Power Ascension Bible Volume 4

Thread #1
How to speak.

Corporate perspective.

Thread
Pretend everything is on record. You do yourself a favor when you
watch every word you say.
Manage expectations with your words.

DONT over promise.

NO committal statements.

DO NOT MISLEAD.
Dont use I or ME.

Put a distance between you and the conversation. Make them believe
you're not the sole decider.

Gives you an out.

Apply emotions. Always.

If they think you're being an unfair prick, vocalize it and assure them
that you're not.
PREVENTS build up of hate.
You are NEVER OFF-RECORD.

Unless you're hanging out with close associates between closed

doors.
Listen more than talking.

Resist the urge to talk about yourself.

Seek leverage.

Ask what their philosophy around the topic of discussion is. Ask about
their belief.

Then affirm it to be the same as yours.

Never be first to instigate detailed conversations.

It just shows that you are more interested than they are.

Maintain low resolution discussion until they signal otherwise.

If you're facing a take it or leave it offer,

never show weakness. It will be used against you.

If you are proposing the take it or leave it offer,

ALWAYS show emotions. It reduces animosity.

Maintain a semi-victim position when you have disproportionate
power.
Thread #2
"How would I go about contacting a high net worth to invest me, I
am 20 years old and very hard working and determined"

received this question in my DMs about a month ago and although its
too vague, I am going to address it in this thread.
If the objective is for a high net worth (HNW) to invest in you, then
there's five factors you need to dedicate your life to, before
approaching anyone with this intention.

1. Past Performance
2. Appearance
3. Character
4. What are you selling?
5. Reputation
1. Past Performance

What have you done in your past that has earned you the right for a
HNW to invest in you?

If you're in your 20's and you are NOT studying a degree in

STEM/Finance/MBA/Law,

then you are at a major disadvantage.

Whether you believe College to be trash in this era or not, does not
matter.

What matters is that in the eyes of HNW's, there is nothing more

useful to do in your 20's than take up a degree in those
aforementioned areas.
Yes,

when it comes to this, college defines you.

"What about working in your family business as a young kid"?

I personally give a lot of credit to young men who decide to work in

their family business,

but unfortunately that is not how most HNW's see it in my experience.

To them, it just means mom & dad held your hand.

"What about developing a product yourself instead of going to
college"?

In your 20's?

That makes you an outlier. If you think you're an outlier, go ahead. But
you're taking a giant risk.

The average age of successful entrepreneurs is about 40.

2. Appearance

If you don't have the corporate, structured neat look,

you have a lot of work to do.

This is rather simple and it should take you no more than a day to
transform yourself.
HNW respond to how you appear. Increase your chances to their
appeal by;
Wearing no jewelry. Just a watch.

No eccentric colors. No hair buns.

Always wear a business shirt. No tight pants that hug your calve
muscles. Wear straight classic cut pants.

Your casual look should be a business shirt, or a t-shirt with a blazer

on top. Dark tainted colors.
3. Character

Do a self audit of what you have been like to others.

Do people know you as the cutthroat backstabber, or an honest

straight forward person?

Does your ego get in the way if someone criticizes you?

HNW's want to see a polite, honest student ready to learn.

4. What are you selling?

This is the hardest part of the thread. If you don't have a product, you
will not get HNW's to invest in you.

If you do, it will depend on the product.

Here's the bare minimum you need to know that should get you only
started:
Scalability is the KING in this day and age.

If your product can not scale, there's a good chance HNW's will not
invest.

If you found a revolutionary way to offer coffee to people,

you're going to have a hard time,

compared to a software product that can jump industries.

Do you have any protection in place?

Is your product replicable? What is stopping your business partner

from leaving and replicating this product on their own?

How are you mitigating all this risk to provide security to a HNW?
Have a Target Market Determination done up.

Show and detail exactly from A-Z,

-who you're product is for

-who its not for
-how it will be used
-will it need people training
- where the commercialization channels are
- what it relies on to commercialize
Have an excel cashflow ready.
Show at least 4 years of projected revenue with expenses on Sheet 1,

and the sources of where all that revenue is coming from on Sheet 2.

Don't jack up the numbers. In real life, there will be at least 20 revenue
hurdles you have not thought of.
You should accommodate your cashflow with discounts across the
board to demonstrate understanding of unexpected hurdles.

