You are on page 1of 7

Advances in Biological Research 9 (3): 133-139, 2015

ISSN 1992-0067
© IDOSI Publications, 2015
DOI: 10.5829/idosi.abr.2015.9.3.9385

Cytotoxic Effect of Venom Produced in Vitro from Primary Culture


of Conusbiliosus Venom Duct Cells on HEK 293t Cells
1
M.S. Viswanathan, 1S. Arularasan, 2Amrutlal K. Patel, 1, 2M. Chandra Shekar,
2
Neelam M. Nathani, 2Ravi K. Shah, 3D.N. Rank, 2C.G. Joshi and 1T. Balasubramanian

1
Centre of Advanced Study in Marine Biology,
Annamalai University, Parangipettai-608 502, Tamilnadu, India
2
Department of Animal Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science
and A.H., Anand Agricultural University, Anand, India
3
Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Veterinary Science
and A.H. Anand Agricultural University, Anand, India

Abstract: Bioweapon synthesis through animal cell culture technique is gaining significant interest for the
development of new drugs related to human diseases. Marine cone snail’s venom is a potential source of
unique bioactive neurotoxic peptides which can be utilized for treating cancer. Here, we describe establishment
of primary culture of venom duct epithelial cells from Conusbiliosusand demonstrate that secretory cells of
venom duct can be potential in vitro source for venom production. The venom duct cells remained in
suspension in the primary culture with no signs of adhesion and continued slow but sustained proliferation.
Cytotoxic effects of culture supernatant on HEK 293T cells showed inhibitory effect on cell growth providing
probable evidence for cono-peptides production.

Key words: Marine Cone Snail Primary Culture Secretory Cells Venom Duct Cytotoxicity

INTRODUCTION well establiehed cell line available till date is that


ofBiomphalariaglabrata embryonic (Bge). With the
Conotoxins from marine cone snail have been advancements in animal tissue culture technology this
explored with great interest by neuroscientists since long problem can be overcome by establishment of primary cell
due to their potential therapeutic applications. culture from marine invertebrate [7, 8]. Conus venom can
Conopeptides have been found to act as highly specific be obtained by several approaches, such as milking,
ligand for ion channel and receptors in the central dissection, recombinant production and chemical
nervous system. The cone snail venom comprises a synthesis [9, 10]. However, remarkable changes in the
cocktail of highly complex structured and small sized production of cono-peptides have not yet been achieved.
neuro peptides which are produced by venom duct [1]. In contrast, plenty of cone snails are sacrificed for
Earlier anatomical studies on venom apparatus of genus research purposes [11]. Previously, researchers have
Conus also revealed the well-organized venom duct developed the primary culture of venom secretory cells
responsible for venom production [2, 3]. The columnar from snake venom gland to synthesize the venom in
epithelial cells with basal nucleus present in inner layer of animal cell culture medium [12]. The crude toxin from
venom duct synthesize these peptides [4, 5]. Till date venom ducts of Conusbetulinus has shown its potential
concerted efforts have been undertaken to evaluate the as cytotoxic agent on HeLa cell line [13]. Therefore,
molluscan using various approaches including molecular In vitro culture of venom duct cells and synthesis of
techniques and development of cell line by culture based cono-peptides in animal cell culture medium can be a new
approach [6]. However, due to lack of relevant knowledge biotechnological approach not only for conservation of
on mollusc cell physiology and biochemistry, the only marine cone snail but also for production of conotoxin.

Corresponding Author: M.S. Viswanathan, CAS in Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences, Annamalai University,
Parangipettai-608 502, Tamil Nadu, India. Tel: +91-9952406206, E-mail: vtpviswa@gmail.com.
133
Advan. Biol. Res., 9 (3): 133-139, 2015

In the present study, we have developed the long-term


primary culture of venom secretory cells from venom duct
of Conusbiliosusand studied its cytotoxic properties
in vitro.
MATERIALS AND METHODS

