Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Preface
Welcome to the fifth edition of Language Intervention human health for all individuals are living a life of purpose
Strategies in Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication and quality connection to others.
Disorders. The first edition of this book was published in The fifth edition contains 36 chapters organized into five
1981, the second in 1986, the third in 1994, and the fourth sections. Section I covers basic considerations such as defi-
in 2001. All four editions grew out of the realization that the nitions of aphasia and stroke, incidence of stroke, the neural
discussion of aphasia therapy had become a major theme in basis of language disorders, medical aspects of stroke, and
clinical aphasiology literature but that the specification of the assessment of language disorders in adults.
numerous types or strategies of intervention was of fairly Section II contains five chapters on principles of lan-
recent origin. guage intervention such as research methods appropriate to
All five texts grew out of the belief that there continues to our field, treatment recovery, prognosis, and clinical effec-
be a substantial number of approaches applicable to the tiveness, teams and partnerships in clinical practice, as well
remediation of language-disordered adults that should be as treatment of bilingual and bicultrurally diverse individu-
brought together and shared. The five texts are also grounded als. A number of issues related to service delivery are dis-
in the realization that a variety of different therapeutic prin- cussed.
ciples and approaches need to be articulated, assembled, Section III contains five chapters on psychosocial and
applied, and critiqued in order to strengthen the quality of functional approaches to intervention—models that focus
future work in our field. on improving ability to perform communication activities of
The major purpose of the fifth edition is to bring daily living. Such approaches consider the impact of aphasia
together significant thoughts on intervention and to stimu- on the well-being of the individual, their family, and the
late further developments in the remediation of adults with environment.
aphasia. It should be noted that some of the models pre- Section IV, the largest section, covers ‘Traditional
sented in this text still need to be supported by controlled Approaches to Language Intervention.’ It is divided into four
studies and long-term clinical application. units containing seven stimulation approaches, four cogni-
Each edition of this text is increasingly informed by the tive neuropsycological and four neurolinguistic approaches,
view that language is cognitively based (Chapey, 2008) and and three ‘specialized’ interventions.
socially constructed by participants communicating with Section V provides suggestions for remediation of disor-
someone, about something, for some reason; and that judg- ders that frequently accompany aphasia or are related to or
ments of competence/incompetence involve evaluations confused with aphasia; namely, traumatic brain injury, right
about issues such as role, context, intent, timing, volume, hemisphere damage, dementia, apraxia, and dysarthria.
movements, intonation, gender, age, taste, group member- The chapters can be read in any order. In addition, all the
ship, etc. (Bloom and Lahey, 1988; Kovarsky, Duchan, and chapters do not need to be read at one time. For example,
Maxwell, 1999). In addition, the dual goals of communica- when I teach our graduate course in adult aphasia, I typically
tion—that of transaction or the exchange of information use about 12 to 15 chapters as a core, and then refer to other
and that of interaction or the fulfillment of social needs chapters as they come up in class discussions, presentations
(such as affiliation with other people, assertion of individual- or term papers, and/or when students ask questions about a
ity, demonstration of competence, gaining and maintaining specific individual that they are observing or working with in
membership in social circles, etc. (Simmons-Mackie, 2008) clinical practicum. I use the remaining chapters to give addi-
are increasingly reflected in the texts. tional options, depth, and resources for actual work with
Further, the texts increasingly reflect the fact that we have individuals affected by aphasia.
a responsibility to individuals with aphasia and their signifi- Language Intervention Strategies in Aphasia and Related
cant others to foster their membership in a communicating Neurogenic Communication Disorders—Fifth Edition can be
society and their participation in personally relevant activi- used in classes for advanced undergraduate and graduate
ties (Simmons-Mackie, 2008). The texts also emphasize the students in speech language pathology. Clinical aphasiolo-
belief that two of the most important factors in positive gists who are no longer formal students, but who desire to
vii
GRBQ344-3513G-FM[i-xviii]qxd 02-13-2008 07:47 AM Page viii APTARA(GRG QUARK)
viii Preface
keep abreast of new ideas in their field will also find the Chapey, R. (2008). Cognitive Stimulation: Stimulation of Recognition/
material of interest. Further, the material will be valuable to Comprehension, Memory, Convergent Thinking, Divergent and Evaluative
Thinking. In R. Chapey (Ed.)., Language Intervention Strategies in Aphasia
students and professionals in nursing, medicine, and other and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders—Fifth Ed. Baltimore, MD.:
health-related disciplines. Lippincot Williams and Wilkins.