You don't need to provide rationale on where your source of revenue

is coming from, because..
at your level, although it would help greatly, it is not expected that you
have direct access to market in order to commercialize the product.

That should be the HNW's job. They should see the value in your
product and have a list of contacts to take this to.
Have some sort of binding documentations in place.

You don't need a shareholders agreement at this level, but you do

need a Term Sheet to be able to sign a HNW on board.

Get an NCNDA, an MOU, and HOA. Look these up, they're all
necessary for this stage.
5. Reputation

To get HNW's to invest in you is not as simple as walking up to one

and offering them what you have.
In real life, it will probably happen through someone you know.

And that someone you will meet in your current line of work who
already trusts & admires you.
So you should be building your connections in your line of work every
day.

You are always one person away from a HNW.

You should be SELECTIVELY providing value for free to those who

appear high net worth.

If you don't know what they look like. pay attention & you will learn.
It's not always the flashy cars or the suits that distinguish them.
Pay attention to how people carry themselves, how they respect their
time, the mannerism in which they speak.
Once you have identified them, you should do everything you can to
provide them free value.

Leverage.
The idea is to have a group of well respected high earning people to
trust and respect you,

enough so that when you approach them with your product,

they take you to a HNW without hesitation. They shouldn't need to

spend time validating your character & reputation.
Thread #3
If you find that you don't get offended in an interactive situation where
otherwise 99% of the people would,

there's a good chance that you have extreme emotional detachment.

If there is NO internal ego triggered, you can control your offending

counterpart in many ways.
Most interactions go sour because one person says something that
offends in one way or another. May be subtle, may be rash.

Most people react. Some don't but still internalize it.

VERY FEW stay completely detached.

Practice remaining neutral (internally and expressively) to offensive
remarks.

To the point where you welcome it.

The idea is not for you to fail in distinguishing between rude/polite

people.

But its for people to realize that nothing triggers a reaction out of you.
No one expects ZERO reaction.

It creates imbalance.

People who try to trigger others with comments or their behavior, use
it for control.
When you don't react, you immediately create leverage.

The leverage is:

They can't control you & they suddenly feel controlled by you.
Whatever the offending remark was, it was used to attain a result.

If the result was to throw you off, then you already won.

If it was to get something, DO NOT adjust your behavior because of

this insult.

They tried to offend to get a discount on what they want. It failed.

Remain neutral and incentive driven.

Do not alter your behavior to lick your wounds.

The intense fortified character you demonstrate by complete

detachment towards any remarks,

puts you entirely in control of your counterpart whether you realize it or

not.

Practice.

Thread #4
Do not take credit for implementing a radical change.

Do not want to be known as the source of influence.

Intelligent men instinctively know that the spotlight shined on them will
have consequences.

Lesser men see the spotlight as an ego boost.

Don’t be fooled.
Better to play the victim when you’re instrumental in implementing a
widespread change of any sort.

Be part of the people affected by the change.

Blame it on external factors.

Never announce that you’re the author of such decisions.

Good or bad.

Applies to all contexts.

All kinds of radical changes & decisions that affect an entire
entity/business or society,

will upset a portion of the people.

Could be large or small.

But the source of hate will have the same magnitude.

Motivation driven by negative emotions are far more powerful.

You’ll inevitably become a target.
Always pretend external forces dictates your decisions,

and you,

just like the rest of the people,

end up as beneficiaries,

or collateral damage.

Thread #5
Making a small mistake that can easily be corrected, is the most
effective way in determining who likes you and who doesn’t.

Those who like you will brush it off, help you save face & refrain from
letting others know.

Those who don’t, will react in excess, often loudly.

Voluntary, reversible mistakes also makes you appear
ignorant/unaware,

which is often the best way to encourage others in overstepping their

boundary if their intention is to exploit/ridicule you.

This can be applied in all new social contexts; new job, gatherings,
parties.
The mistake you do that makes you look subpar is a small price to pay
in exchange

of immediately determining who’s on your side and who’s not.

And no one cares when you’re new.

Play dumb, apologise, then observe who crosses the line.

Exception to the rule;

Don’t do this when your presentation relies on your reputation.

If you’re selling something, presenting an idea etc,

you have to be flawless.

Thread #6
The slippery slope;

when one event occurs, other associated events follow.

Until it leads to hell.

It is NOT a fallacy.

But how slippery is the slope to ensure the arrival of hell?

Is it possible to draw the line?

