Professional Documents
Culture Documents
STARTER GUIDE
Contents
1
SAFe and Scaled Agile Framework are registered trademarks of Scaled Agile, Inc.
A Release Train Engineer is a servant leader who steers the Agile Release Train (ART) of five to ten agile teams
(product developers, their Product Owners, and Scrum Masters), the Product Manager, and the System Architect/
Engineer.
The RTE uses their knowledge to tailor Lean-Agile to work well within the ART’s specific environment. The RTE
facilitates the Lean-Agile processes to speed the workflow and to grow the agility of the ART’s people, improving
the ART’s value delivery.
Think back to when you worked with a great RTE. How did they model the role? What made them so effective? If
you have not been that fortunate, find a mentor in your organization, or follow a role model’s podcast or blog for
ideas and advice.
Agility
Epic
NFRs Epic
Enabler
Portfolio Backlog
Solution Solution
Demo Demo LARGE SOLUTION
Roadmap
Enabler
Pre
Pre
Kanban
Compliance
Post
Post
Solution Solution Variable
Enterprise Arch/Eng Mgmt Fixed MBSE Capability
Milestones
Solution Set-Based NFRs
Delivery S O LU T I O N
Solution Backlog
STE TRAIN Supplier
Shared
Services
Customer Centricity Continuous Delivery Pipeline ESSENTIAL
Business
Agile Owners
Product AG I L E R E L E A S E T R A I N CoP
Delivery Solution
PI Planning
PI Planning
NFRs • Review
Agile Teams Program Scrum
• Retro DevOps
IP Iteration
IP Iteration
Enabler
Backlog
CI CI Feature
Metrics
Product Story
Owner
Architectural Built-In
NFRs CE Iterations CE Story Runway
Continuous Quality
Learning Scrum Team Kanban Program Increment Program Increment
Master Backlogs
Culture Leffingwell, et al. © Scaled Agile, Inc.
Lean-Agile Leadership
SAFe and Scaled Agile Framework are registered trademarks of Scaled Agile, Inc.
Source: https://www.scaledagileframework.com/#
The Release Train Engineer consistently demonstrates the Lean-Agile mindset through their actions and words in a
non-transactional work environment. The intent of this guide is not to dive into the Lean-Agile mindset. However,
the Lean-Agile mindset is crucial and essential to becoming an effective RTE.
• DevOps Approach
The RTE is responsible for applying principles in the ART. Apply principles over practices, tools and processes. Above
all, apply values.
• Translator of metrics
• Cultivate a positive environment and experiences for the people of the ART.
• Ensure valuable metrics are in place. Transparently report ART standing while
helping to track features and capabilities.
• Coach how to get the best use out of the tools available and lobby for better
tools.
COACH
The RTE supports the Lean-Agile transformation by coaching the ART (agile
teams, Product Manager, System Architect/Engineer, and Business Owner(s)).
The RTE ensures the ART utilizes Lean-Agile processes and events.
• Ensure the input for PI Planning is well-crafted (Vision, Roadmap, and Backlogs)
• Facilitate the PI planning event. Develop an agenda and keep everyone on track to
complete within the short timebox.
• Facilitate the Scrum of Scrum and PO Sync with purpose and tangible outcomes.
The RTE works tirelessly on a systemic level to support the ART within the
larger organization.
• Nurture relationships between ART members and others outside the ART.
The RTE backlog isn’t something you learn about in OUTSIDE YOUR BOARD
your certification course, but it will make a difference
• If an ART has teams with different holiday
as you perform your responsibilities as your ART’s
calendars, develop a comprehensive holiday
Servant Leader. Consider the agile backlog – an agile
calendar and provide it to the ART to remove
tool teams use to track the stories and other work
potential issues.
they want to complete in an Increment.