Kovarsky, D., Duchan, J. and Maxwell, M. (1999). Constructing (In)
Roberta Chapey, Competence. Disabling Evaluations in Clinical and Social Interaction. Mahwah,
Ed.D. Professor NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Simmons-Mackie, N. (2008). Social approaches to aphasia intervention.
References In R. Chapey (Ed.)., Language Intervention Strategies in Aphasia and Related
Bloom, L., and Lahey, M. (1988), Language Disorders and Language Neurogenic Communication Disorders—Fifth Ed. Baltimore, MD.: Lippincott
Development. New York: Macmillan. Williams and Wilkins.
GRBQ344-3513G-FM[i-xviii]qxd 02-13-2008 07:47 AM Page ix APTARA(GRG QUARK)
Acknowledgments
To those who have contributed to my personal life and pro- this text a kaleidoscope of enriching and rewarding experi-
fessional career, past and present, I express my deep appreci- ences for me as well as for each of our patients. I am deeply
ation. I am also grateful to the authors and publishers who appreciative of their caring and support and for many “one
granted me permission to quote from their works. and only moments” of connection.
Many concerned and dedicated people have helped bring I am also thankful to the staff of Lippincott Williams &
this textbook to fruition. Sincere appreciation is extended to Wilkins for their dedication to making this a first rate text
each. Special thanks are extended to Argye E. (Beth) Hillis and for facilitating so many relentless details of this project.
for her professionalism and enthusiasm in organizing the For the tireless support and help, I thank Peter Sabatini,
section on cognitive neuropsychology. As editor, I would Acquisitions Editor; Lisa Koepenick, Managing Editor; and
especially like to thank each contributor for helping to make Susan Katz, Vice President, Health Professions.
ix
GRBQ344-3513G-FM[i-xviii]qxd 02-13-2008 07:47 AM Page x APTARA(GRG QUARK)
GRBQ344-3513G-FM[i-xviii]qxd 02-13-2008 07:47 AM Page xi APTARA(GRG QUARK)
Contributors
xi
GRBQ344-3513G-FM[i-xviii]qxd 02-13-2008 07:47 AM Page xii APTARA(GRG QUARK)
xii Contributors
Contributors xiii
Charlotte C. Mitchum, MS, CCC-SLP Bruce Earl Porch, PhD
Research Associate Associate Professor
Department of Neurology Speech and Hearing Sciences and Neurology
University of Maryland School of Medicine University of New Mexico
Baltimore, Maryland Albuquerque, New Mexico
xiv Contributors
Contents
6 Aphasia Treatment: Recovery, Prognosis, 14 Group Therapy for Aphasia: Theoretical and
and Clinical Effectiveness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186 Practical Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 376
Kevin P. Kearns and Roberta J. Elman
Leora R. Cherney and Randall R. Robey
xvi Contents
Contents xvii
Section V. THERAPY FOR ASSOCIATED NEUROPATHOLOGIES 36 The Nature and Management of Neuromotor
OF SPEECH- AND LANGUAGE-RELATED FUNCTIONS 877 Speech Disorders Accompanying Aphasia . . . . . . 1009
Julie Wambaugh and Linda Shuster
33 Communication Disorders Associated with
Traumatic Brain Injury . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 879 APPENDIX 36.1 Consonant-Production
Mark Ylvisaker, Shirley F. Szekeres, and Timothy Feeney Probe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1035
APPENDIX 33.1 Aspects of Cognition . . . . . . . . . 955 APPENDIX 36.2 Example of Lists of Balanced
Multisyllabic Words . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1036
APPENDIX 33.2 Conventional Versus Functional
Approaches to Intervention after Brain Injury:
APPENDIX 36.3 Examples of Sentence-
Communication, Behavior, and Cognition . . . . . . . 956
Completion Items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1037
APPENDIX 33.3 Examples of Compensatory
Strategies for Individuals with Cognitive APPENDIX 36.4 Metronome and
Impairments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 Hand-tapping Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1039
APPENDIX 33.4 Rationale for Collaborative APPENDIX 36.5 Eight-Step Continuum . . . . . . 1040
Relationships with Everyday People . . . . . . . . . . . . 960
APPENDIX 36.6 Original Sound-Production
APPENDIX 33.5 Communication-Partner Treatment Hierarchy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1040
Competencies for Supporting and Improving
Cognition in Individuals with Cognitive APPENDIX 36.7 Modified Sound-Production
Impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 961 Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1041
34 Communication Disorders Associated with
APPENDIX 36.8 Modified Response Elaboration
Right-Hemisphere Damage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 963
Penelope S. Myers and Margaret Lehman Blake
Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1042
Section I
Basic Considerations
GRBQ344-3513G-C01[01-19]qxd 1/21/08 11:11 AM Page 2 Aptara Inc.
