Professional Documents
Culture Documents
English
English
1
Table of contents
1. Introduction
2. Summary
4. Conclusion
5. Reference
Introduction
2
Francis Bacon's 17th-century essay, "Of Judicature," delves into the
intricate dynamics between the judiciary and the executive, particularly
during power struggles for authority. Bacon emphasizes the crucial role of
judges in interpreting, not creating, law, highlighting the significance of
integrity in their actions. Drawing parallels between corrupt judges and
past practices of the Catholic Church, Bacon employs vivid metaphors to
caution against the harsh application of laws and advocates for a balanced
approach to justice. The Latin phrase "Qui fortiter emungit, elicit
sanguinem," meaning "Violent wringing makes the nose bleed," serves as a
metaphorical warning in the context of Bacon's essay, symbolizing the
harmful consequences of forceful actions. This phrase encapsulates Bacon's
overarching message: the imperative for judges to exercise authority
judiciously, avoiding excessive force and ensuring a harmonious legal
system aligned with state policy.
3
Summary
4
Qui fortiter emungit, elicit sanguinem
Bacon's essay underscores the principle that judges should interpret and
apply the law with prudence rather than imposing it forcefully. The
comparison between corrupt judges and the practices of the Church of
Rome serves as a cautionary tale, highlighting the potential injustice
inflicted upon society when judges deviate from their duty with integrity.
The analogy of corrupt judges being equated with the capital remover of
landmarks emphasizes the societal harm caused by unjust decrees,
paralleling the harm caused by miscreants who sabotage landmarks.
5
wisdom reinforces the idea that a well-informed and educated judiciary is
crucial for dispensing fair and just decisions.
In the broader context of the essay, the Latin phrase warns against the
negative consequences of wielding authority forcefully, aligning with
Bacon's call for judges to be lions under the throne—assertive yet
subservient to the overarching authority of the Crown. The emphasis on
judges consulting with the king and state underscores the need for a
harmonious relationship between the judiciary and the executive,
preventing conflicts between just laws and true policy.
6
In conclusion, Francis Bacon's essay "Of Judicature" not only unveils the
intricate dynamics between the judiciary and the executive in a power
struggle for authority but also emphasizes the pivotal role of judges in
maintaining a just legal system. Bacon's caution against the harsh
application of laws and his metaphorical warnings, including the Latin
phrase "Qui fortiter emungit, elicit sanguinem," underscore the potential
detrimental consequences of forceful actions in the administration of
justice. The essay serves as a timeless call for judges to uphold integrity,
balance, and prudence in their interpretation and application of the law.
By drawing parallels between corrupt judges and historical instances of
abuse of power, Bacon advocates for a judiciary that acts as a moral
compass, upholding justice and equality. In the broader context, his vision
of judges as "lions under the throne" emphasizes the need for a
harmonious collaboration between the judiciary and the executive,
ensuring a united legal system aligned with the principles of the state. In
essence, Bacon's essay stands as a timeless guide for judges, urging them to
exercise their authority judiciously and conscientiously in the pursuit of a
just and harmonious society.
7
Reference