Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISBN: 978-1-5063-7919-7
Why another generalist text? There are three reasons this book should exist,
and they all start with “new.” First, there are new developments in our
understanding of generalist practice. If you’re old enough, you remember the
days before generalist practice when we were struggling to find a way to
coordinate an increasingly confusing array of practice methods: structural,
functional, interactional, generic, the life model, etc. When generalist practice
came along, it was an answer to many of our prayers: a common base for
practice with a set of concepts like person-in-environment (PIE) and stages of
change, that we could all—finally—agree on. This is why generalist practice
is the glue that holds this profession together. No matter the level of
education, the modality of practice, or the level of practice, everything we do
flows out of the generalist implementation model (GIM). Happily, generalist
practice has kept up with the times. It has been flexible enough to incorporate
our growing understanding of how social work operates in its zeitgeist. Over
time, we’ve bolstered generalist practice with the strengths perspective.
We’ve articulated a stage of change called engagement and put it right in
front of assessment. We’ve added considerations of spirituality and diversity.
We’ve changed problem-solving to planned change. These past evolutions
are what has allowed generalist social work practice to stay alive. But there
have been more developments recently, and this book allows us to put them
into context.
Some new developments that are present in this book include a focus on self-
reflection that shows up as a new first stage of planned change. The
evidence-based practice of mindfulness for reflection is illuminated. Also in
service to self-reflection are the case studies that are presented in a unique
way. We hear the thoughts of the worker as they struggle with their own
impact on the helping process. Each chapter includes a validated personality
survey to guide students’ thinking about their own thinking and a section on
the emotions of the worker in the chapter’s case study. In addition, the new,
more nuanced understanding of diversity is presented using the concepts
cultural humility and intersectionality. Gender expression works its way in
too. In that vein, the gender-neutral pronoun they is used throughout in its
new singular form. The overall self-reflection message to students is that they
should understand themselves and build a professional use of self before they
begin engagement in every case.
Finally, these days generalist practice rests on a new code of ethics. Students
are introduced to the NASW Code of Ethics (National Association of Social
Workers [NASW], 2018) in several ways: There is a feature at the end of
each chapter that includes an ethical dilemma, and there is an ethical
challenge question in every chapter that directs students to actually read
portions of the code. For those of us who may have become used to the 1996
version, there is an appendix to the book that identifies all of the changes that
appear in the 2018 version.
The second “new” that accounts for this book is that we have a new audience.
While the book is friendly to the mature student, it speaks directly to the
young person who lives in a dynamic culture much different from our own.
One reviewer wrote that today’s students’ “love bite-sized information,
challenges, lists, intro and summaries, outline of learning points, and
presentation of content that can be dissected. I believe the author has
accomplished all of these and the readability is appropriate.” Readability is
paramount in this text. After all, isn’t the most frustrating part of teaching
social work the fact that our students don’t want to read? The book is full of
diagrams, and concepts are also illustrated with a lot of sample “he said, she
said” dialogue. Ideas are introduced in one chapter and reinforced and
practiced in the next. And the next. Important concepts are infused
throughout, and mastery is assessed through exercises provided in ever-
increasing complexity while students’ understanding of concepts develops.
Other aspects of the book facilitate student mastery of concepts and your
documentation of that mastery. For example, following each chapter, you will
find a matrix noting which competencies are addressed in which sections and
features that align with each of the competencies are identified. In this simple
table, students will be able to recognize their progress with the competencies
they must ultimately demonstrate. Faculty, please note that this matrix is in
exact conformity to the sample matrix that CSWE provides in the
Accreditation portion of their website.