• Depending on how the ART’s Product
By developing, refining, and prioritizing your own Manager schedules customer sessions, the
RTE backlog, you’ll be able to pull stories into RTE may want to keep those on their radar.
iterations that set realistic expectations, maintain a In less experienced ARTs, these sessions tend
steady pace of improvement, and align dependencies to become a five-alarm fire drill that affects
and constraints. teams. Get ahead of it.
With ART event facilitation efforts in the RTE backlog, Be sure to commit time each week to read blogs,
it’s now time to add self-improvement actions. An RTE participate in online classes, talk to other RTEs, get
commits to their continuous self-improvement. involved in Agile Communities of Practice, or reach out
to mentors.
Start by reviewing the RTE traits and responsibilities
in the last section. What are your strengths? Where do
you need to improve? Are there any areas of learning
that especially interest you? Add these ideas to the
“What you do speaks so loudly I cannot hear
RTE backlog. Use this RTE backlog to track, prioritize,
what you say.”
and measure your improvement progress.
– Ralph Waldo Emerson
The RTE is responsible for the ART’s agile health. Operationalize improvement activities:
An Improvement Roadmap helps you improve agile
health. • Add identified efforts from team discussions
to the ART Improvement Roadmap when they
The ART Improvement Roadmap is built from don’t belong in a team backlog. For example, an
retrospectives, problem-solving workshops, and ART refresh on consistent metric gathering and
keen observations. Although the RTE maintains it, reporting.
it takes everyone’s input on the ART to construct a
useful ART Improvement Roadmap. Over time, these • Gather the appropriate buy-in for each action on
improvements build healthy Lean-Agile practices that the roadmap. For example, you may need funding
benefit the ART and organization. for training, or you may need to persuade the team
to join a 30-minute assessment exercise.
An agile roadmap is not a locked plan. As the backlog
is continually re-prioritized, the roadmap changes. It • During PI Planning, ensure that the larger efforts
takes skill to proactively improve the ART’s processes. are on the teams’ Iteration Boards in their Capacity
and Lean-Agile health without distracting from the allocation. For example, you may need to negotiate
ART’s solution intent. An ART has a limited capacity and divert team capacity in future PIs for a two-
for change; so be sure to prioritize changes. Keep day training.
your servant leadership firmly in place, balancing
the need for continuous improvement with product
development work.
In this sync, you will again want to uncover how the ART
currently maneuvers the Lean-Agile activities (customer
centricity, roadmap, runway, dependencies, non-
functional requirements, enabler work, releases, etc.). R S P
T A/ d
It’s a good idea to begin syncing as a triad on a regular
weekly cadence, especially if you don’t sit shoulder-to-
E E M
shoulder. These syncs will quickly evolve into problem-
solving discussions, brainstorming exercises, or a
coffee break about your weekend (remember it’s about
building relationships).
A Triad Sync, or something similar, is not something
Bring the insights gained from your other syncs as all ARTs do. We find it builds a strong ART and often
topics to discuss. If you find that you no longer need resolves risks before they occur. The RTE tailors Lean-
this sync, that’s great. You’ve established an openness Agile to support the ART within the environment. What
between each other. novel idea would help your ART?
As RTE, PI Planning is where your facilitation, Lean- It’s a crucial sync between the agile teams, System
Agile knowledge, and servant leadership skills are Engineers, Architects, the Product Manager, Business
put to the test and shine the brightest. It’s the RTE’s Owners, and stakeholders. The intent to align the
happy place, so enjoy every minute! ART remains the same, whether it’s virtual or co-
located. Agile often enhances the virtual environment
PI Planning is an essential activity held regularly experience. Tailor the virtual PI Planning event to your
at the end of each Program Increment (PI). The culture with the right tools.
PI Planning event aligns the ART team members
to one clear set of PI Objectives to be delivered in
the PI timebox (often 10 weeks). This short-term
commitment shared by all is a powerful accelerator.
“A goal without a method is nonsense.”
– W. Edwards Deming
• Ensure the meeting space has large walls for each The intent is the same; the logistics simply shift.
team’s multiple 25”x30” boards, the ART Program
Board, and the ART’s long-term roadmap. You need • If your organization allows, try the Scaled Agile’s
a lot of physical wall space! Measure it before you Collaborate tool. It’s well designed with boards and
book the space. templates.
