Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Smart Work vs Hard Work: Exam preparation necessitates a great deal of effort on the part of
students. Giving up their social life, avoiding all of the things they enjoy doing with their leisure,
sitting in the confines of their houses with a book in hand, and so on. It does become
monotonous after a time. The repetitious, apparently unending practice that students are
required to perform in the name of ‘working hard' makes it even duller for them.
It's a need of the hour for aspirants to understand the difference between working hard
and working wisely. To maximize efficiency and get the desired result in the exam, a
perfect balance of hard work and smart work is required.
Hard Work is defined as just doing a task without planning ahead of time how
you will do it or using any means of reducing your efforts. Hard work requires-
● Commitment
● Persistent
● Resourcefulness
● Time
● Focus
● Farsightedness
Well, Toppers follow the right balance between smart work and hard work. In
other words, toppers do study for 8 - 10 hours daily which is a characteristic of
hard work, but they make sure that they invest their time smartly to get the
maximum results. While preparing for CLAT and Other Law Entrance exams,
where the competition is so tough, aspirants must use their time smartly to
get the final selection. Every aspirant has 24 hours time to themselves, it is up
to the individual how he chooses to use his time in order to get ahead in this
competition. It is not possible to get a selection with only hard work or only
smart work. There has to be a balance between these two.
Let us understand with the help of an example. Look at the following picture
Here both Aspirant A and Aspirant B are doing the hard work as both are
studying for 8 - 10 hours but Aspirant B is also allotting the time based on the
nature and priority of the subjects.
Subjects like Reasoning and Quant need more time as they require a lot of
question practice. That's why Aspirant B has allotted more time to quant and
reasoning. On the other hand, Aspirant A has not considered this fact.