Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A RT
T H RO U G H T H E
AGES
NON-WESTERN
PERSPECTIVES
T H I RT E E N T H E D I T I O N
Fred S. Kleiner
Australia • Brazil • Japan • Korea • Mexico • Singapore • Spain • United Kingdom • United States
Gardner’s Art through the Ages: Non-Western © 2010, 2006 Wadsworth, Cengage Learning
Perspectives, Thirteenth Edition
Fred S. Kleiner ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright
herein may be reproduced, transmitted, stored, or used in any form or by
any means graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including but not limited
Publisher: Clark Baxter
to photocopying, recording, scanning, digitizing, taping, Web distribution,
Senior Development Editor: Sharon Adams Poore information networks, or information storage and retrieval systems,
except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States
Assistant Editor: Kimberly Apfelbaum Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
Editorial Assistant: Nell Pepper
Senior Media Editor: Wendy Constantine For product information and technology assistance, contact us at
Cengage Learning Academic Resource Center,
Senior Marketing Manager: Diane Wenckebach
1-800-423-0563
Marketing Communications Manager: Heather Baxley For permission to use material from this text or product, submit all
requests online at www.cengage.com/permissions.
Senior Project Manager, Editorial Production: Lianne Ames Further permissions questions can be emailed to
Senior Art Director: Cate Rikard Barr permissionrequest@cengage.com
PREFACE xi CHAPTER 3
CHINA AND KOREA TO 1279 47
IN TRO D U C T I O N China 47
WHAT IS ART HISTORY? 1 Korea 68
Art History in the 21st Century 2 T MATERIALS AND TECHNIQUES: Sheng Bronze-Casting 49
Different Ways of Seeing 8 T MATERIALS AND TECHNIQUES: Chinese Jade 51
T RELIGION AND MYTHOLOGY: Daoism and Confucianism 52
Southeast Asia 41
Contemporary Art 44
T MATERIALS AND TECHNIQUES: Indian Miniature
Painting 36
vii
CHAPTER 5 T ART AND SOCIETY: The Mesoamerican Ball Game 152
Japan, 1336 to 1868 105 T ART AND SOCIETY: Gender Roles in Native American Art 183
THE ISLAMIC WORLD 121 T ART AND SOCIETY: Art and Leadership in Africa 195
Early Islamic Art 122 T ART AND SOCIETY: Idealized Naturalism at Ile-Ife 196
viii Contents
CHAPTER 12 GLOSSARY 242
Contents ix
This page intentionally left blank
PREFACE
xi
and architecture of South and Southeast Asia, China and Korea, an understanding of architectural technology and terminology. The
Japan, the Islamic world, Native North and South America, Africa, boxes address questions of how and why various forms developed,
and Oceania. It boasts roughly 300 photographs, plans, and draw- the problems architects confronted, and the solutions they used to
ings, virtually all in color and reproduced according to the highest resolve them. Topics discussed include the form and meaning of the
standards of clarity and color fidelity. Included are many new or up- stupa, the origin and development of the mosque, and the construc-
graded photos by a host of new photographers as well as redesigned tion of wooden buildings in China.
maps and plans. Materials and Techniques essays explain the various media artists
The captions to the illustrations in this edition of Art through the employed from prehistoric to modern times. Since materials and
Ages, as before, contain a wealth of information, including the name techniques often influence the character of artworks, these discus-
of the artist or architect, if known; the formal title (printed in ital- sions contain essential information on why many monuments ap-
ics), if assigned, description of the work, or name of the building; the pear as they do. Hollow-casting in bronze in Shang China, Japanese
provenance or place of production of the object or location of the woodblock prints, and Andean weaving are among the many sub-
building; the date; the material(s) used; the size; and the current lo- jects treated.
cation if the work is in a museum or private collection. As in previ- Religion and Mythology boxes introduce students to the principal
ous editions, scales accompany all plans, but for the first time scales elements of the world’s great religions, past and present, and to the
now also appear next to each photograph of a painting, statue, or representation of religious and mythological themes in painting and
other artwork. The works illustrated vary enormously in size, from sculpture of all periods and places. These discussions of belief systems
colossal sculptures carved into mountain cliffs and paintings that and iconography give readers a richer understanding of some of the
cover entire walls or ceilings to tiny figurines and jewelry that one greatest artworks ever created. The topics include Buddhism and
can hold in the hand. Although the captions contain the pertinent Buddhist iconography, Muhammad and Islam, and Aztec religion.