• Book smaller rooms for conference calls for remote • Ensure the tools work well for boards and breakout
participants or for two teams to collaborate. Don’t rooms. Are the tools and the content approved by
forget the projector/monitor and conference room the organization’s security team? Can the tools
phone. handle the number of participants and traffic?
Technology is changing quickly, revisit virtual tool
• Do you need a sound system, microphone, or a options often. Bots for Zoom meetings really help!
larger presentation screen?
• Ensure the Scrum Masters have coached the
• Make sure the room has tables and chairs for teams on how to use the tools.
everyone, including participants like business
owners, stakeholders, and shared services. • Coach the Product Manager, System Architect/
Engineer, Business Owners, Stakeholders, and
• Make sure you have enough outlets (bring extra) to other participants on how to use the virtual tools.
charge laptops and phones.
• Ensure access to secure systems is approved for
• Pre-order enough food and drinks. Food makes the participants.
people happy. Make people happy.
Weeks before the PI Planning ceremony, coach the Objectives are both committed and uncommitted.
ART on how to develop the content needed for PI Some necessary work is fraught with unknowns or
Planning. inherent impediments. When doing this work, has the
The end goal of the PI Planning event is to agree and team tagged it as an uncommitted objective, adding spikes
commit to realistic Team PI Objectives. Proactively into an early iteration? If not, do they think that is realistic?
coach the Scrum Masters so they can coach the Why?
teams. Many Product Managers and agile teams find
Objectives confusing; be sure to volunteer to coach.
Objectives don’t hold all the work.
Objectives differ from Epic/Features/Stories. Are there too many Objectives? Is the team trying too hard
Objectives tell the business in business language to cover each story in its Objectives?
what the team is committed to delivering at the
end of the PI. It’s a great idea to provide Objective
examples to show the language and summary level
of detail.
SMART PI Objectives
S pecific
The Objectives will align to a clear, compelling
Vision and mission.
Before PI Planning, review the vision and mission to
M easurable
prevent misalignment. Does your ART have a Vision
that the Product Manager, System Architect/Engineer, A ttainable
and other stakeholders agree on? Does the vision align
with the teams’ reality? R ealistic
At PI Planning, as you review the Team PI Objective
board, ask yourself clarifying questions to keep the T ime-Bound
ART and teams on track. When it’s not quite right,
you’ll ask the ART guiding questions, leading them to
find a better approach.
All Scaled Agilists use a consistent common language to communicate efficiently, clearly, and quickly. Ensure the
ART develops useful, consistent PI Planning Boards. Be available during PI Planning to guide the ART as boards are
developed.
It all starts with the Team PI Boards. They make work, risks, dependencies and constraints, end goals, and team
capacity allocation to different types of work visible. As a team is building their boards, many potential issues jump
out for the team to self-correct as it becomes visible. It also enables others to review a team’s boards without
disrupting the team.
• The RTE teaches the Product Manager and Business Owners how to read the boards. The RTE coaches
Stakeholders during PI Planning.
Here’s a review of what everyone should know about the Team PI Boards.
Risk board
• To start, the team posts risks to escalate to the
Program level (not team risks).
All Scaled Agilists use a consistent common language to communicate clearly and efficiently. It’s important that
everyone understand the Program Board, as it can be a source of confusion during PI Planning. As RTE, you want to
ensure everyone reads the boards the same way. Coach the Product Manager and Business Owners on how to read
the Program Board. Scrum Masters should teach the teams how to read it.
As RTE, explain the acceptance criteria for the teams’ final PI Plan.
All Iterations have a sensible plan loaded at less than capacity with all interdependencies
agreed to and on the Program Board. All teams use the same capacity calculation.
All teams understand their program-level risks and have them on a board.
• Test the sound system and video conferencing • Post the most current ART Roadmap that can be
system, if applicable. doodled on.
