Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Practice
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/renewable-energy-finance-theory-and-practice/
Renewable Energy Finance
This page intentionally left blank
Renewable Energy
Finance
Theory and Practice
Santosh Raikar
Seabron Adamson
Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier
125 London Wall, London EC2Y 5AS, United Kingdom
525 B Street, Suite 1650, San Diego, CA 92101, United States
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and
retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek
permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangements
with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency,
can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the
Publisher (other than as may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience
broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical
treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in
evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In
using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of
others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors,
assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products
liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products,
instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
ISBN: 978-0-12-816441-9
Foreword xi
Preface xiii
Acknowledgements xv
Index 275
The URL for the companion site when it goes live should be https://www.elsevier.com/
books-and-journals/book-companion/9780128164419.
This page intentionally left blank
Foreword
For those of us in the renewable energy field, these are heady times. Energy policy,
green energy, climate change e these are no longer specialist topics, but are being
discussed every day in the news, in politics, and around the dinner table. There is a
sense of change in the air, and, as in all moments of profound change, one of the
key questions is “How are we going to pay for all of this?”
No one knows for sure, but a transition to a global, low-carbon, renewable energy
sector will likely require trillions of dollars in capital investment. Most of that money
must be raised in private capital markets. So, the solution to the great environmental
challenge of the 21st century will almost certainly involve ensuring that the capital
markets can be harnessed to fund renewable energy investments on a colossal scale.
One of the key mechanisms for funding new large-scale renewable energy projects
is project finance, which is non-recourse to the sponsor, and hence dependent on the
future cash flows available to the project from its operations. In this book, Santosh
Raikar and Seabron Adamson, noted project finance practitioners, describe the
concepts of project finance and how it can be applied to investments such as wind
farms and solar facilities. They also describe the detailed financing structures used
by sponsors and lenders to manage the risks and uncertainty inherent in these projects.
In doing so, they make accessible decades of practical experience, which is not often
seen described clearly in print. Raikar and Adamson also introduce some relevant areas
of public policy, engineering, energy economics, law, and other topics, and how these
interact to make large-scale renewable energy investments viable.
I believe this book can be a primer for a broad range of people focused on the
renewable energy sector: finance students, project developers, policymakers, aca-
demics, and bankers. Given the scale and urgency of the energy financing challenges
ahead, the clear description of how and why renewable project finance works that is
available in this volume will be useful in a range of contexts e not just closing the
next deal.
Raymond S. Wood, MBA
Senior Investment Banker e Energy and Power
MIT Sloan School of Management, Class of 1990
This page intentionally left blank
Preface
If climate change is one of the greatest challenges of the 21st century, then one of the
biggest questions in contemporary finance should be how to pay for the measures
needed to control it. Since switching to renewable energy resources is at or near the
top of most policymakers’ list of measures for reducing carbon emissions, as a prac-
tical matter the financing problems arising in new renewables projects should have
substantial commercial and public policy interest.
While there is a large body of literature on renewable energy economics, I know of
no other text that explains how a large-scale renewable energy project e such a wind
farm or solar photovoltaic facility e actually gets financed in detail. This book seeks to
address this gap, providing the analytical frameworks and cash flow modeling tools
used by project sponsors and lenders in real-life projects. For example, the chapter
on tax equity is the first of its kind, providing a complete breakdown of the different
complex tax equity financing structures widely used in renewable energy projects. In
writing it, we have drawn upon several decades of joint experience as renewable proj-
ect finance practitioners. The book has benefitted in particular from my co-author San-
tosh Raikar’s long career in investment banking, which has focused on the
development and application of project finance techniques to renewable energy.
One of the first things I learned in project finance is that it requires an understanding
of far more than financial theory and spreadsheet modeling. Never having studied law,
I found one of my first assigned tasks in joining the professional workforce to review
and then model complicated power off-take agreements. Anyone who has worked on
renewable energy in the real world knows that no project developer or banker can
succeed without some knowledge of the legal, economic, engineering, public policy,
and tax issues associated with these projects. There is no other way to understand the
full risks to the project and how these are allocated in the contractual and financing
structure.
