Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/309476629
Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis of the Iponan River Watershed with the
Proposed Dike System
CITATIONS READS
0 550
6 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Jefferson Jr. Ramos Vallente on 09 April 2023.
Abstract - It has been observed from recent years that flooding has been increasing in frequency in most river basins in the Philippines.
Consequently, the changing course of the rivers due to recurring floods have detrimental effects on hydraulic structures built to mitigate
flooding. In Iponan River Basin located in Cagayan de Oro City inundating rivers has threatened areas that were thought to be distant
and safe during extreme rains. During the TS Sendong and ST Pablo flood event, the river overflowed in which some existing sections
of the proposed dike system were already present before the flood, the design was proven insufficient since some areas are still inundated.
This study aims to determine the effectivity of the proposed dike system with the consideration of the downstream areas of the river.
Digital Elevation Model (DEM) from Lidar data is used and satellite imagery dataset such as Landsat and ASTER were utilized
extensively to extract topographic data like the river geometry, cross-section and land use. Also, other important data like precipitation
and flood-dike specifications from PAG-ASA and DPWH respectively were considered.
Page 2 of 6
XU Engineering Resource Center
College of Engineering
Xavier University – Ateneo de Cagayan
Table 1. The necessary parameter values are determined by the
2.2 Hydrological data selected methods. The initial abstraction, curve number,
percentage impervious and manning’s coefficient of roughness n,
2.2.1 Rainfall for each subbasin were computed based on the soil type, land cover
and land use data. The subbasin lagtime and baseflow were
The rainfall data used in the simulation of actual and hypothetical computed based on the analysis of the topography of the basin.
rain events in HEC-HMS were acquired from PAG-ASA rainfall
database and XU-ERC and Shell Weather Stations (TRMM?). Table 1. Methods used for the different calculation type for the
hydrologic elements
2.2.2 Gauge Height – Discharge Hydrologic Calculation Type Method
Element
Gauge height – discharge relationship was established by Subbasin Loss Rate SCS Curve Number
expressing it in a form of a rating curve wherein discharge, Q Transform SCS Unit Hydrograph
serves as a function of the gauge height, h readings used in the Baseflow Constant Monthly
calibration of the HEC-HMS Model. Furthermore, the gauge Reach Routing Muskingum-Cunge
height and discharge data located at San Simon, Pagatpat Station
were acquired from the Quality Assurance and Hydrology Division
2.4 Hydraulic Model Development
of DPWH in a handbook format. The data are then manually
tabulated in excel format and was subjected to further analysis by
From the rainfall-runoff model performed in HEC-HMS, peak
generating two separate rating curves for Pre-Sendong and Post-
flow probabilities need to be evaluated using the flood hydrograph
Sendong data. Based from the analysis, it shows that the Post-
resulted from the simulation and flow statistics. This analysis will
Sendong rating curve with an R-squared value of 0.87 must be used
yield a hydrograph that requires for specifying the boundary
in the HMS Calibration.
condition in hydraulic analysis using HEC-RAS. The water-
surface elevation at various cross-sections of a the Iponan river
reach could be traced through performing HEC-RAS simulations
using the Digital Terrain Model (DTM) and inflow hydrographs.
The DTM would be generated using the existing topographic and
bathymetric data. The topographic data contain the spot heights of
the flood plain collected from the field, and the bathymetric data is
from the river under study.
The hydrologic model of Iponan River Basin was developed using The RAS layers include layers created for stream centerline, cross-
HEC-HMS together with the ArcMap v.10 extension HEC- section cut-lines, flow-path centerlines, and main channel banks.
GeoHMS. It is a public domain software developed by the US Additional layers like land use (for Manning’s ‘n’ extraction) and
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to simulate event-based and levees (dike systems) could be developed and imported. Finally
continuous rainfall – runoff of dendritic watersheds. running the GeoRAS would be carried out to generate the flood
depth maps. Boundary conditions for the upstream as well as the
An ASTER-Based DEM was used as the terrain for the basin downstream are chosen in terms of water levels corresponding to
model. The watershed delineation and its hydrologic elements, input discharges of the gauge stations or the results obtained from
namely the subbasins, junctions and reaches, were generated using the hydrologic analysis. A one-dimensional hydraulic analysis
HEC-GeoHMS after importing the elevation data and stream component for unsteady flow simulation is performed and the
networks. resulting flood depth would be compared with the field surveyed
data. Field data needed to be collected by surveying the floodplain
Parameters for the subbasins and reaches were computed after the at the selected locations during the Sendong 2011 and Pablo 2012
model domain was created. There were several methods available events and is required for model verification.
for different calculation types for each subbasin and reach
hydrologic elements. The methods used in this study are shown in
Page 3 of 6
XU Engineering Resource Center
College of Engineering
Xavier University – Ateneo de Cagayan
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION adjusted for HEC-RAS only considers a one -dimensional flow.