• Scrum Masters should post the team’s empty • Post breakout room sign-up sheet with locations
boards on the walls. Ensure there is plenty of and timeboxes.
room in front of the boards for collaboration and
review. • Confirm (and re-confirm) that cleaning crews will
not “clean” the room until the PI Planning event is
• Create team areas in front of their wall space. In complete. Post multiple huge notes so the cleaning
each space have seating with tables. Make sure crew does not alter the room.
there is enough room for people to spread out
and for other teams and stakeholders to sit and
talk. Virtual PI Planning
• Make sure each team has enough supplies on • Check that the technology tools work well and are
their tables. Include plenty of black markers and ready for PI Planning.
square post-it notes in the correct colors. Don’t • Broadcast links and tool instructions as
forget the extra charging outlets. appropriate.
As RTE, actively welcome everyone as they arrive. During kickoff, ensure that everyone understands the
If you don’t know someone, introduce yourself. It PI Planning process and the definition of done. Ask
doesn’t matter if it’s virtual or co-located: set the tone yourself the following questions and follow-up with
to cultivate a positive community environment and individuals as needed:
experience.
• Has a sense of purpose toward the Vision filled the
The RTE keeps things moving. Each team and ART room and its people?
has sticky points. Prioritize and work through them as
you walk the walls. Keep your eyes on the clock; time • Is everyone clear on their deliverables at the end of
flies during PI Planning. Don’t micro-manage, instead Day Two?
support and facilitate. Perfection is not the goal. • Team commitment to Team PI Objectives
• One board per iteration
After kickoff, the ART breaks out into their team groups. Walk around (“Walk the Walls”) and quietly make sure
everyone has what they need. If virtual, join the breakout rooms. At this time, don’t interrupt unless asked a
question. If needed, stay in touch with PI Planning participants via text to avoid disruptions. Be available as a
servant leader.
Throughout PI Planning, the RTE continually walks the room (or virtually
enters the team space) to observe and ask guiding questions. Each person
at the PI Planning event has a responsibility and role to play. Don’t let the
ART go through the motions without understanding the reasons behind
the actions. As you notice areas for improvement, gently coach and guide.
As RTE, observe and ask yourself the following questions:
Product Owners:
Has each Product Owner clearly articulated dependencies
and constraints to teams and product management? Are
these visible? When you introduced POs to stakeholders
“Success breeds confidence.”
and others, are they using this opportunity to build – Beryl Markham
genuine relationships they’ll need as they refine the
backlog in the future?
After teams begin to fill their boards, it’s the time to ask leading questions to prompt thought and action, if needed.
Don’t pressure them. Keep your eyes and ears open; this is when your critical thinking skills and empathy shines
bright. Here’s a list of common things that prompt further investigation.
Iterations are loaded to allow time for dependencies The Risk board is overflowing. Are these new risks not
and constraints. Check that the dependencies and discussed in backlog refinement? If not, perhaps these
constraints are on the other teams’ boards and the stories are not ready. Do they have the right people at PI
program board in the correct iterations. Planning to ROAM these risks?
Iterations are loaded at higher than 80% of capacity. The draft PI Objective board has committed
Why do they feel this is responsible and reliable? and uncommitted Objectives. Look to ensure the
uncommitted objectives are counted in their capacity.
Team capacity is calculated correctly. What is reducing
a specific iteration’s capacity – vacations, maintenance, A team’s boards have blue post-its. Coach teams to
or support allocations? If need be, sketch a capacity table keep boards at a story level, no larger than a pre-decided
while you explain. Visuals help. amount (often 8) of story points.