dimensions, it is hard for students who have never seen the paintings Art and Society essays treat the historical, social, political, cul-
or statues in person to translate those dimensions into an apprecia- tural, and religious context of art and architecture. The subjects ad-
tion of the real size of the objects. The new scales provide an effective dressed include the Japanese tea ceremony, the Mesoamerican ball
and direct way to visualize how big or how small a given artwork is game, art and leadership in Africa, and tattoo in Polynesia.
and its relative size compared with other objects in the same chapter Written Sources present and discuss key historical documents il-
and throughout the book. luminating important monuments of art and architecture through-
Also new to this edition are the Quick-Review Captions that stu- out the world. The passages quoted permit voices from the past to
dents found so useful when these were introduced in 2006 in the first speak directly to the reader, for example King Ashoka explaining his
edition of Art through the Ages: A Concise History. These brief syn- conversion to Buddhism, which initiated a new era in Asian art.
opses of the most significant aspects of each artwork or building il- A new category is Artists on Art in which artists and architects
lustrated accompany the captions to all images in the book. They have throughout history discuss both their theories and individual works.
proved invaluable to students preparing for examinations. In the 13th Examples include Sinan the Great discussing the mosque he designed
edition I have also provided two new tools to aid students in review- for Selim II, and Xia He’s exposition of the six canons of Chinese
ing and mastering the material. Each chapter now ends with a full- painting.
page feature called The Big Picture, which sets forth in bullet-point Rounding out the features in the book itself is a Glossary con-
format the most important characteristics of each period or region taining definitions of all terms introduced in the text in italics and a
discussed in the chapter. Small illustrations of characteristic works Bibliography of books in English, including both general works and
discussed accompany the summary of major points. Finally, I have at- a chapter-by-chapter list of more focused studies.
tempted to tie all of the chapters together by providing with each copy The 13th edition of Art through the Ages is not, however, a stand-
of Art through the Ages a poster-size Global Timeline. This too fea- alone text, but one element of a complete package of learning tools.
tures illustrations of key monuments of each age and geographical In addition to the Global Timeline, every new copy of the book
area as well as a brief enumeration of the most important art histori- comes with a password to ArtStudy Online, a web site with access to
cal developments during that period. The timeline is global in scope a host of multimedia resources that students can employ throughout
to permit students to compare developments in the non-Western the entire course, including image flashcards, tutorial quizzes, pod-
world with contemporaneous artworks produced in the West. The casts, vocabulary, and more. Instructors have access to a host of
poster has four major horizontal bands corresponding to Europe, the teaching materials, including digital images with zoom capabilities,
Americas, Asia, and Africa, and 34 vertical columns for the successive video, and Google Earth™ coordinates.
chronological periods from 30,000 BCE to the present. A work as diverse as this history of non-Western art could not be
Boxed essays once again appear throughout the book as well. This undertaken or completed without the counsel of experts in all areas
popular feature first appeared in the 11th edition of Art through the treated. As with previous editions, the publisher has enlisted dozens of
Ages, which won both the Texty and McGuffey Prizes of the Text and art historians to review every chapter of Art through the Ages: Non-
Academic Authors Association for the best college textbook of 2001 Western Perspectives in order to ensure that the text lived up to the
in the humanities and social sciences. In this edition the essays are Gardner reputation for accuracy as well as readability. I take great plea-
more closely tied to the main text than ever before. Consistent with sure in acknowledging here the invaluable contributions to the 13th
that greater integration, most boxes now incorporate photographs of edition made by the following for their critiques of various chapters:
important artworks discussed in the text proper that also illustrate Charles M. Adelman, University of Northern Iowa; Kirk Ambrose,
the theme treated in the boxed essays. These essays fall under six University of Colorado–Boulder; Susan Ashbrook, Art Institute of
broad categories, one of which is new to the 13th edition. Boston; James J. Bloom, Florida State University; Suzaan Boettger,
Architectural Basics boxes provide students with a sound founda- Bergen Community College; Colleen Bolton, Mohawk Valley Com-
tion for the understanding of architecture. These discussions are con- munity College; Angi Elsea Bourgeois, Mississippi State University;
cise explanations, with drawings and diagrams, of the major aspects Lawrence E. Butler, George Mason University; Alexandra Carpino,
of design and construction. The information included is essential to Northern Arizona University; Hipolito Rafael Chacon, The University
xii Preface
of Montana; Catherine M. Chastain, North Georgia College & State Catherine B. Scallen, Case Western Reserve University; Natasha Sea-
University; Daniel Connolly, Augustana College; Michael A. Coronel, man, Berklee College of Music; Malia E. Serrano, Grossmont College;
University of Northern Colorado; Nicole Cox, Rochester Institute of Fred T. Smith, Kent State University; Laura Sommer, Daemen College;
Technology; Jodi Cranston, Boston University; Kathy Curnow, Cleve- Nancy Steele-Hamme, Midwestern State University; Andrew Stewart,
land State University; Giovanna De Appolonia, Boston University; University of California–Berkeley; John R. Stocking, University of Cal-
Marion de Koning, Grossmont College; John J. Dobbins, University of gary; Francesca Tronchin, Ohio State University; Kelly Wacker, Univer-
Virginia; B. Underwood DuRette, Thomas Nelson Community Col- sity of Montevallo; Carolynne Whitefeather, Utica College; Nancy L.