For this reason, our approach to the subject of renewable energy project finance is
interdisciplinary. We examine the different power market structures and transmission
interconnection concepts that affect how and where projects get built. We also offer
perspective on the valuation of projects during the development and operation phases.
We discuss debt sizing, the public policy environment for renewables, and the com-
plex web of contracts that support a project. For this reason, students of energy policy
and law may also find this book useful in understanding the elements needed to make
renewable projects financeable.
xiv Preface
We also emphasize how to think about projects as a set of risks. Some risks are
amenable to quantitative analysis, such as the distribution of revenues over a year
given expected wind speeds. Others must be considered more holistically. Project risks
can be managed and allocated, but someone always bears the risk. Experience soon
teaches that it is better to have thought through these risks before the event.
Project finance does depend on models of future project cash flows. Our approach
in writing this book has been to provide examples based on real-world experience, and
to also provide the reader (through access to the book website) with the actual financial
models used. These provide not only a way for students to understand how changes in
inputs and structure affect cash flows and risks, but also could be used by professionals
as a starting point for developing their own custom models for their own projects.
Many energy analysts believe that any deep decarbonization of the global energy
sector will require trillions of dollars of investment, much of it directed at new renew-
able energy generation projects. Governments can set the agenda and shape the policy
environment, but much of this capital must be raised from private capital markets.
Project finance is a widely used financing structure in many countries that will be
critical to make renewable energy projects financially viable if carbon policy goals
are to be met. It is our hope that this book makes some small contribution towards
advancing the shift to clean energy, by providing insight into the financial structures
used to make large-scale renewable energy a reality.
Seabron Adamson
Boston, Massachusetts
September 2019
Acknowledgements
A lot of people directly or indirectly contributed to this work. We offer our thanks to
them and many others for their contributions and support.
Some of the original material on project finance was developed for a series of
informal lectures at MIT. We would like to thank John Parsons for his input (and
for suggesting the cost of capital for pharmaceutical R&D as an analytical framework
for the valuation of renewable energy projects under development), as well as Frank
O’Sullivan, Antje Danielson, and Rowan Elowe of the MIT Energy Initiative. Akshar
Wunnava, Yichen Du, and Mustafa Ali (presidents of the MIT Energy Club) and Jason
Jay and Bethany Patten (of the Sloan Sustainability Initiative) helped organize some of
the original talks. MIT Sloan students Lisa Khanna and Lydia Li provided valuable
research assistance.
Much of the material was developed for our class on renewable energy investments
at the Carroll School of Management at Boston College (BC). We would like to thank
the BC Department of Finance for their encouragement in the class who provided the
motivation to write a book for which no real text was available. We would also like to
thank Ronnie Sadka and Elliott Smith of the Department of Finance at Boston College
for their encouragement and support.
We offer our thanks to Todd Glass and Scott Zimmerman from Wilson Sonsini
Goodrich and Rosati (“Wilson Sonsini”) for spreading our academic stint to the
West coast. They hosted Santosh twice at the Law School at University of California,
Berkley, where they teach a law course on Renewable Energy Project Development
and Finance. Their guidance was instrumental in developing the course outline and
reading materials for our course at BC.
The finance practice is incomplete without the legal analysis and documentation.
Santosh is fortunate to have had outstanding support from Sean Moran and Michael
Joyce from Wilson Sonsini since 2013. These two provided the legal term sheets
included in the appendix. Sean has been at the forefront of developing the tax equity
structure for renewable energy projects since the early 2000s. Most of the tax analysis
and structuring discussed in the book Santosh learned by working through various
transactions. Lauren Collins provided outstanding expertise to review Chapter 6 from
a tax law perspective and provided helpful case law research.