Fong, R., Lubben, J., & Barth, R. P. (Eds.). (2018). Grand challenges for
social work and society. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
This book would not have been possible without the help and inspiration of
many. First, let me thank all of the social work theorists past and present who
have broken the ground and shared their passion for the profession and for
teaching. Thanks go to the faculty and staff of the Department of Social
Work at Kutztown University of Pennsylvania for their inspiration, input, and
the general dedication that allowed me to step away to write. I also would not
have had the opportunity to write had not my sister, Adele, been willing to
shoulder the lion’s share of family responsibilities. Thanks to friends like
Colin Hanna, who were willing to read early drafts, and particularly to John
Vafeas, whose general support, meticulous reading, and well-thought-out
input resulted in significant improvements. Thanks also go to all of the
students whose seminar discussions inform a number of the case studies in
the book. Finally, thanks go to my colleagues across the country who were
willing to review the developing manuscript. I am humbled by your careful
reading and detailed comments—nearly all of which I have addressed in one
form or another. They have resulted in a much better book than would have
been possible otherwise. Thanks for the love and support from Alice, Allison,
Kristen, and Lisa, who help me do whatever I do, and to Arik, Chico, Alicia,
and Alexis just for being their delightful selves. Finally, my deepest
appreciation goes to my daughter, Alice, who is always willing to translate
the evolving language of young people. She generously shared stories of her
own social work practice and confirmed my suspicion that this book needed
to be written.
Janice Gasker,
has studied and taught social work at all levels. She has been teaching
generalist social work practice for over 20 years, and is currently the
bachelor of social work (BSW) program director at Kutztown University
of Pennsylvania. She has coauthored a master of social work (MSW)
and a doctor of social work (DSW) curriculum and has authored a
number of Council on Social Work Education (CSWE) self-studies,
including those required for initial accreditation and multiple
reaffirmations.
Janice has also consulted with other universities on building their self-
study on generalist curricula. She has published numerous articles and
authored two books on childhood sexual abuse.
Part I Conceptual Foundations
1 Introduction to Generalist Social Work
This introductory chapter begins with a case study, setting the stage for the
format of chapters to come. It focuses on four main topics to create a
foundation for the rest of the text: (1) the definition and characteristics of
generalist social work practice, (2) the person-in-environment (PIE)
perspective, (3) multisystem practice (MSP), and (4) the function of the
generalist approach and social work education. The unique aspects of the
social work profession are featured.
Learning Objectives
1.1 Explain the differences between social work and other helping professions, including
the person-in-environment (PIE) perspective.
1.2 Recall the definition of generalist social work practice.
1.3 Explain the attributes of generalist social work practice.
1.4 Describe the role of generalist practice in the social work profession.
1.5 Paraphrase the competencies common to all social workers, and recall the stages of
planned change.
Case Study: The Social Work Difference
Marella’s footsteps sounded strangely hollow as she walked down the school
hallway. The day at Thaddeus Stevens Elementary school was over for the
kids. Most of the professionals had gone home too. Marella was there
because it was Thursday, and she worked from noon to 8:00 p.m. on
Thursday. It meant she had to have her daughter in day care until late at
night, but she spent quality time with her every Thursday morning. And the
change in her schedule was worth it. In the evenings, Thaddeus Stevens was
transformed. Several generations of social work professionals had worked to
make Thaddeus Stevens a school that was truly a part of the neighborhood.
No longer was the school a place where parents came when their kid was in
trouble. Now, it was a place of community support.
Social workers work with students, but their job is very different from
that of a teacher or other professional.
©iStock.com/Wavebreakmedia
As she turned a corner, Marella could see the job search staff arranging the
chairs for job interview role plays. Marella headed down the hall to the
classroom she used every Thursday for her Kids Night Out Without (KNOW)
program. The “without” meant without parents, teachers or preschool
siblings. Marella smiled as she remembered Alessandro, the sixth grader who
named the program. He’d gone from being a kid who rarely spoke to one who
had no problem raising his voice to shout out his suggestion for the name of
the group. That was a year ago, and since then, the KNOW group had
expanded its purpose. Originally, Marella had developed the group to provide
a place for single parents to bring their school-aged children so they could
participate in the Job Search Night. Now, KNOW had another purpose. It still
provided care for 12 students, but the students received social work services
too. The added purpose of KNOW was to allow students to share their
feelings about the topic of the week and to locate community resources for
families. It worked like this: Hour 1 served as behavioral therapy to allow the
kids to learn appropriate socialization. To the kids, Hour 1 was actually called
Horsing Around Time. Marella chose this name for the early part of the
group because every day a particular teacher would stand in the hallway
shouting “Stop horsing around!” Marella knew it was hard for the kids to sit
still all day, so she thought she’d make horsing around okay for a while.