lege; Daniel Ehnbom, University of Virginia; Lisa Farber, Pace Univer- Wicker, University of Mississippi; Alastair Wright, Princeton Univer-
sity; James Farmer, Virginia Commonwealth University; Jerome sity; Michael Zell, Boston University.
Feldman, Hawaii Pacific University; Sheila ffolliott, George Mason I am also happy to have this opportunity to express my gratitude
University; Ferdinanda Florence, Solano Community College; William to the extraordinary group of people at Wadsworth involved with the
B. Folkestad, Central Washington University; Mitchell Frank, Carleton editing, production, and distribution of Art through the Ages. Some of
University; Sara L. French, Wells College; Norman P. Gambill, South them I have now worked with on various projects for more than a
Dakota State University; Elise Goodman, University of Cincinnati; decade and feel privileged to count among my friends. The success of
Kim T. Grant, University of Southern Maine; Elizabeth ten Grotenhuis, the Gardner series in all of its various permutations depends in no
Silk Road Project; Sandra C. Haynes, Pasadena City College; Valerie small part on the expertise and unflagging commitment of these
Hedquist, The University of Montana; Susan Hellman, Northern Vir- dedicated professionals: Sean Wakely, executive vice president, Cen-
ginia Community College; Marian J. Hollinger, Fairmont State Univer- gage Arts and Sciences; P. J. Boardman, vice president and editor-in-
sity; Cheryl Hughes, Alta High School; Heidrun Hultgren, Kent State chief, Cengage Arts and Sciences; Clark Baxter, publisher; Sharon
University; Joseph M. Hutchinson, Texas A&M University; Julie M. Adams Poore, senior development editor; Helen Triller-Yambert, de-
Johnson, Utah State University; Sandra L. Johnson, Citrus College; velopment editor; Lianne Ames, senior content project manager;
Deborah Kahn, Boston University; Fusae Kanda, Harvard University; Kimberly Apfelbaum, assistant editor; Wendy Constantine, senior
Catherine Karkov, Miami University; Wendy Katz, University of media editor; Nell Pepper, editorial assistant; Cate Rickard Barr,
Nebraska–Lincoln; Nita Kehoe-Gadway, Central Wyoming College; senior art director; Scott Stewart, vice president managing director
Nancy L. Kelker, Middle Tennessee State University; Cathie Kelly, Uni- sales; Diane Wenckebach, senior marketing manager; as well as Kim
versity of Nevada–Las Vegas; Katie Kempton, Ohio University; John F. Adams, Heather Baxley, William Christy, Doug Easton, tani hasegawa,
Kenfield, Rutgers University; Monica Kjellman-Chapin, Emporia Cara Murphy, Ellen Pettengell, Kathryn Stewart, and Joy Westberg.
State University; Kathryn E. Kramer, State University of New York– I am also deeply grateful to the following for their significant
Cortland; Carol Krinsky, New York University; Lydia Lehr, Atlantic contributions to the 13th edition of Art through the Ages: Joan Keyes,
Cape Community College; Krist Lien, Shelton State Community Col- Dovetail Publishing Services; Ida May Norton, copy editor; Sarah
lege; Ellen Longsworth, Merrimack College; Dominic Marner, Univer- Evertson and Stephen Forsling, photo researchers; Pete Shanks and
sity of Guelph; Jack Brent Maxwell, Blinn College; Anne McClanan, Jon Peck, accuracy readers; Pat Lewis, proofreader; John Pierce,
Portland State University; Brian McConnell, Florida Atlantic Univer- Thompson Type; Rick Stanley, Digital Media Inc., U.S.A; Don Larson,
sity; Amy McNair, University of Kansas; Patrick McNaughton, Indiana Mapping Specialists; Anne Draus, Scratchgravel; and Cindy Geiss,
University; Cynthia Millis, Houston Community College–Southwest; Graphic World. I also wish to acknowledge my debt to Edward Tufte
Cynthia Taylor Mills, Brookhaven College; Keith N. Morgan, Boston for an illuminating afternoon spent discussing publication design
University; Johanna D. Movassat, San Jose State University; Heidi and production issues and for his invaluable contribution to the crea-
Nickisher, Rochester Institute of Technology; Bonnie Noble, University tion of the scales that accompany all reproductions of paintings,
of North Carolina–Charlotte; Abigail Noonan, Rochester Institute of sculptures, and other artworks in this edition.