Norton Rose Fulbright has always been proactive in disseminating the latest devel-
opments in the renewable energy industry. The Project Finance Newswire published
by the firm is a valuable first stop for detailed analyses of legal developments influ-
encing the industry. Keith Martin deserves a special mention for advancing the
xvi Acknowledgements
industry in the right direction through advocacy and education. His colleagues e
Michael Masri (currently at Orrick), David Burton, Roger Eberhardt, and John Mar-
ciano (currently at Akin Gump) e supplied materials that were very helpful in
designing the course and this book.
Tax equity modeling is highly complex. We were fortunate that Rubiao Song from
JP Morgan readily shared a simplified spreadsheet model to be used in our class. While
Santosh developed most of the book’s spreadsheet examples, Rubiao’s spreadsheet
example provided a reliable resource to ensure the calculations were consistent with
the industry practice. Dennis Moritz from Advantage for Analysts provided an addi-
tional layer of scrutiny of Chapter 6.
Our current and former employers who supported this project are also due some
heartfelt thanks. This includes Jacob Rosenfeld and State Street for Santosh and his
current group at Silverpeak. He would especially like to thank Colleen Floberg,
Antonio Giustino, Erica Nangeroni, Harshal Mohile, Michael Alexander, and Winston
Chen who contributed in multiple ways. Erica was very helpful with her research
assistance on energy storage. We would both like to thank Alex Margolick for his sub-
stantial editing and organizational efforts. Santosh would like to thank his family for
outstanding support during his time away from home.
Seabron would like to thank his colleagues at Charles River Associates, especially
Chris Russo, Derya Eyilmaz, and Billy Muttiah. Please note that this book reflects the
personal views of the authors and does not reflect the views of CRA, its employees, or
its clients. He would also like to thank Karsten Neuhoff and Nils May of DIW Berlin
for their helpful suggestions on the German experience, and Mark Russell for his help
on graphics. The discussion of energy markets and transmission risks has benefitted
from conversations over the years with many people in industry and academia, but
especially with Richard Tabors, who helped develop the theory of spot pricing and
who started Seabron’s work on energy and climate issues while still a graduate student
at MIT. As always, he thanks his wife Ali for her support.
We thank the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, DSIRE, PJM, and Bridge
to India Energy Private Limited for granting permission to use their graphics in the
book.
Finally, we would like to thank Elsevier and its team, including Tommy Doyle,
Michael Lutz, J. Scott Bentley, Indhumathi Mani, Selvaraj Raviraj, and Joseph
Hayton. They have provided valuable guidance and support through the publication
process.
Financing the new energy
economy 1
For most of history, almost all energy used by humans was renewable. The iconic
windmills of the Netherlands date as far back as 1200 AD, and water and wind driven
mills were used before that era to grind grain. As late as 1800, almost all of the energy
consumed in Paris e then one of the largest and richest cities in the world e came from
firewood and charcoal, although by the end of the 18th century firewood had to be
transported over 100 miles on average to the French capital to meet the demands of
a growing urban population.1 Only around 1830 would coal, the first fossil fuel to
play a major role in the global energy economy, start to replace wood as the dominant
energy source for Paris, London, and the other great European cities.
1
Kim, E., & Barles, S. (2012). The energy consumption of Paris and its supply areas from the eighteenth
century to the present. Regional Environmental Change, 12(2), 295e310. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-
011-0275-0.
Carter’s initial energy policy speech was criticized as being short on specific policy
details. One of the concrete policies to emerge was the Public Utilities Regulatory Pol-
icy Act of 1978 (PURPA). In the first major stimulus for renewable energy in the mod-
ern era, PURPA, among its other provisions, required electric utilities to purchase
energy from certain “qualifying facilities”, which included renewables. The PURPA
era brought forth the first major wave of new renewable energy projects in the United
States.
