Professional Documents
Culture Documents
vii
viii Contents
Index 343
Foreword
This book is a treasure in so many ways. All nurses should send a
resounding note of gratitude to Sister Mary Elizabeth.
She has collected in one volume an incredible amount of research on
centuries-old nursing heroes and matched that with compelling research
on contemporary nursing heroes. Her book manages to be both scholarly
and inspiring at the same time.
I was struck by a quote from a 1914 article in the American Journal of
Nursing by Dr. Charles Emerson, describing nursing as “a profession that
does not yet know how great are the responsibilities that are to rest on its
shoulders.” In so many ways, I think that is still so true today. Nurses, in
spite of more education and experience, still only partially glimpse the
magnitude of their role, as Florence Nightingale so beautifully said, to
“often hold God’s precious gift of life in their hands.” It may be that to
realize this too clearly would overwhelm us.
As challenging as nursing can be in today’s world, it is wonderful
to have the resources in this book to inspire and encourage us as we read
about the wonderful nurses who blazed the trail before us; however, it is
even more inspiring and encouraging to couple this with actual quotes
from today’s nursing heroes. Most of us who have been in health care can
think of other nurses in the various positions and specialties highlighted
who also see their care of patients in exactly the same way.
The love of people that motivated the emergence of nursing is still
so evident today. It is no wonder that in interview after interview nursing
is the most trusted voice. Only this love keeps nurses practicing with the
challenges that are so stressful today. We count on this love to continue to
inspire nurses and to keep our healthcare system, in the face of increased
technology, focused on the human being to be cared for.
This is a wonderful book to give to a nurse. It is also an excel-
lent book for executives and board members. Reading it will help them
appreciate the wonderful and saintly things being done each day and
night in their facilities. It will help them make boardroom decisions that
protect this great treasure for their communities.
We are indebted to the author for bringing together such an inspir-
ing collection and relating it to contemporary nursing and leadership
theory. It confirms the timeliness of this magnificent profession.
xi
Introduction
In 1977, Robert Greenleaf introduced a conceptualization of leadership
that he labeled “servant leadership” with the publication of his seminal
work Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and
Greatness. Greenleaf’s philosophy purported that a true leader, in any
venue, must be a servant of those he or she leads. Since that time the con-
cept has been embraced by many business and educational communities
for whom the practice of servant leadership has been found to be a highly
successful leadership style. This is reflected in the plethora of books and
articles on servant leadership published during the past three decades.
It is, however, only more recently that the practice of servant
leadership has captured the attention of healthcare institutions and,
more specifically, of nurses practicing in those facilities. Recent nursing
servant leadership articles do, however, strongly support the adoption
of servant leadership as the most appropriate leadership philosophy and
practice for nursing and health care.
Ever since becoming acquainted with the philosophy of servant
leadership, I have wanted to explore the concept as a potential leadership
style for contemporary practicing nurses. In fact, my own clinical nursing
practice, as well as my nursing education and nursing research experi-
ences over the past 35 years, have suggested that the majority of nurs-
ing leaders are already practicing servant leadership although not using
the label. To validate or contradict my perception I decided to conduct
a phenomenological study of the philosophy and behavior of currently
practicing nursing leaders entitled Called to Serve: The Lived Experience
of a Nursing Vocation.
A unique characteristic of this book is the inclusion of the Called to
Serve study data, which contain many powerful and poignant nursing
servant leadership perceptions and anecdotes elicited in tape-recorded
interviews with 75 nursing leaders. These data provided the foundation
for an empirically based model of servant leadership for nursing that
can be used to teach and guide the practice of servant leadership among
nurses. The sample population of 75 nursing leaders interviewed for the
study consisted of 4 administrators, 13 managers/supervisors, 10 head
nurses, 18 charge nurses, 10 team leaders, 9 advanced practice nurses
(clinical nurse specialists, nurse–midwives, nurse practitioners, parish
nurses, and nurse anesthetists), 9 nurse educators, and 2 nurse research-
ers (pseudonyms are used in all cases where nurse leaders are named).
xiii
xiv Introduction
xv
The Prayer of a
Nurse Servant
Leader
Gentle God,
Teach me to listen with my heart to
those who are anxious
and afraid.
xvii
xviii The Prayer of a Nurse Servant Leader
Teach me,
dear Lord,
to become a nursing servant leader
worthy of my
calling.