Technology; Karen Michelle O’Day, University of Wisconsin–Eau Finally, I owe thanks to my colleagues at Boston University and to
Claire; Allison Lee Palmer, University of Oklahoma; Martin Patrick, the thousands of students and the scores of teaching fellows in my
Illinois State University; Jane Peters, University of Kentucky; Julie art history courses during the past three decades. From them I have
Anne Plax, University of Arizona; Donna Karen Reid, Chemeketa learned much that has helped determine the form and content of Art
Community College; Albert W. Reischuch, Kent State University; through the Ages and made it a much better book than it otherwise
Jonathan Ribner, Boston University; Cynthea Riesenberg, Washington might have been.
Latin School; James G. Rogers Jr., Florida Southern College; Carey
Rote, Texas A&M University–Corpus Christi; David J. Roxburgh, Har- Fred S. Kleiner
vard University; Conrad Rudolph, University of California–Riverside;
Preface xiii
1 in.
I-1 King on horseback with attendants, from Benin, Nigeria, ca. 1550–1680. Bronze, 1 7 –12 high. Metropolitan Museum of Art,
New York (Michael C. Rockefeller Memorial Collection, gift of Nelson A. Rockefeller).
This African artist used hierarchy of scale to distinguish the relative rank of the figures, making the king the largest. The sculptor
created the relief by casting (pouring bronze into a mold).
I N T RO D U C T I O N :
W H AT I S A RT
H I S TO RY ?
xcept when referring to the modern academic discipline, people do not often juxtapose the words
E “art” and “history.” They tend to think of history as the record and interpretation of past human ac-
tions, particularly social and political actions. Most think of art, quite correctly, as part of the present—
as something people can see and touch. Of course, people cannot see or touch history’s vanished human
events, but a visible, tangible artwork is a kind of persisting event. One or more artists made it at a cer-
tain time and in a specific place, even if no one today knows just who, when, where, or why. Although
created in the past, an artwork continues to exist in the present, long surviving its times. The first
painters and sculptors died 30,000 years ago, but their works remain, some of them exhibited in glass
cases in museums built only a few years ago.
Modern museum visitors can admire these objects from the remote past—and countless others hu-
mankind has produced over the millennia—without any knowledge of the circumstances that led to the
creation of those works. The beauty or sheer size of an object can impress people, the artist’s virtuosity
in the handling of ordinary or costly materials can dazzle them, or the subject depicted can move them.
Viewers can react to what they see, interpret the work in the light of their own experience, and judge it a
success or a failure. These are all valid responses to a work of art. But the enjoyment and appreciation of
artworks in museum settings are relatively recent phenomena, as is the creation of artworks solely for
museum-going audiences to view.
Today, it is common for artists to work in private studios and to create paintings, sculptures, and
other objects commercial art galleries will offer for sale. Usually, someone the artist has never met will
purchase the artwork and display it in a setting the artist has never seen. This practice is not a new phe-
nomenon in the history of art—an ancient potter decorating a vase for sale at a village market stall prob-
ably did not know who would buy the pot or where it would be housed—but it is not at all typical. In
fact, it is exceptional. Throughout history, most artists created paintings, sculptures, and other objects
for specific patrons and settings and to fulfill a specific purpose, even if today no one knows the original
contexts of most of those works. Museum visitors can appreciate the visual and tactile qualities of these
objects, but they cannot understand why they were made or why they appear as they do without know-
ing the circumstances of their creation. Art appreciation does not require knowledge of the historical
context of an artwork (or a building). Art history does.
Thus, a central aim of art history is to determine the original con- Stylistic evidence is also very important. The analysis of style—an
text of artworks. Art historians seek to achieve a full understanding not artist’s distinctive manner of producing an object—is the art histo-
only of why these “persisting events” of human history look the way rian’s special sphere. Unfortunately, because it is a subjective assess-
they do but also of why the artistic events happened at all. What unique ment, stylistic evidence is by far the most unreliable chronological cri-
set of circumstances gave rise to the erection of a particular building or terion. Still, art historians find style a very useful tool for establishing
led an individual patron to commission a certain artist to fashion a sin- chronology.
gular artwork for a specific place? The study of history is therefore vital
to art history. And art history is often very important to the study of WHAT IS ITS STYLE? Defining artistic style is one of the key
history. Art objects and buildings are historical documents that can elements of art historical inquiry, although the analysis of artworks
shed light on the peoples who made them and on the times of their cre- solely in terms of style no longer dominates the field as it once did.