Desks were pushed to the side of the room and playtime began. Sometimes
she would have the kids play Duck, Duck, Goose or Red Light, Green Light
so they’d have a chance to run around. While there was the occasional
behavioral challenge, for the most part the kids ended up smiling and settled
just in time for Snack. Most of the kids were hungry at the end of the day.
Some of them would be getting a quick dinner and no breakfast the next
morning.
At the beginning of the school year, Marella approached the principal about
providing nutritious snacks on Thursday evenings. She went to the principal’s
office at the appointment time. That day, she dressed up a bit and made sure
she wasn’t late. When she entered the office, she said, “How are you, Mr.
Davis?” It was in a voice only a little higher than usual. Then she sat down
and glanced at a memo she had prepared. “As you know, even though we
provide free breakfast and lunch, some of our kids are still hungry.” She tried
to stop her knee from jiggling. “So I’d like to provide a nutritious snack on
Thursday evenings when I have my social work session with 12 kids.”
Marella had done her homework. “I’ve talked to the cafeteria workers about
federal guidelines for nutritious foods, and I’ve drawn up a list of approved
snacks. Alongside each I have the cost of that snack for 12 people.” Marella
handed her memo to the principal. He said, “You don’t need the cafeteria or
the cafeteria staff to do this?” No, she didn’t. “Are these all allergy-free
foods?” Yes, they were. Then, to her utter astonishment, he said, “See Ms.
Rivera at the desk. Let her know I told you that you can be reimbursed up to
$15.00 each week for snacks as long as you present a receipt.” Marella was
elated, knowing she had just improved the lives of 12 kids every week for the
rest of the school year. And that’s how Snack became a part of Thursday
evenings.
After Snack was Safe Space, a group social work session in which kids talked
about the theme of the week. Sometimes the theme was anger management
(Count to Ten), sometimes it was family functioning (Dare to Care), and
sometimes it was abuse prevention (Talking Helps). During these group
social work sessions, Marella helped the students share their feelings and
develop solutions to challenges they faced every day. Later, when parents and
caregivers came to collect the kids, Marella snuck in some family-based
social work—once she quietly provided a mom with a referral to an intimate
partner violence prevention group, once she talked to a grandmother about
parenting and self-care skills, and once she walked a mom to the bus stop so
she could point out the location of a nearby cost-free food pantry.
If a student obviously needed individual counseling, Marella almost always
referred the kid’s caregiver or parent to the school counselor—Marella didn’t
have time to do much individual counseling. If a kid needed to be tested for
intelligence to become eligible for classroom supports or if Marella wondered
if a kid had a learning disability, she referred the caregiver to the school
psychologist to set a time for testing. As the school social worker, she spent
most of her time helping teachers modify their classroom activities to
incorporate troubled kids; making visits to kids’ homes to provide family
counseling and prevent truancy; working with the principal to make school
policies student-friendly; and interviewing kids that were identified as at risk
for child abuse. It was always a hectic week, but Marella’s favorite day was
Thursday . . . when she could work in the program she developed herself.
Section 1.1: The Uniqueness of the Social Work
Profession
In this section, we begin to look at the uniqueness of the social work
profession.
What Makes a Social Worker Different?
Social workers often work alongside either volunteers or other human service
providers without a social work background. Marella worked with a school
psychologist, a school counselor, a nurse, a physical therapist, a principal,
and library volunteers. People usually had an idea, or thought they had an
idea, of what each of those professional roles entailed. Social work was
different. When Marella said she was the school social worker, people often
misunderstood social work. If she was lucky, they asked her what a social
worker does. Marella wished she had a way to tell them all of the things
social workers could do:
She worked with kids individually and in groups. She worked with
their families. She intervened on the organizational (school) level
by working with the principal and with teachers. Most important to
her personal satisfaction was that she had developed a program to
serve the needs of the community. Marella knew that she looked at
things differently than all of the people she worked with, but she
didn’t know how to explain it.
