‭To, Date:07/12/2023‬

‭The Registrar of Trademark,‬

‭Trademark Registry, MUMBAI‬

‭Sub: REPLY TO EXAMINATION REPORT (MIS-R) Dated on:‬‭08/11/2023 16:51:06‬

‭Ref.: Examination Report of Trademark‬

‭“‬ ‭”‬‭Application No‬‭. 5968100‬

‭Respected Sir/Madam,‬

‭We are in receipt of your examination report dated‬‭8‭t‬h‬ ‭November‬‭with‬

‭Reference‬ ‭to‬ ‭above‬ ‭mentioned‬ ‭Trademark‬ ‭Application.‬ ‭However,‬‭the‬‭Applicant‬‭through‬‭his‬

‭registered agent wants to reply to you under:‬

‭1)‬‭We‬ ‭submit‬ ‭that‬ ‭the‬ ‭applicant‬ ‭M/s:‬ ‭ANKIT‬ ‭YOGESH‬ ‭MISHRA‬ ‭has‬ ‭no‬ ‭mala‬ ‭fide‬
‭intention,‬ ‭and‬ ‭the‬ ‭applicant‬ ‭adopted‬ ‭the‬ ‭aforesaid‬ ‭trademark‬ ‭after‬ ‭conducting‬ ‭the‬ ‭complete‬
‭search in the market as per‬‭Class 25‬‭filed an application‬‭on 06/06/2023.‬

‭2)‬‭Objection‬‭raised‬‭on‬‭our‬‭filed‬‭mark‬‭which‬‭is‬‭“‬ ‭”‬‭is‬‭under‬‭section‬‭11‬‭(1)‬
‭of‬ ‭the‬‭Trademarks‬‭Act,‬‭1999‬‭stating‬‭the‬‭mark‬‭is‬‭identical‬‭with‬‭or‬‭similar‬‭to‬‭earlier‬‭marks‬‭in‬
‭respect‬‭of‬‭identical‬‭or‬‭similar‬‭description‬‭of‬‭goods‬‭or‬‭services‬‭and‬‭because‬‭of‬‭such‬‭identity‬‭or‬
‭similarity, there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public.‬
‭3) Our proposed mark‬‭ANKIT MISHRA‬‭is a Device mark‬‭and is proposed to be registered‬
‭under‬‭class 25‬‭and includes‬

‭Name of trademark‬ ‭ANKIT MISHRA‬

‭Application number‬ ‭5968100‬

‭Type of trademark‬ ‭Device‬

‭Logo‬

‭Description of goods‬ ‭CLOTHING,ETHNIC WEAR.‬

‭4) The conflicting marks according to the examination report has details as: -‬

‭Name of‬ ‭ NKIT‬

A ‭ N EXCLUSIVE‬
A ‭ HE WORD "A"‬
T
‭trademark‬ ‭FASHION‬ ‭ARTISTIC WORK‬ ‭IS WRITTEN‬
‭with‬ ‭IN PARTICULAR‬ ‭AROUND THE‬
‭device‬ ‭STYLE AND‬ ‭DESIGN AND‬
‭MANNER‬ ‭THE WORDMARK‬
‭CONTAINING‬ ‭WRITTEN IN‬
‭WORD ANKIT‬ ‭GOLDEN COLOR‬
‭INTERNATIONAL‬ ‭UNDERLETTER‬
‭WITH DEVICE‬ ‭"A" AND AF‬
‭MEANS ANKIT FAS‬
‭Application‬ ‭4082975‬ ‭4725660‬ ‭5132704‬
‭number‬

‭Type of‬ ‭Device‬ ‭Device‬ ‭Device‬

‭trademark‬
‭Logo‬

‭Description‬ ‭ lothing, footwear,‬

C ‭ EADYMADE‬
R ‭ lothing, footwear,‬
C
‭of goods‬ ‭headgear‬ ‭GARMENTS,‬ ‭headgear‬
‭FOOTWEAR,‬
‭WHICH ARE‬
‭INCLUDED IN‬
‭CLASS 25.‬
‭Status‬ ‭Registered‬ ‭Registered‬ ‭Objected‬

‭5)‬‭It‬‭is‬‭evident‬‭on‬‭the‬‭face‬‭of‬‭it‬‭that‬‭no‬‭two‬‭people‬‭can‬‭get‬‭confused‬‭between‬‭the‬‭conflicting‬
‭marks‬‭as‬‭they‬‭are‬‭not‬‭only‬‭written‬‭differently‬‭but‬‭have‬‭different‬‭colour‬‭combinations,‬‭use‬
‭of design, pattern, etc., are distinct by themselves.‬

