CW Rubric For Aero Department
Conclusion (My Design
Introduction, Goals, project aim
( Title , design brief, literature
Group Proposal RUBRIC
background linked to design ,
thoery) Weight: 20%
Missing or inadequate Intro, course Missing or Inadequate Challenge
Fail 0-39% project , course name , goals and not description, no design description or documentation for semester 1 and
related to main department project justifications
Only general picture of Goals
Pass 40-49%
without insight
Clearly stated Goals with some
Good 50-59%
insight
Clearly stated Goals with minimal
V. Good 60-69%
other material
Well-written Goals with wide-
reaching concepts , Project name ,
course name , course description ,
department project , project
Excellent 70-100% description , constraints , limitations
, literature review ( course materials
, library books, Moodle , google and
instructors, information and brain
storming for design,
Project Challenge (Suggested and
Alternate solution , my unique
design solution (indivisual) ,
solution matrix, comparsion )
Weight: 20%
Missing or inadequate Plans and
semester 2 plan
Generic Description of Robotics
Challenge, or bridge only
Good Description of Challenge with Good Plan and Actual Work with
some insight good justifications
Very good Challenge Description,
discussion of Constraints,
Limitations, and possible solution
Excellent and complete description
of department Challenge, material
constraints , alternative materials
mentioned clearly and justified,
specifications of the aircraft
mentioned and how it achieve the
design criteria , selection of design
and final design is justified
Plan and project Delivery process Design drawing and Analysis Overall porposal quality and
Steps Explained and
(our project delivery with good process (Three drawings , claw appearance ( References ,
design cycle drawing,
planning appearance and work analysis and bridge analysis, bridge font , graphical presentation
main outcomes of group
break down structure ) Weight: removal) and clarity of language
porposal )
20% Weight: 20% Weight: 10%
Weight: 10%
Missing or inadequate Aircraft Missing or Inadequate Missing or inadequate
Design , no drawing , or wrong elements , not using template conclusion , design cycle
drawing , no analysis , wrong format diagram and discussion
Basic appearance with a lot Only general picture of
Generic Plan and Actual future Work OK Aircraft Design Drawing,
of gaps and missing elements conclusion without
with little or no realistic planning no discussion of drawing
and a lot of information gaps discussion
Clearly stated conclusion
Good Bridge Design + adequate
Good appearance but needs with some insight and
description of design analysis and
correctios and clarifications incorrect design cycle ,
process
incorrect diagram
Clearly stated conclusion
Very Good Plan and Actual Work Good Aircraft Design + Design Very Good appearance , minor with minimal other
with insights into Design Cycle Process discussion corrections discussion , missing
recommendation
Well-written conclusion
Excellent Plan and Actual future Excellent appearance of all with wide-reaching
Work plan ( semester 2) with insights elements of proposal , when concepts with
Aircraft Design + Design Process +
into Design Cycle and Project printed will be readable and recommendation and
four views drawings , format
Planning ( two semesters plan , publishable , including colorful design cycle drawing is
template correct , all dimensions
weekly planned , Gant chart , risk drawing , and eye catching , well presented and linked
available for building the drawing.
and possible problems and solutions references are perfect and to the outcome results of
for planning) cited correctly within text the project and linked to
delivery plan