When calibrating models, it must have the right amount of
3.1 Model Development discharge to be able to attain an output which can assimilate a
corresponding flood event. Generating a reasonable value of
This section explains the necessary processes on which each phase Manning’s coefficient is crucial to obtaining a good model and to
took an account to generate the desired output. do so, land use must have a good accuracy check.
The land cover of the Iponan Rivebasin identified five (5) unique Calibration is about adjusting the models to a referred standard.
classifications for the spectral analysis of the study area which are While calibrating, data acquired from TS Pablo (2012) and flood
essential for the rainfall-runoff mode and flood models. These maps developed by XU-ERC for TS Pablo were used. Calibration
classifications are the built-up areas (urban areas, constructed points were set respectively to flooded and non-flooded zones and
channels and roads), water (rivers, streams and canals), light these corresponding points measured the accuracy of the model
vegetation (crop lands and grass lands), heavy vegetation (dense after calibration is done.
forested areas), and open soil (earth windings and no vegetation
areas). The specific classifications are essential to the hydraulic A total of five (5) hydraulic models were developed to calibrate the
model to achieve a realistic and spatially precise hydrologic and ST Pablo rain event. To increase the accuracy of the calibrated
hydraulic model. (Merwade, 2012) models, computed parameters such as cross-section cutlines and
levees were altered since given data such as discharge and land use
The classification yielded a 91% average accuracy for the four are close to real values. After simulation of trials, results show a
different ROIs of 30x30-meter spatial resolution. The same percent match of more than 80% on the comparison of flooded
classifications were resampled by the Majority Resampling areas and verification points. The maximum percent match
method in ArcMap, a method used for discrete data. This generated attained was 91.18% and is subjected to validation with the TS
a classification with a 150x150-meter spatial resolution which the Sendong rain event.
accuracy averaged 77.5%. Both classifications conformed to the
accuracy range which would be acceptable for the applicable 3.1.4 Validation
standards. (Bach et al., 2005,
Rozenstein and Karneli, 2010) Validation is one of the final stages necessary to create an accurate
hydraulic model. The five (5) hydraulic models uses the rain data
from TS sendong which was gathered by XU-ERC. The models
are simulated with the use of the TS Sendong flow hydrograph.
Inundated maps are then compared along the concerned flooded
areas during our reconnaissance survey. The method of validation
Table 2. Manning’s n values is similar on how calibration was done where percent match
between flooded areas and verification points were computed.
Land Use Classification Manning’s n values
Water 0.030
3.1.5 Flood Inundation Analysis
Built up 0.015
Light vegetation 0.035 Flood inundation analysis is an important component for
Heavy vegetation 0.100 appropriate land use planning in floodplain areas. It is usually in
Open soil 0.020 the form of easily-read, rapidly-accessible charts and maps which
facilitates the administrators and planners to identify areas of
3.1.2 Sensitivity Analysis concern and prioritize their mitigation or response efforts. This
study integrates advanced techniques to accurately delineate flood
Out of the eight (8) parameters considered and administered to prone areas. In addition, analyzing the on-going construction of the
sensitivity analysis, four (4) of which were proven sensitive. DPWH dike system was considered in the RAS model both under
Namely cross-section cutlines, levees, discharge and Manning’s in a Sendong and Pablo scale flood to determine the inundated
coefficient. areas along the floodplain area.
Results indicate that each parameter has its corresponding value to 3.2 Model Parameters
effectively generate the hydraulic models. Cross-section cutlines
must have the right amount of cross section interval which will This section explains the necessary parameters used to generate the
extend throughout the concerned span. Levees can be man-made desired model.