GRBQ344-3513G-C01[01-19]qxd 1/21/08 11:11 AM Page 3 Aptara Inc.
Chapter 1
applicable to children who never had language abilities their holistic functional concerns and what might be done to
to lose. (Childhood aphasia is not discussed in this text.) address them (Hallowell. 2007).
It should be noted, though, that children who have suf- While, occasionally, the term “aphasic” may be used to
fered neurologic incidents such as gunshot wounds, refer to an “individual with aphasia” in the writings of
surgical removal of tumors, or even stroke, may develop diverse authors, there is a widespread movement among
a true form of “aphasia” if those incidents cause them health care professionals to heighten sensitivity to individu-
to lose communication abilities they had gained earlier als served by choosing terminology that does not objectify
in life. and label people primarily through their impairments or dis-
3. Aphasia involves language problems. Aphasia is abilities. Readers are encouraged to join this movement, and
often described as symbolic processing disorders, a mul- to help sensitize others to the importance of using person-
timodal problem of formulation and interpretation of first language. Guidelines for writing and talking about per-
linguistic symbols. In defining aphasia it is important to sons with aphasia and related disorders are summarized in
recognize that any or all modalities of symbolic commu- Table 1–1.
nication may be affected: speaking, listening, reading,
writing, and receptive and expressive use of sign lan-
guage. Most cases involve at least some impairment in
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS OF APHASIA
all language modalities. Although it is simple to define the term “aphasia,” there are
4. Aphasia is not a problem of sensation, motor func- a number of in-depth definitions or frameworks for studying
tion, or intellect. Aphasia excludes general sensory the nature of aphasia. An understanding of basic differences
and mental deficits. By definition, aphasia does not among ways of conceptualizing aphasia is essential to devel-
involve a problem of sight, touch, smell, hearing, or oping a solid theoretical framework of one’s own.
taste. Although aphasia may be accompanied by any num-
ber of other deficits in perceptual acuity, its definition
excludes such deficits. Further, aphasia is not a result of
Propositional Language Framework
general intellectual deterioration, mental slowing, or According to Hughling Jackson, aphasia is an impairment in
psychiatric disturbance. Aphasia is also not due to motor one’s ability to make propositions, or to convey the intent of
impairment. The exclusionary characteristics of the def- an utterance (Jackson, 1878). In referring to the “proposi-
inition of aphasia are especially critical in the differen- tional” aspects of language, Jackson emphasizes the intellec-
tial diagnosis of a wide array of neurogenic language, tual, volitional, and rational aspects of language that involve
speech, cognitive, motor, and perceptual disorders. the use of linguistic symbols for the communication of
highly specific and appropriate ideas and relationships. In a
proposition, both the words and the manner in which they
A NOTE ON REFERRING TO are related to one another are important. Jackson contrasts
propositional aspects of language with subpropositional
PEOPLE WITH APHASIA aspects, which he characterizes as inferior, automatic, highly
Before progressing with further study of aphasia and its learned responses (Goodglass & Wingfield, 1997; Head,
management, it is important to note that the term “aphasic” 1915; Jackson, 1878).
is not a noun but an adjective, just as are most of the words Within this framework, a person with aphasia is seen as
we use to describe disabilities. While one might defend the having difficulty communicating specific meaning and inte-
stylistic use of the adjectival form as a label for a person who grating words into particular contexts to express specific
has aphasia (“an aphasic”), such labeling may convey a lack ideas and relationships. Patients may know words, but may
of respect for, and sensitivity toward, individuals who have habitually use them incorrectly, and often fail at embedding
aphasia (Brookshire, 2007). words in a variety of sentence forms. Jackson noted that even
Indeed, the World Health Organization (WHO) has when propositional language is impaired, many patients
launched worldwide efforts to modify the ways in which we retain automatic language. For example, even with severe
refer to persons with disabilities, as discussed later in this propositional deficits, an individual may be able to name the
and other chapters. The WHO classification emphasizes days of the week, complete sentences such as “The grass
that disablement is not considered an attribute of an individ- is _____,” or produce highly learned responses such as “Hi.
ual, but rather the complex interactions of conditions How are you?”
involving a person in the context of his or her social envi- According to proponents of the framework, an individual
ronment (WHO, 2001). Health-care professionals and with aphasia has an impairment in the use of spontaneous
researchers throughout the world are following suit by language to communicate specific meaning. The more propo-
deemphasizing the reference to individuals according to sitional language required in a particular communication
medically based diagnostic categories, focusing instead on context, the more difficulty the patient has communicating.
