Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
D
uplicated external ear canal is a rare congenital condi-
tion. It is a form of presentation of firs branchial cleft
1
type 2 anomaly. All of this abnormalities may have an
external opening which is located from ear lobule down to the
1,2
hyoid bone in the neck. Type 2 anomaly of the first branchial
4,5
cleft has been reported more frequently. Some of these
cases may have an opening to the external ear canal, in this
Departments of ENT and 1Pathology,
case the patient will complain from ear discharge. The tract of
Ghaem Hospital, this fistula in type 2 of first branchial cleft anomaly will have
Mashad University of Medical Sciences, skin adnexes and cartilaginous structure which differentiate it
Mashad, Iran. 1
from type 1 first branchial cleft anomaly.
Correspondence:
Our cases were from type 2 anomaly. Pathologic findings
Nematollah. Mokhtari MD, confirmed complete structures of external ear canal with com-
Department of ENT, plete circumferential ring having normal skin and adnexes with
Ghaem Hospital, cartilaginous component. Therefore, according to the classifi-
Mashad University of Medical Sciences,
Mashad, Iran.
cation of Vokurka the name of duplicated external ear canal
Tel: +98 915 3164074 was applied to these patients because they had their own
6
Fax: +98 511 8413492 normal external ear canal. Patients’ facial nerves had a dis-
E-mail: n-mokhtari@mums.ac.ir tinct course in most of the cases.
This study presents two main surgical impacted desquamated material and debris
points (loop formation of facial nerve and (Fig 1). The duct (duplicated external ear ca-
opening into the normal ear canal) with com- nal) had a complete ring of cartilaginous skele-
plete pathological structures of the fistula tract. ton all through its course to the internal end.
However, as Work has pointed out they may The post-operative course was uneventful ex-
1
have an abnormal route, and it makes the cept for minimal weakness in one patient
results of this study unique in that two patients which subsided gradually. None of these pa-
with abnormal loop formation around the fis- tients developed recurrence or discharges up
tula tract. Therefore, those surgeons who deal to follow-up of three years.
with these abnormalities should be careful in
not hurting facial nerve.
These cases are unique in that they were gland diseases; in: Otolaryngology Head
rd
presented with well formed duplicated external and Neck surgery by Cummings. 3 ed.
ear canal without other types of malformations Mosby Co; 1998.
8-10
as reported by others. The remarkable sur- 3 Carmody CS. Chapter 87. Developmental
gical findings in these cases included the ab- anomalies of the neck in: Pediatric otolar-
nd
normal course of the facial nerve exploration yngology. 2 Edition. W. B. Saunders Co;
using surgical microscope and nerve locator. 1990.
The histopathological survey placed our cases 4 Stokroos RJ, Manni JJ. The double audi-
into type 2 category of the anomalous of the tory meatus-a rare first branchial cleft
first branchial cleft. anomaly; clinical presentation and treat-
ment. Am J Otol 2000; 21: 837-41.
Conclusion 5 Rockey JG, John DG, Herbetko J. An un-
described first branchial cleft anomaly.
We have to insist on the knowledge and skill of J Laryngol Otol 2003; 117: 508-10.
the medical surgeons in early detection, refer- 6 Vokurka J. Congenital duplication of ex-
ral and thorough clinical, surgical and histopa- ternal auditory canal. Cesk Otolaryngol
thological surveillance to manage this abnor- 1989; 38: 314-7.
mality more efficiently. 7 Jackson JM, Sadove AM, Weaver DD, et al.
Unilateral duplication of the cerebellar
Acknowledgment hemisphere and internal, middle, and ex-
ternal ear: a clinical case study. Plast Re-
The authors would like thank the personnel of constr Surg 1990; 86: 550-3.
audiovisual service of Ghaem Hospital of 8 Al-Fallouji MA, Butler MF. First branchial
Mashad University of Medical Sciences, for their cleft anomaly. Postgrad Med J 1983; 59:
sincere hard work in preparing and converting 447-9.
slides and digital pictures into printed materials. 9 Wiltekindt C, Schondorf J, Stennert E.
Jungehulsing M. Duplication of the external
References auditory canal: a report of three cases. Int J
Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2001; 58: 179-84.
1 Work WP. Cysts and congenital lesions of 10 Belvins NH, Byahatti SV, Karmody CS.
parotid gland. Otolaryngol clin North External auditory canal duplication anoma-
America 1977; 10: 339-43. lies associated with congenital aural
2 Walner DD, Myer CM. Chapter 9; Salivary atresia. J laryngol Otol 2003; 117: 32-8.