Professional Documents
Culture Documents
( de Gruyter 2003
Let X be a real inner product space of finite or infinite dimension d2, and let % 0 0
be a fixed real number. The following results will be presented in this note.
A. A surjective mapping s : X ! X preserving Lorentz–Minkowski distances 0 and
% in one direction must be a Lorentz transformation.
B. The causal automorphisms of X, dim X d 3, are exactly the products dl, where
l is an orthochronous Lorentz transformation and d a dilatation x ! ax,
R C a > 0.
C. If % > 0, there exist X and an injective s : X ! X preserving Lorentz–Minkowski
distance %, such that s is not a Lorentz transformation. This result can be
extended, mutatis mutandis, to Euclidean and Hyperbolic Geometry.
If X is finite-dimensional, result A is an immediate consequence of the following
theorem of Benz–Lester ([4], [12], [13], [5]).
Theorem 1. Suppose that X is a real inner product space of finite dimension d2 and
that % 0 0 is a fixed real number. If s : X ! X satisfies
1 Notation
Let X be a real inner product space of arbitrary finite or infinite dimension d2, i.e. a
real vector space equipped with a fixed inner product
t : X X ! R; tðx; yÞ ¼: xy;
x ¼: x þ x0 t
lðx; yÞ :¼ ðx yÞ 2 ðx0 y0 Þ 2
Remark. It might be noticed that the theory does not seriously depend on the chosen t
([6], p. 229).
k2
Ap ðxÞ :¼ x0 p þ ðxpÞt; Bp; k ðxÞ :¼ x þ kAp ðxÞ þ A 2 ðxÞ:
kþ1 p
Obviously, k 2 d 1. The mappings Ap ; Bp; k are linear and Bp; k : X ! X is even bijec-
tive. Define also
B0; 1 ðxÞ :¼ x x0 t:
Bp; k is called a Lorentz boost, a proper one for k d 1, an improper one for k c 1.
All Lorentz transformations l of X are exactly given by
with a boost Bp; k , an orthogonal and linear mapping o from X into X satisfying
oðtÞ ¼ t, and with an element d of X.
On Lorentz–Minkowski geometry in real inner product spaces S3
The following theorem was proved by Cacciafesta [9] in the case dim X < y, and
by Benz [7] in the general case.
for all x; y A X , then s must be the product of a Lorentz transformation and a dilata-
tion.
2 Proof of result A
and
If dim X < y, result A follows from Theorem 1. Suppose now that X is infinite-
dimensional and that s : X ! X is surjective, satisfying (4) and (5) for all x; y A X ,
where % 0 0 is a fixed real number. Hence, by Lemma 3, s is injective, and thus bijec-
tive. Hence, by Theorem 2, there exists a Lorentz transformation l : X ! X and a
real number k 0 0 such that
sðxÞ ¼ k lðxÞ
sðxÞ ¼ lðxÞ
for all x A X .
Remark. Theorem A holds true, as was shown, for all real inner product spaces X
with dim X d 2. If X ¼ R2 , if we put
xy :¼ x1 y1 þ x2 y2
pffiffiffi pffiffiffi
for x ¼ ðx1 ; x2 Þ, y ¼ ð y1 ; y2 Þ of X, and t :¼ ð1= 2; 1= 2Þ, then
sðx1 ; x2 Þ :¼ ð f ðx1 Þ; x2 Þ
3 Causal automorphisms
Let x; y be elements of X. Also in the infinite-dimensional case we put
xcy
if, and only if, lðx; yÞ c 0 and x0 c y0 hold true. A bijection s : X ! X is called a
causal automorphism if, and only if,
x c y , sðxÞ c sðyÞ
for all x; y A X .
The proof of Proposition 1 is not di‰cult.
Proposition 1. Let x; y; z be elements of X and let k be a real number. Then the fol-
lowing statements hold true.
(i) x c x,
(ii) x c y and y c x imply x ¼ y,
(iii) x c y and y c z imply x c z,
(iv) x c y implies x þ z c y þ z,
(v) x c y implies kx c ky for k d 0,
(vi) x c y implies kx d ky for k < 0.
Of course, x < y stands for x c y and x 0 y, x d y for y c x, and x > y for y < x.