Collection and processing of snails: Live specimens


of Conusspecieswere collected randomly from Porbandar
coastal line of Gujarat, India (Fig.1). The live specimens
were transported to laboratory and maintained in sea
water before being processed for further purpose.
The collected samples were rinsed with distilled water to
remove salt and other debris for identification based on
shell morphology and colour pattern to confirm its
taxonomy as Conusbiliosus species [14]. Venom glands
were dissected out from the identified Conusbiliosus
specimens in sterile laboratory conditions. Fig. 1: Live marine cone snail Conusbiliosus on sandy
shore of Porbandar beac
Morphology of Venom Secretory Cells: Initially,
histology study of resected Conus venom duct was
carried out by fixing it in 10% formaldehyde to understand
the organization of venom secretory cells in live cone
snail. After fixation, water molecules present in the tissue
was removed using isopropyl alcohol and then tissue
block was infiltrated by paraffin, allowed to solidify in a
mold and embedded with a small cube of paraffin.
Tissue sectioning was accomplished using microtome and
each section was mounted on slides. Clearing process
was applied to remove the paraffin and then histological
section was stained using hematoxylin and eosin (H and
E). Finally, stained slides were observed under
microscope (Lieca).
Fig. 2: Procedure for isolation of venom secretory cells
Cell Culture and Maintenance: Primary culture of venom from venom duct of Conusbiliosus
secretory cells from Conusbiliosus venom duct was
developed using the protocol described previously for
mammalian salivary glands with few modifications (Fig. 2)
[15, 16]. Briefly, live cone snail was wiped with 70%
ethanol. The shell was broken with the help of hammer.
The venom gland was freed from connective tissue and
their venom duct was excised (Fig. 3). Venom duct was
washed thoroughly with a PBS followed by Medium 199
(M-199). The venom duct tissues were minced to slurry in
a basal medium M-199 supplemented with antibiotics (100
IU/mL penicillin, 100µg/mL streptomycin, 5 µg/mL
gentamycin) and subsequently digested with 0.25%
trypsin (Sigma) for 30 min at 24°C to 28°C temperature
with inversion every 10 min. Samples were triturated
by pipetting for 10-15 times and enzyme action was Fig. 3: Venom apparatus of Conusbiliosus (a) Venom
stopped by adding 5% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen). bulb (b) Venom duct

134
Advan. Biol. Res., 9 (3): 133-139, 2015

The cells were filtered through 70µm filter and pelleted assay. The cells were detached by trypsinization,
by centrifugation (1500 rpm for 10 min) at room seeded at a density of 1.0X105 cells/ well into 96-well
temperature. The supernatant was discarded and cell culture plates and subsequently, incubated in a
pellet was washed twice with complete growth humidified 5% CO2 incubator for overnight. The growth
medium (M-199 medium supplemented with 5% fetal medium was removed without disturbing the cell sheet.
bovine serum) and seeded in a T 25 flask (Corning) The monolayer of cells was washed with PBS to remove
and incubated at 24°C to 28°C temperature. Primary dead cells and excess fetal bovine serum. The culture
explant culture cells were observed and photographed medium (M-199) and venom bulb extract served as
using inverted microscope. Crude supernatant of negative and positive control respectively. Undiluted
venom duct cell culture medium was collected at crude supernatant and each dilution of the crude sample
regular intervals of 2-3 days and centrifuged at 7500 rpm ranged from 1:10 to 1:1000 were added to respective wells
for 10 min to clear the supernatant of cell debris or of 96 well plates in triplicate. The cells were observed
remaining intact cells. The supernatant was further under inverted microscope for significant changes in their
preceded for confirmation about venom production by morphology. After 48 hours of incubation, cell viability
cytotoxicity analysis. The cultured cells were further was analyzed by MTT assay. 20µl of MTT (5mg/ml) was
studied by H and E staining to compare these cells with added to each well and incubated at 37°C for 3- 4 hours.
tissue histology. Then, the medium was replaced with 150µl of dimethyl
In parallel, Human Embryonic Kidney 293T cells sulfoxide and incubated for 45 minutes in CO2
(HEK 293T) were cultivated in DMEM F-12 supplemented incubator. A colored formazon crystal was assayed
with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin and spectrophotometrically at 570nm using a plate readerand
streptomycin for cytotoxicity analysis of venom duct cell theresults are presented as the percentage of cell viability.
culture supernatant to confirm the production of venom
from cultured venom gland cells. Cultured cells from RESULTS
venom duct and HEK 293T were maintained at 37°C in
5% carbon dioxide (CO2). In the present study, live specimens of
Conusbiliosus were confirmed through conventional
Assessment of Cell Viability by MTT Assay: In order to taxonomical approach. The morphological key characters
determine the cytotoxic effects of culture supernatant observed were cone shaped and less number of spires on
of primary venom duct cell culture on HEK 293T shell, a wide aperture, usually elongated body whorl, the
cells, the viability was measured by MTT [3-(4, presence of numerous axial and spiral growth threads and
5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] lines. The colour of the body whorl was pale brown.

Fig. 4: Conusbiliosus venom duct primary culture. Desegregated venom duct cells in culture medium on day 0 (a),
day 3 (b), day 14 (c) and day 27 (d)

135
Advan. Biol. Res., 9 (3): 133-139, 2015

Fig. 5: Microscopic observations of venom duct cells. Histology of venom duct (A), Cells in the culture medium (B) and
H and E staining of cultured cells (C).