Amen.
1 Called to Serve:
The Nurse’s
Vocation of Caring
The greatest among you must become like the youngest and the
leader like the one who serves.
—Luke 22:26–27
Several of the nurses that I work with said that they saw servant
leadership and nursing as synonymous.
—Caitlin, Nurse manager of a palliative care department
In a nursing vocation—a calling to serve—sometimes you have to
extend yourself to do the right thing and be caring and compassion-
ate in that calling. I think especially as a nursing supervisor in the
hospital, empathy and compassion stand out. Once . . . we had a
patient who was dying in the critical care unit, and one of the eve-
ning staff was hesitant to let the family members stay because it was
past visiting hours. But, as the CCU (critical care unit) supervisor,
I said they could stay because it was important; the patient was
aware of what was happening. She knew that she was dying, and she
knew that the family was there, and it meant a lot to the family also.
I think you have to cross over and put yourself in the place of the
patient and family to do the right thing and be compassionate and
caring. . . . Sometimes we have to bend the rules a little bit so we
make sure we are allowing that caring and compassion of our nurs-
ing vocation to be evident.
—Anne, supervisor of a critical care unit
The concept of servant leadership in nursing is both old and
new, both ancient and modern. From the beginning of time individuals
have been called forth from their societies to serve the needs of the ill
and the injured. In Chapter 2 of this book, nursing’s tradition of service
is documented through exploring the lives of nursing leaders from the
1
2 Chapter 1 Called to Serve: The Nurse’s Vocation of Caring
nursing as a vocation was much more evident during the era of the
3-year diploma nursing programs, which consisted of an apprenticeship
in a hospital with some formal classes provided to support practice.
Nightingale’s Christian faith underlying her philosophy of nursing, is
also cited as central to the earlier perception of nursing as a vocation of
service (Bradshaw, 2002).
Considering Bradshaw’s understanding of Nightingale’s Christian
philosophy of nursing, Swedish theologian Mikael Lundmark has
offered an interesting analysis of the nursing vocation by comparing
the writings of Bradshaw and Katie Eriksson, who also finds in nursing
central concepts of love and charity as identified by Saint Paul. Ultimately
Lundmark concludes that both Bradshaw and Ericksson’s models
“prevent nursing practice from being reduced to a mechanistic application
of techniques” and reinforce “a high ethical standard” (2007, p. 778).
Their theories, Lundmark concludes “explicitly (Bradshaw) or implic-
itly (Eriksson) advocate a vocational understanding of nursing as being
essential to nursing theory” (p. 778).
As the founder of professional nursing, and as a Christian, Florence
Nightingale recognized nursing as a spiritual calling in her classic work
Notes On Nursing published in 1859:
Christian nurses, it is suggested, are called to serve the ill and the
infirm by the teaching and example of Jesus, as recorded in the gospels:
For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and
you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you
welcomed me, I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was
sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited
me…. Truly I tell you, just as you did it to one of the least of
these who are members of my family, you did it to me.”
6 Chapter 1 Called to Serve: The Nurse’s Vocation of Caring
vocation or calling to serve the sick. Writing in 1885, Clara S. Weeks, who
authored one of the first textbooks in nursing, described the confiden-
tial nature of the nurse–patient relationship with the admonition “No
one (nurse) with any sense of delicacy can regard (the relationship) as
otherwise than inviolably sacred what is thus tacitly left to her honor”
(p. 22). In an 1898 text identifying “practical points in nursing,” Emily
Stoney commented that “The Profession of nursing is one in which there
is no limit to the good that can be done; it is also one in which every
woman [sic] embracing it must walk worthy of the vocation to which
she is called” (pp. 17–18); and, in her 1921 book, The Psychology of Nurs-
ing, Aileen Cleveland Higgins, superintendent of the Stanford School for
Nurses, wrote “The trained nurse, like cloisonné, is made up of many
precious things. Virtue upon virtue, gift upon gift, power upon power,
the ideal nurse possesses” (p. v).
