4. Summary of ratings on functionality and usability of the system

Criteria Mean Descriptive Equivalent

Functionality 4.73 Strongly Agree
Usability 4.67 Strongly Agree
Over-all Weight Mean 4.70 Strongly Agree

32