GRBQ344-3513G-C01[01-19]qxd 1/21/08 11:11 AM Page 5 Aptara Inc.
TABLE 1–1
Guidelines for Writing and Talking about Persons with Aphasia and Related Disorders
Recognize the importance of currency and context There are always variances in the terms that particular consumers or
in referring to individuals with disabilities. readers prefer, and it is essential to stay current regarding changes in
accepted terminology as well as to be sensitive to preferences for referents
within a given communicative context.
Consider reference to “disabilities”. Although the very term “disability” may be considered offensive to some
(with its inherent focus on a lack of ability), it is currently generally
preferred over the term “handicap” in reference to persons with physical,
cognitive, and/or psychological challenges or “disabilities”.
Avoid using condition labels as nouns. Many words conveying information about specific disabilities exist in both
noun and adjectival forms, yet should primarily be used only as
adjectives, or even better, modified into nouns corresponding to conditions.
For example, it is not appropriate to call an individual with aphasia “an
aphasic”.1 Likewise, it is not appropriate to call an individual with
paraplegia “a paraplegic,” or to call persons with disabilities “the disabled”.
Use person-first language. Person-first language helps emphasize the importance of the individuals
mentioned rather than their disabilities. Although the term “an aphasic
individual” would be preferred to the use of “an aphasic”, such labeling
still conveys a disability-focused identity. It is more appropriate, for
example, to refer to a “person with anomia” or an “individual with
dementia,” than to an “anomic person” or a “demented individual”.
Consider use of the term “individual” or Consistent with the aim of focusing on individuals and their broad life
“person” rather than “patient”. contexts, rather than on people being treated in a medical context, use of
the word “person” or “individual” is generally preferable to use of the
term “patient”. In some contexts, such as in academic texts and articles,
when people with and without language disorders are being discussed,
use of the term “patient” may help to provide clarity of referents and to
simplify explanations. In some contexts, the term “client” or “consumer”
may be preferred to “patient” when referring to a person who is receiving
professional services.
Avoid language of victimization. Do not use language suggesting that clients are “victims” or people who
“suffer” from various forms of disability. For example, say, “the client
had a stroke” rather than “the client is a stroke victim.” Say, “She uses a
wheelchair,” rather than “she is confined to a wheelchair.” Say “her leg
was amputated . . . ” instead of, “the client suffered an amputation of the leg”.
Avoid words with negative connotations. Words that evoke derogatory connotations should be avoided in every
context. These include such words and phrases as affliction, crazy,
crippled, defective, deformed, dumb, insane, invalid, lame, maimed, mute,
retard, and withered.
Encourage others in appropriate language use. By modeling appropriate language in writing about persons with disabilities,
including those with language disorders, students, clinicians and researchers
take an important step in helping others to improve in this area. It is vital
to help others learn to implement guidelines such as these directly through
course work and other educational experiences. Likewise, polite and
constructive corrections of others using inaccurate language helps
encourage more positive communication as well as more enabling positive
societal attitudes, widening the arena for empowering persons with
disabilities.
1
Brookshire, R.H. (2007). An introduction to neurogenic communications disorders. St. Louis: Mosby – Year Book.
(Adapted from Hallowell, in press).
GRBQ344-3513G-C01[01-19]qxd 1/21/08 11:11 AM Page 6 Aptara Inc.
Assessment involves an analysis of the patient’s ability to use than the intended word. An inaccurate verbal formulation
spontaneous speech to express specific ideas. Intervention may lead to interference with thought processes, as there is
focuses on stimulation of the patient’s ability to use proposi- a drive to establish consonance between the thought
tional language. process and the actual utterance. For example, if a patient is
trying to say “circle” and instead utters “square,” the con-
cept of circle may be modified to be consistent with the
Concrete-Abstract Framework
utterance, and the patient may begin to think of a circle as a
Goldstein and Scheerer (1948) observed that having an square.