The RTE systemically reviews the Program Board to get ahead of any issues in the upcoming PI. The time to fix it is
in PI Planning. As you review, consider the following:
A team front-loads their iterations. If you are unsure there too many dependencies on a feature? If you see
if this is realistic, ask why it is realistic. Remind them a potential issue, talk it over with the team. The team
that reliability is key. There may be reasons why it is the may have a very good reason for it. Is the Program Board
optimal way to load. covered in overabundance of red strings? Perhaps the
teams need to be restructured; take a note to discuss it in
Review each dependency and constraint. Check the the Retrospective.
red string: does the iteration work for dependencies
and constraints match on each teams’ boards and the Notice any milestones or events that may potentially
Program Board? Is there is enough lead time or lag take focus away from the team. If the team boards do
between when a dependency feature is being worked not indicate it, ask the Scrum Master if they’ve accounted
and completed, and a dependent feature is to begin? Are for it in their iteration load.
As RTE, use your facilitation skills to ensure that the At the end of Day One, if you aren’t positive that the
stakeholders attend the draft plan review. Before the Scrum Masters have done so, take a photo of each
review, ensure the team knows the presentation order. board. Accidents happen.
Encourage the team to review just these three items
below, then open the floor to Q&A. Each team has less As the teams leave PI Planning, the RTE guides the
than a 10-minute timebox. Keep it moving. Business Owners, Program Manager, Stakeholders (as
applicable), System Architect/Engineer, to gather for
1. Capacity and load per iteration the Management Review. As a facilitator, the RTE will
have previously explained to them why this review is
2. Draft of the Team PI Objectives crucial. Again, use your RTE facilitation skills to secure
participation.
3. Program-level risks and impediments (not the
risks within the team)
The RTE begins the review with a simple question: Are • Will the teams’ Draft Plans produce a clear outcome
there any issues to resolve? towards the Vision?
During the team’s Draft Plan reviews, management • Are the features correctly prioritized?
may have either seen issues with the plans or • Where are our sticky points; how do we grease the
recognized that management-level decisions need to be rails to go faster?
made for the teams to be successful. The Management
Review adjusts and avoids potential issues. • As RTE, what unsaid issues did you notice? What
underlying issues are we not talking about? What
• Does the ART have any bottlenecks; how can we could derail or slow the train?
alleviate it?
The RTE collects any “Issues and Actions (adjustments)”
• Does the Vision need to be adjusted to alleviate or to present to the teams in the morning.
propel teams’ efforts?
ISSUE ADJUSTMENT
Feature B has too many spikes and dependencies De-prioritize until more refinement provides
on teams outside the ART; it doesn’t meet clarity.
uncommitted objective criteria.
Team 1 may not deliver the Feature D Team 2 and 3 remove Feature D from PI Plans.
components to team 2 and 3 by the end of
iteration 4.
Day Two starts with a review of any requested After each team presents their Final Plan, ask the
revisions due to the Day One Management Review. Business Owners if the plan is accepted. If accepted,
Then teams break out to complete their boards. celebrate! If not, teams need to continue to work with
the Business Owner towards an acceptable final plan.
Before the Final Plan Review (especially if virtual), Actively lend your support to this team and Business
ensure the team knows the presentation order. Owner; it’s difficult!
Encourage the team to review just the following
three items, then open the floor to Q&A. Each team
has a <10-minute timebox.
When you announce it is time for the confidence vote for the team and the program, expect cheers! Ask each
team individually for a show of hands: As an individual, do they have confidence that the team can meet the PI
objectives? Any low confidence vote should be thoroughly discussed and resolved without rancor. If a low vote
happens at this time, as RTE you should note it for future follow-up as the person should have been heard earlier
by his/her teammates. If virtual, ensure your tool supports voting or even better - make it fun by using a tool like
mentimeter.com.
Once an acceptable confidence vote is reached (3 or 4), ask the team if they are committed to their PI Objectives.
Again, if no commitment, lend your RTE facilitation skills as they work through it. Never push; the goal is a
predictably reliable commitment. Once all teams have an acceptable confidence vote and commitment, ask for an
ART Confidence vote. If virtual turn off mute, then loudly cheer and celebrate this hard-won accomplishment!
Celebrate!
