Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scheme of Work
Lesson Topic
SPEC: Students must be able to apply sociological methods to the study of education.
The item tends to have ‘hooks’ or clues about issues you can write about, read it
and look for them.
Level 2
Must relate
Method and to item
application
to education
in general.
Lesson 2 - Methods in Context –
Education as a Research Context
•Outline the main characteristics of education as a context of
sociological research.
• Explore potential issues that could be faced when conducting
research in an educational context.
SPEC: Students must be able to apply sociological methods to the study of education.
EDUCTION AS
A CONTEXT
Teachers FOR SOCIAL
Parents
RESEARCH
Researching Pupils
• Power and status.
• Pupils ability.
• Impression Management
Researching Classrooms
• A controlled setting – restricted access.
• Gatekeepers
• Peer Groups
Researching Schools
• Schools’ own data
• The law
• Gatekeepers
• School organisation
Researching Parents
• Difficulty in contact and access.
• Willingness to participate.
6 x Groups
Nationally?
What have we
already
looked at?
Destination?
Globally?
What you
study?
Level 2 – Types of Official Statistics in Education
Achievement by Attendance,
Class, Gender, & truancy,
Ethnicity inclusion League Tables,
Marketisation
What have we
already
looked at?
Destination of
leavers into
further
PISA
education,
work, or training
Gender &
Subject Choice
Level 2 – Documents in Education
Public Documents
School websites Personal Documents
Positivists prefer to use Official Statistics because they allow them to identify cause and
effect relationships, trends, and they can make comparisons between different social
groups. Within education, school results are available on league tables. Furthermore, data
is available on students ethnicity, as well as Social Class through Free School Meals.
Sociologists can therefore, compare the results of students for those that do and do not
have Free School Meals. If a wide gap is identified, the a positive correlation can be made
between Social Class & Achievement. Therefore, Official Statistics are useful for analysing
social class differences in education.
The reliability of Official Statistics can be called into question, as the definitions of
measurements often change. For example, when it comes to achievement, success has
been measured differently. When League Tables first came out under the Conservatives,
success was measured in % of A-C students, favouring private schools and middle class
schools. However, under Labour ‘Value-Added’ was seen as a more accurate way of
measuring achievement, therefore creating a new system of measurement, which tended
to be more accurate in determining good schools, as well as favouring working class
schools. Therefore, with Official Statistics having changed definitions, make it difficult to
draw comparisons over time.
Lesson 8 - Methods in Context – Revision
& Mapping of Content
• Explore
strengths and limitations of using a variety of
methods for a variety of topics.
SPEC: Students must be able to apply sociological methods to the study of education.
Does it produce quantitative data that will show the extent of a particular
Theoretical phenomenon, trends and correlations? Or is it the insightful, in-depth
qualitative data you want? Objectivity / subjectivity. Primary or secondary
data. Positivist vs Interpretivist PIQQ
Write in each method at the top of the grid.
Introduction
You are all part of a research team that will use
three different interview techniques:-
• Structured/formal interviews
• Semi-structured interviews
• Unstructured/informal interviews
You are investigating the issue of
Task 1: The method
Structured Semi-structured Unstructured
interview interview interview
PRACTICAL
Strengths
Limitations
ETHICAL
Strengths
Limitations
THEORETICAL
Strengths
Limitations
Does the interviewee appear relaxed and does this help to gain more detailed responses?
Does he /she use a set interview schedule – set of questions, or do the questions change in response to the answers he receives?
Is there a clear ‘direction’ with the interview and questions leading to a desired outcome?
Is there anything that interrupts the flow of questioning? Does this have an impact on the success of the interview?
Is there rapport and empathy which helps to bring about fresh insight into how the interviewee is?
Do the questions allow the interviewees to express themselves in their own words and reveal their true meanings?
How were sensitive issues dealt with in the interview? Did interviewees appear under pressure to answer?
Was there evidence of informed consent, guaranteed confidentiality and a right not to answer?
Do you think the interviewee was telling the truth or able to lie, exaggerate?
Did the interviewer impose their own ideas onto the interviewee?
Was there evidence of ‘interview bias’ where the interviewer asked leading questions?
Was there social desirability – did the interviewee give false answers to make themselves seem more interested?
Did you notice the interviewer having to explain a question due to a misunderstanding over the meaning of the words?
Having watched this interview – was it successful? How have you made this judgement? What might you have done differently if you had been the
interviewer?
Task 3: Research Context
OFSTED REFORM
https://www.tes.co.uk/news/school-
news/breaking-news/ofsted-purges-40-inspectors
https://www.gov.uk/changes-to-education-
inspection-from-september-2015
SETTING & STREAMING
http://www.suttontrust.com/newsarchive/teaching
-matters-more-than-setting/
http://creativecurriculumisabella.weebly.com/limit
ations-and-benefits-of-mixed-ability-classes.html
Task 3: Practical Work
Group A student(s) using the structured interview
Group B student(s) using the semi-structured interview
Group C student(s) using the unstructured interview
Group D student(s) using the web based/telephone interview
All students will carry out an interview that will last for a minimum of 10 minutes, that should be recorded (as appropriate) and
a detailed transcript of the interview must be made. The depth and quality of their evidence may be affected by the type of
interview technique they use.
Students may be allocated one of the following to interview (this will vary on your own access to and availability of
interviewees).
School headteacher
College principal
Member of the school/college PTA
Member of the school/college governing body
Local councillor
Locally elected MP (or EMP)
Parent of a secondary school pupil (state school)
Parent of a secondary school pupil (private school)
Member of the local education authority
Family relative (adult)
Neighbour or member of your local community
Post 16 student (not known to you)
Teacher/lecturer from your own institution
Member of the local business community
Local newspaper journalist
Local teacher/college union representative
*Headteacher/teacher/school representative of the exam board
*Member of the government or member of the Department for Education
* note – one of these will be a web-based interview and one a telephone interview
Task 4 – Feedback & Evaluation
At this session you will need to present your
findings to the rest of the group. In this discussion,
you need to feedback on your own findings
collected from the interview and what your felt
were the strengths and limitations of your own
interview technique. Did you collect the range and
depth of evidence which you were hoping for and
how far did practical, ethical and theoretical issues
impact on your results? How you present this is up
to you. PowerPoint and discussion is the most
popular way.