ation in a way other historical documents cannot. Furthermore, artists Art historians speak of several different kinds of artistic styles.
and architects can affect history by reinforcing or challenging cultural Period style refers to the characteristic artistic manner of a spe-
values and practices through the objects they create and the structures cific time, usually within a distinct culture, such as “Classic Maya” in
they build. Thus, the history of art and architecture is inseparable from Mesoamerica or “Southern Song” in China.
the study of history, although the two disciplines are not the same. Regional style is the term art historians use to describe varia-
The following pages introduce some of the distinctive subjects art tions in style tied to geography. Like an object’s date, its provenance,
historians address and the kinds of questions they ask, and explain or place of origin, can significantly determine its character. Very of-
some of the basic terminology they use when answering these ques- ten two artworks from the same place made centuries apart are more
tions. Readers armed with this arsenal of questions and terms will be similar than contemporaneous works from two different regions.
ready to explore the multifaceted world of art through the ages. The different kinds of artistic styles are not mutually exclusive.
For example, an artist’s personal style may change dramatically during
a long career. Art historians then must distinguish among the different
period styles of a particular artist.
ART HISTORY
WHAT IS ITS SUBJECT? Another major concern of art histo-
IN THE 21ST CENTURY
rians is, of course, subject matter, encompassing the story, or narra-
Art historians study the visual and tangible objects humans make and tive; the scene presented; the action’s time and place; the persons in-
the structures humans build. From the earliest Greco-Roman art crit- volved; and the environment and its details. Some artworks, such as
ics on, scholars have studied objects that their makers consciously modern abstract paintings, have no subject, not even a setting. The
manufactured as “art” and to which the artists assigned formal titles. “subject” is the artwork itself. But when artists represent people,
But today’s art historians also study a vast number of objects that their places, or actions, viewers must identify these aspects to achieve com-
creators and owners almost certainly did not consider to be “works of plete understanding of the work. Art historians traditionally separate
art.” That is certainly true for many of the works examined in this pictorial subjects into various categories, such as religious, historical,
book. Art historians, however, generally ask the same kinds of ques- mythological, genre (daily life), portraiture, landscape (a depiction of a
tions about what they study, whether they employ a restrictive or ex- place), still life (an arrangement of inanimate objects), and their nu-
pansive definition of art. merous subdivisions and combinations.
Iconography—literally, the “writing of images”—refers both to the
The Questions Art Historians Ask content, or subject of an artwork, and to the study of content in art. By
extension, it also includes the study of symbols, images that stand for
HOW OLD IS IT? Before art historians can construct a history other images or encapsulate ideas. Artists also may depict figures with
of art, they must be sure they know the date of each work they study. unique attributes, such as a scepter, headdress, or costume that iden-
Thus, an indispensable subject of art historical inquiry is chronology, tifies a figure as a king (FIG. I-1). Throughout the history of art,
the dating of art objects and buildings. If researchers cannot deter- artists also have used personifications—abstract ideas codified in hu-
mine a monument’s age, they cannot place the work in its historical man form. Worldwide, people visualize Liberty as a robed woman
context. Art historians have developed many ways to establish, or at with a torch because of the fame of the colossal statue set up in New
least approximate, the date of an artwork. York City’s harbor in the 19th century. Even without considering style
Physical evidence often reliably indicates an object’s age. The and without knowing a work’s maker, informed viewers can deter-
material used for a statue, painting, or vase—bronze, stone, or mine much about the work’s period and provenance by iconograph-
porcelain, to name only a few—may not have been invented before a ical and subject analysis alone.
certain time, indicating the earliest possible date someone could
have fashioned the work. Or artists may have ceased using certain WHO MADE IT? Although signing (and dating) works is quite
materials—such as specific kinds of inks and papers for drawings— common (but by no means universal) today, in the history of art
at a known time, providing the latest possible dates for objects made countless works exist whose artists remain unknown. Because per-
of those materials. Sometimes the material (or the manufacturing sonal style can play a large role in determining the character of an
technique) of an object or a building can establish a very precise date artwork, art historians often try to assign, or attribute, anonymous
of production or construction. works to known artists. Sometimes they assemble a group of works
Documentary evidence can help pinpoint the date of an object all thought to be by the same person, even though none of the objects
or building when a dated written document mentions the work. in the group is the known work of an artist with a recorded name.
