Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Quantitative
research deals with numerical values and how they
can describe a phenomenon or infer a relationship.
• The basis of formulating and testing hypotheses are variables, which are traits
that numerically describe or give meaning to an object, phenomenon, or group of
people.
Variables
are the ones that are usually identified, examined,
described, or correlated to answer a scientific inquiry.
Controllability
Quantitative research should be in an environment
where all variables are identified and can be controlled.
Generalizability
Generalizability is from larger sample sizes that the
results are based on as a representative of the population.
Objectivity
The results of the data are observable and
measurable using structured instruments.
Replicability
The research study should be replicable by other teams
of researchers that will eventually come up with similar outcomes.
Non-Experimental Research
- Describe a situation or phenomenon.
- Researchers collect data without making
changes or introducing treatments.
Correlational
- Its primary objective is to compare two variables then
identify the relationship between them.
- A research design investigates relationships between two variables.
- Measures the degree of their relationship or associations.
Types:
1. Positive Correlation – an increase in one variable leads to increase the other
variable. A decrease in one variable will also decrease in the other variable.
Example: family income and daily allowance
Experimental Research
- This kind of research is centrally concerned with constructing
research that is high in causal validity.
- a scientific approach
- Researchers collect data with making changes or introducing treatments.
A. True Experimental
- The primary objective of a true experimental research design is to identify a
cause-effect relationship between the variables where the samples are
randomized.
- According to Prieto, et.al., it offers the highest internal validity of all the designs.
B. Quasi-Experimental
- Quasi-experimental research mirrors experimental research but it is not true
experimental research where a causal relationship can be determined with the use
of dependent and independent variables.
- Quasi-experiments do not use random samples but assigned samples.
B. Quasi-Experimental
- This kind of research is almost the same as that of True Experimental Design.
The only difference is the absence of random assignments of subjects to other
conditions.
Example: The Effect of Remedial Program to Beginners
Variables
Are anything that can be observed by the researchers.
A variable may be a person, thing, place, situation, or phenomenon.
Mediating Variables
are also known as intervening variables since they intervene between the
independent and dependent variables to show their connection.
Moderating Variables
are variables that have a strong conditioned effect, which may modify the
relationship between the independent and dependent variables.
Extraneous Variables
are variables that should be mainly excluded from the research study as they may
interfere and compromise with the experiment and research results.
Level of Measurement
The measurement level, also called scales of measure,
gives you an idea of the type of data you have.
Categorical Variables
• A nominal variable is any variable that represents different types of data, which
may be divided into groups or categories. There is no intrinsic order; hence, its
frequencies can only be counted.
The examples are race, ethnicity, and hair color.
• An ordinal variable is any variable that may also be divided into groups or
categories, but it has intrinsic order or rank. Its frequencies can be both counted
and ranked in which the distance between categories is not equivalent.
Some examples are academic standing/ academic status, place in a competition,
and evaluation.
Continuous Variables
• A ratio variable is an interval value, but unlike the interval variable, it has a true
zero. It has numerical value and meaning which can also be counted, ranked, and
has a meaningful difference between values. There is a true zero point, which
means that nothing exists for that variable and that zero simply means none.
Lesson 3 : Identifying a Quantitative Research Problem
and Writing a Research Title
• Accounting
• Business Management
• Environmental and Earth Science
• Health Science
• Education
• Social Sciences
• Humanities
• Formal
- Formal tone.
- Should not contain abbreviations, jargons, or colloquial terms unless these are
the main focus of the study.
- A research title should be able to summarize the study in the fewest possible
words.
• Clear
- Benefits those who do not know much about the field of inquiry.
- Helps those looking for references.
- Research Instruments
are basic tools researchers use to gather data for specific research problems.
• Demographic Forms
- Used to collect basic information such as age, gender, ethnicity, and annual
income.
• Performance Measures
- Used to assess or rate an individual’s ability such as achievement, intelligence,
aptitude, or interests.
• Attitudinal Measures
- Instruments used to measure an individual’s attitudes and opinions about a
subject.
Validity
A research instrument is considered valid if it measures what it supposed to
measure.
• Construct Validity
Evaluates whether a measurement tool really represents the thing we are
interested in measuring. It’s central to establishing the overall validity of a method.
- Construct
Refers to a concept or characteristic that can’t be directly observed, but can be
measured by observing other indicators that are associated with it.
- It can be characteristics of individuals, such as intelligence, obesity, job
satisfaction, or depression; they can also be broader concepts applied to
organizations or social groups, such as gender equality, corporate social
responsibility, or freedom of speech.
• Content Validity
- Ability of the test items to include important characteristics of the concept
intended to be measured.
- To produce valid results, the content of a test, survey, or measurement method
must cover all relevant parts of the subject it aims to measure. If some aspects are
missing from the measurement (or if irrelevant aspects are included), the validity is
threatened and the research is likely suffering from omitted variable bias.)
• Face Validity
- considers how suitable the content of a test seems to be on the surface. It’s
similar to content validity, but face validity is a more informal and subjective
assessment.
- As face validity is a subjective measure, it’s often considered the weakest form of
validity. However, it can be useful in the initial stages of developing a method.
• Criterion validity
- Tells whether a certain research instrument can give the same result as other
similar instruments.
- To evaluate criterion validity, you calculate the correlation between the results of
your measurement and the results of the criterion measurement. If there is a high
correlation, this gives a good indication that your test is measuring what it intends
to measure.
Reliability
Refers to the consistency of the measures or results of the instrument.
Reliability of Instrument:
• Test-retest Reliability
Measures the consistency of results when you repeat the same test on the same
sample at a different point in time. You use it when you are measuring something
that you expect to stay constant in your sample.
• Internal Consistency
Assesses the correlation between multiple items in a test that are intended to
measure the same construct.