Consignments

Observers 1 2 3 4 5 6 Row Average

1 9 10 9 10 11 11 10 0.63
2 12 11 9 11 10 10 10.5 0.09
3 11 10 10 12 11 10 10.67 0.02
4 12 13 11 14 12 10 12.00 1.46
Column average 11 11 9.75 11.75 11 10.25 10.79
0.04 0.04 1.09 0.92 0.04 0.29

Error
1.46 0.04 0.00 0.92 0.63 2.38
1.67 0.09 0.21 0.21 0.50 0.00
0.02 0.77 0.14 0.14 0.02 0.02
0.04 0.63 0.00 1.09 0.04 2.13

SSC 9.708 =4*SUM(C9:H9)

SSR 13.13 =6*SUM(J4:J7)
SSE 13.13 =SUM(C12:H15)
Step 1 Column Hypothesis
Null hypothesis Ho The average moisture content of all the consignments are equal
All the column menas are equal
µ1=µ2=µ3=µ4=µ5
Alternate Hypothesis H1 The average moisture content of all the consignments are not equal
All the column menas are not equal

Row/ block Hypothesis

Null hypothesis Ho The average moisture content measured by all 4 observers are equal
All the row menas are equal
µ1=µ2=µ3=µ4=µ5
Alternate Hypothesis H1 The average moisture content measured by all 4 observers not are equal
All the row menas are not equal

Step 2 Level of significance α 0.05

Step 3 Use Randomised Block design

Critical values
F treatment F α,c-1,n-r-c+1 F 0.05,5, 15 2.90
F block F α,r-1,n-r-c+1 F 0.05,3, 15 3.29

Step 4 Calculate values

Source of Variation Sum of Squares
Degrees of freedomMean Square
Between columns SSC c-1 MSC = (SSC/c-1)
9.71 5.00 1.94

Between rows SSR r-1 MSR= (SSR/r-1)

13.13 3.00 4.38

Errors SSE (c-1)*(r-1) MSE=(SSE/n-r-c+1)

13.13 15 0.88

Total SST n-1

35.96 23

Anova: Two-Factor Without Replication

SUMMARY Count Sum Average

Row 1 6.00 60.00 10.00
Row 2 6.00 63.00 10.50
Row 3 6.00 64.00 10.67
Row 4 6.00 72.00 12.00

Column 1 4.00 44.00 11.00

Column 2 4.00 44.00 11.00
 Column 3 4.00 39.00 9.75
Column 4 4.00 47.00 11.75
Column 5 4.00 44.00 11.00
Column 6 4.00 41.00 10.25

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS
Rows 13.13 3.00 4.38
Columns 9.71 5.00 1.94
Error 13.13 15.00 0.88

Total 35.96 23.00

Step 5 Decision
Column Hypothesis
Calculated F falls in the accepeted region
Null hypothesis is accepted
Alternate hypothesis is rejected
The average moisture content of all the consignments are equal

Row/ block Hypothesis

Calculated F falls in the rejection region
Null hypothesis is rejected
Alternate hypothesis is accepted
The average moisture content measured by all 4 observers not are equal
e consignments are equal

e consignments are not equal

ed by all 4 observers are equal

ed by all 4 observers not are equal

F value
F treatment = (MSC/MSE)
2.22

F block = (MSR/MSE)
5.00

Variance
0.80
1.10
0.67
2.00

2.00
2.00
 0.92
2.92
0.67
0.25

F P-value F crit
5.00 0.01 3.29
2.22 0.11 2.90
Consumer option/Age
80 Kids 90 Kids 2K Kids
group

Liked new brand 95 85 70

Step 1
Did not like new brand 35 55 72
Indifferent 30 34 35

Step 2

Step 3

Step 4

Step 5
2 a)

2 b)
State Null and Alternate hypothesis
Null hypothesis Ho The consumer optinion is independent of age group
Alternate hypothesis H1 The consumer optinion is not independent of age group

Level of significance α 0.05 0.01

Goodness of Fit test

Use Chi-square test
Critical values
Chi square α, (n-1)*(c-1) 0.05 0.01
Chi square 0.01,16 26.30 32.00

Calculate Chi sqaure values

Observed Freequency
Row
Consumer option/Age group 80 Kids 90 Kids 2K Kids
total

Liked new brand 95 85 70 250

Did not like new brand 35 55 72 162

Indifferent 30 34 35 99
Column total 160 174 177 511

Consumer option/Age group 80 Kids 90 Kids 2K Kids

Liked new brand 3.57 0.00 3.18
Did not like new brand 4.87 0.00 4.50
Indifferent 0.03 0.00 0.01