Internal evidence can play a significant role in dating an art- Scholars base their attributions on internal evidence, such as the dis-
work. A painter might have depicted an identifiable person or a tinctive way an artist draws or carves drapery folds or earlobes. It re-
kind of hairstyle, clothing, or furniture fashionable only at a certain quires a keen, highly trained eye and long experience to become a
time. If so, the art historian can assign a more accurate date to that connoisseur, an expert in assigning artworks to “the hand” of one
painting. artist rather than another. Attribution is subjective, of course, and
I-2 Claude Lorrain, Embarkation of the Queen of Sheba, 1648. Oil on canvas, 4 10 6 4. National Gallery, London.
To create the illusion of a deep landscape, Claude Lorrain employed perspective, reducing the size of and blurring the most distant forms. Also, all
diagonal lines converge on a single point.
these spaces and masses graphically in several ways, including as DIFFERENT WAYS OF SEEING
plans, sections, elevations, and cutaway drawings.
Even a cursory look at the works illustrated in this book will quickly
A plan, essentially a map of a floor, shows the placement of a
reveal that throughout history, artists have created an extraordinary
structure’s masses and, therefore, the spaces they circumscribe and
variety of works for a multitude of different purposes. Despite this
enclose. A section, like a vertical plan, depicts the placement of the
diversity, the art produced by most non-Western artists differs from
masses as if someone cut through the building along a plane. Draw-
art produced in the Western world by the absence of two of the most
ings showing a theoretical slice across a structure’s width are lateral
characteristic ways that Western artists have used to represent peo-
sections. Those cutting through a building’s length are longitudinal
ple, objects, and places since the Greeks pioneered them a half mil-
sections. An elevation drawing is a head-on view of an external or in-
lennium before the Common Era—perspective and foreshortening.
ternal wall. A cutaway combines in a single drawing an exterior view
with an interior view of part of a building.
This overview of the art historian’s vocabulary is not exhaustive, PERSPECTIVE AND FORESHORTENING Perspective is
nor have artists used only painting, drawing, sculpture, and architec- a device to create the illusion of depth or space on a two-dimensional
ture as media over the millennia. Ceramics, jewelry, and textiles are surface. The French painter Claude Lorrain (1600–1682) em-
just some of the numerous other arts. All of them involve highly spe- ployed several perspectival devices in Embarkation of the Queen
cialized techniques described in distinct vocabularies. As in this in- of Sheba (FIG. I-2), a painting of a biblical episode set in a 17th-
troductory chapter, new terms are in italics where they first appear. century European harbor with a Roman ruin in the left foreground.
The comprehensive Glossary at the end of the book contains defini- For example, the figures and boats on the shoreline are much larger
tions of all italicized terms. than those in the distance. Decreasing the size of an object makes it
I-3 Ogata Korin, White and Red Plum Blossoms, Edo period, ca. 1710–1716. Pair of twofold screens. Ink, color, and gold leaf on paper, each screen
5 1 –58 5 7 –78 . MOA Art Museum, Shizuoka-ken.
Ogata Korin was more concerned with creating an interesting composition of shapes on a surface than with locating objects in space. Asian artists
rarely employed Western perspective.
appear farther away. Also, the top and bottom of the port building at left, seen from behind with the bottom of its left rear hoof facing
the painting’s right side are not parallel horizontal lines, as they are viewers and most of its head hidden by its rider’s shield, and the
in a real building. Instead, the lines converge beyond the structure, fallen hunter at the painting’s lower right corner, whose barely visi-
leading viewers’ eyes toward the hazy, indistinct sun on the horizon. ble legs and feet recede into the distance.
These perspectival devices—the reduction of figure size, the conver- Like the Japanese painter (FIG. I-3), the African sculptor who de-
gence of diagonal lines, and the blurring of distant forms—have picted the Benin King on horseback with his attendants (FIG. I-1) did
been familiar features of Western art for 2500 years. But it is impor- not employ any of the Western conventions seen in the Rubens
tant to note at the outset that all kinds of perspective are only picto- painting (FIG. I-4). Although the Rubens painting and the Benin
rial conventions, even when one or more types of perspective may plaque are of approximately the same date, the African figures are all
be so common in a given culture that people, including most read- in the foreground, stand (or sit) in upright positions, and face the
ers of this book, accept them as “natural” or as “true” means of rep- viewer directly. The sculptor represented nothing at an angle. The
resenting the natural world. viewer even looks at the horse head-on and sees only its two front
In White and Red Plum Blossoms (FIG. I-3), a Japanese land- legs and head. Once gain, neither approach to picture-making is the
scape painting on two folding screens, Ogata Korin (1658–1716) “correct” manner. The artists’ strikingly divergent styles reflect the
used none of these Western perspective conventions. He showed the significantly different societies of 17th-century Europe and Africa.