Writing on “The Place of Religion in the Life of the Nurse,” in a 1914
American Journal of Nursing article, physician Charles T. Emerson described
nursing as “a profession that does not yet know how great are the respon-
sibilities that are to rest on its shoulders” (p. 856). Emerson continued, “We
need cultured nurses, educated nurses, and we need spiritual nurses …
nurses who hear their call most clearly… (nurses who) have seen the highest
spiritual vision of service to their fellow man” (pp. 863–864). He concluded:
“Do this and society will call you blessed” (p. 864). In a 1922 address on
the spiritual aspects of nursing, Rev. Wilson Stearly is quoted as speak-
ing of the nurse as both professional and minister: “To the physician, the
nurse … is a colleague in science and a coworker in the ministry and art
of healing” (p. 336); and in a 1923 article in The Public Health Nurse, nurses
were reminded that “all who embrace nursing as a life profession must
have as the secret source of their ministering contacts the ability to do
what (saints) did, namely, give their help in the name of God” (White,
1923, p. 283). In 1926, the journal entitled The Trained Nurse and Hospital
Review, published a paper on the “Christ Spirit” in the hospital in which
the author asserted: “Nurses go to the bedside from a season of prayer.
They meet the waning hopes of the poor bedridden soul with the radiant
beams of a morning glimpse of God” (Lumpkin, 1926, p. 628).
The spiritual vocation of the nurse was recognized in a 1939
American Journal of Nursing paper entitled “The Religious Function of
the Nurse,” which noted that the nurse “above any other professional
worker” is called to “serve the religious needs of her patients” (Dicks,
p. 1110); and a 1940 article in The Trained Nurse and Hospital Review
pointed out the relationship between the nurse’s profession and vocation
stating: “The immense moral strength, the elevation of ideals, and the
8 Chapter 1 Called to Serve: The Nurse’s Vocation of Caring
inspiration toward self-sacrifice and service that come from the teachings
of Christ are of priceless aid to the nurse even from a professional stand-
point” (Gill, p. 189).
As well as attention to professional duties, the inspiration of the New
Testament makes nursing a “profession of kindness” asserted Mary Ranson
in a 1952 article (p. 29). “There are only a few vocations that Christ explicitly
promised to reward; yours is one of them,” promised an author speaking
to student nurses in 1954 (Hain, p. 57); and “Your role as a nurse is to take
human suffering, lift it in hands that are tender, bless it with lives that are
dedicated, enrich it with the incense of prayer, and offer it to God almighty,”
was a minister’s message to nurses published in 1955 (Murphy, p. 58).
Finally, in a 1956 nursing text dealing with moral issues, the authors asserted
“Because the nurse’s vocation is so singularly Christlike, it is imperative
that she work through Him, and in Him, and with Him. The nurse will find
the solution to most of her difficulties, will see her vocation in a new light,
through personal contact with Christ” (Hayes, Hayes, & Kelly, p. 8).
In the early days of professional nursing, books and articles both by
nurses and about nurses, such as those cited above, described nursing as
a special calling, a vocation of service, characterized by the highest ideals
of caring and commitment. This was partly to highlight the positive and
elevated nature of this newly identified profession in order to counteract the
preprofessional era of the unseemly women to whom nursing roles were
often relegated. The spirituality of the nursing vocation was also applauded
in order to remind those aspiring to the professional nursing role that much
would be asked of them in their chosen work. This was especially true in
earlier times when nurses were called upon to work long hours, in often
less than comfortable conditions, for little pay. Even as working conditions
and salaries improved, however, nurses themselves continued to envision
their caregiving activities as constituting a service to humankind, chosen
for altruistic rather than material reasons. Many Christian nurses perceived
a direct link between their profession of caring for the ill and the Lord’s
teaching in Matthew 25:35–36; for other nurses, simply the humanitarian
nature of the nurse’s service provided satisfaction and fulfillment.
For the majority of nurses this ideal of service, whether religious or
secular, has not changed even as both the art and science of the profession
have evolved into a more sophisticated catalog of knowledge and skills.
That fact is clearly and poignantly demonstrated in contemporary nurses
attitudes and behaviors reported in later chapters of this book. While it
must be admitted that a few of today’s nurses have decried the service
commitment of nursing, strong voices supporting and applauding the
concept of the nursing vocation continue to be heard.