Slippery slope occurs

when a certain behaviour is incentivised, followed by another related

behaviour that is incentivised, and so on.
The slope steepens when a certain behaviour is adopted by the
masses.

The minority become ostracised.

When the majority change their behaviour for an incentive,

the minority get punished when they do not adopt same behaviour.

If the majority REJECT behavioural adjustment,

then there is no division between the majority and minority. And thus,
no punishment.
An example of a potential slippery slope we are facing today;

A = B = C = ... = Z

A = Comply to wear masks

B = Comply to social distance
C = Comply to lockdowns
D = Comply to get the vaccine
Z = Comply to dig your own grave
The probability of the above becoming a slippery slope depends on
two elements;

value judgement, and cost/benefit analysis.

Value judgement;

It more valuable to wear a mask & appear as a reasonable, compliant

citizen,
rather than refusing to wear it, marginalising yourself, garnering all the
bad attention.

Cost/benefit analysis;

Benefits of complying outweighs the cost of nothing.

Value judgement;

It is more valuable to social distance & appear as a reasonable,

compliant citizen,

rather than refusing to.

Cost/benefit analysis;

Benefits of appearing compliant & avoid getting a virus with a 3%

mortality rate OUTWEIGHS the cost of again..nothing.
The slippery slope is valid here;

A=B
Value Judgement;

It is more valuable to have businesses open and trading,

rather than shutting them down to control a pandemic.

Cost/Benefit Analysis;

Massive economic costs OUTWEIGH the benefits of not contracting a

virus with 3% mortality rate.
The slippery slope ENDS HERE;

A = B but ≠ C.
Value Judgement;

It is more valuable to NOT inject yourself with a improperly researched

vaccine,

over injecting to control a pandemic.

Cost/Benefit Analysis;

Unknown potential health hazards OUTWEIGH the benefits of

reducing the severity of a virus with 3% mortality rate.
The slippery slope ENDS HERE;

A = B but ≠ C and ≠ D
The problem with value judgements and cost/benefit analysis,

is that they require intelligence.

The majority line up for Z (digging their own grave)

The NEXT majority refuse A entirely in the fear of leading to Z.

Both as unreasonable as each other.

The minority are the intellect that know A COULD lead to Z,

but does not have to be rejected in order to prevent it from necessarily

leading to Z.
EVERYTHING is a slippery slope.

It's up to your value judgement & cost/benefit to determine where you

draw the line.
If you do not have the intellectual capacity to use your own value
judgement and cost/benefit analysis,

observe both ends of the extreme spectrums.

The reasonable answer is somewhere in the middle.

There is 1 argument that radicalizes slippery slopes;

That when a behavioural change is enforced from an

AUTHORITATIVE FIGURE,

such as, the government,

the slippery slope becomes inevitable.

And this has been historically true. NOT ALWAYS (eg seatbelts).

But in some cases.

And this is ONLY true because the masses lack value judgement
&have historically been prepared to trade freedom for incentivized
security.

And the root of the problem is NOT the masses.

The problem is allowing wicked people to take control of power who
instigate slippery slopes.
Therefore the solution is NOT rejecting A, or fully embracing Z.

The masses will always be subject to slippery slopes.

And the minority will always be forced to follow or be ostracised.

THIS will never change.

The solution is for ethical men to strive for power.

And that’s not done by pointing out the truth and rebelling like child.

Thread #7
China is now the second largest economy,

measured by nominal GDP.

The economic and military rivalry between China and the US has
been noted to be the

"Thucydides Trap".

What is this? -

Read this thread.

The Thucydides Trap is a metaphor quoted by ancient historian;
Thucydides. It was quoted with regards to the the rise of Athens and
its conflict with Sparta, resulting in the Peloponnesian War.
The metaphor is used to describe the high probability of war between
two powers when a dominant power is threatened by a rapidly
emerging power.
In the past 500 years, 16 cases of Thucydides Trap have been
identified.

12 ended in war.

Including World War I.

Drivers of this dynamic include rapid GDP growth, increased military
strength and a sense of importance for the emerging power.

This is combined with the insecurity and fear from the established
power feeling the need to act "before its too late".
To avoid war, decision makers for both parties must radically change
their attitudes and behaviour.
The US has led the West for the last 100 years.

The US is ahead of China in terms of GDP on a nominal basis.