two plum trees as seen from a position on the ground, but viewers
look down on the stream between them from above. Less concerned PROPORTION AND SCALE The Rubens painting and the
with locating the trees and stream in space than with composing Benin relief also differ markedly in the artists’ treatment of porpor-
shapes on a surface, the painter played the water’s gently swelling tion and scale. Proportion concerns the relationships (in terms of
curves against the jagged contours of the branches and trunks. Nei- size) of the parts of persons, buildings, or objects. People can judge
ther the French nor the Japanese painting can be said to project “cor- “correct proportions” intuitively (“that statue’s head seems the right
rectly” what viewers “in fact” see. One painting is not a “better” pic- size for the body”). Or proportion can be a mathematical relation-
ture of the world than the other. The European and Asian artists ship between the size of one part of an artwork or building and the
simply approached the problem of picture-making differently. other parts within the work. Proportion in art implies using a mod-
Artists also represent single figures in space in varying ways. ule, or basic unit of measure. When an artist or architect uses a for-
When the Flemish artist Peter Paul Rubens (1577–1640) painted mal system of proportions, all parts of a building, body, or other en-
Lion Hunt (FIG. I-4), he used foreshortening for all the hunters and tity will be fractions or multiples of the module. A module might be
animals—that is, he represented their bodies at angles to the picture a column’s diameter, the height of a human head, or any other com-
plane. When in life one views a figure at an angle, the body appears ponent whose dimensions can be multiplied or divided to determine
to contract as it extends back in space. Foreshortening is a kind of the size of the work’s other parts.
perspective. It produces the illusion that one part of the body is far- In certain times and places, artists have formulated canons, or sys-
ther away than another, even though all the forms are on the same tems, of “correct” or “ideal” proportions for representing human fig-
surface. Especially noteworthy in Lion Hunt are the gray horse at the ures, constituent parts of buildings, and so forth. In ancient Greece,
I-4 Peter Paul Rubens, Lion Hunt, 1617–1618. Oil on canvas, 8 2 12 5. Alte Pinakothek, Munich.
Foreshortening—the representation of a figure or object at an angle to the picture plane—is a common device in Western art for creating the
illusion of depth. Foreshortening is a type of perspective.
many sculptors devised canons of proportions so strict and all- pear at approximately the same size on the page. Readers of Art
encompassing that they calculated the size of every body part in ad- through the Ages can learn the size of all artworks from the dimen-
vance, even the fingers and toes, according to mathematical ratios. sions given in the captions and, more intuitively, from the scales that
In other cases, artists have used disproportion to focus attention appear—for the first time in this 13th edition—at the lower left or
on one body part (often the head) or to single out a group member right corner of the illustration.
(usually the leader). These intentional “unnatural” discrepancies in
proportion constitute what art historians call hierarchy of scale, the ART AND CULTURE The history of art can be a history of
enlarging of elements considered the most important. On the Benin artists and their works, of styles and stylistic change, of materials and
plaque (FIG. I-1), the sculptor enlarged all the heads for emphasis techniques, of images and themes and their meanings, and of con-
and also varied the size of each figure according to its social status. texts and cultures and patrons. The best art historians analyze art-
Central, largest, and therefore most important is the Benin king, works from many viewpoints. But no art historian (or scholar in any
mounted on horseback. The horse has been a symbol of power and other field), no matter how broad-minded in approach and no mat-
wealth in many societies from prehistory to the present. That the ter how experienced, can be truly objective. Like artists, art historians
Benin king is disproportionately larger than his horse, contrary to are members of a society, participants in its culture. How can scholars
nature, further aggrandizes him. Two large attendants fan the king. (and museum visitors and travelers to foreign locales) comprehend
Other figures of smaller size and status at the Benin court stand on cultures unlike their own? They can try to reconstruct the original
the king’s left and right and in the plaque’s upper corners. One tiny cultural contexts of artworks, but they are limited by their distance
figure next to the horse is almost hidden from view beneath the from the thought patterns of the cultures they study and by the ob-
king’s feet. In contrast, in the Rubens painting (FIG. I-4), no figure is structions to understanding—the assumptions, presuppositions, and
larger than any other. prejudices peculiar to their own culture—their own thought patterns
One problem that students of art history—and professional art raise. Art historians may reconstruct a distorted picture of the past
historians too—confront when studying illustrations in art history because of culture-bound blindness.
books is that although the relative sizes of figures and objects in a A single instance underscores how differently people of diverse
painting or sculpture are easy to discern, it is impossible to deter- cultures view the world and how various ways of seeing can cause
mine the absolute size of the works reproduced because they all ap- sharp differences in how artists depict the world. Illustrated here are
I-5 Left: John Henry Sylvester, Portrait of Te Pehi Kupe, 1826. Watercolor, 8 –14 6 –14 . National Library of Australia, Canberra (Rex Nan Kivell
Collection). Right: Te Pehi Kupe, Self-Portrait, 1826. From Leo Frobenius, The Childhood of Man (New York: J. B. Lippincott, 1909).