If virtual, pre-send a box to
each ART member before PI
Planning. Everyone opens it at
the same time (team t-shirts,
s’more boxes, or something silly
works well). Build camaraderie!
As each team demos, team metrics are often “When you punish your people for making a
presented at the same time. mistake or falling short of a goal, you create
an environment of extreme caution, even
• The ART should develop a mix of metrics that
fearfulness. In sports, it’s similar to playing ‘not
provide value. No vanity metrics! Functionality
to lose’- a formula that often brings on defeat.”
metrics are standard but for quality metrics,
use domain-relevant metrics. Track the leading – John Wooden
indicators.
It’s the RTE’s responsibility to coach the Scrum Masters to ensure value in the Agile team retrospectives
and to provoke value in the Retros that the RTE facilitates. Retros are ADAPTIVE. Make it fun!
ADAPTIVE
A ct on Improvements
D iverge and ideate before you converge and align
A ccount for needed follow-through
P robe for genuine understanding
T ry something new
I nvolve all
V isualize
E xpose the one thing no one will say
As RTE, guide to discover and reduce (or eliminate) as RTE ask others for their feedback. Ask yourself, has
the root cause of systemic issues during the I&A’s psychological safety left the room? What cultural dynamic
Problem-Solving Workshop. Timebox the workshop to is preventing participation?
under two hours.
Brainstorm! Encourage lots of ideas on how to remove
State the problem. Is it clear? The issue and the impact or reduce the cause, don’t let criticism or sarcasm in the
are known? How and what happened? At what point and room. No limits!
where it happened? All agreed?
Everyone votes for the top three solutions. Have these
Sketch the Ishikawa (fishbone) diagram. As been restated as stories and features to deliver these
brainstorming begins, talk about the symptoms. If needed, solutions? Have these been placed in the appropriate
guide the conversation by grouping ideas by classifying the backlog?
“main bones” (e.g., tools or process). As potential causes
are raised, do a Five Why exercise to agree upon the root The value is in the participatory discussion and the
cause. Ask quiet participants for their ideas. Work through actions prompted by the discussion.
each cause to agree on the root cause.
If everyone’s muscles tighten when a top dog walks If teams are hesitant about others (like the RTE) joining
in the room, spend time coaching him/her. He/she their activities, is it a lack of psychological safety? Is it
should consistently show the ART that there is no the way the last RTE (or you) approached them? There
“top dog,” just people with different roles that feed are no shortcuts: you need to earn their trust by being
into each other’s work to make a great product. Over trustworthy.
time, the teams will learn to trust.
Are people genuinely interested in the solution? Are they
If you don’t hear someone speak during a gathering, looking forward to the IP iteration so they can hackathon
ask for their opinion. Think about their lack of away on a concept? Or do they do the bare minimum?
Beck, K., Beedle, M., van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., Grenning, J., Highsmith, J., Hunt, A., Jeffries,
R., Kern, J., Marick, B., Martin, R. C., Mellor, S., Schwaber, K., Sutherland, J. & Thomas, D. (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software
Development Manifesto for Agile Software Development.
Ivan, F. (2015). Becoming Agile with ShuHaRi. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2015—EMEA, London, England.
Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
Kim, G., Humble, J. & Debois, P. & Willis, J.. (2016) The DevOps Handbook. IT Revolution Press. Schwaber, Ken & Sutherland, Jeff
(2020, Nov). The Scrum Guide. https://www.scrumguides.org/scrum-guide.html
Shimokawa, Koichi & Fujimoto, Takahiro (2009) The Birth of Lean The Lean Enterprise Institute.
The Scaled Agile Framework. (2020). Release Train Engineer and Solution Train Engineer.
https://www.scaledagileframework.com/release-train-engineer-and-solution-train-engineer/
Other resources
www.agnosticagile.org
www.Scrum.org
www.FunRetro.io
“Mistakes are a fact of life. If you are willing to
www.InspectandAdapt.com be wrong then you have earned the right to be
right.”
– Nikki Giovanni