Calculated Chi Square 16.17

p value 0.04

Decision
Alpha = 0.05
Caluculate Chi sqaure falls in the acceptance region
Caluculate Chi sqaure (16.17) < Critical Chi sqaure (26.30)
Null hypothesis is accepted
Alternate hypothesis is rejected
The consumer optinion is independent of age group

Alpha = 0.01
Caluculate Chi sqaure falls in the acceptance region
Caluculate Chi sqaure (16.17) < Critical Chi sqaure (32.00)
Null hypothesis is accepted
Alternate hypothesis is rejected
The consumer optinion is independent of age group
 of age group
dent of age group

Expected freequency
Consumer option/Age
80 Kids 90 Kids 2K Kids
group

Liked new brand 78.278 85.127 86.595

Did not like new brand 50.724 55.162 56.114

Indifferent 30.998 33.71 34.292
Time of the day On the hour On the Half-hour Early in program Late in program
10 42 36 62 51
37 41 68 47
41 38 64 48
4 62 57 88 67
60 60 85 60
58 55 81 66
9 100 97 127 105
96 96 120 101
103 101 126 107
Step 1 State null and alternate hypothesis

Column/ Classification effect H0 Null hypothesis The average response of position of all four slots are equ
All the column means are equal
H1 Alternate hypothesis The average response of position of all four slots are not
All the column means are not equal

Block/ Row Effect H0 Null hypothesis The average response of all three time day effects are eq
All the row means are equal
H1 Alternate hypothesis The average response of all three time day effects are no
All the row means are not equal

Interaction Effect H0 Null hypothesis There is no interaction effect

Interaction effect is absent
H1 Alternate hypothesis There is interaction effect
Interaction effect is present

Step 2 Level of significance α 0.05

Step 3 Use Two way anova-factorial design

Critical value
F treatment 3.40
F block 3.01
F Interaction 2.51

Step 4
Anova: Two-Factor With Replication

SUMMARY On the hour On the HalEarly in p Late in pr Total

10.00
Count 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 12.00
Sum 120.00 115.00 194.00 146.00 575.00
Average 40.00 38.33 64.67 48.67 47.92
Variance 7.00 6.33 9.33 4.33 123.72

4.00
Count 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 12.00
Sum 180.00 172.00 254.00 193.00 799.00
Average 60.00 57.33 84.67 64.33 66.58
Variance 4.00 6.33 12.33 14.33 132.45

9.00
Count 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 12.00
Sum 299.00 294.00 373.00 313.00 1279.00
Average 99.67 98.00 124.33 104.33 106.58
Variance 12.33 7.00 14.33 9.33 128.27
 Total
Count 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Sum 599.00 581.00 821.00 652.00
Average 66.56 64.56 91.22 72.44
Variance 697.53 701.78 700.69 625.03

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value
Sample 21560.89 2.00 10780.44 1209.02 0.00
Columns 3989.42 3.00 1329.81 149.14 0.00
Interaction 25.33 6.00 4.22 0.47 0.82
Within 214.00 24.00 8.92

Total 25789.64 35.00

Step 5 Decision

Column/ Classification Effect Calculated F(149.14) > Critical F(3.01)

Null hypothesis is rejected
Alternate Hypothesis is Accepted
The average response of position of all four slots are not equal

Block/ Row Effect Calculated F(1209.02) > Critical F(3.40)

Null hypothesis is rejected
Alternate Hypothesis is Accepted
The average response of all three time day effects are not equal

Interaction Effect Calculated F(0.47) < Critical F(2.51)

Null hypothesis accepted
Alternate Hypothesis is Rejected
There is no interaction effect
Interaction effect is absent
on of all four slots are equal

on of all four slots are not equal

ee time day effects are equal

ee time day effects are not equal

F crit
3.40
3.01
2.51
 Win Loss Step 1 State null and alternate hypothesis
Federer 94 5
427 61 Column/ Classification effect
185 37
Nadal 50 12
254 81
283 26
Djokovic 43 12 Block/ Row Effect
288 61
144 42
Murray 45 11
243 63
76 33 Interaction Effect