But China is the world’s largest economy on a

purchasing-power-parity basis. China has also surpassed the US to
become #1 in a variety of economic indicators.
China-US rivalry resembles a Thucydides Trap.

The ideological biases and differences between a western "liberal

democracy" & a highly autocratic totalitarian regime are extreme.
I quote "liberal democracy" because I don't believe US to be a
democracy. Just sells itself as one.
There is a perception that China has taken advantage of the open
world economic system to further its own domestic agendas and have
undermined those systems to its advantage.

Distrust of the Chinese Communist Party seems widespread now

across US, European and SE Asian politics.

Thread #8
You're not an impressive woman if you stay home, cook, wash and
clean for your man.

Conservatives love to play that card.

Impressive is having to work to make ends meet while doing your best
to retain your femininity & having the wisdom to know when to no
longer lead.
There's nothing glorious about a woman who's done nothing in her
youth and simply settled for the housewife role.

That's just the easiest path.

I've seen this so many times within families and relatives; the best
daughters are those that work hard in their youth.
Women who want to take up the conservative role of washing, cooking
and cleaning, have to earn the right to do that.
They earn it by diligently spending their youth, working, studying -
ensuring their own security and independence.
Women WHO HAVE NO REGARD for their own security and
independence are NOT conservative women.

They are simply a different decorated form of gold diggers.

This is the paradox no one will understand.

Women who embrace their femininity are those who take measures
against its weaknesses.

They know they must look after themselves. They can only forgo the
pursuit of their own security once they find the right man.

Gold diggers don't think this way.

Thread #9
If you’re not in a dominant position ready for marriage,

you are not ready for dating.

In fact, dating will only put you further away from being ready.

It will slow you down.

Women only slow you down.

Even the ones that promise you to help achieve your goals.

It’s total bullshit.

They will want your attention, time, cuddles, all the time.

If you don’t give it, you’ll have to put up with their moods, anger &
frustration.
“But dating is necessary for experience!”

If you want experience, then speak your intentions.

Be man enough to get a girl in your bed while being able to promise
that you can’t commit to anything.

Do not lead them on.

Also consider the fact that your “need for experience” comes at the
cost of racking up body counts for girls.

I’m not saying experience is not important.

But add the tally on women who don’t already respect themselves;
usually liberals.

Stay away from conservatives.

All this frivolous shit is irrelevant.

What matters is reaching your aim; being at the mercy of nothing.

Then what matters is family; extending your bloodline.

Everything else is a distraction.

Messing with women before reaching your aim just makes you weak
and pathetic.

Also makes you unworthy of family.

You’ll be remembered as the father who couldn’t provide comfortably

because he was too busy getting his dick wet in his youth.
Not being able to commit to one woman AFTER reaching your aim,

makes you just as pathetic and weak.

If it wasn’t for that condom, you’d be manufacturing offsprings you

wouldn’t even know about.

Balls to make kids, but none to raise them.

Deadbeat dad.

Death is better.

Thread #10
If you want to behave in a way that serves your best interest,

you will quickly find that it’s good to be brutally honest with women,

and not so honest with men.

There’s context to this.

Your best option with females is to be honest with them.

Lying to them to have sex is a inevitable disaster. It just doesn’t work.

Better to be upfront and honest about what you want.
Honesty does not work with other men.

Why?

Because you’re not always cooperating with them.

There’s always a degree of competition. And with competition, comes

defection.

Whereas you NEVER compete with women.

The context is applied depending on what games you’re playing.

Honesty is a tactical error in zero sum games.

Honesty serves your best interest in positive sum games.

All games with women should be positive sum.

Playing zero sum with them is just too much of a headache and
nuisance once they find out.

If you want sex, best to be honest and sell your intention that yields
positivity for both.

Deception here just comes back to bite you.

All games with men can be positive or zero sum.

It really depends on the path you’re on.

If you’re on upward ascension, most games you play will be zero sum.

If you’re just a chilled guy who watches netflix, goes out with friends to
bars and clubs, then you prefer win win.
You can tell a lot about where a guy is headed simply based on the
games he plays with people.

Most guys in this society play win-win with men, and play zero sum
with women.

This is big mistake, and damages society at large.

Men need be involved in more competition games. Deceit, defection
only teaches them to grow more powerful.

Doing this with females just breaks them and creates more feminists.

Today is February 10, 2023. I will have this document

updated in a few days with all 60+ of UM’s threads. Please
standby.