It’s best if social workers can understand and can let people know what the
profession is about. It’s often misunderstood, and as a result it’s often
underappreciated. You will learn about five of the ways social work is a
unique profession:
Ethical Perspectives
Get a copy of the NASW Code of Ethics (NASW, 2018). You can buy a copy from NASW
or get it for free on their website. Take a look at the purpose of the NASW Code of Ethics
(NASW, 2018) on page 2. Which values, principles, and standards seem most important to
you?
Some aspects of the social work code are unique. Social justice, for example,
may be seen in other professions’ codes, but in ours it’s up front in the core
professional values. We don’t just care about fairness for individuals; we care
about equity for families, groups, organizations, and communities. The same
thing is true with the dignity and worth of the person. Of course, many
professionals find it important to respect the dignity of people, but social
workers focus on it in every situation. Most people who choose to be social
workers share these values with the social work profession. Because of the
NASW Code of Ethics (NASW, 2018), social workers make ideal candidates
for a broad range of human service jobs. The code provides for that broad
range of jobs by addressing the common concerns of social workers who are
child welfare workers, probation officers, educators, hospital and nursing
home case managers, job coaches, program evaluators, hospice workers,
family counselors, political staff members, mental health counselors and case
managers, school social workers, group counselors, homeless outreach
workers, youth mentors, substance abuse counselors, grant writers, crisis
counselors, and more. The NASW Code of Ethics (NASW, 2018) is such a
significant part of social work that it will be revisited throughout this text.
Person-In-Environment Perspective
The third uniqueness of social work is that every social worker views their
work through the person-in-environment (PIE) lens. The Encyclopedia of
Social Work calls this a “practice-guiding principle” (Mizrahi & Davis,
2008). The PIE perspective is another concept of such importance to the
social worker that it will be seen throughout this text. The PIE perspective
“creates uniform statements of social roles; environmental, mental, and
physical health problems; and client strengths” (Karls & Wandrei, 1994, p.
3). In other words, the PIE perspective gives social workers a unique
perspective and a language to describe that perspective.
Most important is the fact that PIE perspective allows all generalist social
workers to perceive people as participants in
a family,
a culture, and
society.
This means that individuals can be best understood by considering how they
interact with all components of their environments. This allows us to seek out
and identify the cause of people’s challenges in that space where people
interact with other people and institutions. For example, we recognize that a
child’s violent behavior might be influenced by a conflict-ridden household.
We recognize that a teacher’s classroom rules might be influenced by
administration policies. A parent’s behavior may be influenced by their
financial concerns or unemployment. By thinking of it that way, we avoid
blaming people for their situations—peoples’ lives are influenced by many
interacting systems. People may not know how to change those systems. We
think of families, schools, and “big picture” things like health care as systems
because PIE is an offshoot of general systems theory, a topic we’ll cover in
depth in Chapter 2. For now, know that the PIE perspective allows social
workers to see peoples’ problems outside of themselves and not necessarily
as their fault. The PIE perspective is also important to us in that it forms part
of the foundation for multisystem practice (MSP), a method of
understanding the situations of the people we serve and a method of carrying
out social work practice.
Social Justice
Social workers seek social justice. Our NASW Code of Ethics (NASW, 2018;
more on the code later) is very clear about our profession’s connection to
social justice. The profession’s mission is to “enhance human well-being and
help meet the basic human needs of all people with particular attention to the
needs and empowerment of people who are vulnerable, oppressed, and living
in poverty . . . Social workers promote social justice and social change”
(NASW, 2018, p. 1). The definition assumes that people who are vulnerable,
oppressed, and living in poverty are living with social injustice. Social justice
can be defined in many ways (more on this in Chapter 14), but it is often
associated with human rights (Gasker & Fischer, 2014). To the Council on
Social Work Education (CSWE; 2015), human rights include freedom,
safety, privacy, an adequate standard of living, health care, and education. In
addition, human rights can be thought of in broad terms, as “civil, political,
environmental, economic, social, and cultural” (p. 7). All of this is to say that
social workers are always on the lookout for injustice in big and small ways.
We work to create situations where the benefits of society are distributed to
where they are needed the most.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
DANCE ON STILTS AT THE GIRLS’ UNYAGO, NIUCHI
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.