Other countries also responded to the energy crisis. Energy research and develop-
ment expenditures rose in the European Union in the late 1970s and early 1980s but
various major European countries responded differently to the energy shocks. France
concentrated on its nuclear industry. Germany, which had a large coal industry, was
less dependent on imported oil for its total energy consumption, but also became after
the 1986 Chernobyl accident more skeptical of nuclear power. Green ideas had taken
hold in Germany even in the 1970s, and these provided an initial basis of public sup-
port for renewable energy research and development. Denmark, with few energy re-
sources of its own, was highly dependent on imported oil. In 1976 two reports from
the Danish Academy of Technical Sciences played a major role in shaping Danish
renewable energy policy and the country’s support of wind energy, including tax
credits and investment subsidies.2
2
Aklin, M., & Urpelainen, J. (2018). Renewables: the politics of a global energy transition. Cambridge,
MA: The MIT Press.
3
Data from REN21, Global status report 2019, 2019. Available from www.ren21.net.
Financing the new energy economy 3
80% of total final global energy consumption in 2017. Another 7.5% came from tradi-
tional biomass sources (firewood, charcoal, etc.), which remain important energy
sources for many people in some developing countries. The “modern” renewable en-
ergy sector accounted for only 10.6% of total final energy, and of this fraction only 2%
of total final energy came from renewable power generation such as wind farms, solar
photovoltaic (PV) and other sources.
A relatively low share for these renewable energy sources also holds true in the
United States. While wind and solar power have made significant gains in the United
States, it has grown from a low base. Fig. 1.2 illustrates the sources and uses of energy
in the United States in 2018, based on analysis done by the Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory.4 The left-hand side shows sources of energy, and total produc-
tion in “quads” in the year.5 On the right-hand side are consuming sectors (residential,
commercial, industrial, and transportation). The electricity sector is an intermediate
sector - other primary energy sources are used to generate electricity - but final
consumption of electricity is in the four final sectors. Similar “Sankey” diagrams are
available for other countries e we focus here on the US only as one example.6
A brief review of this annual energy flow diagram illustrates some important as-
pects of US energy consumption. First and foremost, only just over a third of energy
used actually provides useful energy services to customers and businesses e most of
the energy produced is lost as “rejected energy” or waste heat. For example, consider
the transportation sector, shown in the lower right-hand box. The transportation sector
used 28.3 quads of energy inputs in 2016, but only achieved 5.95 quads of useful ser-
vices (moving cars and trucks down the road or planes through the sky, for example).
The rest was dissipated in heat, and reflects the relatively low thermal efficiency of
combustion engines, aircraft turbines, and other transport power sources.
Second, it is easy to see that the transportation sector is one of the largest end-use
segments, and is almost entirely based on petroleum at present, with small amounts of
biofuels (chiefly from ethanol and biodiesel), natural gas, and (minimal) electricity
used.
Third, the largest total user of energy is the electric generation sector, which used
approximately 38% of total energy. Over half of the input energy for generating elec-
tricity came from coal and natural gas fossil fuels, with nuclear being the next largest
contributor. Despite their rapid recent growth, wind, geothermal, and solar energy
made up only about 3% of the total energy mix in the United States. Renewable hydro
4
Graphic used by permission of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Available from https://
flowcharts.llnl.gov/.
5
A “quad” represents one quadrillion British Thermal Units and is a unit used in large scale energy analyses.
To give some perspective, one quad of crude oil will fill about 80 supertankers. Note that total U.S.
consumption in the year was approximately 101.2 quads, so the figures in the boxes are close to a per-
centage value as well. The Appendix includes a full discussion of the energy units and conversions useful
in energy project finance.
6
The International Energy Agency has an online tool for generating these diagrams for various countries
and regions at https://www.iea.org/sankey/.
4
Renewable Energy Finance
Fig. 1.2 US energy flow chart.
Source: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Reproduced by permission of LLNL.
Financing the new energy economy 5
power from dams made up another 2.5%, but few expect that percentage to grow in the
future due to the lack of new sites on which to build large dams.
While in the 1970s many feared the exhaustion of fossil fuel resources, a primary
focus of renewable energy policy now is the reduction of carbon emissions and other
pollutants while maintaining similar standards of energy production.