Fig. 6: Photomicrograph of primary cell culture from the venom duct of Conusbiliosusshowing two different cell types
in the culture medium

They were moderate 34mm to 48mm in size, occurred in suspension with no signs of adherence throughout the
sandy shore of the sea. Venom duct was used as a culture period. During the initial culture period, limited
starting material for the primary culture. The primary numbers of cells were observed in the culture flask.
venom secretory epithelial cell culture experiments were On 3rd day, cells started proliferating and high numbers of
performed with marine cone snails whose venom duct venom duct cells were observed in the culture medium at
length ranged between 5.6cm and 6.4cm. The venom the end of two weeks (Fig.4). Under the sterile conditions,
secretory cells grew well in the culture medium M-199 cell viability was noted as 65% to 70% in culture medium.
supplemented with FBS also suitable for primary culture. From the third week onwards, signs of cell death were
The optimum temperature for venom secretory cell culture progressively detected. Histological study and
was 24°C to 28°C. The cells in primary culture remained in morphological analysis of the primary venom secretory

136
Advan. Biol. Res., 9 (3): 133-139, 2015

Fig. 7: HEK 293T cells after treating with culture supernatant of venom duct cells in different dilutions (A) Cells with
medium as negative control B) Cells with venom bulb crude extract as positive control (C) Undiluted culture
supernatant (D) Dilution 1:10 (E) Dilution 1:100 (F) Dilution 1:1000.

Fig. 8: Cytotoxic effect of culture supernatant (Undiluted; 1:10; 1:100 and 1:1000) on HEK 293T cells after 48-hours
incubation period. Culture medium was taken as negative control with 100% viability.

cell culture, as well as H and E staining confirmed two DISCUSSION


groups of cells existing in the venom duct (Fig.5).
These venom secretory cells were cuboidal and Development of marine invertebrate cell culture is
column-like shaped cells (Fig.6). The secretion of venom still at preliminary stages. It is necessary to apply the
substance in the culture medium was confirmed by animal cell culture technology to establish the primary cell
analyzing the effect of culture supernatant on cell viability culture of marine mollusc species for investigating
using MTT assay. The HEK 293T cells were treated with their potential therapeutic applications [8]. To the best
primary venom duct cell culture supernatant of different of our knowledge this is the first attempt to culture
concentrations for 48 h. The survival rate of the cells Conus venom duct cells. Previously, the ant,
was found to be 40 % with undiluted culture supernatant Pseudomyrmextriplarinus were cultured and 0.25%
as compared to control cells but there was no significant trypsin was used for dissociation of venom gland cells
effect with diluted culture supernatant. However, in-vitro [17]. Venom gland cells from the snake, Bothropsjararaca
result evidenced toxin production in the medium (Figs.7 were cultured in in-vitro condition as a long- term primary
and 8) as suggested by considerable reduction of cell culture to produce venom. These cells were accumulated
viability. to form clusters and considered as functionally viable