These strikingly different portraits of the same Maori chief reveal how differently Western and non-Western artists “see” a subject. Understanding
the cultural context of artworks is vital to art history.
two contemporaneous portraits (FIG. I-5) of a 19th-century Maori people. Remarkably, Te Pehi Kupe created the tattoo patterns from
chieftain—one by an Englishman, John Sylvester (active early memory, without the aid of a mirror. The splendidly composed in-
19th century), and the other by the New Zealand chieftain himself, signia, presented as a flat design separated from the body and even
Te Pehi Kupe (d. 1829). Both reproduce the chieftain’s facial tattoo- from the head, is Te Pehi Kupe’s image of himself. Only by under-
ing. The European artist (FIG. I-5, left) included the head and shoul- standing the cultural context of each portrait can viewers hope to un-
ders and underplayed the tattooing. The tattoo pattern is one aspect derstand why either representation appears as it does.
of the likeness among many, no more or less important than the As noted at the outset, the study of the context of artworks and
chieftain’s European attire. Sylvester also recorded his subject’s mo- buildings is one of the central concerns of art historians. Art through
mentary glance toward the right and the play of light on his hair, the Ages: Non-Western Perspectives seeks to present a history of art
fleeting aspects that have nothing to do with the figure’s identity. and architecture in Asia, the Islamic world, the Americas, Oceania,
In contrast, Te Pehi Kupe’s self-portrait (FIG. I-5, right)—made and Africa that will help readers understand not only the subjects,
during a trip to Liverpool, England, to obtain European arms to take styles, and techniques of paintings, sculptures, buildings, and other
back to New Zealand—is not a picture of a man situated in space and art forms created in those parts of the world from the earliest times
bathed in light. Rather, it is the chieftain’s statement of the supreme to the present but also their cultural and historical contexts. That
importance of the tattoo design that symbolizes his rank among his story now begins.
Indus Civilization
The Indus Civilization flourished from about 2600 to 1500 BCE, and evidence indicates there was active
trade during this period between the peoples of the Indus Valley and Mesopotamia. The most important
excavated Indus sites are Harappa and Mohenjo-daro. These early, fully developed cities featured streets
oriented to compass points and multistoried houses built of carefully formed and precisely laid kiln-
baked bricks. But in sharp contrast to the contemporaneous civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt, no
surviving Indus building has yet been identified as a temple or a palace.
I R AN
East
AFG H AN I ST A N China
Peshawar CHINA Sea
GANDHARA H
i m T I B ET
Harappa
a l
a y
P AKI ST AN s R. P U N JA B Delhi N
E
a s S I KKI M
u Lumbini P A Philippine
Ind Mathura
Kushinagara L
Mohenjo- Ga
BHUTAN Sea
daro Yamuna R. n g es R. Patna (Pataliputra)
Khajuraho Sarnath
Udayagiri Barabar Bodh Gaya
G
Hills B I H A R
U
Sanchi
JA
M Y ANM AR
Deogarh
RA
(B U RMA )
T
Me
Dhauli
A
South
G
(Bombay) Mumbai Karle D e cca n P HILIP P I N E S
ko
IN
China
ng
W e s
AL
Elephanta R.
Plateau THAILAND
K
VIETNAM Sea
K rishna R. CAMBODIA
Angkor
t e
Andaman
Celebes
ha
Punjai
Polonnaruwa M A L A Y S I A
S RI L A NK A S Borneo Celebes
( C EY L O N ) u
m SINGAPORE
a
t
r
INDIAN OCEAN a I N D O N E S I A
South Asia Java Sea
Dieng
Southeast Asia 0 400 800 miles Plateau
0 400 800 kilometers Borobudur
J a va
MOHENJO-DARO The Indus cities boasted one of the world’s deep. The builders made the pool watertight by sealing the joints be-
first sophisticated systems of water supply and sewage. Throughout tween the bricks with bitumen, an asphaltlike material also used in
Mohenjo-daro, hundreds of wells provided fresh water to homes Mesopotamia. The bath probably was not a purely recreational facil-
that featured some of the oldest recorded private bathing areas and ity but rather a place for ritual bathing of the kind still practiced in
toilet facilities with drainage into public sewers. In the heart of the the region today.
city stood the so-called Great Bath, a complex of rooms centered on Excavators have discovered surprisingly little art from the long-
a sunken brick pool (FIG. 1-2) 39 feet long, 23 feet wide, and 8 feet lived Indus Civilization, and all of the objects found are small.
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.