‭6)‬ ‭The‬ ‭names‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭trademarks‬ ‭themselves‬ ‭differentiate‬ ‭each‬‭other‬‭as‬ ‭our‬‭proposed‬‭mark‬‭is‬
‭“ANKIT‬‭MISHRA”‬‭WHEREAS‬‭on‬‭the‬‭other‬‭hand‬‭all‬‭of‬‭the‬‭conflicting‬‭marks‬‭that‬‭are‬‭1.‬
‭ANKIT‬ ‭FASHION,‬ ‭2.‬ ‭ANKIT‬ ‭INTERNATIONAL‬ ‭and‬ ‭3.‬ ‭ANKIT‬ ‭FASHIONS‬ ‭have‬
‭completely‬‭different‬‭names‬‭(as‬‭mentioned‬‭in‬‭above).‬‭So,‬‭there‬‭is‬‭no‬‭Chance‬‭of‬‭any‬‭Confusion‬
‭between the public.‬

‭7)‬ ‭Furthermore‬‭,‬ ‭all‬ ‭the‬‭conflicting‬‭marks‬‭have‬‭different‬‭patterns‬‭used‬‭and‬‭do‬‭not‬‭resemble‬

‭each other in any manner as the marks clearly distinguish themselves.‬

‭8) The our differs from conflicting mark in many ways,‬

‭ ame of the‬
N ‭ NKIT MISHRA‬
A ‭ NKIT‬
A ‭ NKIT‬
A ‭ NKIT‬
A
‭Trademark‬ ‭(OUR MARK)‬ ‭FASHION‬ ‭INTERNATIONAL‬ ‭FASHIONS‬

‭ pplication‬
A ‭5968100‬ ‭4082975‬ ‭4725660‬ ‭5132704‬
‭Number‬
 ‭DEVICE‬

‭ OGO‬
L ‭The‬ ‭device‬ ‭mark‬ T ‭ he device has a‬ ‭ he device mark‬
T ‭ nkit Fashions‬
A
‭DIFFER‬ ‭combination of‬ ‭has A and i written‬ ‭written written‬
‭is‬ ‭of‬ ‭peach‬ ‭colour‬
‭different colours‬ ‭in yellow shade‬ ‭on black‬
‭with‬ ‭Ankit‬ ‭mishra‬ ‭in Ankit and‬ ‭with Ankit‬ ‭background‬
‭Fashion Written‬ ‭international‬ ‭with artistic‬
‭written‬ ‭in‬ ‭brown‬
‭in black colour‬ ‭written in below.‬ ‭work in‬
‭shade.‬ ‭with a girl and‬ ‭golden shade‬
‭hat.‬

‭Our‬‭Mark‬‭Ankit‬‭fashion‬ ‭Differs‬‭from‬‭every‬‭other‬‭conflicting‬‭mark,‬‭as‬‭the‬‭device‬‭is‬
‭not‬‭same‬‭with‬‭any‬‭there‬‭mark‬‭even‬‭if‬‭we‬‭are‬‭talking‬‭about‬‭the‬‭colour‬‭combination‬‭or‬‭combination‬
‭of words.‬

‭9)‬ ‭We‬ ‭further‬ ‭submit‬ ‭that‬ ‭while‬‭assessing‬‭the‬‭similarity‬‭or‬‭dissimilarity‬‭of‬‭the‬‭present‬‭mark‬

‭with‬‭an‬‭earlier‬‭mark,‬‭the‬‭“‬‭WHOLE‬‭”‬‭mark‬‭should‬‭be‬‭considered.‬‭A‬‭mark‬‭should‬‭be‬‭assessed‬
‭based on its structural and phonetic features.‬

‭10)‬‭Hence,‬‭our‬‭client‬‭humbly‬‭states‬‭the‬‭Mark‬‭to‬‭be‬‭accepted‬‭by‬‭the‬‭Trademark‬‭Registry‬‭and‬
‭to be published in the Trademark Journal.‬

‭11)‬‭We‬‭humbly‬‭pray‬‭to‬‭the‬‭Learned‬‭Registrar‬‭for‬‭kindly‬‭allowing‬‭us‬‭the‬‭opportunity‬‭of‬‭being‬
‭heard before pronouncing any adverse order for the above said application.‬

‭Adv. Meena Bhattad‬