Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Catarman was established in 1631 and was the center of civilization of the Province
of Camiguin until May 1, 1871 when the Mt. Vulcan Daan eruption destroyed it. It was
re-established into a Municipality through a Spanish Decree in 1912. Today, Catarman is
the second largest town of the Province of Camiguin, classified as a fifth-class
municipality.
The audit was conducted in order to: (a) obtain reasonable assurance that the
financial statements are free from any material misstatement whether due to fraud or error;
(b) assess the overall effectiveness of the agency’s compliance with established standards,
protocols and relevant laws and regulations, and (c) recommend measures for improvement
of operations.
For CY 2022, the Municipality of Catarman was a recipient of various awards and
recognitions as follows: 2nd Overall Most Competitive (5th to 6th class category) in the
Cities and Municipalities Competitiveness Index (CMCI) sponsored by the Department of
Trade and Industry (DTI), Secretary’s Bayanihan Service Award II National Winner (5th
to 6th class category) sponsored by the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE),
National Anti-Drug Abuse Council (ADAC) Performance Award and Seal of Good Local
Governance (SGLG) both sponsored by the Department of the Interior and Local
Government (DILG).
A financial, compliance and performance audit was conducted on the accounts and
operations of the Municipality for the Calendar Year 2022. The audit was conducted to
ascertain the propriety of financial transactions, fairness of the presentation of the financial
statements and compliance to prescribed rules and regulations.
Per Unnumbered Memorandum dated September 14, 2022 from Local Government
Sector Assistant Commissioner Roland A. Rey, the 2022 audit foci and thrusts, in addition
to the risk areas that may be identified as a result of the risk assessment conducted, include:
I. FINANCIAL AUDIT
i
accounted for, all issuances thereof are reported, and the corresponding
proceeds remitted.
• Verification of the existence and validity of the cash in bank accounts.
• Emphasis on the cash analysis, to ascertain that the funds used were not
from the Trust Fund or the Special Education Fund and Program,
Projects and Activities are covered with actual funds/cash.
ii
2. Fund transfers from National Government Agencies (NGAs),
Government-Owned-and/or-Controlled Corporations (GOCCs)
and other Financial/Lending Institutions (e.g. World Bank, Asian
Development Bank, International Monetary Fund, etc.)
• Ascertain that the funds received from NGAs are properly recorded in
the LGU’s books of accounts.
• Verify the LGU’s compliance with the Memorandum of Agreement
(MOA) or other pertinent documents for the timely and proper
utilization of the Trust Fund according to its intended purpose.
• Verify the LGU’s return of excess or unutilized fund to its source
agencies after the fulfillment of the fund’s purpose.
• Evaluation of the LGU’s extent of implementation of programs and
projects, and compliance with the budget and the procurement
regulations, terms and conditions for the programs/projects.
3. Audit of Revenues
Financial Highlights
A comparative presentation of the financial position of the Municipality as of
December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 are shown below:
iii
2022 2021
Assets ₱ 344,265,884 ₱ 278,680,814
Liabilities 63,749,404 34,566,428
Equity 280,516,480 244,114,386
On the other hand, the comparative presentation of the financial performance of the
Municipality for the years ended December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 is shown
below:
2022 2021
Revenue ₱ 124,282,989 ₱ 93,814,268
Expenses 94,211,666 74,777,728
Surplus 25,969,704 16,387,754
1. Receivable accounts totaling ₱3,133,604.08 as of December 31, 2022 has been long
outstanding and considered dormant under COA Circular 2016-005 and thus
affecting the reliability and fair presentation of the financial statements contrary to
International Public Sector Accounting Standards No. 1, Paragraphs 27 and 70.
2. The reliability and existence of Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE) account, with
a carrying amount of P200,558,964.01, could not be ascertained due to the
following: (1) unreconciled discrepancy of Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE)
accounts amounting to P375,383.86 between accounting and property records (b)
incomplete details of Report on Physical Count of Property, Plant and Equipment
(RPCPPE); (c) non-provision of depreciation expense to some Information and
iv
Communication Technology (ICT) Equipment. Hence, not in consonance with
paragraph 27 of International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) 1 and
Paragraph 59 of International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) 17.
3. Deficiencies in the accounting for leave credits of officials and employees run
contrary to IPSAS 39 and COA Circular No. 2015-009 understating the Leave
Benefits Payable by P15,769,665.59 and understating the Terminal Leave Benefits
by P2,174,641.03 and Other Personnel Benefits by P31,820.67, respectively,
thereby affecting the fair presentation of the Financial Statements.
4. The 10% Retention was erroneously recorded in the books of accounts as Other
Payables instead of Guaranty/Security Deposits payable account, not in accordance
with COA Circular No. 2015-009, resulted to the understatement of
Guaranty/Security Deposits payable of ₱1,695,238.85, and an overstatement of
Other payables account by the same amount.
v
Development Fund to include only Programs/Projects/Activities which are feasible
and could be accomplished within the target date of completion; (b) Implement the
development projects programmed during the year as embodied in the Annual
Investment/Development plan and ensure optimum utilization of the 20%
Development Fund for the benefit of the constituents of the Municipality; (c)
Implement immediately all the projects under the continuing appropriation; and (d)
Ensure that all savings from completed projects and all projects which are no longer
feasible and not yet implemented are considered for immediate realignment, subject
to budgetary rules or reverted back to the unappropriated surplus of the 20%
Development Fund for re-appropriation to other development projects.
vi