RPHS01G

GOVERNMENT PEACE TREATIES

WITH
MUSLIM FILIPINOS
GROUP 3 - IT301
Introduction
For decades, the southern Philippines has been plagued by conflict between the
government and various Muslim groups. This complex issue has deep historical roots,
fueled by political, economic, and religious factors.

In an attempt to resolve the conflict and achieve lasting peace, the government has
entered into several peace treaties with Muslim Filipinos. This presentation will explore
these treaties, their key provisions, and their successes and limitations.
Table of Contents

Provisions of the
Background Conclusion
CAB

Successes and
Key Peace Treaties Key takeaways
Limitations
Background
The conflict in the southern Philippines
stems from centuries of Spanish
colonialism, followed by American rule and
the subsequent marginalization of the
Muslim population. This has led to calls for
self-determination and the formation of
various separatist movements.

Since the 1960s, the government has

engaged in several peace negotiations with
these groups, resulting in several peace
treaties.
Key Peace Treaties
The Tripoli Agreement (1976): This agreement granted limited autonomy to the
Muslim provinces of Basilan, Sulu, Tawi-Tawi, and Palawan. However, it was
criticized for its ambiguity and lack of implementation.

The Final Peace Agreement (1996): This agreement established the Autonomous
Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) with greater autonomy than the Tripoli
Agreement. However, it was also plagued by slow implementation and allegations
of corruption.
Key Peace Treaties
The Comprehensive Agreement on the Bangsamoro (CAB) (2014): This agreement
aimed to address the shortcomings of the previous agreements by providing
greater autonomy and self-determination to the Bangsamoro region. It established
the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (BARMM) with a more
robust government structure and wider powers.
Provisions of the CAB
Political Autonomy: The BARMM has its own parliament, chief minister, and
cabinet, responsible for governing the region.

Fiscal Autonomy: The BARMM receives a block grant from the national government
and has the authority to collect its own taxes.

Justice System: The BARMM has its own justice system, including a Sharia court
system.

Normalization: The agreement includes provisions for the decommissioning of

Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) fighters and the return of internally displaced
persons.
Successes and Limitations
Reduced Violence: The CAB has significantly reduced violence in the region.

Increased Political Participation: Muslims now have greater political participation

in the BARMM.

Economic Development: The BARMM is experiencing economic growth.

Limited Implementation: Some provisions of the CAB, such as the normalization

process, have been slow to implement.
Successes and Limitations
Internal Conflicts: There are ongoing conflicts between the MILF and other armed
groups in the region.

Challenges to Governance: The BARMM faces challenges of good governance and

corruption.
Conclusion
The government peace treaties with Muslim Filipinos represent a significant step
towards lasting peace in the southern Philippines. However, the path to peace remains
complex and requires continued commitment from all stakeholders.

Addressing the limitations of the CAB, resolving internal conflicts, and promoting good
governance are crucial for achieving lasting peace and development in the region.
Key takeaways
The role of civil society and international community in supporting the peace
process.

The need for addressing historical injustices and promoting interfaith dialogue.

The importance of education and economic development for building a sustainable

peace.

The challenges of extremism and radicalization in the region.

The End