You are on page 1of 2

Session 4: Leading and managing the global firms

- Global platforms are complying with pressure from EU regulators

How can multinational enterprises (MNEs) strategically manage growth around the world so that they can
be successful both locally and internationally?

How can they learn country tastes, global trends, and market transitions?

Strategy and structure reinforce each other

Home replication strategy international division


International division:
 Typically set up when firms initially expand abroad often when engaging in a home replication
strategy
Problems
 Foreign subsidiary managers in the international division are not given sufficient voice relative to the
heads of domestic divisions
 The “silo” effect: international divisions activities are not coordinated with the rest of the firm, which
focuses on domestic activities
 Firms often phase out this structure after their initial overseas expansion

Localization strategy: Geographic area structure


Geographic area structure:
 Organizes the MNE according to different geographic areas (countries and regions)
 Is the most appropriate for a localization strategy
 Its ability to facilitate local responsiveness is both a strength and a weakness
Problems:
 While being locally responsive can be a virtue, it may also encourage the fragmentation of the MNE
into highly autonomous, hard to control “fiefdoms”
Global standardization strategy: Product division
Global product division structure
 Supports a global strategy in treating each product division as a stand-alone entity with full
worldwide – as opposed to domestic – responsibilities for its activities
 Facilitates attention to pressures for cost efficiencies in allowing for consolidation on a worldwide
(or regional) basis and reduction of inefficient duplication in multiple countries
Problems:
 It is the opposite of the geographic are structure: little local responsiveness

Transnational strategy: Global matrix


Global matrix:
 Is often used to alleviate the disadvantages associated with both geographic area and global product
division structures
 Is intended to support the goals of the transnational strategy – in practice, it is often difficult to
deliver
Problems
 May add layers of management, slow down decision speed, and increase costs while not showing
significant performance improvement

Key takeaways
 At the heart of effective transnational strategy is the ability to manage the tension between the need
for global efficiency and national/ local responsiveness
 The need for both strategic global business managers able to see links across markets and develop
competitive advantage through their integration, and capable entrepreneurial country managers: open
and constructive dialogue between them is a must

You might also like