“abstract attitude” implies an ability to react to things in a Individuals who cannot retrieve the most appropriate lex-
conceptual manner. This attitude is necessary to isolate ical symbol for a context are impaired in their ability to com-
properties that are common to several objects, and for the municate a number and variety of specific propositional
formulation of concepts as opposed to sensory impressions ideas. When the continued efforts relate to the approxi-
of individual objects. It is also used to comprehend relation- mated rather than the intended word, spontaneous language
ships between objects and events in the world. An abstract becomes even more impaired.
attitude gives the individual the power to inhibit actions or Within a framework in which aphasia is seen primarily as
reactions and to use past experiences. These experiences a disorder of thought process, assessment involves determin-
help the individual organize perceptual rules and therefore ing whether individuals can follow a train of thought in their
to create and continue interactions with other people. communication or spontaneous language, and whether they
Language that reflects an abstract attitude is propositional can expand on topics and ideas. For Wepman (1972b, 1976),
language. In contrast, the individual in the concrete attitude the first stage of therapy is thought-centered or content-
passively responds to reality and is bound to the immediate centered discussion in which patients are stimulated to
experience of objects and situations. Concrete language con- attend to their thoughts and remain on topic. During the
sists of speech automations, emotional utterances, sounds, second stage of therapy, patients are encouraged to elaborate
words, and series of words (Goldstein & Scheerer, 1948). on various topics.
In general, impairment in abstract attitude is reflected in
propositional language. If one cannot abstract, one cannot
Unidimensional Framework
symbolize or embed symbols in appropriate contexts. An
individual who is impaired in abstract attitude, then, is A unidimensional view of aphasia relates language behaviors
unable to consider things that are possibilities rather than to a single common denominator. The expressive and recep-
actualities, to keep in mind simultaneously various aspects of tive, as well as the semantic and syntactic components of
a situation, to react to two stimuli that do not belong intrin- language are considered to be inseparable. This view sug-
sically together, to inhibit reactions, and to ideationally iso- gests that damage to the language mechanism results in gen-
late parts of a whole. eral language impairment in which there is an effect on all
Goldstein and Scheerer (1948) developed a number of aspects of language. Aphasiologists who subscribe to this
tests of ability to assume the abstract attitude. These tests framework do not promote the use of Broca’s-Wernicke’s,
include object-sorting tasks involving form, color, and com- fluent-nonfluent, sensory-motor, receptive-expressive, or
bined color and form sorting. When observing sorting test input-output dichotomies in aphasia.
results, one may ask: Is the sort concrete (perceptual) or One of the most popular and in-depth unidimensional
abstract (conceptual)? Can the individual verbally account theories, proposed by Schuell and her colleagues (Schuell,
for the type of sort presented by the examiner (abstract)? Jenkins, & Jimenez-Pabon, 1964), regards aphasia as a gen-
The intervention implications of this framework would be eral language impairment that crosses all language modali-
to stimulate the patient to comprehend and produce lan- ties: speaking, listening, reading, and writing. These authors
guage that is increasingly more abstract. noted that the behaviors impaired in aphasia involve inte-
grations that cannot be attributed merely to organization of
motor responses or to events in outgoing pathways; rather,
Thought Process Framework
they involve use of an ability that is dependent on higher-
Wepman (1972a) suggested that aphasia may be a thought level integrations.
process disorder in which impairment of semantic expres- According to proponents of this framework, aphasia is
sion is the result of an impairment of thought processes that not modality-specific. Rather, it involves the inability to
“serve as the catalyst for verbal expression” (p. 207). He access or retrieve words and rules of an acquired language
noted that patients with aphasia frequently substitute words for communication (Schuell et al., 1964). The person with
that are associated with words they are attempting to pro- aphasia has lost functional spontaneous language, or the
duce, and that the remainder of the individual’s commu- ability to use connected language units to communicate
nicative effort appears to relate to the approximated rather according to the established conventions of the language.
GRBQ344-3513G-C01[01-19]qxd 1/21/08 11:11 AM Page 7 Aptara Inc.
et al., 2001) in which syntactic structure is relatively pre- Wernicke’s aphasia (Damasio, 1998, p. 35). The essential
served. In many cases, patients with Wernicke’s aphasia pre- characteristics of Broca’s aphasia include awkward articula-
sent with logorrhea, or press of speech, characterized by tion, restricted vocabulary, agrammatism, and relatively
excessive verbal production. Paraphasias are most often in intact auditory and reading comprehension (Goodglass
the form of sound transpositions and word substitutions et al., 2001). Typically, writing is at least as severely impaired
(Goodglass, Quadfasel, & Timberlake, 1964). Patients with as speech. Persons with Broca’s aphasia are usually aware of
Wernicke’s aphasia experience naming difficulty that is their communicative deficits, and are more prone to depres-
severe in relation to their fluent spontaneous speech sion and sometimes catastrophic reactions than are patients
(Goodglass et al., 1964). Neologisms are frequent. Those with other forms of aphasia. Some authors and clinicians use
who produce frequent neologistic expressions are often the term “expressive aphasia” to refer to the disability of
unintelligible and are sometimes referred to as having “jar- patients with Broca’s aphasia because of their primary deficit
gon aphasia” (Wepman & Jones, 1961). Patients with in the area of language formulation and production. Likewise,
Wernicke’s aphasia also have difficulty reading, writing, and because lesions that lead to this form of aphasia tend to be
repeating words (Damasio, 1998). They often demonstrate a located in the frontal lobe, Broca’s aphasia represents a clas-
lack of awareness of their deficits, especially compared to sic form of “anterior” aphasia.