137
Advan. Biol. Res., 9 (3): 133-139, 2015

cells during the 21st day to secret the venom in the culture REFERENCES
medium. Above all, secretory cells of the snake venom
gland were non-adherent in nature [12].Conus venom duct 1. Page, L.R., 2012. Developmental modularity and
cells during this study were observed to be non- phenotypic novelty within a biphasic life cycle:
adhesive in nature similar to the snake venom gland. As morphogenesis of a cone snail venom gland.
per the comparison of histological studies, both cone Proc Biol Sci., 279(1726): 77-83.
snail and snake venom gland secretory cells were 2. Marshall, J., W.P. Kelley, S.S. Rubakhin,
observed to be similarin appearance [18]. Previously, J.P. Bingham, J.V. Sweedler and
crude toxin from the venom ducts of C. betulinus isolated W.F. Gilly, 2002. Anatomical correlates of
by extraction method showed anticancer properties venom production in Conus californicus. Biol Bull.,
against HeLa cell lines but the mode of action behind 203(1): 27-41.
cytotoxic effect remained unclear [13, 19]. Most of the 3. Olivera, B.M., 2006. Conus peptides:
conopeptides are known to target specific neuronal biodiversity-based discovery and exogenomics.
receptors and ion-channels of central nervous J. Biol Chem., 281(42): 31173-7.
system [20]. Omega conotoxin MVIIA (Ziconotide) used 4. Monsef, F., S. Khodabandeh and I. Nabipour, 2014.
as analgesic for the treatment of cancer and chronic Venom Apparatus Structure and Conutoxins
neuropathic pain and conotoxin GVIA (SNX-124) is also Granules formation in Cone Snail (Conus coronatus)
used as ananalgesic as well as N-type calcium channel of Persian Gulf.. Iranian South Medical Journal,
blocker. Apart from this, some conopeptides have 17(2): 191-200.
potential applications in a few diseases like Alzheimer, 5. Purcell, A. and H. Safavi-Hemami, 2012.
Parkinson and epilepsy [20]. In case of primary culture Unravelling Conotoxin Folding and Molecular
supernatant from secretory cells of venom gland of Diversity. Australian Biochemist., 43: 4-6.
B.jararaca, cytotoxic activities upon cancer cells have not 6. Arularasan, S., M. Chandra Shekar, G. Zaman,
yet been studied, but southern copperhead snake venom S.M.K. Karthikeyan, D.N. Rank, T.K. Jisha,
proteins isolated by milking approach have been R. Muthazlaian and T. Balasubramanian, 2014.
investigated that showed the highest cytotoxicity through Evaluation of within Species Diversity in Natural
arresting metastasis on various cancer cells. Stock of Babylonia spirata (Linnaeus, 1758),
Along Tamilnadu Coast of India Using Microsatellite
CONCLUSION Markers. World Journal of Fish and Marine Sciences,
6(1): 66-71.
In conclusion, we used venom duct as an 7. Quinn, B., M.J. Costello, G. Dorange, J.G. Wilson
ideal model to produce and secrete venom in the and C. Mothersill, 2009. Development of an in vitro
animal cell culture medium in terms of initiating a culture method for cells and tissues from the zebra
functional long-term primary secretory cell culture, mussel (Dreissena polymorpha). Cytotechnology,
further the cytotoxicity analysis with culture 59(2): 121-34.
supernatant on HEK 293T cells suggested the 8. Van Der Merwe, M., S. Auzoux-Bordenave, C. Niesler
production of conotoxin in the culture medium and and R. Roodt-Wilding, 2010. Investigating the
found that the primary culture supernatant could lead to establishment of primary cell culture from different
loss of viable cells. Despite the evidence of secreted abalone (Haliotis midae) tissues. Cytotechnology,
venom components in the culture medium, their exact 62(3): 265-77.
mechanism of action still remains unclear and require 9. Becker, S. and H. Terlau, 2008. Toxins from
further investigation. cone snails: properties, applications and
biotechnological production. Appl Microbiol
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Biotechnol., 79(1): 1-9.
10. Biass, B., I. Kriz aj, A. Leonardi, S. Dutertre,
We thank University Grants Commission-Gandhi P. Favreau and R. Stoecklin, 2009. Peptidomics and
National Fellowship (UGC-RGNF), Government of India, proteomics of conus consors cone snail venom.
for their financial support during this study. Biopolymers, 92: 348-348.

138
Advan. Biol. Res., 9 (3): 133-139, 2015

11. Kumar, S., S.P. Dixit, N.K. Verma, D.K. Singh, 15. Quissell, D.O., R.S. Redman and M.R. Mark, 1986.
A. Pande, S. Kumar, C.R. and S.L.B., 2009. Short-term primary culture of acinar-intercalated duct
Genetic diversity analysis of the Gohilwari breed complexes from rat submandibular glands. In Vitro
of India goat (Capra hircus) using Cell Dev. Biol., 22(8): 469-80.
microsatellite markers. American J. Animal and Vet. 16. Redman, R.S., D.O. Quissell and K.A. Barzen, 1988.
Sci., 4(3): 49-57. Effects of dexamethasone, epidermal growth
12. Carneiro, S.M., M.B. Zablith, C.M. Kerchove, factor and retinoic acid on rat submandibular
A.M. Moura-da-Silva, D.O. Quissell, R.P. Markus acinar-intercalated duct complexes in primary culture.
and N. Yamanouye, 2006. Venom production In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol., 24(8): 734-42.
in long-term primary culture of secretory cells 17. Hink, W. and J. Butz, 1985. Primary culture of
of the Bothrops jararaca venom gland. Toxicon, antvenom gland cells.. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol.,
47(1): 87-94. 21(6): 333-339.
13. Sadhasivam, G., A. Muthuvel, R. Rajasekaran, 18. Mackessy, S.P. and L.M. Baxter, 2006.
A. Pachaiyappan and B. Thangavel, 2014. Studies on Bioweapons synthesis and storage: The venom
biochemical and biomedical properties of Conus gland of front-fanged snakes. Zoologischer
betulinus venom. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Anzeiger-A Journal of Comparative Zoology,
Disease, 1: 102-110. 245: 147-159.
14. Franklin, J.B., K. Subramanian, S.A. Fernando and 19. Giji, S. and M. Arumugam, 2014. Isolation and
K. Krishnan, 2009. Diversity and Distribution of characterization of hyaluronic acid from marine
Conidae from the TamilNadu Coast of India organisms. Adv. Food Nutr. Res., 72: 61-77.
(Mollusca: Caenogastropoda: Conidae). Zootaxa, 20. Livett, B.G., K.R. Gayler and Z. Khalil, 2004.
pp: 3-63. Drugs from the sea: conopeptides as potential
therapeutics. Curr. Med. Chem., 11(13): 1715-23.

139
All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.

You might also like