Contemporary Nursing as a Vocation to Serve the Sick 9
“This,” Lane adds “generally enables the nurse to reach out more
sensitively, more hospitably, and more compassionately to other spir-
its in the world” (p. 337). Lane ends by describing nursing as a “noble
vocation” (p. 337) as does Downe (1990) in her article entitled “A Noble
Vocation” (1990). Downe asserted that if we are to support professional
status for our nursing, “We should be linking that professionalism to
better care for our clients … if we are recognized for our skills, caring and
dedication, in other words for our vocation,” the professional status will
be assured (p. 24). Downe concludes by suggesting:
perhaps the time has come to insist that caring for people and
caring about the care we give is not a sign of weakness, but
an essential part of humanity. Maybe our resurrection of the
Contemporary Nursing as a Vocation to Serve the Sick 11
responding to the survey believed that “nursing is a vocation” (p. 13). And
in another 2004 Nursing Standard article, author Jane Salvage observed that
although some nurses may “stay away from describing what they do as a
vocation … it is time to rehabilitate the term” (p. 16). Salvage admits that in
some quarters nursing’s “vocational ideal has been undermined by social
and cultural change: the triumph of scientific thought and the extinguish-
ing of religion, mysticism, and metaphysics” (p. 16). “A consequence,” she
points out, “is the current focus on evidence-based practice, measurement,
outcomes, and technical rationality. Coupled with growth of bureaucratic
control over care delivery, this leaves little room for faith, devotion, or the
apparently irrational” (p. 16). This, Salvage admits, “creates a paradox.”
Most nurses come into nursing “because they want to help people”; some
have a religious motivation, others a humanitarian philosophy, but while
not all call nursing a vocation, the majority of nurses “act out in their
career choice their wish to be of service” (p. 16). In asking where that
leaves nursing today, Salvage turns to our founder Florence Nightingale
who “saw nursing as an ‘act of charity,’ a branch of the ‘love of our kind’
but … (was not) sentimental about it. The nurse had to acquire art, science,
skill, and knowledge to turn her values into effective action” (p. 17). Sal-
vage, thus concludes: “Even if they do not readily use the word vocation,
nurses continue to heed their inner call to be of service. Our challenge now
is to rehabilitate the idea of vocation … and forge a new collective ideal of
service that can help transform health services and society” (p. 17).
In a recent survey of 131 student nurses, the question was asked:
“Why do you want to be a nurse?” The two most significant categories of
response were “to help or care for people” and “because they felt called
or led.” The authors reported:
and “The care taken by the servant leader [is] to make sure that other peo-
ple’s highest priority needs are being served” (Greenleaf, 1977, p. 27). Ser-
vant leaders are to place others’ needs before their own and to serve those
over whom they assume leadership. Surely these characteristics of the
servant leader bring to mind the scripture model: “The Son of Man came
not to be served but to serve and to give His life as a ransom for many”
(Mark 10:45). This conceptualization is validated in writings such as those
of servant leadership scholars Ken Blanchard and Phil Hodges (2003) who
authored the book, Lead Like Jesus: Lessons from the Greatest Leadership Role
Model of All Time. Blanchard and Hodges assert that “Jesus modeled the
heart of a true servant leader by investing most of His ministry time train-
ing and equipping the disciples for leadership” (2003, p. 46). They point
out that at the end of His ministry, Jesus told His disciples “I no longer call
you servants … I call you friends” because He wanted them to grow into
greatness in their discipleship after He went to the Father (p. 46).
Echoing a similar theme is the 2008 book “Black Belt Leader, Peace-
ful Leader: An Introduction to Catholic Servant Leadership” by counselor
and Aikido martial arts sensei Tim Warneka. In his book he presents a
global image of servant leadership for the world community. Warneka
observed poignantly, “Today’s world cries out for people who can lead
with a global perspective. We need leaders who lead from the heart as
well as the mind … leaders who can act ethically, intentionally, and with
respect…. Most of all we need leaders who understand that the primary
function of a leader is to serve, not to be served” (p. xi).
The 10 principles of servant leadership identified by Warneka are:
1. Love
2. Humanity
3. Right use of power
4. Leadership as spiritual practice
5. Leadership as a journey of faith
6. Building an embodied peaceful presence
7. Valuing community
8. Seeking personal transformation
9. Understanding the universal
10. Lifelong learning (2008, p. 32).
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.