Step 2 Level of significance α

Step 3 Use Two way anova-factorial design

Critical value
F treatment
F block
F Interaction

Step 4 Anova: Two-Factor With Replication

SUMMARY
Federer
Count
Sum
Average
Variance

Nadal
Count
Sum
Average
Variance

Djokovic
Count
Sum
Average
Variance
 Murray
Count
Sum
Average
Variance

Total
Count
Sum
Average
Variance

ANOVA
Source of Variation
Sample
Step 5 Columns
Interaction
Within

Total

Step 5 Decision

Column/ Classification Effect

Block/ Row Effect

Interaction Effect
 hypothesis

H0 Null hypothesis The average result of the game are equal

All the column means are equal
H1 Alternate hypothesis The average result of the game are not equal
All the column means are not equal

H0 Null hypothesis The average result of all three surface are equal
All the row means are equal
H1 Alternate hypothesis The average result of all three surface are not equal
All the row means are not equal

H0 Null hypothesis There is no interaction effect

Interaction effect is absent
H1 Alternate hypothesis There is interaction effect
Interaction effect is present

0.05

torial design

0.00
0.00
0.00

h Replication

Win Loss Total

3.00 3.00 6.00

706.00 103.00 809.00
235.33 34.33 134.83
29622.33 789.33 24284.97

3.00 3.00 6.00

587.00 119.00 706.00
195.67 39.67 117.67
16124.33 1330.33 14282.67

3.00 3.00 6.00

475.00 115.00 590.00
158.33 38.33 98.33
15160.33 610.33 10628.27
 3.00 3.00 6.00
364.00 107.00 471.00
121.33 35.67 78.50
11342.33 681.33 7011.10

12.00 12.00
2132.00 444.00
177.67 37.00
15098.97 625.09

SS df MS F P-value F crit
10652.33 3.00 3550.78 0.38 0.77 3.24
118722.67 1.00 118722.67 12.55 0.00 4.49
10991.00 3.00 3663.67 0.39 0.76 3.24
151321.33 16.00 9457.58

291687.33 23.00

Calculated F(12.55) > Critical F(4.49)

Null hypothesis is rejected
Alternate Hypothesis is Accepted
The average result of the game are not equal

Calculated F(0.38) > Critical F(3.24)

Fail to reject the Null hypothesis
Alternate Hypothesis is rejected
The average result of all three surface are equal

Calculated F(0.47) < Critical F(2.51)

Null hypothesis accepted
Alternate Hypothesis is Rejected
There is no interaction effect
Interaction effect is absent
Observer SampleConsignments
1 9 1
1 10 2
1 9 3
1 10 4
1 11 5
1 11 6
2 12 1
2 11 2
2 9 3
2 11 4
2 10 5
2 10 6
3 11 1
3 10 2
3 10 3
3 12 4
3 11 5
3 10 6
4 12 1
4 13 2
4 11 3
4 14 4
4 12 5
4 10 6
TimHour Number'
10 On the hour 42
10 On the Half-hour 36
10 Early in program 62
10 Late in program 51
10 On the hour 37
10 On the Half-hour 41
10 Early in program 68
10 Late in program 47
10 On the hour 41
10 On the Half-hour 38
10 Early in program 64
10 Late in program 48
4 On the hour 62
4 On the Half-hour 57
4 Early in program 88
4 Late in program 67
4 On the hour 60
4 On the Half-hour 60
4 Early in program 85
4 Late in program 60
4 On the hour 58
4 On the Half-hour 55
4 Early in program 81
4 Late in program 66
9 On the hour 100
9 On the Half-hour 97
9 Early in program 127
9 Late in program 105
9 On the hour 96
9 On the Half-hour 96
9 Early in program 120
9 Late in program 101
9 On the hour 103
9 On the Half-hour 101
9 Early in program 126
9 Late in program 107
 4On the hour
On the Half-hour
Early in program
Late in program
9On the hour
On the Half-hour
Early in program
Late in program
 Player Result Match count
Federer Win 94
Federer Win 427
Federer Win 185
Federer Loss 5
Federer Loss 61
Federer Loss 37
Nadal Win 50
Nadal Win 254
Nadal Win 283
Nadal Loss 12
Nadal Loss 81
Nadal Loss 26
Djokovic Win 43
Djokovic Win 288
Djokovic Win 144
Djokovic Loss 12
Djokovic Loss 61
Djokovic Loss 42
Murray Win 45
Murray Win 243
Murray Win 76
Murray Loss 11
Murray Loss 63
Murray Loss 33