Fig. 1.3 shows trends in carbon emissions from the US energy sector by primary
fuel (coal, petroleum and natural gas).7 Not all fossil fuels are the same in terms of car-
bon intensity. Of the major fuels, coal has the highest carbon content per unit of en-
ergy, while natural gas (which is primarily methane) has the lowest. Emissions
peaked in the mid-2000s, and declined with lower coal use. Recently, emissions
have started to creep up again, driven substantially by the transportation sector.
There are numerous energy and environmental policy studies examining future sce-
narios for transitioning to a low-carbon energy economy. While a full exploration of
this complex topic is outside the scope of this book, analysis of a few common threads
gives insight into the likely needs for new renewable energy projects:
• Most scenarios share the deep decarbonization of the power generation sector, switching
from coal and other fossil fuels to renewables such as wind and solar, often coupled with
storage. Most recent US analyses focus on expanding renewables over other technologies
such as new nuclear or carbon sequestration, based on current economics.
• As seen in Fig. 1.2, transportation is one of the largest end-use sectors. Many analysts predict
the large-scale conversion of much of the ground transportation fleet of cars and trucks to
7
Data from U.S. Energy Information Administration. Available from www.eia.gov.
6 Renewable Energy Finance
plug-in electric vehicles. This would lower direct carbon emissions, but would in turn raise
electricity demand, further increasing the need for new renewable power generation.
• Finally, the industrial sector, which currently uses large amounts of natural gas and oil, may
also need to be significantly electrified.
These lessons are not limited to the United States. A key finding across a wide range
of future global energy scenarios is that demand for low-carbon renewable energy,
such as wind and solar, will likely increase dramatically in coming years. This will
require tremendous capital investment.
8
Data from IRENA, 2019. Available from www.irena.org.
9
The “Other” category in Fig. 1.4 includes liquid biofuels, biomass and waste-to energy projects, small
hydro, geothermal and ocean energy, and other related investments.
Financing the new energy economy 7
Most scenarios aiming at keeping warming at 1.5 Celsius (the target set in the Paris
Agreement) would require very substantial cuts in emissions from the power sector.
The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) estimates that the share of re-
newables would need increase to 65% of global energy supply by 2050 e more than
triple the current level e to meet the Paris targets.10 As will be discussed in Chapter 13,
some analysts suggest that capital expenditure of over $2 trillion per year for several
decades would be required to meet even a more modest 2 Celsius target. A significant
fraction of that investment would be directly in renewable energy generation projects.
10
International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), Renewable energy: A key climate solution, 2017.
Available from www.irena.org.
11
IRENA, Global Landscape of Renewable Energy Finance, 2018. Available from www.irena.org.
8 Renewable Energy Finance
have been adapted to the needs of the green energy sector. Given the nature of the
subject, the text is necessarily interdisciplinary in nature.
The organization of the book is structured around the concept of flexibility. Chapter
2 describes the renewable support policies that have underpinned most renewable proj-
ect development around the world. As such, it provides some key background for the
material to follow. The subsequent three chapters (Chapters 3 to 5) make up a core unit
that describes the covers the economics of renewable energy projects, the basics of
renewable project finance, and how financing and contractual structures allocate
risk. While not every structure can be discussed, the emphasis is on providing the
reader with a core understanding of the basic concepts to help with the analysis of
any future financing.
Chapters 6 and 7 make up a second unit, focusing on more specialized project
finance structures. This includes the tax equity structures commonly used in the United
States and the structures commonly used in financing distributed generation assets,
such as rooftop solar.
Chapters 8 to 10 make up a third unit, focusing on how renewable energy projects
function in the context of electricity markets. These chapters discuss managing trans-
mission costs and risks for projects, and a few of the alternative off-take structures used
for managing merchant price risks in these markets.
Chapters 11 and 12 explore the valuation of renewable energy projects and devel-
opment companies, and the issues associated with financing energy storage assets, a
rapidly growing class of projects closely associated with renewable energy.
The extended final chapter describes the growth in global project finance for renew-
ables, and examines the lessons from four case study countries: Chile, Germany, India,
and China.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
DANCE ON STILTS AT THE GIRLS’ UNYAGO, NIUCHI
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.