patients with other types of aphasia. Some authors and many
clinicians use the term “receptive aphasia” to refer to the Transcortical Motor Aphasia (TMA). In patients with
disability of patients with Wernicke’s aphasia because of TMA, repetition is intact relative to “otherwise limited
their primary deficit in the area of linguistic comprehension. speech” (Goodglass et al., 2001). Such patients exhibit
Likewise, because lesions that lead to this form of aphasia phonemic and global paraphasias, syntactic errors, persever-
tend to be located in the temporal lobe, Wernicke’s aphasia ation, and difficulty imitating and organizing responses
represents a classic form of “posterior” aphasia. in conversation (Damasio, 1998; Goodglass et al., 2001).
Confrontation naming is usually preserved, but auditory
Conduction Aphasia. The speech of persons with conduc- comprehension is impaired.
tion aphasia is fluent, although generally less abundant than
Global Aphasia. Global aphasia is a disorder of language
the speech of those with Wernicke’s aphasia (Damasio,
characterized by impaired linguistic comprehension and
1998). A hallmark feature is impaired repetition of words
expression. It is often considered a combination of both
and sentences relative to fluency in spontaneous speech,
Wernicke’s and Broca’s aphasia. Patients with global aphasia
which is often normal or near normal. Auditory comprehen-
tend to produce few utterances and have a highly restricted
sion is also relatively spared (Goodglass et al., 2001). Most
lexicon. They have little or no understanding in any
patients “repeat words with phonemic paraphasias, but often
modality and little or no ability to communicate effectively
they will omit or substitute words, and they may fail to
(Wepman & Jones, 1961).
repeat anything at all if function words rather than nouns are
requested” (Damasio, 1998, p. 35). Literal paraphasias
Other Forms of Aphasia
repeatedly interfere with speech.
Anomic Aphasia. Anomic aphasia is a form of aphasia
Transcortical Sensory Aphasia (TSA). Individuals with characterized primarily by significant word retrieval prob-
TSA have fluent, well-articulated speech with frequent para- lems (Damasio, 1998; Goodglass, 1993; Goodglass &
phasias and neologisms (Goodglass et al., 2001). Global Wingfield, 1997). It is differentiated from the symptom of
paraphasias occur more frequently than phonemic para- anomia, or dysnomia, which is typical in most forms of apha-
phasias (Damasio, 1998). A key feature that differentiates sia. Speech is generally fluent except for the hesitancies and
TSA from conduction aphasia is intact repetition ability. pauses associated with word- finding deficits. Grammar is
Auditory comprehension is generally poor. Confrontation generally intact.
naming is impaired, and the patient may offer an irrelevant
response or echo the words of the examiner (Goodglass Primary Progressive Aphasia. Primary progressive apha-
et al., 2001). sia is a type of aphasia that has an insidious rather than an
acute onset. The term “primary” refers to the fact that
deficits in language are the primary symptoms noted, with
Nonfluent Aphasias
cognitive skills remaining intact relative to linguistic skills.
There are three basic types of nonfluent aphasia: Broca’s, The term “progressive” refers to the fact that the condition
transcortical motor, and global aphasia. is degenerative, with communication skills worsening over
time. The underlying etiology for progressive aphasia may
Broca’s Aphasia. Broca’s aphasia is the most classic form of be any of a number of degenerative diseases affecting the
nonfluent aphasia. It is often considered the “opposite” of brain. Many patients with this form of aphasia eventually
GRBQ344-3513G-C01[01-19]qxd 1/21/08 11:11 AM Page 9 Aptara Inc.
that affects each individual’s functioning. An earlier classifi- life (see Chapter 10). Therefore, assessment and treatment
cation scheme proposed by the WHO, the International focus not just on the restoration of language functions, but
Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps also on individual communication of wants and needs and
(ICIDH) employed the general terms “impairment,” “dis- the social and environmental supports that might contribute
ability,” and “handicap,” while a more recent scheme, the to full participation. Assessment and treatment target all
ICIDH-2, employed the terms “impairment,” “activity,” major areas in the classification scheme from day one.