or natural but when generating in HEC-RAS, it must be constantly
Page 4 of 6
XU Engineering Resource Center
College of Engineering
Xavier University – Ateneo de Cagayan
3.2.1. Cross-section Filter Points 3.2.4 Levees
Cross-section data generated in each cut line is defined by a series HEC-RAS can only support two levees per cross-section, the left
of station elevation points provided by Hydrologic Engineering and right over bank. It also allows the user to define levees which
Center River Analysis System (HEC-RAS). The data developed by can constrain the flow of water. When levees are assigned, the
HEC-RAS is limited to a minimum and maximum number of four software will restrict the water from entering the riverside until
(4) and five hundred (500) station-elevation points respectively. IF water overflows. Levee stations and elevations are set above
a given data exceeds the maximum number of points, HEC-RAS ground and HEC-RAS will input vertical walls at a specified
will fail to process the unsteady flow data however HEC-RAS location.
provides an option where one can filter and specify the number of
points needed to generate in each cross-section. Cross sections that The sensitivity analysis shows that levees are erratic since it has
do not meet the specified limitations will be automatically considerable effects in the hydraulic model. HEC-RAS computes
removed. water surface profiles but with given errors where it directly
inundates areas with the same elevation as the water surface and in
Based from the results provided by the sensitivity analysis (cross- the end, can lead to inappropriate inundated locations. To eliminate
section filter points), the filter points became erratic when the this error, a natural levee must be placed at the highest elevation
limitation was set to fifty (50) below due to the profile becoming where it can prevent the overflow of water.
less defined compared to the previous two (2) trials. It was then
concluded that accuracy was measured on how many filter points 3.2.5 Manning’s Coefficient
were used in every corresponding test. The more points, the
accurate the data will be. The results of the trials suggest that one Manning’s coefficient is an essential factor in obtaining an
hundred (100) filter points is enough to generate a clear model with accurate computation for water surface profile. During sensitivity
an accurate flood inundation map. analysis, N-values are classified using various land use layer with
the use of the software ArcMap. The results acquired varies upon
3.2.2 Stream Centerline and Flowpaths the selection of the roughness coefficient for each cross-section.
The parameters must be properly selected for it affects the
Stream centerline is used to define the main channel flow of the accuracy of the model. The N-values per cross-section inputted in
river and is needed to generate river stations to cross-sections while the model is only limited to less than or equal to twenty (20)
flowpaths are used to obtain the downstream reach lengths variations.
between cross-sections and overbank areas. Stream centerline and
flowpaths are RAS geometry needed for HEC-GeoRAS to run. 3.2.6 Energy Slope
The results show that stream centerline and flowpath parameters Energy slope is necessary in obtaining the normal depth within the
do not require modification since parameters are accurate and boundary conditions of the concerned location. With ArcGIS, it
clear. can digitize terrain models of the river which will generate a river
bed elevation profile. The data acquired can then be used to
3.2.3 Cross-section Cut lines calculate the energy slope via elevation over distance. The data
measured can be utilized by the base model for its set parameters.
HEC-RAS then uses the energy slope to solve for the normal
Cross-section cut lines represents the cross-section location where
depth.
station and elevation data will be extracted from the terrain.
Intersection of cut lines with other RAS geometry determines the 3.2.7 Discharge
manning’s roughness coefficients, position of levee, location of
bank stations, and downstream reach lengths. Water surface
Discharge is one of the essential factors in generating the desired
profiles are computed per cross-section and it is one of the most
model. Data gathered from PAGASA (rainfall data from Pablo
important RAS geometry inputs to HEC-RAS to produce a 2012, January 16-17, 2017 flood, January 3, 2013 flood) were used
hydraulic model. Due to HEC-RAS limitation, it can only compute as basis to produce flow hydrograph which simulates the flooded
cross-section data and lengths of the cross-section cut lines area.
programed to the software.
The results show that the width of cross-section cut lines must be IV. CONCLUSION
wide enough to allow non-linear floodplain delineate among cross-
sections. Intervals between cross-sections also contribute to the The Iponan River basin was modeled using HEC-HMS for the
effects when generating a hydraulic model. The closer the interval, inflow hydrograph and HEC-RAS for the flood depth to determine
the accurate the model will be. the inundated areas along the floodplain with the consideration of
the DPWH dike system. With the increasing urbanization in the
area due to the presence of the million peso projects such as Seven
Page 5 of 6
XU Engineering Resource Center
College of Engineering
Xavier University – Ateneo de Cagayan
Seas Waterpark and Resort owned by Engr. Elpidio Paras and City
Mall in Barangay Barra and the Amaia Scapes subdivision by
Ayala situated in Barangay Canitoan, it is evident that it imposes a
threat for the community wherein an increase of the flood peak
during heavy rainfall in the upstream area is possible.
V. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
VI. REFERENCES