Suppose that x; y are elements of X satisfying x < y. Then
½x; y :¼ fz A X j x c z c yg
ucv or vcu
Proposition 2. Let x; y be elements of X with x < y. Then lðx; yÞ ¼ 0 if, and only if,
½x; y is ordered.
x 0 c u0 c y0 ; ku xk c u0 x0 ; ky uk c y0 u0 :
y0 x0 ¼ ky xk c ky uk þ ku xk c y0 x0 ; ð7Þ
ky xk ¼ ky uk þ ku xk ¼ j1 aj ky xk þ jaj ky xk;
u ¼ x þ aðy xÞ:
v ¼ x þ bðy xÞ; 0 c b c 1:
and put
xþy xþy
u :¼ ; v :¼ þ ee:
2 2
Moreover,
x0 c u0 c y0 and x 0 c v 0 c y0 ;
by u0 ¼ v0 ¼ 12 ðx0 þ y0 Þ. Secondly,
1
lðx; uÞ ¼ lðx; yÞ ¼ lðu; yÞ;
4
i.e. by (9),
y x y0 x0
2 G ee < 2
:
Hence
2 y x 2
yx 0 0
G ee < ;
2 2
i.e. lðx; vÞ and lðv; yÞ are negative. Because of (10), (11), ½x; y is not ordered, a con-
tradiction. Hence lðx; yÞ ¼ 0. r
d c kt þ kp þ d;
a c b , lðaÞ c lðbÞ
for all a; b A X . This is clear for lðxÞ ¼ x þ d, in view of Proposition 1 (iv). It is also
clear for lðxÞ ¼ oðxÞ because of
i.e. oðxÞ ¼ oðxÞ, and on account of the fact that o1 is linear and orthogonal as well,
satisfying o1 ðtÞ ¼ t.
Finally, we consider the case lðxÞ ¼ Bp; k ðxÞ with k d 1. Since B1 p; k ¼ Bp; k we
only have to prove
a c b ) lðaÞ c lðbÞ;
0 c x ) 0 c lðxÞ:
Again, 0 d lð0; xÞ ¼ lðlð0Þ; lðxÞÞ ¼ lð0; lðxÞÞ. Since z0 ¼ zt for all z A X , we get
where g > 0 is a real number, Bp; k a proper Lorentz boost, o a linear, orthogonal,
bijective mapping of X with oðtÞ ¼ t, d an element of X.
Proof. Observe that mðxÞ :¼ gx defines a causal automorphism for a real constant
g > 0. Hence, by Proposition 3, (13) must be a causal automorphism as well.
Suppose now that l : X ! X is an arbitrary causal automorphism. If x 0 y are
elements of X with lðx; yÞ ¼ 0, we may assume x0 c y0 without loss of generality,
and hence x < y. Thus, by Proposition 2, ½x; y is ordered. Since l is a causal auto-
morphism, also ½lðxÞ; lð yÞ must be ordered and lðxÞ < lð yÞ holds true. Hence, by
Proposition 2, lðlðxÞ; lðyÞÞ ¼ 0. Now Theorem 2 implies that
1
x! lðxÞ
m
4 Proof of result C
Let B be a set with cardðBÞ d @ :¼ cardðRÞ and define X to be the set of all functions
x:B!R
X X
x þ y :¼ ½xðbÞ þ yðbÞb; lx :¼ ½l xðbÞb
bAB bAB
P
and xy ¼ b A B xðbÞ yðbÞ. Then X is a real inner product space of dimension cardðBÞ
with basis B. If fb1 ; . . . ; bn g is a finite subset of B, then there exist exactly
@ cardðBÞ ¼ cardðBÞ
cardðX Þ ¼ cardðBÞ:
cardðX Þ ¼ cardðBnftgÞ:
Therefore there exists a bijection m : X ! Bnftg. Suppose that % > 0 is a fixed real
number and define
rffiffiffi
%
sðxÞ :¼ mðxÞ:
2
x ¼: x þ x0 t; x A t ? ; x0 A R;
% ¼ lðx; yÞ ¼ ðx yÞ 2 ðx0 y0 Þ 2 :
Remark. The method followed in this section can be applied to Euclidean and Hyper-
On Lorentz–Minkowski geometry in real inner product spaces S11
bolic Geometry in order to find injective mappings s : X ! X which are not distance
preserving, but which preserve a fixed distance % > 0. Non-injective mappings leaving
invariant a fixed distance %, but not all other distances, were given by Beckman and
Quarles [3] in the euclidean case, and by Benz [8] in the hyperbolic case. In this con-
nection observe theorems of Beckman, Quarles [3], Farrahi [10], Kuz’minyh [11], in
which, in the finite-dimensional case, distance preserving mappings are characterized
by the invariance of one single distance % > 0.