and “participation,” to refer to the various contextual aspects This framework also helps clinicians and researchers
of disabling conditions one might experience. The two pri- focus on the core features of health and well-being. It
mary levels within the most recent WHO International encourages us to focus on seeing aphasia as a contextualized
Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) life-affecting condition requiring resources and compen-
are (1) body structure and function and (2) activity and par- satory and adaptive services for full life participation (Parr,
ticipation (WHO, 2001). Byng, & Gilpin, 1997). Health, well-being, and quality of
For individuals with aphasia, body structure and func- life are considered essential to understanding aphasia and in
tion refers to impairments of brain and brain functions. helping those affected by it. Vitally related to a focus on life
Activity limitations primarily involve the four language participation is the Life Participation Approach to Aphasia
modalities: speaking, listening, reading, and writing as well (LPAA Project Group, 2000) (see Chapter 10).
as tasks necessary for daily living, such as conversing with
the nurse or family member, writing a check, making a
phone call, reading a paper or menu, and so forth. These ETIOLOGY AND EPIDEMIOLOGY
modalities have been the traditional focus of assessment and OF STROKE AND APHASIA
intervention in aphasia. During the past 20 years, such tasks
have increasingly been the focus of care. Stroke
The constructs of activities and participation capture Stroke, or cerebrovascular accident (CVA), is the most preva-
the notion of engagement in daily life and realizing immedi- lent cause of aphasia. A stroke occurs when blood flow to an
ate and long-term real-life goals. This might include playing area of the brain is interrupted by the blockage of a blood ves-
golf, shopping for clothes, getting a job, going on vacation, sel or artery, or by the rupturing of an artery. Blood carries
participating in clubs and organizations, and so forth. We essential nutrients, especially glucose and oxygen, to brain cells.
may discuss limitations of “activities” in a similar way to our Since brain cells do not have the capacity to store these nutri-
use of the term disability. We may discuss limitations of ents, they are in need of constant blood supply. Even brief peri-
“participation” in a similar way to our use of the term hand- ods of interruption in blood supply to the brain can have lasting
icap. For people with aphasia, these constructs represent the devastating effects on brain tissue (see Chapters 2 and 3).
ability to use language in context. Environment is another Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United
key construct in the ICF. It includes the assistive technology, States and the most common cause of adult disability
relationships with and support from others, support services, (American Heart Association, 2006). In the United States
policies and regulations, physical environmental factors, and alone, approximately 700,000 individuals experience a stroke
the attitudes of individuals with aphasia and their significant each year (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
others. Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, 2006).
The WHO classification schemes provide a framework According to Zivin and Choi (1991), roughly 30 percent of
for moving away from the classic biomedical model and take those who have a stroke die, and “20 to 30 percent become
into consideration the organic and the complex functional severely and permanently disabled” (p. 56). For at least 40
consequences of disease. Viewing aphasia in this framework percent of those who survive, stroke is a seriously disabling
helps us consider social exclusion and inclusion as funda- disease. Many survivors have lasting problems with move-
mental to the context in which people with aphasia commu- ment and motor control of the body, perceptual deficits, cog-
nicate and engage in daily life activities. People with aphasia nitive problems, and swallowing disorders, as well as prob-
are not seen as solely responsible for the social consequences lems of speech and language.
of their aphasia. The framework highlights the dynamic There are several types of stroke. Chapters 2 and 3 con-
interaction of important variables such as social support, risk tain a discussion of the most common forms of stroke lead-
factors, causes, genetics, capabilities, environmental factors, ing to aphasia, namely thrombotic, embolic, and hemor-
and life habits of social participation in examining health, rhagic strokes.
handicap, and disability. For example, consistent and depend-
able support from friends and family will likely decrease the
Incidence of Aphasia
impact of impairment; a depressed, uninvolved spouse may
increase it. All individuals in the environment—and the Statistics regarding the incidence of aphasia and of the vari-
environment itself—impact functioning and participation in ous subtypes of aphasia are variable, owing to subject
GRBQ344-3513G-C01[01-19]qxd 1/21/08 11:11 AM Page 11 Aptara Inc.
cannot; many have much to say but are significantly limited There is tremendous variability in how aphasia affects an
in their ability to express themselves. Persons who were individual’s sense of self and social ability. The effects may
employed prior to acquiring aphasia may be unable to main- be disproportionate to the degree of neurologic impairment.
