IV.

RESULT AND DISCUSION 70000

60000
Accuracy Time Consuming
50000
% (ms)
40000
Decision Tree 95.3% 4.53
30000
Naïve Bayes 94.4% 3.79
20000
SVM 95.1% 5.34
10000
RVM 96.1% 64908.16
0
kNN 87.3% 49.13 Decision Naïve SVM RVM kNN Rochio
Rochio 83.7% 61.86 Tree Bayes

Tampilkan semua table, grafik semua yg dihasilkan Figure 5 Time consumption in Java statement classification
Dilakukan pembahasan
Sehingga bisa disimpulkan (mengarah ke kesimpulan)
V. CONCLUSION
Hasil terbaik

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This work was supported by the Indonesian Government
through the Scholarship Schema of LPDP RI and Puslapdik
Kemendikbudristek.
REFERENCES

[1] S. Brudzinski, "Open LaTeX Studio," 2018. [Online].

Available: https://github.com/sebbrudzinski/Open-
LaTeX-Studio/. [Accessed 2023].
[2] T. Parr, The Definitive ANTLR 4 Reference, The
Pragmatic Programmers, 2013, pp. 1-326.
[3] Z. Yun-tao, G. Ling and W. Yong-cheng, "An Improved
Figure 4 Accuracy in Java statemsent classification
TF-IDF Approach for Text Classification," Journal of
Zhejiang University-Science, vol. 6, pp. 49-55, 2005.
[4] B. Agarwal and N. Mittal, "Text Classification Using
Machine Learning Methods-A Survey," Proceedings of
the Second International Conference on Soft Computing
for Problem Solving, vol. 236, pp. 701-709, 2012.