Let B be a set with a cardinality d @, and consider the real inner product space X
as defined at the beginning of this section. In view of cardðBÞ ¼ cardðX Þ, there exists
a bijection
m : X ! B:
dðx; yÞ :¼ kx yk
%
sðxÞ :¼ pffiffiffi mðxÞ:
2
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Hence dðsðxÞ; sðyÞÞ ¼ ðsðxÞ sðyÞÞ 2 ¼ % for x 0 y with x; y A X . So every
distance 0 0 goes over in distance %.
In the hyperbolic case with the distance notion
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffipffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
hðx; yÞ d 0 and cosh hðx; yÞ :¼ 1 þ x 2 1 þ y 2 xy;
pffiffiffi %
sðxÞ :¼ 2 sinh mðxÞ:
2
hðsðxÞ; sðyÞÞ ¼ %
for every x 0 y with x; y A X . So also here every distance 0 0 goes over in distance %.
References
[1] A. D. Alexandrov, Seminar report. Uspehi Mat. Nauk. 5 (1950), no. 3 (37), 187.
[2] A. D. Alexandrov, V. V. Ovchinnikova, Notes on the foundations of relativity theory.
Vestnik Leningrad. Univ. 11, 95 (1953).
S12 Walter Benz
[3] F. S. Beckman, D. A. Quarles, Jr., On isometries of Euclidean spaces. Proc. Amer. Math.
Soc. 4 (1953), 810–815. MR 15,335a Zbl 0052.18204
[4] W. Benz, Eine Beckman–Quarles-Charakterisierung der Lorentztransformationen des Rn .
Arch. Math. (Basel ) 34 (1980), 550–559. MR 82h:51022 Zbl 0446.51015
[5] W. Benz, Geometrische Transformationen. Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim 1992.
MR 93i:51002 Zbl 0754.51005
[6] W. Benz, Lorentz–Minkowski distances in Hilbert spaces. Geom. Dedicata 81 (2000),
219–230. MR 2001e:46032 Zbl 0959.51013
[7] W. Benz, Lie sphere geometry in Hilbert spaces. Results Math. 40 (2001), 9–36.
MR 2003b:51007 Zbl 0995.51003
[8] W. Benz, Mappings preserving two hyperbolic distances. J. Geom. 70 (2001), 8–16.
MR 2002g:51017 Zbl 0988.51015
[9] F. Cacciafesta, An observation about a theorem of A. D. Alexandrov concerning Lorentz
transformations. J. Geom. 18 (1982), 5–8. MR 83h:51026 Zbl 0485.51015
[10] B. Farrahi, A characterization of isometries of absolute planes. Resultate Math. 4 (1981),
34–38. MR 82i:51022 Zbl 0472.51009
[11] A. V. Kuz’minyh, Mappings preserving the distance 1. Sibirsk. Mat. Zh. 20 (1979),
597–602. MR 80h:51016 Zbl 0427.51008
[12] J. A. Lester, The Beckman–Quarles theorem in Minkowski space for a spacelike square-
distance. Arch. Math. (Basel ) 37 (1981), 561–568. MR 83e:51008 Zbl 0457.51027
[13] J. A. Lester, Distance preserving transformations. In: Handbook of incidence geometry,
921–944, North-Holland 1995. MR 96j:51019 Zbl 0826.51010
[14] J. Rätz, On light-cone-preserving mappings of the plane. In: General inequalities, 3
(Oberwolfach, 1981), volume 64 of Internat. Schriftenreihe Numer. Math., 349–367, Birk-
häuser 1983. MR 86e:51025 Zbl 0527.51006
[15] E. M. Schröder, Zur Kennzeichnung distanztreuer Abbildungen in nichteuklidischen
Räumen. J. Geom. 15 (1980), 108–118. MR 82h:51025 Zbl 0463.51015
[16] E. M. Schröder, Ein einfacher Beweis des Satzes von Alexandrov-Lester. J. Geom. 37
(1990), 153–158. MR 91c:51019 Zbl 0704.51010
[17] E. C. Zeeman, Causality implies the Lorentz group. J. Mathematical Phys. 5 (1964),
490–493. MR 28 #5785 Zbl 0133.23205