tain employment, leading not only to financial stress but also Even mild deficits may be traumatizing to persons who
to feelings of isolation, frustration, and worthlessness. Some closely identify with their active roles as communicators.
people with aphasia are lonely and desperate. Others toler- Others with severe neurologic impairments and language
ate the condition remarkably well. deficits tolerate the effects of their condition with remark-
Despite worldwide efforts to improve the ways that individ- able serenity.
uals with disabilities are treated and regarded, negative atti-
tudes toward and discomfort with persons with communica-
tive and physical disabilities remain. Individuals with stroke
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE
and aphasia are susceptible to attitudinal barriers, lack of Evidence-based practice is a construct receiving increasing
important information, loss of companionship with loved attention from researchers, clinicians, patients, and health
ones, marginal social status, rejection, distrust, stigmatization, insurance companies, as well as agencies that rate quality of
and loss of esteem (Boone & Zraik, 1991; Croteau & LeDorze, care in a wide array of health care contexts. As with many
2006; Love, 1981; Murphy, 2006; Post & Leith, 1983). other health-related disciplines, the frequency of use of the
Patients’ significant others are usually dramatically term in the neurogenic communication disorders literature
affected by the onset of aphasia in a friend, colleague, or has expanded dramatically over the past decade. It refers to
loved one. The onset of acquired aphasia, so life-changing in the skilled use of empirical support to make diagnostic and
practically every dimension of daily living, inspires many to intervention decisions (c.f., Sackett, Rosenberg, Gray,
appreciate just how central communicative ability is to being Hayes, & Richardson, 1996; Sackett, Straus, Richardson,
and feeling human. Rosenberg, & Haynes, 2000). The concept of using evi-
dence to inform practice is not a new one. However, it has
become a growing focal point due to: the expansion of our
Language: The Human Essence
knowledge base; the increased accessibility of data and other
The need for socialization is the core of human existence, information via recent advances in print- and web-based
and the ability to communicate with others is the essence of publishing; the growing demand for accountability from
that socialization. Language is basic to what Chomsky consumers, employers and insurance companies; and the
(1972) calls the “human essence.” More than any other continuous quality improvement- and outcomes-focused
attribute, language distinguishes humans from other ani- programs in which we engage as clinicians to ensure that we
mals. It is the most basic characteristic of the intellect and provide the best services we can. The “evidence” we use to
the very means through which the mind matures and devel- inform our clinical decisions may come in the form of expert
ops. Language enables individuals to describe and clarify opinion, or from research involving a variety of methods,
their thoughts for themselves and others. including case studies, randomized clinical studies, and ran-
Human experience and interaction are welded to lan- domized controlled clinical trials (c.f., Frattali & Worral,
guage. According to Goodman (1971), the ability to share 2001; Robey, 1998; Robey & Schultz, 1998). The way we
experience through language is a means of homeostasis that incorporate the evidence is ideally influenced by our careful
enables human beings to maintain and/or restore an equilib- consideration of the methodologic quality and validity of
rium in which they can survive. Goodman also observes that specific research studies, our own clinical judgment about
language is the basis of personality, revealing our innate the relevance and importance of research findings to a spe-
being and our psychic ties with the world. cific patient, the values of the patient, the feasibility of
Language is also the essence of maturity, which is defined applying research findings in a given intervention context,
as an ability to relate warmly to and intimately with others — and our own and others’ expert opinion (c.f., Woolf, Grol,
with their goals, aspirations, and hopes. It involves a “fitting Hutchinson, Eccles, & Grimshaw, 1999).
in,” carrying one’s share of personal and social responsibility, The Academy of Neurologic Communication Disorders
and conveying one’s seasoned intelligence. Thus, definitions and Sciences (ANCDS) has developed evidence-based
of maturity involve and revolve around the ability to use lan- practice guidelines founded on careful literature reviews
guage effectively. and analysis by teams of clinical researchers in specialty
Insofar as persons with aphasia are impaired in their abil- areas within neurogenic communication disorders.
ity to use language, they are impaired in their human Examples of guidelines published to date include those on
essence. Part of the personality often appears lost, and the cognitive-communicative disorders resulting from trau-
ability to maintain interpersonal relationships, to convey matic brain injury (Turkstra, Ylvisaker, Coelho, Kennedy,
wants and needs, and to be a mature self-reliant, self- Sohlberg, & Avery, 2005). ANCDS writing groups are now
actualized person is impaired. developing guidelines for additional areas, including aphasia
GRBQ344-3513G-C01[01-19]qxd 1/21/08 11:11 AM Page 15 Aptara Inc.
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.